U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE COORDINATOR FOR COUNTERTERRORISM REMARKS BY PHILIP C. WILCOX, JR. FEBRUARY 8, 1995 Remarks by Philip C. Wilcox, Jr. Coordinator for Counterterrorism before the National Jewish Community Relations Advisory Council Omni Shoreham Hotel February 8, 1995 Terrorism has been a threat to civil society since time immemorial, and it is very much in the headlines today. Though terrorists are a tiny, deviant minority, their brutal attacks against innocent civilians take a heavy toll on security and well being around the world. The vivid images of terrorism in the media make the horror of terrorism all the more shocking and real. This morning I want to review the threat from terrorism today and the danger it poses to the Middle East peace process. I will also offer some thoughts on terrorism and Islam, and explain U.S. counterterrorism efforts. One reason for our deep concern about terrorism is that for decades Americans have been targeted abroad. Today, we know that international terrorists can also strike here at home, as we learned from the World Trade Center bombing in 1993, and the related case of a conspiracy to bomb other targets in New York, which is now being tried. The other reason why terrorism is such a high priority for us is the danger it poses to our friends abroad and our foreign policy interests, for example, to the Middle East peace process, which is once again a prime terrorist target. First, let's look at the global situation, where the picture is mixed. The good news is that acts of international terrorism in 1994 were at their lowest point in 23 years: there were 321 incidents, compared to 665 at the high point in 1987. What are the reasons for this decline? -- There is a growing consensus among nations that terrorism is beyond the pale and must be stopped, and there is increasing international cooperation to this end. -- Our policy of success in identifying states which sponsor terrorism, isolating them and bringing sanctions to bear has also paid off. -- The fall of the old Soviet Union, and the communist states of Eastern Europe, which gave aid and comfort to many terrorist groups, is another reason for this positive trend. -- South Africa's decision to choose reconciliation over confrontation, and the move away from violence toward accommodation in Northern Ireland, other signs of change -- Finally, the historic shift in the Middle East toward peace between Arabs and Israelis, and the decision of the PLO to forswear violence and negotiate with Israel, has started a process of reconciliation between former enemies. Nevertheless, other newer groups are fighting a vicious rear guard actions to defeat the peace process, and this recent upsurge of terror, primarily by the Islamic extremist groups Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and Hizballah, against Israeli and Jewish targets is one of the major negative factors in the global terrorism scene. -- Examples of this campaign to undermine the peace process include: -- The World Trade Center bombing in 1993 and the related conspiracy now being tried, involved Islamic extremists implacably opposed to Israel and the United States to thwart the peace process; -- The suicide bombing of the AMIA Jewish cultural center in Buenos Aires in July, 1994, apparently by Hizballah, which had claimed responsibility for an almost identical bombing of the Israeli Embassy there in 1992; -- The bombing of a Panamanian commuter aircraft in July 1994, killing 21, of whom three were American citizens and eleven were Jewish; -- Attacks on the Israeli Consulate and a building housing Jewish organizations in London; and -- A series of terrorist acts in Israel and in the West Bank and Gaza, including the attack on Palestinians in Hebron last February, and a wave of terrorist attacks and bombings against Israelis, the horrific bombing in Natanya January 22, which killed 21 Israelis was the most recent example of this vicious campaign. These attacks are a desperate effort to reverse the historic decision by the Israeli government and the PLO to make peace. They are also an effort by religious extremists to turn the Arab-Israeli dispute into a religious war. We must not underestimate the damage of terrorism to security and to confidence in the peace process. But there is a strong determination among Israelis and Palestinian leaders to redouble their efforts toward peace and to marginalize the terrorists. As Secretary Christopher has said, the terrorists who oppose the peace process are waging a "rear guard action designed to return the Middle East to a tragic path of fear and conflict" President Clinton has made clear on many occasions that these groups are a vestige of the past and cannot be allowed to succeed. So the answer to the terrorists is not to surrender to their demands and curtail the peace process. The answer is for the parties and those who support peace to work more closely and cooperatively: a better efforts by the Palestinian Authority in dealing with those engaged in and planning terror; the demonstrated commitment by Israel and the PLO to the Oslo process; and the importance in promoting assistance to the Palestinians and economic development in Gaza and the West Bank. Showing the fruits of peace is a powerful weapon against its enemies. As Secretary Christopher has said, "a peace that is just and secure for all the peoples of the Middle East is the best answer to the terrorists." Terrorism by Islamic extremists threatens, not only the peace process, but society and governments elsewhere; for example in Algeria, where the Armed Islamic group has waged a campaign of violence, and in Egypt where the Gamaat al Islammiya has attacked government officials and foreign tourists. It is important to distinguish between these extremists groups who use violence and terror in the name of