The World in 2009

• America's new hope
• Buckle up
• Come to order
• The year of unsustainability

• Banning the bomb
• Shocking science
• The perils of sharing
• English marks a million

Right or wrong? Review our previous issue:

Twin track

• The audacity of change
• Goodbye Guantánamo
• Pick your scenario
• The bucks stop here

• National Association for the Alleviation of Credit Pandemonium
• Crime, interrupted
• An end of hubris

Right or wrong? Review our previous issue:

The Democrats’ year

• Latin drift
• Old order, new oil

• Canada's clashes
• Building on the B in BRIC

Right or wrong? Review our previous issue:

Canada goes greener

• Riders on the storm
• A rocky and a hard place
• A subcontinent votes
• After the Olympics
• Twitching China

• Shock and aftershock
• Hurry, Murray-Darling
• Indonesia sets an example
• Large issues and medium powers

Right or wrong? Review our previous issue:

The challenge to Beijingoism

• Iraq wants its sovereignty back
• Going nuclear in Iran
• Full of angst
• Buying the world

• Everything to play for
• Putting Africa on the map
• Closing the knowledge gap

Right or wrong? Review our previous issue:

On and on in Iraq

• A bad year for diplomats
• About 2008: sorry
• Long shots for 2009
• The great wheel of China

• Scramble for the seabed
• The museum-building binge
• Farewell to youth
• Isaiah, chapter 100

Right or wrong? Review our previous issue:

A year for accountability

• Nice project, shame about the voters
• Ever greater union
• Take your partners
• A French semi-revolution
• After the fiesta
• North stars

• Same old Silvio?
• Message from Madrid
• Swaggering on
• An answer to the Russian question
• Twenty years of capitalism: was it worth it?
• Frozen conflicts

Right or wrong? Review our previous issue:

Defining Sarkozism

• Maybe, prime minister
• Straining at the leash
• Made in Britain

• Binary blues
• Spent, spent, spent
• No such thing as a free crunch

Right or wrong? Review our previous issue:

The storm to come