2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of corruption on healthcare satisfaction in post-soviet nations: A cross-country instrumental variable analysis of twelve countries

Abstract: There is the lack of consensus about the effect of corruption on healthcare satisfaction in transitional countries. Interpreting the burgeoning literature on this topic has proven difficult due to reverse causality and omitted variable bias. In this study, the effect of corruption on healthcare satisfaction is investigated in a set of 12 Post-Socialist countries using instrumental variable regression on the sample of 2010 Life in Transition survey (N = 8655). The results indicate that experiencing corruption s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
41
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been both empirically and theoretically proven that corruption has an immensely negative effect on development around the world (Chitakunye et al 2015). Several authors assert that corruption tends to discourage investment and economic growth, aggravate the problems of informal economic activities, create obstacles to economic and political reform, exacerbate the inequality between the rich and the poor, significantly reduce satisfaction with public services and, in the long run, cause considerable degradation of living standards (Justesen & Bjørnskov 2014;Habibov 2016;Habibov & Cheung 2016). In addition, corruption results in negative citizen perceptions of public service performance, thus reducing their overall level of trust in the government (Park & Blenkinsopp 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been both empirically and theoretically proven that corruption has an immensely negative effect on development around the world (Chitakunye et al 2015). Several authors assert that corruption tends to discourage investment and economic growth, aggravate the problems of informal economic activities, create obstacles to economic and political reform, exacerbate the inequality between the rich and the poor, significantly reduce satisfaction with public services and, in the long run, cause considerable degradation of living standards (Justesen & Bjørnskov 2014;Habibov 2016;Habibov & Cheung 2016). In addition, corruption results in negative citizen perceptions of public service performance, thus reducing their overall level of trust in the government (Park & Blenkinsopp 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 1,000 households were randomly selected for a face‐to‐face interview that was conducted by specially trained interviewers in each country. A full discussion of the LITS design and implementation can be found in Habibov ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patronage and cronyism are interrelated with wide-spread corruption that permeates every aspect of Tajikistan's society (Marat, 2012;Wickberg, 2013). Tajik citizens pay bribes and other informal payments to access jobs, secondary and higher education, health care, and more (Habibov, 2016;Khodjamurodov, Sodiqova, Akkazieva, & Rechel, 2016;Whitsel, 2011;Wickberg, 2013). Power hierarchies, corruption, and poverty make it hard to climb the socio-economic ladder in Tajikistan unless one belongs to the ruling elites.…”
Section: Ambiguity Of Class and Structural Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%