Discuție Utilizator:Remigiu/Arhiv 1

Ultimul comentariu: acum 17 ani de Ugo în subiectul Articol nou Gorali

Bine ați venit la Wikipedia, o enciclopedie liberă, multilingvă, creată prin colaborarea oricui!

Spor la lucru și distracție plăcută din partea tuturor wikipediștilor.

Vă invităm să citiți pagina de ajutor pentru a afla cum funcționează Wikipedia. Dacă aveți orice întrebare, nedumerire sau nesiguranță puteți întreba la Cafenea, chiar dacă nu are nici o tangență cu Wikipedia. Pentru întrebări legate strict de funcționarea Wikipedia ne puteți scrie aici. De asemenea puteți trimite un e-mail la wikiro-l@wikipedia.org.
Pentru a începe explorarea, vă recomandăm să vizitați portalul comunității. La pagina articolelor de calitate se află o listă de articole pe care le considerăm bine scrise. Pagina de actualități oferă știri despre evenimente cotidiene, iar noutățile din domeniul wiki vă informează despre modul de dezvoltare al ro.wp.

Wikipedia funcționează după câteva reguli pe care vă rugăm să le consultați la pagina despre politica oficială a proiectului. Pe scurt, aceste reguli se referă la a respecta legea drepturilor de autor și la a scrie articolele în mod obiectiv, dintr-un punct de vedere neutru. De asemenea, puteți consulta:


Vă invităm să vă înscrieți pe pagina wikipediștilor, acolo unde găsiți lista utilizatorilor Wikipedia vorbitori de limba română din întreaga lume, și să participați la Autointerviu!

Vă mulțumim și vă felicităm că ați decis să vă alăturați acestui efort colectiv de a scrie o enciclopedie și de a o pune în mod liber la dispoziția publicului vorbitor de limba română.

--Vlad|-> 15 ianuarie 2006 03:06 (EET)Răspunde

Pagina utilizator modificare

Hi Michal,

We are happy to have you here, and also happy to see you contributing. If you allow me, I want to tell you the correct version for your message on your user page. It is like so:

Numele meu este Michał și eu înțeleg româna cu multă dificultate. În principal, eu ajut prin adăugare de Interwiki-uri.

which goes like this:

My name is Michał and I undrestant romanian with great difficulty. Mainly, I help by adding Interwikis.

Orioane 26 ianuarie 2006 19:15 (EET)Răspunde

No problem, about the mistakes, I can assure you my polish is worse ;). Anyways keep up the good work. Orioane 26 ianuarie 2006 23:22 (EET)Răspunde

â și î modificare

Hi,

I've seen you asked what is the difference between â and î. As sounds, there is no difference and the only one is because orthography. I don't know exactly which was the rule before the war, but during the communist period the rule was that î is used everywhere except for the words român, and its derivates and România and also for the verb to be at the fisrst person singular and third person plural: sînt. After the Romanian revolution there was a mouvement to revert to the old orthography using â, and in 1993 the Romanian Academy modified the rule and the current one is: at the beginning of a word there is always î and inside a word only the first one is â, and the rest are î (for example fountain is fântînă). Also the verb to be at the fisrst person singular and third person plural is writen sunt. However, there is a certan discontent about this rule change and you can easily find books and cultural newspapers written with the old rules. Also the older persons (older than 30) don't tend to use the rule and in the Republic of Moldova, the old rule is still in effect. Orioane 27 ianuarie 2006 00:16 (EET)Răspunde

Your request modificare

Hy,

About your requests from yesterday - that related to the Românime article and the one about the Romanian Road system.

About the first one, the Romanime article, i am sorry to say this, but I don't think I'll try and translate it on the english wikipedia, because I don't quite like the other users reaction there about tha articles of this type, and I'll refrain from starting an article on a delicate matter. I'm sorry to say this, but there are some fights going on there on the n:Transylvania, en:Moldavian language and en:Romanianization articles, and I don't want to get into the fight.

About the roads in Romania, I searched the maps I knew, but I couldn't find one. All I found was the complete list of motorways and national roads at trhis article: en:Roads and expressways in Romania. Orioane 28 ianuarie 2006 21:13 (EET)Răspunde

Invitation to the checkuser vote modificare

You are now entitled to vote in the checkuser elections overhere at Romanian Wikipedia. We are glad to invite you to vote for your favorite users and is very important for us your opinion - we need the minimum number of votes so please vote.

