homefeedbacksupportlog on 1-Feb-2010 
  About F1000

 What is F1000?
 Key features
 How it's organized
 FAQs
 Faculties and sections
 Scope of sections
 Intl Advisory Board
 List of Faculty Members
 Associate Faculty Members
 The evaluation system
 Citing F1000
 Take a tour of the site
 Accessing fulltexts
 PubMed linkout
 How to subscribe
 Academic subscriptions
 Corporate subscriptions
 Try F1000 for free
 Who we are
 Media information
 Librarian resources
 Press releases
 In the press
 Developing countries
 F1000 Medicine
 Terms and conditions
 Privacy policy
 Contact us

Faculty of 1000 in the Press

 Faculty of 1000 Biology in the Press                   2001  |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  200520062008

2008

"Reviewing Peer Review" by Bruce Alberts, Brooks Hanson and Katrina L Kelner
Read online
Science: July 4, 2008 (Vol. 321, no. 5885, p. 15) DOI: 10.1126/science.1162115

"Efforts like the Faculty of 1000, where experts scan a large set of biology journals and select the best contributions wherever published, can be very helpful. Such efforts can reduce the pressures that many group leaders feel from young scientists, who often place undue emphasis on publishing in a few high-profile journals--where the criteria used for evaluation may not match their research, no matter how valuable the contribution.""

"100th PLoS ONE article evaluated at Faculty of 1000 Biology" by Niyaz Ahmed
Read online
'Support Open Access with dignity and determination' --- Blog of Niyaz Ahmed - Pathobiologist, Veterinarian, and Section Editor of PLoS ONE: July 17, 2008.

"...for a broad based and high volume journal..., the F1000 evaluations constitute important quality indexes for individual articles...This is especially relevant when a much debated bibliometric index such as the 'impact factor' is becoming increasingly irrelevant."

2006

Rejecting arrogance
Read online    PDF
E Marder: Current Biology 2006 Feb 7 16(3):R70.

" ... the success of 'Faculty of 1000'... argues that there are successful models for the field to communicate value [of a paper] other than through the rejection rate of the journal in which a paper is published . "

2005

"Open Access in Social and Cultural Science: Innovative Moves to Enhance Access, Inclusion and Impact in Scholarly Communication" by Chris Armbruster
Read online    PDF
Social Science Research Network (SSRN) : November 15, 2005

" Faculty of 1000 highlights important contributions to knowledge and outlines their relevance...Continuously, [providing] readers with a rapidly evolving insider’s evaluation of new research. The merit of the individual paper counts. "

"Impact Factors Run Into Competition: Researchers look for other ways to evaluate a paper's importance" by Richard Monastersky
Read online
The Chronicle of Higher Education : October 14, 2005

" As the disenchantment over impact factors grows, some new tools are emerging that will help scientists and administrators evaluate colleagues and their research. Faculty of 1000...uses a stable of hand-picked specialists to rate new biology papers. "

"Sussing Out the Search Engines" by ML Baker
Read online
eWEEK : January 20, 2005

" It's a good way to figure out what's new and exciting in a particular piece of research... The searches on the site are a good way to find articles that might have otherwise escaped notice.... "

2004

The Secret of (Almost) Original Thinking
Read online
Next Wave : Science magazine 19 Sept 2003

" ...time demands mean that postdocs can no longer fritter away half a day in the library scouring obscure journals as they used to as graduate students...A lot of this general fishing around can be made much easier with Web sites such as the Faculty of 1000... "

Public peer review - An alternative to impact factors
Read online
Current Science 2004 87(4) :419-420

" ...an invaluable source of information for all those who want to keep abreast of scientific literature. "

(n.b. All Institutes in India are eligible for Free access to F1000 via Faculty member sponsorship: more details.)

The Science Advisory Board
Read online
Scientific & Medical Links : The Faculty of 1000

" Provides scientists with a continuously updated insider's guide to the most important papers within any given field of research. "

"Changing Scientific Publishing" Science letter
Read online
Science 13 August 2004, 305(5686):945-946

"Because this new online service [F1000] evaluates each paper solely on its merits, it is beginning to make the journal in which a paper appears much less relevant."