Islam to pursue their ambitions for power, and the great majority of Muslims who abhor violence. Fortunately, most Americans reject the old false stereotype which linked Islam with violence and terror. The basic tenets of Islam, like Judaism and Christianity, teach peace and non-violence. We should also dismiss the scare scenario, advanced by some, of a looming confrontation between a militant, united Islamic world, hostile to the U.S., Israel and the secular West. There is no doubt that political Islam is a growing phenomenon today. But the Islamic world, stretching from Senegal to Indonesia, is infinitely varied. It has secular, reformist and fundamentalist adherents, moderates, militants, democrats and autocrats. There is no doubt that many Muslims in some countries who feel alienated and frustrated by poverty and the failure of governments to meet their expectations, are attracted by the appeal of political Islam. Yet Islamic extremist groups who have attempted to impose their will have largely failed. Iran and Sudan the only two countries where militant islamists have seized power, have few friends in the Islamic world and are hardly viewed as the wave of the future. We are confident, in any case, that terrorists who fly the flag of Islam are a small minority. We oppose the zealots who oppose peace, and we are confident they will fail. And we do not view Islam as the next "ism" confronting the West. Let me turn, now to what the Clinton administration and other nations are doing to combat terrorism - and I can assure you we are doing a lot. The Executive order number 12947 banning funding from U. S. sources of groups which threaten the Middle East peace process, and the draft Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995, which the President will soon submit to the Congress, are recent examples of the high priority of counterterrorism on our foreign policy agenda. There are three main tenets of U. S. counterterrorism policy: -- The first is to identify those states which give direction, support, or refuge to terrorists, to impose sanctions against them, and to mobilize other governments to join in these efforts. -- Iran, the most active state sponsor today, continues to assassinate dissidents and to provide direction and support to terrorist groups to undermine the peace process. Iranian terror has been curbed by sanctions, but it remains a threat, especially through its direction and support for the Lebanese Hizballah and its support for Hamas and the Palestinians for Islamic Jihad. -- Libyan terrorism has been sharply reduced by sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council, as a result of the bombings of Pan Am 103 and UTA 722. But Libya still defies its obligation to hand over the perpetrators of these crimes, and we will not rest until they are brought to justice. -- Iraqi terror has also been limited by international sanctions, although Saddam Hussein has continued to murder dissidents and to attack foreign relief personnel in Northern Iraq. -- Cuba, North Korea, Sudan, and Syria are the other nations we have designated as state sponsors. Syria is now engaged in peace negotiations with Israel, and Damascus has not been directly involved in acts of terrorism since 1986. But Syria continues to allow terrorist groups, like the Palestinian Islamic Jihad which committed the bombings in Israel on January 22, a presence in Damascus. And until this problem is resolved, Syria will remain on our list. -- The second principle of our policy is to refuse to make deals with terrorists. Past experience, for example, the ultimate release of our hostages in Lebanon shows the success of that policy. The third tenet of our policy is to reinforce the rule of law, and to support law enforcement cooperation among governments against terrorist crimes. Real progress has been made in this area. For example, there are also eleven international treaties and conventions on international cooperation to prosecute various terrorist crimes, whereas in 1985, there were only five such agreements. The U.S. government is deeply involved in an active program of consultations with diplomats, law enforcement and intelligence officials of other governments who share our concern about terrorism. Since terrorism is a global phenomenon, these cooperative links are critical. The Department of State has provided counterterrorism training to over 18,000 officials in fifty nations over the last decade through our Anti-Terrorism Assistance program. The U.S. also has an excellent program of counterterrorism research and development, in which we cooperate with the UK, Canada and Israel. Growing international cooperation against terrorism has manifested itself in other ways as well. -- The UN General Assembly passed a strong resolution last year condemning terrorism in all its forms and state support for terrorists. -- The Organization of American States, at the recent Summit of the Americas, launched a Plan of Action against Terrorism and called for a hemispheric conference on the subject. -- And the Organization of the Islamic Conference, representing the States in the Islamic world adopted a resolution condemning terrorism at its annual meeting last year. These effort by the U.S. and other nations have done much to curb international terrorism. But terrorists continue to strike at innocent civilians around the world, and their campaign against the Middle East peace process is a particular danger. If history is any guide, terrorists will persist, with new techniques and targets, even as the majority of the world's people reject terrorism and strengthen their defenses. A strong, vigilant, resourceful counterterrorism effort by the U.S. and other nations is critical to combat this menace, and let me assure you again that this will continue to be among the highest priorities of the Clinton Administration. (###)