In order to vote, press Votați aici for each candidate. If you agree with the user add yourself at Pentru, if not at Împotrivă or if you want not to vote for the candidate add yourself at Abțineri. If you want to leave comments to the vote add at Comentarii. Thank you very much, Mihai | D 31 ianuarie 2006 22:35 (EET)Răspunde

Thank you, Michał P, for the supporting vote given to myself as a checkuser candidate. --Vlad|-> 1 februarie 2006 13:29 (EET)Răspunde

Pages for dates modificare

Hello. I have recently started to attempt expanding the chapters for births and deaths in the date pages. Wanting so, I investigated the variants in English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese and Swedish in order to obtain as much information as possible. I'd like your help in importing such births/deaths entries from the Polish Wikipedia as well. Do you think you have the spare time to assist me with some simple translations now and then? Thanks. --Rebel 19 februarie 2006 15:28 (EET)Răspunde

Oh, I only requested an English translation. I'll then adapt them to Romanian. No need in complicating things. I'll let you know as soon as I'm ready. Thanks. --Rebel 19 februarie 2006 16:28 (EET)Răspunde

Wikipedia:Wikipedist modificare

Hi. An anonymous user added you in the wikipedians' list as living in Słupsk, Poland. Was that you? Thanks. — AdiJapan  25 februarie 2006 02:36 (EET)Răspunde

Powiat Słupsk modificare

Dear Michał, I saw that both the German and the Netherlands Wikipedia uses the name "Powiat Słupski" for the article about your district. "Județ" is a typical Romanian form of administration, thatswhy I think that the form "Județul Słupsk" is very peculiar. My proposal is to redirect the article to "Powiat Słupsk" or "Powiat Słupski". I am glad for your interest concerning the Romanian Wikipedia. --Mihai Andrei 3 martie 2006 22:35 (EET)Răspunde

Surely! Kind regards, --Mihai Andrei 15 martie 2006 11:48 (EET)Răspunde

Interbellic Couny Images modificare

Hello,

I've seen youve asked Andrei if you can use the interbellic county Romanian map. It is already on commons, and you can also find a full category of highligted maps of all the counties. It is commons:Category:Locator maps of historical counties in Romania. Orioane -msg- 15 martie 2006 11:55 (EET)Răspunde

Tori Amos modificare

Hi! I had to comment out the second paragraph (http://ro.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tori_Amos&diff=299342&oldid=297842), because really I can't make any sense of it. Please don't mind my asking if is it some sort of automatic translation? Thanks! --Vlad|-> 16 martie 2006 20:38 (EET)Răspunde

Ok, I see, sorry for this, I've put the English paragrpah commented, maybe I'll get a chance to get to it later. When you've got a couple of minutes, could you please take a look at Skarżysko-Kamienna and put some description to the two external links? Thanks! --Vlad|-> 17 martie 2006 17:12 (EET)Răspunde

limba cașubiană modificare

Hello,

For me the most correct seems to be limba cașubiană. It might also be correct limba kașubiană - with a k - but since the letter k is rarely used in Romanian I think the first one would be better. Orioane -msg- 5 aprilie 2006 10:19 (EEST)Răspunde

On google, I find most results for limba kașubiană, though there are also some results for limba cașubiană. BTW, in the Format:Interwiki principală we only put Wikipedias bigger (with more articles) + Aromanian language (dialect of Romanian) and Rromani (a new Wikipedia launched with support from Romanian Wikipedia). If it was to be Wikipedia Romania, Moldova and Vojvodina we would also put Wikipedia in Hungarian and Wikipedia in German (German Wikipedia is anyway bigger than the Romanian one), Wikipedia in Russian (Russian Wikipedia is also bigger than the Romanian one), Wikipedia in Ukranian, and maybe also Wikipedia in Serbian. But this is Wikipedia in Romanian, not Wikipedia Romania. For instance http://www.wikimedia.ro is available in all languages spoken in Romania. But anyway there is a list with most Wikipedias at Wikipedia:Coordonare multilingvă, even though it is old, and it should be actualized. Otherwise I'm very glad to see a non-Romanian speaker trying to contribute in the Romanian Wikipedia. But I guess you do speak some Romanian, because as I saw your contributions they contain whole frases written in correct or almost correct Romanian. --Danutz

Garda de Fier modificare

Hi! Thank you for your notice! Yes, it smells fishy to me too, for there is too much text written at once. And I think that part of it is copy-pasted from somewhere (it may be not) Sadly, I do not know about the facts that really happened (or are accepted by the majority of the historians), for I am not good at all with history, especially if recent. I will make some research of my own, but until then I will send your message to other people who know better, so they can decide. Thanks again! --KlaudiuMihăilă Mesaj 18 aprilie 2006 00:24 (EEST)Răspunde

Stub sorting modificare

Hi! I agree that we should sort the stubs, so I'll try to do as much as I can in the future. --Emily | msg. 25 aprilie 2006 23:10 (EEST)Răspunde

Hradec Králové modificare

Hi Michał. Claudiu has made the corrections, but in en.wp the population is 95 195 and in ro.wp is 94 684. -Laurap\ mesaj 26 aprilie 2006 17:08 (EEST)Răspunde

Request for information modificare

Hello Michał,

My name is Razvan and I am also working as much as I can on the Romanian Wikipedia. I am pleased to meet someone interested in Romanian culture. Sorry for bothering you but we need some information.

