By Adrian Musolino
January 17th 2010 @ 3:13am (3 weeks ago)
Related coverage
Australian sport owes much to little old Adelaide
Tour Down Under - Adelaide.
Over 100,000 will gather in Adelaide’s CBD today to watch Lance Armstrong, Cadel Evans and their pro-cycling buddies – impressive for a city with just over one million inhabitants. Adelaide, so often derided by its eastern seaboard brethren as a backwater has, in fact, contributed much to the wider Aussie sporting landscape, be it cycling, motorsport and even rugby.
The Tour Down Under has grown exponentially over the past decade, fuelled in the last two years by the presence of Lance Armstrong, becoming the first event outside of Europe to be included on the UCI’s Pro Tour.
It was state government funding and support that helped the event develop beyond its formative stages, and Premier Mike Rann hasn’t hidden the fact that the government has dipped into its own pockets to attract the likes of Armstrong, knowing how crucial competitors of that calibre are to an event’s success.
Adelaide has an impressive history of not only attracting such international events to the state – particularly impressive when you consider its size – but also turning them into a success.
The Australian Formula 1 Grand Prix was Adelaide’s forerunner of its major sporting events – first held in 1985, becoming one of the most popular stops on the F1 tour.
South Australian government support was crucial in attracting the event; attempting to put Adelaide on the map and distinguishing it from Melbourne and Sydney to an international audience.
Without that state government investment and the success of the season-ending Adelaide race, it is unlikely Australia would be enjoying its current golden age in motorsport, which owes much to the knock-on effects of the race that helped to popularise all forms of motorsport in Australia.
When the race was lost to Melbourne, Adelaide rebounded with the Clipsal 500 for the V8 Supercar series – creating the template of a festive city event that is being replicated by races across the series, particularly in Sydney (Homebush).
Government investment was also crucial in bringing the Sevens Rugby tournament to the state, perhaps the strangest feather in Adelaide’s cap.
Although the South Australian Rugby Union board was established as far back as 1932, Adelaide is far from a rugby stronghold, with Aussie Rules the staple sporting diet for locals.
Adelaide’s League and Union footprint is almost non-existent (anyone remember the Adelaide Rams?), yet the state government, yet again, invested heavily to attract the event, which is popular with locals, fitting neatly into Adelaide’s congested opening few months of each year alongside the Tour Down Under, Clipsal 500 and various Arts and music festivals.
The idea of moving the Sevens tournament away from Adelaide to try and help expand the form of the game on the eastern seaboard was recently raised here on The Roar, and though the proposal won’t be well received in the city (Adelaidians have a fear of major events being stolen – see the Grand Prix), it is yet another example of how an Adelaide grown event could go on to substantially benefit the wider Australian landscape.
But few events are as well received as in Adelaide, which is deprived of so many world class acts, be it headline bands or major acts.
As a result the locals create a euphoric support for events in the state, and Adelaidians tend to idolise their sporting heroes like few others – to the point where a non-sporting friend told me he was concerned at how feverishly Adelaide was under the Armstrong spell and backing Premier Rann and his sporting investments.
Armstrong’s arrival into Adelaide unbelievably and inexcusably bumped the Haiti tragedy from the frontpage of the daily newspaper, The Advertiser, on Thursday.
When Armstrong sent out an invite to join him on a public ride through his Twitter page, approximately 5,000 accepted and joined him.
It’s a sports mad city, perhaps only truly rivalled by Melbourne, and on Friday night at Hindmarsh, with Armstrong stealing the headlines, this point was proven with the woeful and bottom of the table Adelaide United pulling yet another 10,000 plus crowd – an incredible phenomenon this season that I’ve explored previously.
Far from a backwater, Adelaide’s legacy and impact on Australian sport is immense.
When debating the sporting capital of Australia, Adelaide deserves a mention at minimum.
Like this content? Buzz it up!
Free Email updates:
Our daily emails are only sent if there is content for the sport or that author. You can subscribe to multiple daily emails; or get the daily Roar email with all our content in it. We value privacy. More...
(35)
Marshall said | January 17th 2010 @ 8:50am (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
Good investments like that make a big difference. As you say I find it odd they went after Sevens Rugby. Shows a committed govt on big events.
Marshall said | January 17th 2010 @ 8:57am (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
Just saw Mike Rann write this: So if you didn’t see Bradman bat, Pele score a goal, or Muhammed Ali fight, come and see Lance Armstrong ride in our own backyard.
He likes playing it up!
Michael C said | January 17th 2010 @ 8:29pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
I’d've thought Lance Armstrong sits pretty okay in that company, along with Tiger Woods ‘drive’ and Roger Federer forehand.
Mattay said | January 18th 2010 @ 8:04am (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
Surprised he didn’t add “and watch Mike Rann govern”. He sure rates himself ol’ Randy.
James said | January 17th 2010 @ 9:32am (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
Getting the Grand Prix was the biggest thing and was one of the defining moments in the history of Australian sport, not just for motorsport but all sport as it should how well Australia, even an unknown town like Adelaide, could run international events.
