Return to:
Index of "Environment and Science" ||
Electronic Research Collections Index ||
ERC Homepage
U.S. Department of State
96/03/19 Fact Sheet: US Oceans Policy & Law of the Sea Convention
Bureau of Public Affairs
Fact Sheet
U.S. Oceans Policy and the Law of the Sea Convention
On July 29, 1994, the Agreement Relating to the Implementation of Part
XI of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea was
adopted and opened for signature at the United Nations in New York. The
Agreement fundamentally changed the provisions of the Convention (Part
XI) that establish a system for regulating the mining of mineral
resources from the deep seabed beyond national jurisdiction. The purpose
of the Agreement is to remove the obstacles to the acceptance of the
Convention that have prevented the United States and other
industrialized countries from moving to become parties to it.
The United States believes that the Agreement satisfactorily addresses
long-held objections to the Convention's seabed mining provisions.
Therefore, the United States signed the Agreement and has submitted the
Law of the Sea Convention and the Agreement together as a package to the
Senate for advice and consent. Entry into force of a widely accepted and
comprehensive law of the sea convention--to which the United States can
become a Party--has been a consistent objective of successive United
States Administrations since negotiations began on such a convention
over two decades ago. As of March 19, 1996, 87 governments are Party
to the Convention, including Germany, Italy, South Korea, and Australia.
Background: United States Oceans Interests
The United States has important and diverse interests in the oceans. As
the world's pre-eminent naval power, the United States has a national
security interest in the ability to freely navigate and overfly the
oceans as essential preconditions for projecting military power. The end
of the Cold War has, if anything, highlighted this need. Ensuring the
free flow of commercial navigation is likewise a basic concern for the
United States as a major trading power, whose economic growth and
employment is inextricably linked with a robust and growing export
sector. By far, the bulk of international trade is transported by sea.
At the same time, the United States, with one of the longest coastlines
of any nation in the world, has basic resource and environmental
interests in the oceans. The seabed of the deep oceans offers the
potential for economically and strategically important mineral
resources. Inshore and coastal waters generate vital economic
activities--fisheries, offshore minerals development, ports and
transportation facilities and, increasingly, recreation and tourism. The
health and well-being of coastal populations--the majority of Americans
live in coastal areas--are intimately linked to the quality of the
coastal marine environment.
Understanding the oceans, including their role in global processes, is
one of the frontiers of human scientific investigation, and the United
States is a leader in the conduct of marine scientific research.
Further, such research is essential for understanding and addressing
problems associated with the use and protection of the marine
environment, including marine pollution, conservation of fish and other
marine living species, and forecasting of weather and climate
variability.
Pursuit of these objectives, however, requires careful and often
difficult balancing of interests. As a coastal nation, for example, we
naturally tend to seek maximum control over the waters off our shores.
Equally, as a major maritime power, we often view such efforts on the
part of others as unwarranted limitations on legitimate rights of
navigation.
Moreover, traditional perceptions of the inexhaustability of marine
resources and of the capacity of the oceans to neutralize wastes have
changed, as marine species have been progressively depleted by
harvesting and their habitats damaged or threatened by pollution and a
variety of human activities. Maintaining the health and productive
capacity of the oceans while seeking to meet the economic aspirations of
growing populations also requires difficult choices.
Striking the balances necessary to implement United States oceans policy
must be viewed in the international context. Living resources migrate.
Likewise, marine ecosystems and ocean currents, which transport
pollutants and otherwise affect environmental interests, extend across
maritime boundaries and jurisdictional limits. National security and
commercial shipping interests are also international in scope.
Achievement of oceans policy objectives thus requires international
cooperation at the bilateral, regional, and global level. The
alternative is increased competition, and conflict over control of the
oceans and marine resources to the potential detriment of United States
interests and the marine environment generally.
The United Nations Convention On the Law of the Sea
United States oceans policy has always had as a basic objective the
application of the rule of law to the uses and conservation of the
oceans. The United States was a leader in the international community's
effort to develop an over-all legal framework for the oceans in the
Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, which began its
substantive work in 1974.