We have currently a very heated debate on the Romanian Church United with Rome (Greek Catholic). Against this background we have a debate on the situation of the greek-catholics in other countries of the Eastern Block. As far as I know this church was also suppressed in Poland. Could you tell us some information or indicate some on-line sources in English, French or German about the story of the Greek-Catholic Church in Poland?

Thank you very much and sorry for bothering you,

Razvan2001 8 mai 2006 00:22 (EEST)Răspunde

Re: Categorisation in Romani Wikipedia modificare

Hi! There will come also the categories, by now there is a lot of work to do to make it workable (interface translation, templates). All the best, Desiphral 14 iunie 2006 22:27 (EEST)Răspunde

Format:Șterge modificare

Hi. What was wrong at Format:Șterge? — AdiJapan  24 iunie 2006 21:02 (EEST)Răspunde

Good job on Moldovan Wikipedia, this should be closed immediately. -- Bonaparte talk 26 iunie 2006 12:41 (EEST)Răspunde
Dear Michał,

potrzebuję żeby dziękować. Dziękują tak dalece! Sprawiać przyjemność, nie niepokoi my będzie wygrywać. Sorry for the mistakes, I hope you don't mind :) -- Bonaparte talk 26 iunie 2006 16:17 (EEST)Răspunde

Timis Maps modificare

Hi and thanks for reminding me about the utility of uploading the maps directly to Wikicommons. I was unsure whether I should do that right from the beginning but in the end decided to upload them on our ro wikipedia. They can later be used by whoever, even uploaded by bots to wikicommons(if there are any). For now I wanted to make a point, since they are, I beleive, some of the first maps of this kind to come up from our community. Maybe you can understand me. So...they're uploaded already:) But thanks!

Multumesc! Thank you! modificare

http://mo.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AFratele_lui_Bonaparte%2C_il_cunosti%3F&diff=11789&oldid=11787 Thank you! I'm blocked there but as well as Node is blocked and his friend Telex, but they create Socks like a gun machine, as the last one Bonny...They keep vandalising that artificial Wikipedia and their users. Bonaparte talk 29 iunie 2006 08:30 (EEST)Răspunde

Maybe you could also remind Bogdan that a sock, namely Bonny is still not blocked. It's from the series of Telex's socks that impersonates any name of Bonaparte. Now sock of Telex are Bonny and No name for now..-- Bonaparte talk 29 iunie 2006 14:23 (EEST)Răspunde

Stub sorting project modificare

Hello! I saw that you joined the Stub Sorting Wikiproject. If you have questions related to this project, feel free to ask, I'd be glad to help. Also, if you wish, you can add this project's user box on your page: {{Utilizator WP:SC}}. --Horia S 29 iunie 2006 21:01 (EEST)Răspunde

Well, there are simpler tasks such as assigning the right stub labels wherever you find an article which needs that. :) --Horia S 29 iunie 2006 22:25 (EEST)Răspunde

Category modificare

You dubled the category. Categorie:Istoria Marii Britanii exists already as categorie:Istoria Regatului Unit. And I think, Categorie:Marea Britanie should redirect to Categorie:Regatul Unit.    Mihai scrie-mi 6 iulie 2006 14:38 (EEST)Răspunde

Liv Kristine modificare

Ok. Done. --Rebel 16 iulie 2006 21:05 (EEST)Răspunde

Deletion of Silvia Night modificare

Hello Michał. I noticed you added the article specified above for deletion. I removed the {{șterge}} format hoping that the person who created it will eventually return and develop it at least into a stub, if not more. That article is not the only one containing merely a table or a format. I'll just wait to see what our anonymus contributor will do in the future regarding the Eurovision-related articles and decide what to do with them then.

Hope you understand. Cheers. --Rebel 19 iulie 2006 05:02 (EEST)Răspunde

On the English Wikipeida Silvia Night redirects to Silvía Night. I motived the original page to the previously mentioned title, which others found correct. Alright? Cheers. --Rebel 19 iulie 2006 14:57 (EEST)Răspunde

Hi Michael, pls look at the Moldovan Wikipedia, it seems that Khoikhoi is the vandal Moldova. Dziekuje!!-- Bonaparte talk 3 septembrie 2006 22:17 (EEST)Răspunde

Main page modificare

Congratulations on your page being chosen as the best option. I am delighted with the level of commitment you are showing to the Romanian Wikipedia. --Rebel 17 septembrie 2006 00:22 (EEST)Răspunde

Protection modificare

Hi. I don't see a good reason to protect templates {{UnireCutie}} and {{UnireCutieFin}}. We are trying to have as few protected pages as possible, and use this feature exclusively in those places where it is strictly necessary, that is, on very visible pages such as the main page or templates used in thousands of articles.