Forgetmenot said | January 17th 2010 @ 12:45pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
Yes Adelaide does seem to be very good at attracting new and relatively unknown events and then building them up for other cities to steal.
Before Armstrong came along i was thinking the the Tour Down Under could become one of the major events on the cycling calendar. While it is far from major at the moment, it is growing. Lance Armstrong coming here and participating is doing wonders for the sport.
Sporting Capital of Australia? Hnads down Melbourne,it is the Worlds sporting capital. Im not from Victoria and never have been.
jimbo said | January 17th 2010 @ 8:39pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
To be a sporting capital you must embrace all types of sports and all types of sportsmen and women.
Melbourne’s recent attempts to derail the FIFA WC bid and block any games to be played in Melbourne shows it is more interested in AFL than anything else.
AFL Capital of the World, more likely.
bever fever said | January 17th 2010 @ 8:53pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
D ribble, Melbourne is the reigning AFL. NRL, Aleague, Netball and basketball permier, it also has the Formula 1, Australian tennis open and has just built a stadium for its Super rugby, soccer and league team.
It also has one of the premier sporting groungs in the world (MCG) which has just recently hosted the boxing day test match and around 45 thousand people just turned up to a 20/20 state game.
It is also most certainly the AFL capital of the world, that is where your problem is, sou r grapes is all you have.
If soccer australia has been truthful with their bid all problems could have been avoided, why dont they just build their own grounds and not use other competing codes.
Tell me Jimbo, as you believe that Melbourne is not the sporting capital of this country then what is.
I have asked before but you got nada.
Mattay said | January 18th 2010 @ 8:06am (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
If you gave me the option of living in any city in the world for 12 months and being able to attend every sporting event in that city for that period, I would pick New York, London and Paris before Melbourne.
bever fever said | January 18th 2010 @ 8:36pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
I never said it was the sporting capital of the world and i can see some good points regarding New york and London and maybe the French open in Paris, but call me nieve but what else does Paris have am i missing something….. a bike race. maybe !!
Actually Melbourne stacks up pretty well against these other cities.
Beast-A-Tron said | January 17th 2010 @ 10:56pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
“Melbourne’s recent attempts to derail the FIFA WC bid”
I was unaware the Lord Mayor was undertaking such actions.
So apparently Melbourne does not embrace soccer, as I’ve heard often? I suspect it is a continual source of embarrassment (& cognitive dissonance) for certain anti-football zealots parroting the above line; seeing as Melbourne fields the best A-League crowds. Not to mention Victory dominating the A-Leagues’ short existence.
For a state that does not “embrace all types of sports and all types of sportsmen and women” as you infer, it can sure turn out a crowd for sporting events. So what does that make the rest of the state capitals?
Marshall said | January 17th 2010 @ 12:56pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
I was waiting for someone to go with the building the events to be stolen angle.
BigAl said | January 17th 2010 @ 2:21pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
Not to put too fine a point on it – but sport ALWAYS thrives when/where there is little else to do.
Marshall said | January 17th 2010 @ 2:51pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
Not always. Look at Canberra and Tasmania.
Robbo said | January 17th 2010 @ 5:36pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
Canberra – home to the Brumbies (one of the premier rugby clubs in the world).
It’s beside the point – Adelaide is some three times bigger than Canberra or Tasmania. In any case all they have is some heavily subsidised cycling event that can’t sustain itself without millions of dollars from the taxpayer.
There is nothing special about Adelaide – for a city of over a million it hasn’t accomplished a lot.
slickwilly said | January 17th 2010 @ 4:08pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
strange, but the article makes only one reference (and a fleeting one at that) to afl football.
Marshall said | January 18th 2010 @ 9:02am (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
The sporting world doesn’t revolve around the AFL.
slickwilly said | January 18th 2010 @ 10:54am (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
a rather cynical take on the point i was making – correct me if im wrong but the author was highlighting Adelaides influence on the Australian sporting calander (an influence that exists in spite of the backwater view many on the eastern seaboard have towards the city) – this being the authors premise, one would reasonably assume afl football would rate more of a mention than what the author gave given its dominance in SA
Billo said | January 17th 2010 @ 7:39pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
An English friend of mine emigrated to Adelaide about 18 months ago, and already his eight-year-old son is an Aussie Rules fanatic who loves playing the game.
I seem to recall that the Rams attracted quite respectable crowds, and I would hope that Adelaide would eventually have clubs in the NRL and the Super 15.
Mattay said | January 18th 2010 @ 10:33am (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
The Rams did okay while playing at Adelaide Oval. Once it was moved to Hindmarsh the crowds dropped and unfortunately that’s what most people remember. All the more reason for the city stadium which we’ll no doubt hear more about heading towards the March 2010 state election.
Marshall said | January 17th 2010 @ 9:01pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
@Robbo, I disagree. Look at the Grand Prix – a huge international event, followed by Clipsal which is the best attended V8 race and the Tour Down Under, Sevens Rugby etc.
