The Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania - Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the LPPa forum. 
Feel free to join the discussions.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Changing Focus/Priorities  (Read 3414 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Thomas Paine's Goiter
Guest
« on: November 04, 2004, 12:59:10 PM »

I'm not sure if I'm alone in these lines of thinking or not, but I'm betting I'll know by the responses here.  This post may ramble and stray a bit, but I'll try to stay on course.

Over the last four years I've become increasingly agitated by the direction of the national party as well as the priorities set by the various state-level parties.  My frustration with the national party has boiled over because of the priorities and wasteful spending that the party leaders have shown.

To me, the most important aspect of being a third party is grass-roots support.  Actual party members and voters that believe in your party and your candidates.  Getting protest votes and "none of the above" votes might work for a single election, but it's no way to establlish momentum.  Building small pockets of Lp loyalty is the way to go about it.

I started to ignore the dictums of the national party four years ago when I started following individual campaigns accross the country.  And I'm not talking about US Rep or Senate campaigns.  I'm talking country commissioner, city council, township supervisor, and state rep campaigns.  I saw that there were plenty of possibilities for the party to score many small victories around the country.  Instead the national party was intent on raising money to run TV ads (VERY EXPENSIVE TV Ads) on national TV about the war on drugs.  They were also emailing calls for cash for Harry back then.  While I'm sure that the commercials were great, it was a wasted opportunity.  The national party raised hundereds of thousands of dollars and spent it on a presidential race and TV ads.  If they were to have really done some analysis on the smaller races previously mentioned, they would have noticed a true opportunity for change.  If the party would have funded some of those candidates, they would have been competitive.  If the party would have OVERfunded those candidates, there is a distinct possibility that they would have been victorous.  And as we all know winning begets winning.  Getting a few local wins is a great way to start building a base, to start raising money, to springboard into larger and larger races.

Alas, it was not to be.  The national party spent money just so that they could continue to be the 3rd largest party.  I thought things might have changed in 2002, but I was wrong.  Instead of really focusing on local races, the national party focused on the Wisconsin Governor's race.  WHAT!??!!??!  The calls for cash were deleted immediately from my inbox and I gave money to individuals that seemed to have some chance to make a splash.  Many of them did well for having zero money, in fact did a WHOLE lot better than Thompson did in Wisconsin as he sucked the party dry of funds.  This year was more of the same for Badnarik.  We wasted money on him and ignored state level races in which we had a chance.  To me, if we're going to raise $250,000 for a campaign, it should be for a state rep campaign - outspend the other side and win.  Create pockets of loyalty and power.

At the state level, I've been disappointed in the organization and the fund-raising abilities.  There are many races throughout PA where we really could make a difference - county commissioner, township supervisor and city councils - but few LPPa members know that these races are occurring and that our candidates need money and help.  I think this is a failure to utilize technology.  One advantage of being smaller and nimble is that we're able to utilize things like the net and email to really change focus quickly.  But we don't.  I feel that if we've got a race where there is a chance, I mean a glimmer of a victory, we need to be there with money and volunteers.  And we can't just match dollars from the two parties.  We need to double the money they are spending.  We need to double the volunteers.

This year it changes for me personally.  I'm going to start using this board as a way of getting messages out.  I'm going to implore everyone that reads this to sign up for the discussion lists:

http://mail.lppa.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion_lppa.org
http://mail.lppa.org/mailman/listinfo/volunteers_lppa.org

I'm going to use those lists and board to let everyone know about races, both state and nationwide where we have a chance.  And I'm going to use them as a call for help when it's needed.

I'm also going to start to use some of the resources (friends) that I have in state government.  And last but not least, I'm going to start discussions about things that we as LP members don't do during elections -- phone banks, mailers, organized (both internet and on the ground) fundraisers.  I also hope to start a discussion about wasting resources on unwinnable races and concentrating resources to win.

I hope it works.  If not, I can say I tried.  Like I said, I guess I'll know where everyone else stands by the way they respond to this message.
Logged
Nicholas_Bostaph
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 9


WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2004, 07:49:11 AM »

I'm not really sure how I feel about a lot of this, and think I should probably wait until I have a chance to learn more before trying to make a decision.  However, I thought I would respond to at least part, if for no other reason than to get a discussion going. Wink

Before I get started, could I ask for a definition of "grassroots"?  I've heard the term thrown around a lot, and cobbled together an idea of what it means, but would be really grateful for a precise definition.



