DONATE
22
REP. ILHAN OMAR QUESTIONS BIDEN’S FIRST AIRSTRIKE ON SOMALIA
In a letter to the White House, the Somali-born Democrat demands answers about the legality and purpose of the attack.
Ryan Grim, Sara Sirota

July 23 2021, 9:06 a.m.
Rep. Ilhan Omar speaks to reporters in Statuary Hall on Capitol Hill on Jan. 12, 2021, in Washington, D.C. Photo: Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
REP. ILHAN OMAR is challenging the Biden administration’s justification for its Tuesday airstrike in Somalia, which the Pentagon claimed was targeted against suspected members of al-Shabab. The Minnesota Democrat is also hitting the White House for a failure to make promised and appropriated reparation payments to families of civilians killed in American airstrikes, according to a letter to President Joe Biden that was provided to The Intercept. The strike was the first in Somalia since Biden took office and came amid the White House’s stated plans, put forward by national security adviser Jake Sullivan in January, to limit drone operations while the administration reviews its counterterrorism policy. Omar, who grew up in Somalia before spending four years in a Kenyan refugee camp, represents a district with a heavy Somali American population.
The airstrike near the city of Galkayo targeted militants in al-Shabab, an insurgency group based in Somalia that the U.S. has long fought as part of its so-called global war on terror. Sullivan’s directive instructed the military and CIA to gain White House permission before launching attacks in places like Somalia and Yemen.
Omar letter to Biden on Somalia
2 pages
Since then, the administration has rejected requests by U.S. Africa Command, or AFRICOM, to strike al-Shabab targets. But according to the New York Times, Tuesday’s attack occurred without White House approval. In this case, the militants were supposedly attacking members of an elite U.S.-trained Somali commando force called Danab, and Pentagon spokesperson Cindi King said AFRICOM had the power to authorize the response independently under the military’s “collective self-defense” justification. No U.S. troops were actually with the Danab commandos when the attack occurred, as they were advising the unit remotely. 
Omar found the rationale unpersuasive. “As you know,” she wrote in the letter, “‘collective self-defense’ is a term with variable meanings in national and international law, and especially in the context of your ongoing review of airstrike authorities, its use merits further explanation in this case. This is also an important and timely matter since it seems suggestive of your Administration’s broader approach to airstrikes in Somalia.”
Join Our Newsletter
Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you.
I’m in
The strike on Somalia occurred amid growing mobilization in the House of Representatives and Senate to reclaim oversight of the extensive war powers the White House has amassed since 9/11. On Tuesday, Sens. Mike Lee, R-Utah, Chris Murphy, D-Conn., and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., introduced the National Security Powers Act to assert congressional authority over the deployment of force, export of weaponry, and declaration of national emergencies.
Last month, the House voted to repeal the 2002 Authorization for the Use of Military Force, or AUMF, that greenlighted the war in Iraq and that Trump used to justify assassinating Iranian Gen. Qassim Suleimani. But the far more consequential approval — and thus the more difficult one to repeal —  is the 2001 AUMF that authorized the war in Afghanistan and that the U.S. has continuously invoked to defend airstrikes against alleged terrorists around the world, driving activists to seek its reversal. Its repeal would, however, still be far from a guarantee that the White House will defer to Congress. Just last month, Biden claimed that Article II of the Constitution offers him self-defense authorities that would rationalize airstrikes against Iran-backed militias in Syria and Iraq.
Aside from the question of legality, Omar suggested that the strikes aren’t even effective on their own terms.
Citing an airstrike effort that began under the Trump administration, Omar noted that “the increase in strikes corresponded with an almost doubling of terrorist attacks on civilians committed by Al-Shabaab,” the precise opposite of the administration’s stated goals. 
“It is critical that we realize we are not going to simply drone the Al-Shabaab problem to death,” Omar wrote, “and that any kinetic action is part of a broader strategy focused first and foremost on the security of Somali people and the stability of the Somali state.”
WAIT! BEFORE YOU GO on about your day, ask yourself: How likely is it that the story you just read would have been produced by a different news outlet if The Intercept hadn’t done it? Consider what the world of media would look like without The Intercept. Who would hold party elites accountable to the values they proclaim to have? How many covert wars, miscarriages of justice, and dystopian technologies would remain hidden if our reporters weren’t on the beat? The kind of reporting we do is essential to democracy, but it is not easy, cheap, or profitable. The Intercept is an independent nonprofit news outlet. We don’t have ads, so we depend on our members — 70,000 and counting — to help us hold the powerful to account. Joining is simple and doesn’t need to cost a lot: You can become a sustaining member for as little as $3 or $5 a month. That’s all it takes to support the journalism you rely on.
Become a Member
CONTACT THE AUTHOR:
Ryan Grim
ryan.grim@​theintercept.com
@ryangrim
Sara Sirota
sara.sirota@​theintercept.com
@SaraLSirota
RELATED
Ilhan Omar and “Moral Equivalence,” a Term of Propaganda Invented in the 1980s
In the Least Wired Country on Earth, U.S. Military Asks Airstrike Victims to File Complaints Online
Biden’s Bombing Campaign Is a Trumpian Assertion of Presidential Power
House Takes First Step to Claw Back War Powers From White House
LATEST STORIES
Public Pensions Are Financing Refresco’s Anti-Union Campaign in New Jersey
Matthew Cunningham-Cook 4:00 a.m.
Refresco is a subsidiary of PAI Partners, a private equity firm that counts several public pension funds among its investors.
EPA Exposed
New Evidence of Corruption at EPA Chemicals Division
Sharon Lerner Sep. 18
EPA whistleblowers have provided evidence that agency officials avoided calculating the health risks posed by hundreds of new chemicals.
Deconstructed Podcast
Tax the Rich
Deconstructed Sep. 17
The Democrats’ $3.5 trillion reconciliation package would reshape the American economy.
22 Comments (closed)
Join Our Newsletter
Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you.
Weekly editor’s picks
Breaking stories and exclusives
Politics coverage
ABOUT
POLICIES AND REPORTS
BECOME A SOURCE
JOIN NEWSLETTER
BECOME A MEMBER
TERMS OF USE
PRIVACY
SECUREDROP
© FIRST LOOK INSTITUTE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
You have 2 articles remaining
Join Our Newsletter for Free Access to Our Reporting
This is not a paywall and joining is free.Interested in your privacy options? Learn about different ways to access this site by visiting our email privacy page.
Already subscribed? Confirm your email address to not see this again.
By signing up, I agree to receive emails from The Intercept and to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
TheIntercept_ENGLISHPORTUGUÊSPOLITICSJUSTICENATIONAL SECURITYWORLDTECHNOLOGYENVIRONMENTSPECIAL INVESTIGATIONSVOICESPODCASTSVIDEOSDOCUMENTSBECOME A MEMBER⟶ABOUTPOLICIES AND REPORTSBECOME A SOURCEJOIN NEWSLETTERftTERMS OF USEPRIVACY