Marshall said | January 17th 2010 @ 9:53pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
Also, Adelaide United are at the bottom of the table and get 10,000, Sydney are fighting for the premiership and get 15,000 for a top of the table clash.
jimbo said | January 17th 2010 @ 10:39pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
Sydney people are a bit fussier with their attendances – 85K sell outs for the Socceroos and Beckham but only 14K avge for SFC.
But if SFC win the minor premiership and a home GF against MVFC, then they’d probably sell out the Olympic Stadium again.
Redb said | January 18th 2010 @ 11:03am (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
As a frequent visitor to Adelaide including for sport I can only say this is article is typical of the small town attitude amongst the locals.
All cities have their hubris, but this is a gem. Sorry Adrian, but Adelaide is hardly a major contributor to Australian sport, it plays its part, but not in the league of Melbourne or Sydney, or Brisbane for that matter.
Redb
Marshall said | January 18th 2010 @ 11:40am (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
Think a lot of people are missing the point, particularly about how important Adelaide bringing the Grand Prix to Australia was and what an impact that had on all Australian sport. Victorians love to use the GP has proof of how their sports mad, but it was Adelaide’s and the race helped put Australia on the map, particularly in Europe. The Tour Down Under is doing that also, particularly as it incorporates country SA
True Tah said | January 18th 2010 @ 11:47am (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
That begs the question, how did Adelaide lose the GP to Melbourne in the first place?
As someone with minimal interest in motorsport, the only real memory I have of the Adelaide GP is when Schumacher bumped Nigel Mansell off the track in 1994 (?).
Marshall said | January 18th 2010 @ 11:52am (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
Because they paid more $$$. Remember F1 is ruled by $ not loyalty. The point is Adelaide and the SA government got it in Australia in the first place. PS: It was Damon Hill that Schumacher took out.
Redb said | January 18th 2010 @ 12:38pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
I think you’ve hit the nail on the head, the writer is a motor sport nut and this has skewed his view of motor racing’s importance in OZ. Sure the V8’s are a big deal thhse days but still behind the major sports.
The Bathhurst 1000 is arguably the most influentional motor racing event in Australia’s history and that is in central-western NSW.
Swimming is more significant than motor racing and for that you would look to Queensland and NSW primarily.
Redb
Redb said | January 18th 2010 @ 12:35pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
“Victorians love to use the GP has proof of how their sports mad”
Do they?
The GP was important for about 5 minutes in the mid 1990s when Victoria’s economy was down the rabbit hole and Kennett used the poaching of the event to lift some confidence in the State. Worked as well, Victoria/Melbourne has never looked back.
The F1 GP is the least important of the big sporting events in Melbourne and is well behind the AFL Grand Final, Melbourne Cup, Boxing Day test and Aust Open tennis in the collective Melbourne sporting conscious.
Redb
Beast-A-Tron said | January 18th 2010 @ 4:45pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
“but it was Adelaide’s and the race helped put Australia on the map”
I can agree the Adelaide street circuit was superior to the Melbourne GP.
Rohan said | January 18th 2010 @ 3:31pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
…but hardly a patch on melbourne’s sporting capital of the world hubris!
Marshall said | January 18th 2010 @ 1:04pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
Redb, that says a lot in itself. The Grand Prix was a huge deal in Adelaide and in Melbourne it’s hardly noticed. I think you’re underestimating the popularity of F1 around the world and the sort of viewership it gets, hence exposure for Adelaide and Australia.
Redb said | January 18th 2010 @ 1:10pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
“The Grand Prix was a huge deal in Adelaide and in Melbourne it’s hardly noticed”
Now your getting it, and you just contradicted yourself from a previous post.
Redb
Lazza said | January 18th 2010 @ 3:42pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
Well besides the F1 and the Australian Open how many truly World Class sporting events does Melbourne host? Can you afford to lose one of them and still call yourself a ’sporting capital’?
Sporting capital of Australia perhaps, sporting backwater to everyone else.
True Tah said | January 18th 2010 @ 3:54pm (3 weeks ago) | Report comment
Lazza as a sandgrouper you might be subjective, but when will Adelaide ever host the Olympics?
Melbourne has hosted the Olympic Games, Commonwealth Games, futbol world cup qualifiers, bledisloe cup matches, British and Irish lions matches, state of origin matches. Not to mention Tiger Woods “playing” last year.
This is on top of everything else mentioned (AFL grand final, F1, Australian open, cricket). Plus having the most successful team in Australian domestic futbol, and the best NRL team in recent years.
Plus the MCG was voted by the average Pom as one of the top 5 sports venues in the world outside the UK, interestingly it was the only non-futbol stadium to make the cut).
And Marshall, if the Grand Prix was such a huge deal for Adelaide, then why the hell did the SA Government let Jeff Kennett outbid it?
Adelaide is a relatively small city, and while it has made a worthwhile contribution to Australian sport at times, some of the stuff on here is ludicrous. Most of the athletic talent in SA gets funnelled into Australian football, and thus most of the rest of the world cant appreciate their achievements sadly.