I agree that the way to establish the party is to concentrate on smaller races and slowly work our way up.  However, I've always been a fan of attacking any given problem from multiple directions.  You then always have a foothold to keep you moving forward even if one plan fails.  In that light, I don't think that money was wasted on the TV commercials that were put out in the Badnarik campaign.  I'm going to support that with some anecdotal evidence (bad form, I know, but bear with me).

Four years ago, I helped install Satan as the new religious extremist and dictator for life (ie: I voted for Bush).  This vote was cast in ignorance, and in trust.  I didn't have the knowledge that there were third parties, nor did I understand that a candidate may not always uphold the exact principles of his associated party.  The trust was in my family, and mostly my brother, who convinced me that I was Republican.  He insisted that Republicans stood for smaller government and less taxes, and even then I understood the economic and social advantages of that goal.

Part of the problem was that I understood the corruption and dishonestly inherent in politics.  It had never occurred to me that there might someday be a honest politician with integrity and intelligence though.  So I gave up on politics in general.  I didn't learn anything new, I forgot what I already had learned, and I made no effort to follow politics as a whole.  After all, you either voted for the Democrat or the Republican, and everyone knew that they both cheated and lied, right?

Two years ago my wife (fiancee at the time) sent me a link to the "worlds smallest political quiz".  I had heard the word "Libertarian" before, but this was the first time I was able to associate any values, ideas, or description with it...I didn't even realize they were a political party like the Republicans and Democrats!  It didn't take long of looking over the website to understand that, even though I didn't know it, I was definitely a Libertarian.

In the time since, I have talked to everyone I know about Libertarians and their ideology at one point or another.  There are a few things I have noticed.  First, most people agree with Libertarian ideas, but fall prey to the 'wasted vote' syndrome.  Second, Most people who know a bit about politics and are already affiliated with Republicans or Democrats are very unlikely to convert.  Most importantly, people like myself, who are optimistic about the future, who believe that there is always hope, and who have almost no political knowledge, are the most likely to openly listen and evaluate Libertarian ideas you present and take the time to consider affiliated with the Libertarian party.



The TV ads run for Badnarik weren't intended to just beg for a vote.  They presented the ideology and philosophy (in a 30 second blurb) to thousands upon thousands of people.  Many of whom aren't like you, or like I am now, but are very much like I was.  Some of the people who saw those ads never knew that there were third parties.  They never considered that there might be a party that represents their views, and never took the time to take part in politics because neither the Democrats nor the Republicans offer much other than larger government.  These are people who now have a new word, "Libertarian", floating around in their head, and I'm confident that at least some of them are going to find the LP because of it.

This is important because many of them, like me, probably never paid any attention to the local races.  If you had channeled that money into a local race, you would never have earned my vote, because I simply wouldn't have cared enough (back then).  However, had you gotten word about the Libertarian party out to me, and piqued my interest enough that I would visit the site and learn more, then you would end up with a dedicated and optimistic fellow party member who would not only vote for the LP local candidates every chance he got in the future, but would also contribute time and money to the party.



Whoops, that took longer than I thought to write, back to work now... Wink
Logged

Thomas Paine's Goiter
Guest
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2004, 02:17:29 AM »

Quote from: "Nicholas_Bostaph"


Before I get started, could I ask for a definition of "grassroots"?  I've heard the term thrown around a lot, and cobbled together an idea of what it means, but would be really grateful for a precise definition.



Locally based ("rooted") volunteer activists, nominally desired by both parties but at times neglected in favor of fundraising and television advertising.
Logged
Nicholas_Bostaph
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 9


WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2004, 09:39:14 AM »

Quote from: "Thomas Paine's Goiter"
Quote from: "Nicholas_Bostaph"


Before I get started, could I ask for a definition of "grassroots"?  I've heard the term thrown around a lot, and cobbled together an idea of what it means, but would be really grateful for a precise definition.



Locally based ("rooted") volunteer activists, nominally desired by both parties but at times neglected in favor of fundraising and television advertising.



Thank you, very helpful. Smiley
Logged

Ron Goodman
Guest
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2004, 08:51:33 PM »

From a marketing perspective I think it is very worthwhile to run a Presidential candidate.  Badnarik did a wonderful job on TV and radio interviews all over the country.  I've heard from total strangers who were excited to see a candidate they actually liked.  When Michael came to PA he made sure he was there to support our local candidates by getting press coverage and holding media events.

On the flip side winning elections is what it is all about and that is where the state and local races come into play.  We are in the process of building a very viable and more competitive party in PA.  I agree with Thomas in that we need to focus more resources into a handful of winnable races.

