Relationship Secrets for Highly Empathic People

What's Your Reaction:

Loneliness gets to some more than others. But why it hangs on isn't always apparent when read by traditional medical eyes. In my psychiatric practice in Los Angeles and in my workshops I've been struck by how many sensitive, empathic people who I call "emotional empaths" come to me, lonely, wanting a romantic partner, yet remaining single for years. Or else they're in relationships but feel constantly fatigued and overwhelmed. The reason isn't simply that "there aren't enough emotionally available people 'out there,'" nor is their burnout "neurotic." Personally and professionally, I've discovered that something more is going on.

In "Emotional Freedom" I describe emotional empaths as a species unto themselves. Whereas others may thrive on the togetherness of being a couple, for empaths like me, too much togetherness can be difficult, may cause us to bolt. Why? We tend to intuit and absorb our partner's energy, and become overloaded, anxious, or exhausted when we don't have time to decompress in our own space. We're super-responders; our sensory experience of relationship is the equivalent of feeling objects with 50 fingers instead of five. Energetically sensitive people unknowingly avoid romantic partnership because deep down they're afraid of getting engulfed. Or else, they feel engulfed when coupled, a nerve-wracking, constrictive way to live. If this isn't understood, empaths can stay perpetually lonely. We want companionship, but, paradoxically, it doesn't feel safe. One empath patient told me, "It helps explain why at 32 I've only had two serious relationships, each lasting less than a year." Once we empaths learn to set boundaries and negotiate our energetic preferences, intimacy becomes possible.

For emotional empaths to be at ease in a relationship, the traditional paradigm for coupling must be redefined. Most of all, this means asserting your personal space needs -- the physical and time limits you set with someone so you don't feel they're on top of you. Empaths can't fully experience emotional freedom with another until they do this. Your space needs can vary with your situation, upbringing, and culture. My ideal distance to keep in public is at least an arm's length. In doctors' waiting rooms I'll pile my purse and folders on the seats beside me to keep others away.

With friends it's about half that. With a mate it's variable. Sometimes it's rapture being wrapped in his arms; later I may need to be in a room of my own, shut away. One boyfriend who truly grasped the concept got me a "Keep Out" sign for my study door! For me, this was a sign of true love. All of us have an invisible energetic border that sets a comfort level. Identifying and communicating yours will prevent you from being bled dry by others. Then intimacy can flourish, even if you've felt suffocated before. Prospective mates or family members may seem like emotional vampires when you don't know how to broach the issue of personal space. You may need to educate others -- make clear that this isn't about not loving them -- but get the discussion going. Once you can, you're able to build progressive relationships.

If you're an empath or if the ordinary expectations of coupledom don't jibe with you practice the following tips.

Define your personal space needs

Tip 1. What to say to a potential mate

As you're getting to know someone, share that you're a sensitive person, that you periodically need quiet time. The right partner will be understanding; the wrong person will put you down for being "overly sensitive," and won't respect your need.

Tip 2. Clarify your preferred sleep style

Traditionally, partners sleep in the same bed. However, some empaths never get used to this, no matter how caring a mate. Nothing personal; they just like their own sleep space. Speak up about your preferences. Feeling trapped in bed with someone, not getting a good night's rest, is torture. Energy fields blend during sleep, which can overstimulate empaths. So, discuss options with your mate. Separate beds. Separate rooms. Sleeping together a few nights a week. Because non-empaths may feel lonely sleeping alone, make compromises when possible.

Tip 3. Negotiate your square footage needs

You may be thrilled about your beloved until you live together. Experiment with creative living conditions so your home isn't a prison. Breathing room is mandatory. Ask yourself, "What space arrangements are optimal?" Having an area to retreat to, even if it's a closet? A room divider? Separate bathrooms? Separate houses? I prefer having my own bedroom/office to retreat to. I also can see the beauty of separate wings or adjacent houses if affordable. Here's why: conversations, scents, coughing, movement can feel intrusive. Even if my partner's vibes are sublime, sometimes I'd rather not sense them even if they're only hovering near me. I'm not just being finicky; it's about maintaining well-being if I live with someone.

Tip 4. Travel wisely

Traveling with someone, you may want to have separate space too. Whether my companion is romantic or not, I'll always have adjoining rooms with my own bathroom. If sharing a room is the only option, hanging a sheet as a room divider will help. "Out of sight" may make the heart grow fonder.

