ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Blue Origin revealed

Posted: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 4:05 PM by Alan Boyle

After years of working behind closed doors and locked gates, Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos has finally lifted the curtain that shrouded Blue Origin, his space tourism venture.

Among the goodies now displayed on Blue Origin's Web site are photos and videos from the venture's maiden test flight in November, as seen from the ground as well as a rocket-cam ... pictures from the West Texas launch range and Blue Origin's production facility in a Seattle suburb ... and even the Blue Origin coat of arms, emblazoned with the motto "Gradatim Ferociter" (Step by Step, Courageously).


Blue Origin
Blue Origin's Goddard rocket ship sits on its pad just before a November test
launch. Click on the image to watch a
Blue Origin video, used with permission.

Bezos founded Blue Origin in 2000, with the aim of developing a new type of vertical-takeoff, vertical-landing rocket ship capable of taking passengers to the edge of space. At altitudes in excess of 62 miles (100 kilometers), customers should be able to scan Earth's curving expanse beneath a black sky, experience a few minutes of weightlessness and justifiably brag afterward that they've been to outer space. Blue Origin's current development schedule calls for commercial trips to start in 2010.

Details about the operation have been hard to come by. That bit about 2010, for example, comes from the environmental assessment that was required in order for the Federal Aviation Administration to approve test flights at the Blue Origin launch facility, built on Bezos' sprawling ranch near Van Horn, Texas. Even the illustration on the cover of the draft report was adapted from the design for the Delta Clipper, an earlier-generation rocket ship.

Blue Origin's freshly updated Web site gives the public its first look at Goddard, the rocket prototype that's being used for the initial round of test flights. The cute, conical craft - named after rocket pioneer Robert Goddard - can be seen rising from a circular pad of concrete to a height of about 285 feet (87 meters), then coming back down to a soft landing.

Nine thrusters are on the craft's underbelly. In its literature, Blue Origin says it's developing a peroxide/kerosene propulsion system, but upon reflection, the propellant here appears to be hydrogen peroxide.

Accompanying all the snazzy graphics is a letter from Bezos himself, in which he explains Blue Origin's lofty goal:

"We’re working, patiently and step-by-step, to lower the cost of spaceflight so that many people can afford to go and so that we humans can better continue exploring the solar system. Accomplishing this mission will take a long time, and we’re working on it methodically. We believe in incremental improvement and in keeping investments at a pace that's sustainable. Slow and steady is the way to achieve results, and we do not kid ourselves into thinking this will get easier as we go along. Smaller, more frequent steps drive a faster rate of learning, help us maintain focus, and give each of us an opportunity to see our latest work fly sooner."

He also touts Amazon.com's S3 servers (which are housing the data on the Web site) as well as job opportunities at Blue Origin. The photos show the brand-spanking-new digs at Blue Origin's production facility in Kent, Wash. ... cheering employees at the maiden launch in Texas ... and even a grinning Bezos holding a broken champagne cork ("Fortunately, our other valve operations went more smoothly," he joked). 

The employment angle appears to be the motivation behind the increased candor.

"As you noted, the new site does make more information available to potential applicants for positions at Blue Origin," Bruce Hicks, a Houston-based spokesman for the venture, told me in an e-mail.

The glasnost over Goddard still doesn't extend all the way, of course. For example, there's no mention of Blue Origin's second, less spectacular test run in December. In response to my inquiry about that, Hicks said, "I just want to remind you that we said previously we didn't plan to comment one way or another about tests, whether they are scheduled, were scheduled, happened, didn't happen, etc."

This means we'll just have to keep checking the FAA's notices to airmen for word of future tests.

Also, there's no reference to the potential price tag for the commercial flights to come. It may well be that Bezos hasn't yet set a price point (see "patiently and step-by-step," above).

For now, this week's revelations are enough: Based on the video of the first flight, it's clear that Blue Origin could give Armadillo Aerospace a serious run for NASA's money at the next Lunar Lander Challenge in New Mexico - just up the road a piece from Van Horn.

Update for 1:15 a.m. ET Jan. 4: Robin Snelson, who knows the ins and outs of the NASA competition as the creator of the Lunar Lander Challenge Web log, says Blue Origin's craft would be ineligible for the contest. Read her comments below for the details.

Update for 9:50 p.m. ET April 16: After rereading this, I saw that the item wasn't updated to reflect the use of a hydrogen peroxide monopropellant for this test rather than a peroxide/kerosene mix - so I've made the fix.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Still waiting for a flying pogo stick to take me from here to there!
Love the quest!
Margaret
Can't wait to take a picture of E.T. during my first flight!
Good luck to Jeff Bezos (and don't stop at the "edge" of space, either!).
Very cool. Thank the God for the risk takers. Nice to see the internet moguls are venturing forth into the final frontier.
Well, that looks very aerodynamic, NOT!
Just can't wait for a "million dollar flight" It will be the greatest.
Several folks have pointed out that the look of the Goddard is similar to that of the Japanese spaceship design known as the Kankoh Maru:

http://www.uchumaru.com/spaceship/kankohmaru.htm  
Tim, it doesn't need to be very aerodynamic. Won't spend long in the atmosphere, you know?
Actually, "Gradatim Ferociter" means "Step by Step, Aggressively/Ferociously/Defiantly/Arrogantly". That -iter at the end of the word makes it an adverb, and therefore 'ferociter' cannot be translated correctly with 'with'.

