First Presbyterian Church of Watertown

 

 

Isaiah 61

“Oh . . . and one more thing”

The Rev. Dr. Fred G. Garry

December 11, 2005

 

 

            The shouting started in September.  Our youngest, Dave, shouts from the front room, “Come quick.  You have to see this.”  At first I thought it was some sort of breaking news or rare animal on the television- that Dave is five and his television station of choice doesn’t “break” for any news eluded me for a time.  Each bout of shouting would lead me flying through the house so to see the last few seconds of a game or a toy or a gadget.  “I want that for Christmas,” he would say. 

            After four or five mad dashes I devised a new strategy.  When Dave would run into the room begging me to come I would say, “Just put it on the list.  If it’s for Santa I don’t need to see.”  This worked like a charm.  Some part of me figured that Dave saw me as only a fall back anyway.  Our children discover young that I am an easy touch for the small things, but for big stuff you need to talk to mom.  

            Sitting through a couple of cartoons with Dave I found the source of his enthusiasm.  Dave is watching Nickelodeon, an entire network dedicated to children.  Starting in September a lion share of their commercials is geared toward children just like him, boys and girls thinking in terms of Christmas and Santa and “the list.”  I have to tell you the commercials are pretty cool.  It didn’t take long before I was tempted to encourage Santa on Dave’s behalf regarding a few of the toys. 

            While there were certainly commercials during my childhood, television wasn’t what it is now, nor was it the source of my Christmas hopes.  For me this was the Sears catalog.  In scope and sheer size each one could be understood as an example of deforestation.  But the Sears catalog had everything.  Toys, sports equipment, guns, and the ultimate: sheets, comforters, curtains, trash cans, lamps, radios, and of course pajamas all emblazoned with the Miami Dolphins.  I actually knew a young boy named Paul who was lucky enough to have parents who ordered him all these items.  His team was the Dallas Cowboys and his room was a kind of surreal wonderland.  It was as if the catalog were alive.

            I can remember going to my grandparent’s home on Hilltop Drive, their tree and nativity set to the left, the dining room to the right, and at the end of the family room the Sears catalog would be out and ready.  It was a part of Christmas.  It was as if everything there was a possibility; it could be under the tree. 

            Maybe I am wrong here yet for me the Christmas list cannot be too long.  One more thing is never a bad idea on a Christmas list.  This was born I believe from the Sears Catalog with its endless possibilities, endless pages with each one crammed with dozens of toys any self-respecting seven year old would be happy to open on Christmas morning imagining the man in red bringing it on a sled.

            I know I sound like part of the problem, part of the commercialization of Christmas, part of the whole materialism that seems to have redefined the yuletide into a blitzkrieg of spoiled children and gluttony.  And this may very well be true.  If there is a battle to be fought over the spirit of Christmas, I would probably head to the side talking about gifts and Santa and reindeer.  A solemn Christmas just doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense to me. 

            The counter argument runs: sometime in the recent past, Christmas was commercialized and became more about the gifts than the giving; it has evolved into a rather frantic shopping spree and not a time of prayerful reflection culminating in the good news, unto us a savior is born. 

            Yet, listen to what Harriet Beecher Stowe described in “The First New England Christmas.”  “Oh dear!  Christmas is coming in a fortnight, and I have got to think up presents for everybody!  Dear me, it’s so tedious!  Everybody has got everything that can be thought of.”   She describes the town with “every shop and store glittering with all manner of splendors . . . for people that have more than they know what to do with now; to add pictures, books, and gilding when the centre tables are loaded with them now, and rings and jewels when they are a perfect drug.”

            Harriet Beecher Stowe was born in 1811 and her short story was part reminiscence and part fiction.  The fiction was in the characters, not the description of Christmas though.  She wrote about the Christmas of her childhood looking back from 1850 as a means of describing a simpler time, before Christmas had gotten really out of control.

            I found Stowe’s account in a great book entitled, The Battle for Christmas.  Stephen Nissenbaum does a great job showing the origins of our traditions and the nuances of our practices.  Yet throughout each part there is a constant refrain, what Christmas means is always a battle. 