Besides, I think those two templates are almost useless, because they contain one short line each. Using templates for such cases only strains the servers. I suggest writing the boxmerge div command directly in the articles, unless you plan to extend those templates. Cheers. — AdiJapan  18 septembrie 2006 12:35 (EEST)Răspunde

Mini-sondaj pagina principală modificare

In case you have difficulties understanding what I said there, here's the English translation: "I don't agree with Michał's argument. At the begining of the page there is a list of portals, and Portal:România is a portal; I don't think including a portal in a list of portals has any special significance (romanian-centrism in this case.)" Regards. Dmaftei 22 septembrie 2006 15:59 (EEST)Răspunde

Yes, "am răspuns" means "I answered". :-) Portal:România may be just a regional portal on any other Wikipedia, but this being the Romanian Wikipedia, Portal:România automatically acquires a special status (I would suspect Portal:Polska has a special status on the Polish Wikipedia too). As far as the list goes, since it is selective, it will include by necesity those items that are deemed important by a majority of users (well, a majority of users who care to talk about it). Since the huge majority of users here are Romanians, it should be no surprise that Portal:România is deemed important, hence the inclusion of Portal:România in the selective list. I do not think that Romanians thinking that Romanian topics are important denotes "Romanian-centrism". Dmaftei 22 septembrie 2006 17:27 (EEST)Răspunde
This argument is largly pointless, Michał, especially since I don't care about having Portal:România in any special place (or any place at all for that matter) on the main page. That discussion is about removing the Românofonie link from the list of links at the bottom of the page. As far as I'm concerned Românofonie should be removed, period, but there are users that feel it's better to either keep it around, or to replace it with Portal:România. Anyway, while I disagree with you that including a link to Portal:România means "românocentrism", I respect your opinion, so I suggest we agree to have this disagreement and to leave it where it is now.
No, you are not making a lot of mistakes, but you wouldn't pass for a native speaker. :-) The important thing is that you can make yourself understood in Romanian, and that's a big deal. Romanian is not an easy language to learn, and any non-native speaker that manages it at the level you do is to be admired. Dmaftei 22 septembrie 2006 23:00 (EEST)Răspunde
(here's the translation, as close as possible to the English version)
Disputa asta e inutilă, Michał, în special datorită faptului că mie nu-mi pasă dacă Portal:România e în vreun loc special (sau dacă e de tot) pe pagina principală. Discuția este despre ștergerea legăturii la Românofonie din lista de legături din partea de jos a paginii principale. Din punctul meu de vedere legătura la Românofonie ar trebui ștearsă și cu asta basta, dar sunt alți utilizatori care cred că ar fi mai bine să fie păstrată, sau să fie înlocuită cu o legătură la Portal:România. În orice caz, deși nu sunt de acord cu părerea ta că o legătură la Portal:România înseamnă "românocentrism", îți respect opinia, așa că propun să fim de acord să avem această diferență de opinii și să oprim discuția asta aici.
Nu, nu faci multe greșeli, dar nici nu treci drept vorbitor nativ. :-) Ce este important e că poți să spui ce ai de spus în românește, și asta e lucru mare. Româna nu e o limbă ușor de învățat, și oricine nu e un vorbitor nativ care poate să vorbească la nivelul la care poți tu e de admirat. Dmaftei 22 septembrie 2006 23:14 (EEST)Răspunde
I thought I made it pretty clear that I'm done with this discussion... If you want to pursue it any further you should continue it at the discussion page with those users who have more interest in the topic. I really don't care how the issue will be resolved. Dmaftei 23 septembrie 2006 03:04 (EEST)Răspunde

come and vote man! Hai la vot pe en:wiki-- Bonaparte talk 24 septembrie 2006 16:20 (EEST)Răspunde

Re: adjectiv modificare

Nu știu, dar "pomeraniană" sună cel mai bine. Ar trebui să mai întrebi și pe alții. Dmaftei 25 septembrie 2006 19:41 (EEST)Răspunde

Wikiversity modificare

Hi Michal! What exactly is a wikiversity? Thanks! --Vlad|-> 29 septembrie 2006 15:47 (EEST)Răspunde

Hi again! I'm sorry but I didn't get that (the explanation about what vikiversity is)... Would you mind doing that again in English? :) --Vlad|-> 2 octombrie 2006 12:45 (EEST)Răspunde

Username modificare

As far as I know usernames cannot be changed. If you want to start using another username you can create another account. If you do that, please mention both on your new and old user pages the other account, so that everyone knows it's the same person. However, I don't see a big problem with your current username. Anyone can copy-paste it if they really need to, unless you mind people writing your name as Michal instead of Michał. — AdiJapan  2 octombrie 2006 06:10 (EEST)Răspunde

Zamenhof modificare

You just moved the article L. L. Zamenhof to Ludwik Łazarz Zamenhof, and I moved it back to its original name. I think it is much better since:

  • It is not clear which was Zamenhof's mother tongue, most probably he had several, so it won't be correct to write the name only in Polish, or in any other language for that matter.
  • There are many variants of his name in different languages. So the best way to solve this is to write the initials only in the article, and give all name variants in the text.
  • Zamenhof himself often signed L. L. Zamenhof, and this is used by the Esperanto wikipedia (see here).
  • Most Romanians won't probably know how to pronounce Ludwik Łazarz, so I prefer a Romanian variant Ludovic Lazar.