Liz, I went back and forth on "Ferociter" ... I think "fiercely" came close to the mark, and I started out with that. But it seemed to me that "fiercely" didn't strike the right tone for a motto, and certainly it's meant as a positive rather than a negative term ... which ruled out "arrogantly." A common translation is "with spirit, courageously," and so I went with "with courage" because that seemed to strike a heroic tone. But upon reflection, I've changed the word to "courageously." Actually, if you're in a "Star Trek" frame of mind, "boldly" wouldn't be a bad way to go.

Here's the beginning of a treatise on Tacitus' use of the word, which would favor a translation something like "with spirit" or "spiritedly":

http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0065-9711(1953)84%3C250%3ATUOF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-P  

Yours with sincerity,
Alan   ;-)

Vision, passion, dedication. Beyond impressive to see such forward-thinking. I look forward to seeing the future of Jeff's endeavors. Congrats.
Alan, unless the rules for Lunar Lander Challenge are changed for this year, Blue Origin won't be allowed to compete because New Shepard's fuel is on the list of banned propellants (hydrogen peroxide in concentration greater than 70 percent).
Glad to see private investment in space travel- the only real way this will EVER go forward as far as I'm concerned.  NASA has been a money pit for years...


As far as the linguistics go, how about the Japanese for  "ferociter"- "daitan-ni"?
"In response to my inquiry about that, Hicks said, 'I just want to remind you that we said previously we didn't plan to comment one way or another about tests, whether they are scheduled, were scheduled, happened, didn't happen, etc.' "


How nice.  I can only think that a philosophy like that makes it sooo simple to avoid telling the (potential ticket-buying) public about any screw-ups or failures of system unless forced to by public enquiry via legal means.  What kind of public relations philosophy is that for a company that wants to throw and eager public into space and bring them back for mega bucks?  Methinks I will not be trusting anyone with the Madison Avenue mentality trying to sell me rides into space.  Even NASA kills people in the business of trying to expand our world and species into the universe.  It's inherent in the technological challenges.  The public has every right to know everything before stepping aboard Wobbly Flight 106 to nowhere in particular.
Money pit for years? Microwave ovens? Semi Conductors? DOH!

Dear Don (Boyer),

Please try to relax.  No one is forcing you to go into space.  Why not grab a beer and sit out on one of those lovely Hawaii beaches and breathe deeply.

Don Boyer,

The company is far from manned flights of any significance, nothing but a few hundred meters in the near future. The initial design is based on the dcx (not some off the wall Japanese design as some have pointed out), a program which should not have been abandoned. (look what spacedev is doing with another goverment abandoned design (Dreamchaser). Lot based on dcx but other tech definitely proprietary, with the competition it makes sense to keep some stuff secret.

But guess some folks just have to find something to complain about , don't they.

The public has no right to know about the testing particulars of a private enterprise.  Only a moron would broadcast his fumbles and mistakes during the process of developing something completely new for the market.

Thank God bold, private entreprenuers are shouldering the mantle of space exploration that has proven too heavy for the overfunded NASA's girly shoulders.

Actually, the public does have a right to know about the testing of a publicly licensed suborbital spacecraft. Within limits, of course. At some point, when a spacecraft operator is ready to take on passengers, those passengers will be required to give their informed consent to take on the risk of flight. That means they'll have to be given sufficient information about the testing of that craft to gauge the risk.

At this very early stage, Blue Origin isn't required to talk about every hiccup in the unpiloted testing ... and I certainly respect that (although that won't keep me from trying to find out about the hiccups). But even now, if there are incidents that impact the uninvolved public, the authorities would have to be notified. That comes with the territory when you're working in an FAA-regulated field.

Nobody likes to publicize his or her fumbles and mistakes, but there are circumstances when you have to do it ... particularly when you're working with things that can blow up.

On a sunnier note, I think it's really great that Blue Origin is sharing the excitement of the enterprise with the general public and look forward to hearing and seeing more.

So appropriate that space travel is starting to shift to private funding. Just like the DARPANet/Internet conversion, and the shift to more private charitable contribs. Our society is voting with its dollars on what we think is important, and I'm excited to see where we go!
The design looks a tad clunky, but that's usually a matter of taste/choice. In the end it need only work to be beautiful. It's good to see yet another realize the horizon is not a limit but a beginning. Were it not for such we'd have to continue to settle for NASA's attempts which are proving to be lack-luster at best.

