|
|
Advertising | City | Special report: Iraq - the media war | Television
5.15pm ITV 'will not lose out' on ads Dominic Timms Friday March 21, 2003
Mr Desmond said implications that the network would suffer as advertisers withdrew from spots in or close to news programmes were unfounded. "Unlike the last Gulf War, where the element of surprise took media owners by surprise, this war has been widely telegraphed and we have been very pro-active in how we handle it. We will not lose money from this trading year," he told MediaGuardian. Despite admitting that ITV had already received "a couple of deferrments" from travel companies, and that British Airways had "rolled back" a TV campaign due to start this weekend, Mr Desmond said the impact on ITV revenues would be minimal. "Owing to the special dispensation we get from the regulator, those minutes that we lose from the news will be redeemed elsewhere. If it is not clawed back then we can roll it on until after the end of the war. We expect to lose very little money," he said. Last night ITV's News at Nine ran without a single commercial break, the first time it has done so since the attacks on America on September 11 eighteen months ago. Tonight's edition of the News at Nine will also be ad free, with the expected loss of around 3 1/2 minutes of ad time being taken up by Midsomer Murders which follows straight after. Mr Desmond said ITV had clearly communicated with advertisers in the run up to the start of the war in order to minimise disruption. ITV has committed around £5.5m to covering the cost of the war that is widely expected to come to an end in April. US reports said American networks were facing a possible loss of $300m as advertisers such as Mastercard, Toyota and Proctor & Gamble deferred or cancelled advertising.
Iraq and the media
21.03.2003: Did Americans cancel briefing? 21.03.2003: Mark Lawson: 'Shock and awe, coming up soon' 20.03.2003: ITV News at Nine draws 8m 20.03.2003: TV round-up: Watching the watchers 20.03.2003: Sky and ITV claim dead heat 19.03.2003: Viewers count on BBC as war looms near 19.03.2003: ITV condemns BBC over news schedules 18.03.2003: BBC and ITV clash over war bulletins 18.03.2003: Media mull Iraq pullout 18.03.2003: Flood of complaints as BBC postpones Israel investigation 07.03.2003: BBC editorial rules spark accusations of anti-war bias 11.02.2003: BBC bans news stars from anti-war march
21.03.2003: Sun brands Chirac 'Saddam's whore' 20.03.2003: Papers push back deadlines 17.03.2003: They've lost the battle, will they support the war? 21.03.2003: March 20: World press round-up
21.03.2003: US networks suffer as advertisers abandon ship 21.03.2003: Ad slots empty as brands avoid war 20.03.2003: TV networks count cost of war 20.03.2003: Advertisers urged to heed consumer anxiety 19.03.2003: Iraq crisis dents ITV advertising 18.03.2003: US churches urge Blair to stop war
10.03.2003: How the net will play a key role in this war
18.03.2003: Military's spin corps promises honesty over civilian deaths
28.02.2003: Rather's Hussein scoop draws 17m 27.02.2003: White House clashes with TV chiefs 19.02.2003: News media harden anti-US stance 27.02.2003: US reporters condemn Pentagon press controls
13.02.2003: Black is latest to back Blair 11.02.2003: Murdoch backs 'courageous' Blair over Iraq
13.02.2003: War climate helps Asian radio station
10.03.2003: Roy Greenslade: No one wants to read about war 14.02.2003: Peter Arnett: 'You are the Goebbels of Saddam's regime' 27.01.2003: Maggie Brown: Battle stations 27.01.2003: Richard Dowden: Suddenly I had taken four Iraqi soldiers prisoner 26.01.2003: David Beresford: The writes and wrongs of war Printable version | Send it to a friend | Save story | |||||||||||||||||||||||