"Pictogram"
Read online
Pictogram 1, Feb/Mar 2004: Interview with Wil Konings (in Dutch, excerpt translated):

"Impact Factors and citations simply don't tell you everything. It is, of course, significant if your article is accepted by a journal with a certain reputation. That remains the case, but F1000 adds something to it: your article is selected and considered worthy of submitting a judgement by 'big-name' scientists. I know of a colleague from the USA who used his F1000 rating to underline the case for his promotion with the [University's] Governing Board."

2003

New Research Evaluation Tool for the CNRS
Read online
Science magazine: Next Wave: European Science Bytes 1 August 2003

"Heads of research at CNRS will use Faculty of 1000 Biology as part of EvalSciences, an experimental service provided by INIST, the highly specialised document centre of CNRS, which is currently available to 60 individuals at CNRS who evaluate research within the organisation."

"ALPSP Learned Publishing"
Read online
Learned Publishing Oct 2003, 16(4):249 -- 258 DOI: 10.1087/095315103322421982

"What's needed is the technology to manage the explosion of information. By being selective, one is better able to assemble the most significant information into knowledge."

"Improving science through online commentary" Nature Correspondence
Read online
Nature 2003, 423 (6943): 918

"[Faculty of 1000 Biology provides] independent scientific assessment of published papers directly linked to PubMed"

" eMJA: Medical Journal of Australia "
Read online
eMJA (2003 178 (6): 280-281)

"[An] initiative to highlight meritorious papers..."Faculty of 1000" (F1000) aims to identify the best papers in the basic biological sciences through the eyes of a "faculty" of over 1000 selected scientists who are experts in their fields. The experts also briefly explain their choices. We applaud this initiative."

"Bionieuws"
Link to Bionieuws / Read online [ translated page ]
Bionieuws 5 14 March 2003

"F1000 is a peer review system that lets experts pick out the best "cherries". Impact factors do indicate - as it were - on which trees most of the best cherries might be found, but a lot of them are still hidden from view. F1000 tries to bring all the cherries to the fore."

"Coolsites - Faculty of 1000"
Read online
Emerald Abstracts February 2003

"[Faculty of 1000] presents an interesting model...for deciding which are the most important academic publications. The site is well designed and fast."

"Getting Wired: Google's Biological Future?" by Glyn Moody
Read online
Computer Weekly 16 January 2003 p.34

"A service that uses real people... is helping academics find data online"

2002

Internet Resources Newsletter
Read online
Internet Resources Newsletter October 2002

"All in all it [Faculty of 1000] is a wonderful idea, and so simple really, the best ideas often are"

FOS News
Read online
FOS News 29 September 2002

"The judges were particularly impressed by the fact that eminent researchers in the biological sciences are selecting from current literature articles and posting brief commentaries to the web site. This is producing a kind of post publication review system, which is easy to use, up-to-date and customisable to suit personal research areas"

ALPSP website
Read online
ALPSP website September 2002

"BioMed Central's Faculty of 1000 won the award for Publishing Innovation"

The Technology Source
Read online
The Technology Source, September 2002

" BMC sells very attractive add-ons to the free literature, such as the Faculty of 1000 recommendation service "

Journal of Biology
Read online
Journal of Biology1 :3 18 June 2002

" One of BioMed Central's most alluring auxiliary services is Faculty of 1000, a recommendation service harnessing a network of disciplinary experts to recommend the best new work in a large number of biomedical specializations. "

Access
Read online
Access, Number 41, June 2002

" Faculty of 1000, the new online literature evaluation service published by BioMed Central, is planning to make itself freely available to institutions in the world's poorest countries through the World Health Organisation's Access to Research Initiative. Furthermore, the publisher will offer researchers involved with Faculty of 1000 the chance to nominate institutions in other developing countries for a sponsored free subscription "