That's what we did in the central PA area where Cumberland, Dauphin and Lebanon counties combined forces to work on Russ Diamond's campaign.  The end result was he had the highest vote total of our candidates in PA.  Cumberland and Dauphin counties got behind the effort because Russ demonstrated that he was a very viable candidate and did most of the heavy lifting.

I'm very encouraged that both of you are willing to get more active and lend your specific talents to the LPPA.  Get in touch with your county contact and you will be welcomed with open arms!

Ron Goodman
Chairman - Cumberland County LP
rocket1g@earthlink.net
717-243-5708
Logged
timcrowley
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 151


« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2005, 03:55:51 AM »

In general, there are 4 levels of campaigns.  We need
candidates for all levels.

1. paper campaign-  just get on the ballot, answer surveys
that are sent to you.  That's it.  This gives people an
opportunity to vote Libertarian.  Maybe shake hands at the
polls on election day.  Print up a few brochures maybe.

2, Informational campaign-  You send out news releases, get
interviewed in the paper, make a brochure and we help
distribute it door to door, give a few speeches, organize
poll workers, answer candidates' surveys.

3. Serious campaign - you raise thousands of $, have a
Treasurer and campaign staff, take out ads in the paper, etc

4. competitive campaign - you have a serious chance of
winning.  You have precinct captains and volunteers all over
the place. You actually follow one of the many authoritative
campaign books and manuals available.

There's actually a level even below #1, where you submit
your name on the ballot, but you withdraw at the last
minute.  This makes it easier to ask for signatures, since
your name is on the ballot.  People will be more willing to
help you out.

The election season is around the corner so here are some
nuts-and-bolts links to campaigns.

>the LP has a bunch of on-line manuals for candidates, etc.
>http://archive.lp.org/lit/lv/9805-defense.html
>

Subject: Libertarian Party - Candidate Recruitment Manual
(http://archive.lp.org/lit/crm
Logged
timcrowley
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 151


« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2005, 03:56:25 AM »

In general, there are 4 levels of campaigns.  We need
candidates for all levels.

1. paper campaign-  just get on the ballot, answer surveys
that are sent to you.  That's it.  This gives people an
opportunity to vote Libertarian.  Maybe shake hands at the
polls on election day.  Print up a few brochures maybe.

2, Informational campaign-  You send out news releases, get
interviewed in the paper, make a brochure and we help
distribute it door to door, give a few speeches, organize
poll workers, answer candidates' surveys.

3. Serious campaign - you raise thousands of $, have a
Treasurer and campaign staff, take out ads in the paper, etc

4. competitive campaign - you have a serious chance of
winning.  You have precinct captains and volunteers all over
the place. You actually follow one of the many authoritative
campaign books and manuals available.

There's actually a level even below #1, where you submit
your name on the ballot, but you withdraw at the last
minute.  This makes it easier to ask for signatures, since
your name is on the ballot.  People will be more willing to
help you out.

The election season is around the corner so here are some
nuts-and-bolts links to campaigns.

>the LP has a bunch of on-line manuals for candidates, etc.
>http://archive.lp.org/lit/lv/9805-defense.html
>

Subject: Libertarian Party - Candidate Recruitment Manual
(http://archive.lp.org/lit/crm
Logged
timcrowley
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 151


« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2005, 04:10:44 AM »

Recommended Books:

Campaign books: (nuts and bolts of organizing a political
campaign
The Campaign Manager- by Catherine Shaw
How To Win a Local Election - by Judge Lawrence Gray

How To Beat the Democrats (and other subversive ideas)- by
David Horowitz (good rhetoric to use in press releases and
in speeches)

Sales Books:
Selling for Dummies -by Tom Hopkins
Prospecting for Dummies - by Tom Hopkins
Advanced Sales Strategies - by Brian Tracy
The 25 habits of Highly Successful Salespeople - by Steve
Schiffman
Power Sales Presentations - by Steve Schiffman
Fundraising For Dummies - another yellow and black dummies
book which is excellent.

Also cassette tapes and CDs by the same authors.
Brian Tracy- The Psychology of Selling is an excellent
two-tape program which will help you persuade people to join
the LPPa or to accept L/libertarian platform positions.

this page is full of libertarian links.

http://maxpages.com/lio/activist_handbook/

I also recommend the Pioneer Valley Libertarian Association
Candidate Support Disk.  This is well worth the $5 suggested
donation.


Here is a link to the Pennsylvania Manual Online


http://www.dgs.state.pa.us/dgs/cwp/view.asp?a=3&Q=116280&dgs
Nav=|
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com