Thanks, Dumiac 7 octombrie 2006 01:00 (EEST)Răspunde

Re: Rugăminte redenumire modificare

Michał P. a fost redenumit în Remigiu. --Mihai | D 7 octombrie 2006 17:01 (EEST)Răspunde


Classification modificare

I was only trying to classify stubs (romanian ciot). As such I only used the categories which were approved in the site Wikipedia:Sortarea cioturilor/Tipuri de cioturi. What you are referring to are the categories. I don't know if besides being noted as stubs, these should also be categorized. I assumed that this will be done when somebody writes an article on the stub.

I agree with you that categories make searching much easier. But I hardly expect anybody to look for stubs, just to find out that a poet is a poet.

Of course if the rules are different, I will revise my views.

Afil 18 octombrie 2006 01:07 (EEST)Răspunde

I am not sure I understand your objections. Just be so kind and give me the title of an article where you have completed the characterization, and another title of one which I have written and has not been done, so that I can see the difference.

Unfortunately, I did not locate any of those where you made changes.

Afil 18 octombrie 2006 23:54 (EEST)Răspunde

Now I finally understand what you want to do, but I respectfully disagree.

There are two alternatives, out of which I adopted the first.

1. If we are talking about a stub (ciot in romanian) a total list of categories is tedious, and may even not be possible, as many information leading to the choice of categories is missing. In this case, the stub should be caracterized only as stub, with the minimum charistics required for stubs, such as in the cases of our examples ciot-bio-Russia. This is what I considered enough.

2. To get all the possible categories for the stub article. This means, that not only all the categories should be included but also that the name be included in all relevant lists. This is what I have made experimentally for the articles Georgi Adamovici and Roman Gul which you may want to consult.

What you are suggesting, of just including one category seems to me superficial. Why only one category if there are more which could be needed. For instance, in your own example, of Mihail Lermontov, you could have used the years of birth and death which are indicated in the stub. And you could also have listed Lermontov in various lists of russian writers and poets, as well as on the day of birth and death. That would make it complete.

I would however indicate that this is extremely tedious. I considered that when I write an article, all references should at least lead to a stub. A completed article should not have any red references left. This is possible if you accept that the stubs have only the stub category, and leave the details till the entire article is written.

You will be able to notice that in the Romanian Wikipedia there are many references which remain in red, i.e. do not even have stubs. This is valid even for articles which have been accepted as quality articles. And it is disturbing.

Anyway, maybe this issue is worth discussing at the coffee shop in order to reach a common conclusion. In the meantime, I will try to categorize the stubs I am preparing, however I cannot promise to have them complete. The wikipedia system of categories is quite complex. In the romanian system however, there are many categories missing, and the exercise does not only require selecting the categories, but also selecting the new categories which have to be included as well as their subordination. I am not sure that I can do all this, especially for domains with which I am not very comfortable.

But let's keep on discussing the issue. And I would like to know your views about a more general discussion at the coffee shop.

Afil 20 octombrie 2006 03:55 (EEST)Răspunde


Before you mark pages for deletion modificare

Before you mark pages for deletion, please do check if someone else create them right in the that moment... I am talking here about the Silverstone page. I am not happy with this!!!--S2K 19 octombrie 2006 17:48 (EEST)Răspunde

Before you mark pages for deletion (2) modificare

Let's talk in English. Firstly, I clicked the save button to save the work I did, secondly I only started to create that page four minutes before you marked it for deletion. You may be an administrator here, but please do not use your function to make an abuse!!!

At least give the people one hour, and then mark the page... If you go to the page history you will see that exactly in the moment when you marked the page I was still working to give it a shape. Please do click on history before you mark the pages. --S2K 19 octombrie 2006 21:15 (EEST)Răspunde

October modificare

OK.