The resulting United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS),
concluded in 1982, provides a comprehensive legal framework governing
uses of the oceans and the rights and obligations of States relating
thereto. It achieved consensus on the nature and extent of jurisdiction
that States may exercise off their coasts: a territorial sea of a
maximum breadth of 12 nautical miles and coastal State jurisdiction
over fisheries and other resources (e.g., oil and gas) in a 200
nautical-mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), and on the continental
shelf where it extends beyond the EEZ. It balances extended coastal
State jurisdiction with provision for preservation and elaboration of
rights of navigation and overflight in these areas and guarantees of
passage through and over straits used for international navigation and
archipelagoes.
The Convention advances the interests of the United States as a coastal
State. It achieves this, inter alia, by providing for an EEZ out to 200
nautical miles from shore and by securing our rights regarding resources
and artificial islands, installations, and structures for economic
purposes over the full extent of the continental shelf. These provisions
fully comport with United States oil and gas leasing practices, domestic
management of coastal fishery resources, and international fisheries
agreements.
The Convention provides for the conservation of marine living resources,
including coastal fisheries populations, straddling stocks (fisheries
populations whose range includes both areas of the EEZ and the high
seas), and highly migratory species and marine mammals, such as whales.
As a far-reaching environmental accord addressing vessel source
pollution, pollution from seabed activities, ocean dumping, and land-
based sources of marine pollution, the Convention promotes continuing
improvement in the health of the world's oceans.
In light of the essential role of marine scientific research in
understanding and managing the oceans, the Convention sets forth
criteria and procedures to promote access to marine areas, including
coastal waters, for research activities.
The Convention facilitates solutions to the increasingly complex
problems of the uses of the ocean--solutions that respect the essential
balance between our interests as both a coastal and a maritime nation.
Through its dispute settlement provisions, the Convention provides for
mechanisms to enhance compliance by Parties with the Convention's
provisions.
Early adherence by the United States to the Convention and the Agreement
is important to maintain a stable legal regime for all uses of the sea,
which covers more than 70% of the surface of the globe. Maintenance of
such stability is vital to United States national security and economic
strength.
(###)
[Box item]
The Agreement Relating to the Implementation of Part XI Of the United
Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
The new agreement--the Agreement Relating to the Implementation of Part
XI of the Convention on the Law of the Sea--incorporates legally binding
changes in the deep sea-bed mining provisions of the LOS Convention that
satisfactorily address the objections of the United States and other
industrialized countries. Generally, the new agreement will ensure that
the United States, and others with major economic interests at stake,
have adequate influence over future decisions on possible deep seabed
mining and that the administration of the deep seabed mining regime is
based on free-market principles.
The reformed seabed mining provisions do not set forth a detailed
system, seeking to anticipate all phases of potential activity
associated with mining of the deep seabed. Instead, they set forth sound
commercial and economic principles upon which to develop rules and
regulations establishing a management regime for commercial mining when
interest in commercial mining emerges.
Specifically, the Agreement:
-- Deletes the objectionable mandatory transfer of technology
provisions;
-- Includes provisions to ensure that market-oriented approaches are
taken to the management of the resources of the deep seabed, replacing
Part XI's interventionist and centralized economic planning approach;
-- Scales back the institutions and links their activation and operation
to the actual development of concrete interest in deep seabed mining;
-- Guarantees the United States a seat on the Council of the
International Seabed Authority, where substantive decisions are made by
a chambered voting arrangement, the effect of which is to allow the
United States and two other industrialized countries acting in concert
to block a decision;
-- Guarantees the United States and other major contributors seats on
the Finance Committee which has jurisdiction over all budgetary and
financial matters;
-- Recognizes the seabed mine site claims established on the basis of
the exploration already conducted by United States companies and
provides assured access for any future qualified U.S. miners;
-- Deletes the provisions that would have allowed amendments to enter
into force for the United States without its approval; and
-- Provides that the United States can block funding for liberation
movements as distribution of revenues accumulated as a result of
royalties can only take place on the basis of a consensus decision in
the Council.
[End box]
March 19, 1996
To the top of this page