UKSG Serial News
Read online
UKSG Serial News, Number 16, 28 May 2002

" As a direct consequence of this arrangement, many thousands of researchers in developing countries will have access to Faculty of 1000 evaluations on the most important research papers published in the life sciences "

Nieuwsbrief Universiteitsbibliotheek
Read online (in Dutch)
Nieuwsbrief Universiteitsbibliotheek, number 16, 15 March 2002

"[Faculty of 1000 is] conceptually a major step forward in the way scientific information is presented, with the potential of becoming the first real alternative to the flawed Impact Factor ratings. " (translation)

ELSO Gazette
All change at BioMed Central as it introduces new services and charges
Read online (registration required)
ELSO Gazette, Number 9, March 2002

" The service [Faculty of 1000] is especially useful for those who want to keep up with developments outside their field. "

Serials
Faculty of 1000: A way of identifying what are currently considered the most interesting research articles in biology
Read online (subscription required)
Serials, volume 15, no 1, March 2002

" The service is dynamic, updated every day, but also keeps an archive of all listings, fully accessible and searchable for subscribers. "

Nature Medicine
Recommended reading?
Read online (subscribers only)
Nature Medicine
January 2002, Vol 8 No.1 page 1

"The lists of faculty members reveal at a glance that each area is populated by some of the best
names in the field... It is the best means yet for younger researchers to learn what the senior investigators
in their field deem important"


One minor correction for the record: only 20% of evaluated articles were from Nature, Cell and Science rather than 30% as quoted. This figure has now fallen to 16%.

Chemical and Engineering News

A guide to digital literature
Chemical and Engineering News
7 January 2002, Vol 80 pp. 30-33

Interactive Media International: Digital Media in Context
The imi interview: Vitek Tracz, BioMed Central
Interactive Media International
January 2002

“We see the F1000 factor not so much as an alternative [to the impact factor] as an addition. I do think that in some way it’s going to be a better method because it gives a lot of information about why a paper is interesting.”

2001

Library Journal Online Databases: BioMed Central Meeting abstracts and Faculty of 1000
Read online
Library Journal 15 December 2001

“The company is creating a unique service for research scientists that systematically highlights and evaluates the most interesting papers published in the biological sciences”

The Scientist
Watch for changes in 2002
Read online
The Scientist 10 December 2001

“The first new content element to be added to The Scientist will be reviews of significant new research, as identified and ranked by the Faculty of 1000.”

Internet Resources Newsletter
Faculty of 1000
Read online
Internet Resources Newsletter December 2002

"A unique service for research scientists that systematically highlights and evaluates the most interesting papers published in the biological sciences, based on the recommendations of over 1000 leading researchers."

Trends in Ecology and Evolution
The Online service for keeping up with the biological literature
Read online (subscribers only)
Trends in Ecology & Evolution November 2001

“At last there is hope for those of us who feel overwhelmed with the explosion of scientific papers that are relevant to our teaching and research needs. A new online service called Faculty of 1000 (http://www.facultyof1000.com) draws on the expertise of over 1400 leading biologists in areas that range from evolution and biotechnology to genomics and plant–environment interactions.”

Chemical & Engineering News
SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CONCENTRATES
Chemical & Engineering News
26 November 2001, page 23

Lisnews.com: Library and Information Science News
Faculty of 1000
Read online
Lisnews.com 18 November 2001

The Charleston Advisor
BioMed Central launch next generation scientific literature recommendation service
Read online
The Charleston Advisor 14 November 2001

The Chronicle of Higher Education
New Online Service Lets Biologists Vote on Most Important Articles
Read online
The Chronicle of Higher Education 13 November 2001

“Faculty of 1000 is one of several new online services that are challenging the role of traditional academic journals”

ESBnotizie
Faculty of 1000 (in Italian)
Read online
ESBnotizie November 2001

 


© 1999-2010 Faculty of 1000 Ltd unless otherwise stated. < info@f1000.com >   Terms and conditions   Legal info