Afil 21 octombrie 2006 20:46 (EEST)Răspunde

Vot pentru inlaturarea rusului Epure de pe MO:WIKI modificare

http://mo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Candida%C5%A3i_pentru_promovare -- Bonaparte talk 13 noiembrie 2006 23:20 (EET)Răspunde

Utilizator:Remigiu/Słupsk modificare

Salut,

Done!!! I haven't undrestood what you wanted to say by aici se află ministerul maritim, centrala locală de poliție și partea spitalului voievodateane. - If you write it in English I'll try translating it. Also Heinrich von Stephan – director al Postului Germane it is not OK. what do you wanted to say by Postului - the post like the mail thing or the post as the control thing or the post as a radio. Orioane -msg- 15 noiembrie 2006 16:12 (EET)Răspunde

Done! Orioane -msg- 15 noiembrie 2006 18:43 (EET)Răspunde
If it doesn't upset you, I have spelchecked also your user page. :D Orioane -msg-


Dezambiguizare modificare

Dear friend, I hope I understood and anyway I will follow these instructions. If I run into trouble I will ask you.

Prietene, sper că am înțeles și oricum voi urma aceste instrucțiuni. Dacă mă încurc te voi întreba

Afil 20 noiembrie 2006 18:17 (EET)Răspunde

Michał Zalewski modificare

  1. I corrected the best as I could the article on Michał Zalewski. I also introduced a redirect from Michal Zalewski. I took some information from the French and English version of Wikipedia, but I don't have information to do much more. I hope this meets your requirements, but let me know if there is anything else I should do.
  2. As far as the article title (disamguization) issue is concerned, I only do it if I have to in order to create links to eliminate orphans. I try to avoid it but in many cases it is the only way. I am aware that it is not necessary but it does not disturb anything and it helps against the orphans.

Good luck

Afil 27 noiembrie 2006 03:15 (EET)Răspunde

Siberian wikipedia thanks you for your vote in our support. Unfortunately, many votes in this voting http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Siberian_Wikipedia are alleged to be falsified. We need you to verify your vote. There are two ways of doing it: you can confirm it right below this request or you can do this by adding to your user page a link to your meta account (like this:[1]")

I thought that I already confirmed the vote? Well, I confirm it once again.    Remigiu scrie-mi 15 decembrie 2006 18:35 (EET)Răspunde

Bot modificare

Hi Mihał. I still don't understand why you were against giving the bot flag to K.J.Bot, at Wikipedia:Bot/Cereri de aprobare. We do not have too many bots, if that is what you meant. If we ever have too many of them, we'll just reject all bot flag requests. Please explain your opposition. Thanks. — AdiJapan  16 decembrie 2006 17:50 (EET)Răspunde

The number of bots is not a problem. But if this bot makes mistakes we will not grant it the bot flag. Please tell us (on the bot status request page) about the mistakes this bot makes. Support your claim with some proof. It is intriguing that you would trust this bot for FA links, but not for interwiki links...
In order to reject the request we need a good reason. Interwiki bots are, in fact, useful. — AdiJapan  17 decembrie 2006 07:19 (EET)Răspunde

Slupsk modificare

Done! Orioane -msg- 19 decembrie 2006 18:26 (EET)Răspunde

Sărbători Fericite! modificare

Îți doresc Sărbători Fericite și ca acest sfârșit de an să te găsească alături de cei dragi. Totodată îmi pare bine că în 2006 am avut ocazia să colaborez alături de tine la ceea ce este Wikipedia. roamata
Crăciun Fericit și un An Nou plin de bucurii!










Format:CutieLimbi modificare

It's almost OK, bu what do you mean by Tipografie:? In Romanian if you let it like hat it means printing house.Orioane -msg- 26 decembrie 2006 14:48 (EET)Răspunde

In that case it is Tipologie lingvistică. Orioane -msg- 26 decembrie 2006 14:54 (EET)Răspunde


Da! Fie ca anul 2007 să fie anul României! Îţi doresc Sărbători Fericite şi să fii iubit! Bonaparte
Romania
Romania
Romania
Fie ca România să fie puternică în Uniunea Europeană, o forţă regională iar în curând să fim o ţară mare, Moldova e pământ românesc! Bonaparte  










 

AAA!!! şi nu uitaţi vă rog de votul de pe meta.wiki pentru închiderea Wikipediei "Moldoveneşti", vandalii au început să lase votul deschis după ce Nicolae l-a închis...wikipedia este blocată dar şi votul trebuie să reflecte acest lucru! Vandalii anti-români sunt: Node ue, Khoikhoi, Irpen & Co. De mai bine de o lună votul a fost închis şi trecut şi în lista aceasta cu sentinţa DELETE http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects A trebuit sa vina si un grec să vă facă treaba...Unde sunt românii??


Problema ramane deschisa, pana cand nu se accepta faptul ca votul pt inchiderea ei se inchide...tocmai au dat rusii revert...MaxSem e rus tocmai promovat steward. Noi nu avem Steward? Il avem pe Rommihaitza dar se teme...bine ca nu se tem rusii... -- Bonaparte talk 27 decembrie 2006 10:05 (EET)Răspunde

Premiu modificare

Felicitări, ai primit două premii: "Designerul anului" și premiul special "Cel mai implicat utilizator străin" cu ocazia Premiilor Wikipediei Române 2006. -- Orioane -msg- 27 decembrie 2006 12:41 (EET)Răspunde


Spune-mi, cat de greu a fost sa inveti limba aceasta?

