Process Management - Improvement and Advantages

Home >> Accreditation
The reasons that processes are mapped
Advantages of Process Mapping
Process Improvement
If after a process has been checked, a decision is taken to leave it unchanged, there is a high probability that after an extended period of time has elapsed, that process may begin to degrade. This process should now be improved to restore its productivity.
  1. Identify performance issue(s). Involve an evaluation of the capability to meet service levels, delivery, quality, minimise cost and meet all functionality commitments. (Evaluate effectiveness, efficiency and quality).
  2. Conduct Root Cause Analysis (RCA).
  3. Define and analyse current performance of activities related to the issue.
  4. Communicate results.
  5. Implement improvements (for example re-design).
  6. Manage operational transition and monitor.
Root Cause Analysis
Root Cause Analysis may be conducted using tools such as:
  1. 5 Whys Method or
  2. Fishbone or Ishikawa Diagram
5 Whys Method
Ask 5 Whys and have team members answer.
Follow through on a trail.
Stay focused on objective evidence.
Advantage: Simple
Disadvantage: The team members may be difficult and attempt to derail the questioning.
Fishbone or Ishikawa Diagram
This tool requires brainstorming by category of potential causes. Potential causes (6M) fall into the following categories:
  1. Man
  2. Materials
  3. Machine
  4. Method
  5. Measurement
  6. Milieu (Environment)

These categories help to guide the thoughts of the team. Efforts should be made to eliminate potential cause until only the root cause is left.
Here’s how to use this tool:
  1. Clearly define the problem. This problem is written in the circle to the right (effect).
  2. Identify potential cause categories – 6M. These go into the six rectangular boxes around the diagram.
  3. Extend a line from each major cause in the boxes to the ‘backbone’. Attach ideas to the potential causes on the horizontal arrows.
  4. Brainstorm potential causes by each category.
  5. Discuss potential causes with the goal of eliminating all but the root cause. In other words, determine the cause that, once addressed, will solve the problem (effect) for good.
When and where to stop brainstorming is the most important part of this approach. It would be wise to stop only after reaching a policy, process, procedure or a person that seems to be a root cause.
It should be noted that this is not a blame game. The goal is process improvement.
Report a Broken Link/Error or make a Suggestion

Board of Governors
Key Academic and
Corporate Staff
Job Vacancies

Programme Listing
Academic Calendar
International Students
Post Graduate Studies & Research
Short Courses

Email Address *


Privacy Statement | Disclaimer
The University of Trinidad and Tobago | (868) 642 8888 or (868) 223 4888 |e:
School vector created by pch.vector -
Count: 6630
QA&IEHOME+About QA&IEMeet QA&IE StaffQuality PolicyQuality ManualQuality Assurance HandbookAdditional Resources+Responsibilities+Quality Assurance+Quality Management SystemOverviewQMS - Levels of DocumentationDocument ControlDocumenting Procedures / Work Instructions+Continuous ImprovementOverviewInternal Quality AduitsBenefits of Quality AuditsWhat is the Process for UTT+Institutional Effectiveness +Institutional Profile Institutional Data Profile (IDP)+Institutional Research Research ProjectsResearch Resources+Knowledge & Compliance Systems+Core TechnologyCOSABusiness Intelligence+Supporting TechnologyThe Quality Professionals ForumThe Suggestion Box+Process ManagementAbout Process Management+Process Management - OverviewDefinitionOverviewTypes of ComparisonsPolicy vs Process vs ProcedureSymbols and Descriptors+Improvement and Advantages Reasons to map processesAdvantages of mapping processesProcess ImprovementRoot Cause Analysis+Accreditation Institutional AccreditationSpecialised AccreditationWhat's Happening in QualityContact+News & Media ArticlesVideosPhoto Galleries