TRACKBACK: Click on the highlighted tag below to visit the Web site referring to this item:

"Cosmic Log has published a story titled Blue Origin Revealed, where you can read and learn about Blue Origin, which is Jeff Bezos aerospace company - see pictures and a short video of their successful maiden test flight of their Goddard rocket."

I think it's obvious that Bezos has only released this footage so that he can recruit some new people with heavy lifter experience. He's looking for people with experience with Delta IV or Atlas V, and those aren't small vehicles. Blue Origin isn't in the suborbital business like Scaled Composites and Branson, no matter what Bezos is saying right now they're playing a longer game and working towards an full-blown single stage to orbit lifter. I've written up some thoughts at :

http://www.babilim.co.uk/blog/
2007/01/first-launch-for-blue-origin.html

Can you buy tickets at Amazon? I buy everything else there. "Amazon" and you're done. Keep it up Jeff!

TRACKBACK: Click on highlighted link to visit the Web site referencing this item:

"Here is an example of why wacky Internet billionaires are so much better than stuffy old oil barons or steel magnates. ..."

It's the competition between moguls ( i.e. Branson, Bezos, Turner, Gates, et al) that public interests may benefit...I applaud all your efforts so that I may have opportunity. Way cool.

Armadillo Aerospace's John Carmack has some interesting observations on the Blue Origin revelations, which may support Alasdair's "longer game" hypothesis:

http://armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/
Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=340

Congrats to the Blue Origin Team!

It appears that they used hydrogen peroxide monopropellant rockets for the propulsion on this test. If anyone is intereted in learning more about hydrogen peroxide rockets and thier advantages please see the General Kinetics Inc. website - www.gkllc.com  

This is a neat looking project, but I have to wonder. . . With it being so far behind Scaled Composite's SpaceShipOne at this point, is it potentially superior to that system in any way? Can it/will it leapfrog the capabilities of SpaceShipOne, as the Apollo leapfrogged the Soviets to the moon, or is it too little too late, like mechanical television?

wg cannnon wrote:
>The initial design is based on the dcx (not some
>off the wall Japanese design as some have pointed
>out), a program which should not have been
>abandoned.

The 'design' is not 'based' on the DC-X though that was what the design was compared to in that both were VTVL vehicles. And I think you might want to look into the suggestions before you 'dismiss' them.

Let's start off that the 'design' is "not some
off the wall Japanese design" since it DOES resemble the design cited:

http://www.astronautix.com/craft/kanhmaru.htm
http://www.astronautix.com/gallery/ckahmaru.htm

[...]

Brad Hall wrote:
>This is a neat looking project, but I have to
>wonder. . .

It's not meant as a 'competitor' directly to Virgin, it's 'supposed' to use suborbital passengers to help offset costs of development along the way to an orbital vehicle.

>Robin Snelson, who knows the ins and outs of the
>NASA competition as the creator of the Lunar Lander
>Challenge Web log, says Blue Origin's craft would
>be ineligible for the contest.

Because of the H2O2? I'll say I'm not really 'surprised' given the standing NASA (and most American aerospace for that matter) bias (wrongly) against Hydrogen peroxide. Just because WE had problems with it in the early 40s, (who would have figured that otherwise brilliant "Rocket Scientists" would forget to put a 'safety' valve on a pressure tank?) and we based our entire rocket program on Germans who took so many short cuts with the substance that to hear THEIR experience with the stuff you'd think there was no safe way to handle the stuff at all.

But, given Americans 'bias' against anything WE didn't do well with, why should we listen to someone who had raving sucess' with the substance?

(After all the British didn't go to the Moon, Americans did.... The 'point' that they were around 20 years ahead of us on ICBM research before they 'dropped' out in the early 50s is of course 'beside' the point right :O)

- Randy

Right Time , Right place. Where Lonestar Aerospace Failed to launch in Midland in the 1980's Hopefully VanHorn will get a 'Go'. At LSA we were into Microwave powered (ground supply) Brown Seversky vehicles. Never got beyond the lab stage because we didn't have the funding. I think money is no object on this venture.
As I have always said, everything that can be done in space, should be done. This is the great experimental and exploration era of space flight for mankind, and will be remembered that way for centuries to come. A great turning point in history for humanity. "Break a Leg" Blue Origin !
It's an incredible waste of money, but it's his money to waste. At least it isn't coming from my pocket.
news
Alan Boyle,

Do you have a definition of publicly licensed vs. privately licensed?  I'd be willing to bet that you couldn't even get test flight data on a Boeing Jet that has already been issued a type certificate by the FAA. So what makes you think that on an experimental ticket, you or anyone else is entitled to the test data?  Just because the FAA may be the issuing authority, does not define your right to test data as public domain.
The motto Gradatim Ferociter actually translates best as:

"Step by Step, We Boldly Go..."

Which you can see has overtones in Bezo's mission, and of course significant historical reference.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=26062

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google