Tell me, how difficult it was for you to learn this language?

Te descurci foarte bine, esti mare! Iti trimit si un link daca vei avea nevoie de el http://www.etranslator.ro/english.html este un translator, nu traduce foarte bine dar e bunicel.

You're doing very well, you're great! I send you also a link if you will need it http://www.etranslator.ro/english.html it's a translator, does not translate very well but it's good. -- Bonaparte talk 27 decembrie 2006 16:01 (EET)Răspunde

Muntenegreană modificare

Nici un lingvist serios nu susține existența unei limbi muntenegrene, după cum nu există nici limbă moldovenească, limbă siberiană, limbă argentiniană sau limbă mexicană. De ce continui să susții prostia asta? Că există în alte Wikipedii nu e un argument (Wikipedia nu e o sursă credibilă de informare - politică oficială a Wikipediei).--MariusM 28 decembrie 2006 21:40 (EET)Răspunde

Ca principiu, Wikipediile sînt independente una de alta, nu trebuie să copiem tot ce scrie pe en.wiki (altfel rowiki n-ar avea nici un rost). E greșit că muntenegreana ar fi limbă diferită, consensul lingviștilor (nu al wikipediștilor) fiind că e un grup de graiuri sîrbești. Nici măcar guvernul muntenegrean nu susține oficial limba muntenegrerană, iar la recensămînt majoritatea populației, inclusiv cei care au votat separarea de Sîrbia, au declarat limba maternă sîrbă. Dar chiar dacă guvernul ar susține o limbă separată, nu e un argument științific (vezi și cazul limbii moldovenești). Problema e în mod limpede una politică, nu lingvistică, și un articol corect pe acest subiect trebuie să arate natura problemei.--MariusM 28 decembrie 2006 22:03 (EET)Răspunde

Kraje modificare

Salut,

Why have you moved the Slovakian Krajs to regions? Orioane -msg- 2 ianuarie 2007 17:17 (EET)Răspunde

Spain modificare

Regional languages of Spain is correct in English. However, I still want to check on the political implications. For instance, I am not sure that Catalan is considered a regional language. I will come back after I find out.

Afil 5 ianuarie 2007 17:39 (EET)Răspunde

According to the English Wikipedia they are not regional languages. They are co-official languages of Spain. Of course it depends on what you are writing. You will have to check if the languages you are using are all co-official or if some of them have another status. But you have to be careful. The language issue is extremely sensitive in Spain and the superior status of Castillian is not accepted.

Afil 5 ianuarie 2007 17:54 (EET)Răspunde

It looks OK to me. As long as you don't put regional it is fine.

Afil 5 ianuarie 2007 18:04 (EET)Răspunde

Navigație dinamică modificare

Remigiu, please donnot edit the dynamic navigation templates yet. They will recover in breve. The problem is from Mediawiki:Common.css and Mediawiki:Common.js. But they should recover until tommorow. It takes time until the changes in this scripts are effective. Also please donnot add colour to the title bar, that can be added for special cases in the templates themselves, but by default it should be uncoloured.

Remigiu te rog nu umbla deocamdată la formatele de navigație dinamică. Se vor recupera în breve. Problema e de la Mediawiki:Common.css și Mediawiki:Common.js. --Danutz


Spain modificare

Done

Afil 9 ianuarie 2007 23:13 (EET)Răspunde

Susținere pentru funcția de administrator modificare

Îți mulțumesc pentru votul pozitiv pe care mi l-ai acordat la candidatura de administrator. --R O A M A T A 2007 mesaj 11 ianuarie 2007 14:37 (EET)Răspunde

Czech Republic modificare

At Wikipedia:Subdiviziuni ale țărilor, for the Czech Republic, you replaced "2 regiuni și 13 districte" (source: Romanian Foreign Affairs Ministry) with "13 regiuni și 1 municipiu". What's your source for these terms? The purpose of that page is to provide guidelines with respect to the terms to be used for the administrative divisions of various countries. As such, we need to make sure these terms come from reliable sources. — AdiJapan  13 ianuarie 2007 16:30 (EET)Răspunde

Thanks for the info. But as I said above, the purpose of that page is to establish the correct words for those divisions. This is why the numbers on that page are less important than the words: Is it regiune? Is it district?. I was hoping you had a source in Romanian. We are looking for the Romanian equivalent of kraj. — AdiJapan  14 ianuarie 2007 07:02 (EET)Răspunde
The problem is that we need some kind of verifiable translations, not just our personal ideas (we have plenty of those, that's why we are in this dispute). If you find something please let me know. In the meantime I will use whatever I find in the sources I know. Thanks. — AdiJapan  14 ianuarie 2007 14:00 (EET)Răspunde