            The tradition of gift giving in America really took its present form just as Stowe was born.  It was after the revolution and struggling with their new found freedom, our young nation seemed to go a little crazy with Christmas.  It was as if the great struggle of the fight for independence found a kind of cathartic release in the holidays- Christmas and New Year.  All of the hardship of years of war and threats of war, all the sacrifice and loss seemed to find a release in an extravagant Christmas.  Stowe’s Christmas story depicts the usually conservative, Spartan and thrifty New England going on a bit of spree.

            They become an easy target for claims of decadence or wasteful splendor.  Yet, and here is the part that keeps nagging at me, what if the splendor and the opulence were a kind of recognition of how great was the mercy of God?  There is not a lot of record of boasting or sense of self-importance as part of the national identity after the revolution.  There were plenty examples though of how in awe people were that they were free and how they saw this as God’s gift.  The people who lived through the revolution knew all too well how precarious and how miraculous was their victory.  Christmas, it seems, became a kind of celebration of God’s extravagant mercy.

            Our passage from Isaiah should be read from that vantage.  Isaiah is speaking with people who are rebuilding Jerusalem after a century of disrepair; he is speaking to the people who have somehow awakened to find their exile over a whole new life begun.  The people for whom Isaiah prophesied were not resting on any laurels, but fully aware that their life was a miraculous gift, an extravagant gift.

            Reading Isaiah’s vision is like a global Christmas list unleashed, unbridled.  Read it this way: "What do you want to see, Isaiah?  I want to see good news for the oppressed and the brokenhearted bound up; I want to see liberty for captives and release for prisoners; I want to see a jubilee for the indebted and punishment for their oppressors; I want to see Zion restored and a place of celebration, garland instead of ashes; I want to see the ancient cities rebuilt and glory of old restored to its former splendor."  One of these visions would be enough to occupy the well-intended for a lifetime; Isaiah wants to see ten different moments of transformation.

            I was doing alright until he said "And the ancient ruins and cities, those will be rebuilt."  The list of hopes and dreams were extravagant before this and then it just got a little wild.  But such is life when you see it as a gift, when you see it as mercy and not your own, not what you made, but what you receive. 

            At the time when Harriet Beecher Stowe was a child, America was truly convinced that we were a nation given freedom, given liberty.  Our Christmas season was born of the need to be thankful on an extravagant scale.  By the time Stowe reached my age she found a nation struggling to remember their life was a gift, not the expectation of gifts.  Yet, soon and very soon, this would again be remembered.

            I find it a strange comfort that our battle over Christmas is the same as it ever was.  One hundred and fifty years ago the challenge was the same and has been for every generation.  In light of such an extravagant gift, how should we live, how are we to give?  We read Isaiah’s vision of the world redeemed during Advent because it is the time when it makes sense, when our hearts are ready to ponder the enormity of mercy- when hope becomes wild.  It is true the children may not fully understand how the celebration was shaped of sacrifice, but there may come a day.  Shame be upon us for speeding the loss of innocence.  

            Is it any surprise that we say "bah humbug" to those who cannot dream and rejoice at Christmas?  For now is the time to read Isaiah’s dream and even add to it.  We need to believe that there is good news for the oppressed and release for the captives and freedom for the prisoners and food for the hungry and clothes for naked and oh, one more thing, hope for those in despair and sense of remembrance for the forgotten and forsaken and much, much more. 

            The Sears catalog wasn’t handed to me with a sense of warning or limitation.  It was put into the hands of a young boy as it should be, in the extravagance of more than can be imagined.  There is nothing in the Gospels where we get a sense that Jesus gave a little, or what he could afford, or what was fitting.  There was a wild, extravagance of giving very his life away. 

            So as the battle continues, and it will, remember: the gifting of Christmas is meant to embody the complete giving away, the sense of thankfulness that life is better than can be imagined.  Just remember our extravagance was born of sacrifice.  Amen.