Re:Portal modificare

Mă voi uita, mulțumesc pentru ajutor. Dar at trebui să listezi și tu Portalul Spaniei la Wikipedia:Portal/Director. La Portal:Răsfoire l-am pus eu, când l-am adăugat pe cel de Danemarca.--R O A M A T A 2007 mesaj 14 ianuarie 2007 21:27 (EET)Răspunde


Słupsk , ten w opracowaniu modificare

Pozwoliłem sobie do celów dyskusji skopiować fragment historii Słupska z właśnie opracowywanego tekstu. Chodzi o:

[...] În secolul al IX-lea a luat naștere pe malul de est al fluviului Stolpe, pe un vad neted, o așezare venedică și la scurt timp după aceea a apărut castelul Slupsk. Un drum comercial între Gdańsk și Stargard Szczeciński trecea prin acel vad. Prima atestare documentară datează din anul 1240. Din 1220 până în 1266 castelul a fost rezidența ducilor Swantepolk de Pomerania orientală. În 1276 s-a înființat o nouă colonie pe malul opus al fluviului. Fondatorii au fost comercianți germani și artizani din Westfalia și Holstein. În 1278 dominicanii au... [...]

Od razu będę mówił o co mi chodzi, z czym się nie zgadzam:

  1. nie w IX w. a w VIII w. powstaje warownia w widłach Słupi.
  2. obawiam się, że nazwa "venedică" to po polsku Wenedowie. A chodzi o Wendów.
  3. W żadnym razie nie można wówczas mówić o drogach, mówiąc o Gdańsku, Stargardzie Szczecińskim.. Te drogi, z których korzystają słowianie to spóścizna po drogach ludności kultury łużyckiej. Zatem nie Szczecin a gród obronny Cedynia....
  4. Te daty są dość przypadkowe. Decydującą o Pomorzu datą jest ogarnięcie przez krzyżaków Pomorza; zdobycie, wymordowanie ludności i spalenie w 1308 r. Gdańska decyduje o losach Pomorza!

Jeśli się źle rozczytałem, to bardzo przepraszam. Jeśli chodzi o całe zamierzenie to faktycznie wydaje się być imponujące. Przepraszam, że tak przeszkadzam ale historia miejsc mi bliskich jest dla mnie zbyt interesująca aby jej nie przeczytać. Czasami nie zgadzam się z treścią- wówczas o tym mówię. Serdecznie pozdrawiam, --Wladyslaw Golinski 14 ianuarie 2007 22:05 (EET)Răspunde

Limba română modificare

Czesc, Michal! I wanted to ask you to modify your user box from ro-1 to ro-2 because I feel like you improved a lot your Romanian. Dzieki, Mihai | D 20 ianuarie 2007 22:53 (EET)Răspunde

Format:Tabel Uniunea Europeană‎ modificare

Nu formatarea era problema, ci o sursă pentru cifrele alea; și să se specifice moneda: 13000 de ce?--Laur | Discuție 21 ianuarie 2007 23:06 (EET)Răspunde

The main problem with that table was not the formatting, but the lack of a source and the fact that no currency was/is specified; 13000 of what?--Laur | Discuție 21 ianuarie 2007 23:08 (EET)Răspunde

Da, văzusem, dar GDP nu înseamnă PIB? (PIB și nu PNB adică) - pentru că în en wiki nu există două rubrici, PIB și PNB, ci doar GDP. --Laur | Discuție 21 ianuarie 2007 23:14 (EET)Răspunde
Asta e toată problema, la noi există PIB și PNB iar la en doar GDP. De ce e așa și cine cu cine e echivalent, habar n-am pt că nu prea știu economie...--Laur | Discuție 21 ianuarie 2007 23:18 (EET)Răspunde

"Valahi" în Polonia modificare

Hi Remigiu! I just found out that the Polish Wikipedia has an article titledWołosi w Polsce. I am impressed by how many settlements in Poland are supossed to have "Wallachian" (or, come on, let's not beat up the bush and call it Romanian) roots! And then there is the issue of the Gorals which is as interesting as it is puzzling. Did you contribute yourself to the aricles above? Ugo 24 ianuarie 2007 12:14 (EET)Răspunde

OK modificare

Ca să câștigăm timp am și șters articolul descoperă - motivul de ștergere m-a convins. --Parvus7 26 ianuarie 2007 22:07 (EET)Răspunde

Articol nou Gorali modificare

Mersi pt. adaosurile tale. Articolul de jos il sti?

vezi articol Ugo 27 ianuarie 2007 21:29 (EET)Răspunde

Înapoi la pagina utilizatorului „Remigiu/Arhiv 1”.