Tip 5. Take regular mini-breaks

Empaths require private downtime to regroup. Even a brief escape prevents emotional overload. Retreat for five minutes into the bathroom with the door shut. Take a stroll around the block. Read in a separate room. One patient told her boyfriend, "I need to disappear into a quiet room for ten minutes at a party, even if I'm having fun," a form of self-care that he supports.

In my medical practice, I've seen this creative approach to relationships save marriages and make ongoing intimacies feel safe, even for emotional empaths (of all ages) who've been lonely and haven't had a long-term partner before. Once you're able to articulate your needs, emotional freedom in your relationships is possible.

 

Follow Judith Orloff MD on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JudithOrloffMD

Loneliness gets to some more than others. But why it hangs on isn't always apparent when read by traditional medical eyes. In my psychiatric practice in Los Angeles and in my workshops I've been struc...
Loneliness gets to some more than others. But why it hangs on isn't always apparent when read by traditional medical eyes. In my psychiatric practice in Los Angeles and in my workshops I've been struc...
 
Comments
447
Pending Comments
1
View FAQ
Our moderators screen these comments before they are published
You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next ›  Last »   (11 pages total)
Show: 
photo
K Fairweather   23 minutes ago (12:05 AM)
Dr. Orloff, thank you for articulating the needs of the empath. I've been categorized as being "emotionally unavailable" whenever I needed space from my partner. And he was right. I wasn't present when I needed my solitude.

I am curious: Do you think two empaths have a better chance of connecting and having an intimate relationship, while keeping their need for isolation inviolate?

Perhaps I need to be with fellow empath.
photo
Roxana Bravo   3 hours ago (9:25 PM)
Guess I'm one of those emotional empaths....it's great to know that I'm not alone... :)
photo
Mark Whittington   5 hours ago (7:48 PM)
there may be such a thing as 'highly empathic people'...but i doubt it. I used to use this word on myself. Then i discovered what a passive/aggressive a**hole i was. These are all code-phrases for CODEPENDENT.
If this article resonates with you, it will pay you to find out the truth.
unfortunately, like many HP articles, 'they' have found a button to push, and mass mis-diagnoses be damned.
eques   3 hours ago (9:11 PM)
FYI, Mark, scientists have been studying this very phenomenon for nearly 20 years and have confirmed that about 20% of us are born with a nervous system that is extra-sensitive to our environment. Science has established that HSPs (highly sensitive persons) are indeed much more easily overwhelmed by sensory input from all around us than those with so-called "normal" nervous systems. The scientific term is sensory-processing sensitivity, and the trait has been found in dozens of other species. Check out for instance the research of Elaine Aron -- her site is at http://www.hsperson.com/. Also see http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36201866/ns/health-behavior/. Googling these phrases will bring up lots more. And please, why do you assume that what is true of you is true of the rest of us? That's just sloppy thinking.
PayFwd   3 hours ago (9:48 PM)
Fanned for your research and patience in your response. The test in the first link is interesting!
PayFwd   5 hours ago (7:00 PM)
Dr. Orloff - thank you for your expression of the concept of ‘emotional empaths’. Rare is the article that I would go back to read again the next day; now I must read your book.

All my long life, I have enjoyed friends and relationships, but have needed to ‘escape’ them sporadically. Parties? Needed to get out of the whirl every now and again, needed to leave, generally before my (ex)husband was ready to go.

Workmates and friends have often told me things that I was never to tell anyone else; I’ve been the sounding board/repository for many secrets. This of course piles on the emotional stresses for me, whom I now realize may be a ‘highly empathic person’. Maybe I should have become a psychologist or psychiatrist too - though I don’t feel I have answers for my friends or acquaintances, but only the patience to listen and bear the knowledge of their personal suffering.

Not being of a negative mindset, I still have not given up on finding a similar understanding soul, and have hopes for a constructive relationship in the future. May you reach many others with your message!
photo
josiahbarlow   7 hours ago (5:55 PM)
Thank you for the article...the whole time I was reading I was having "ah-ha" moments about my past relationships and why I struggled in them.
Doubledoot   7 hours ago (5:26 PM)
Dr. Orloff : Thank you for the article and the forum to express some of my thoughts about this matter. I've been contemplating these issues for years. I've concluded that there is something inherantly wrong with the way we tend to think about this subject. Many "experts" on the subject imply if tacitly that there is actually something "wrong" with you if you prefer not to be social in whatever socially acceptable way they deem fit or if you shun relationships for whatever reason. There is a multi million dollar industry based on the premis that it is simply wrong to do this or violates some kind of human validity to reject the social imperative we are ingrained with from birth. They tend to advocate that we strive beyond our ability to fit in and succum to the social programing that dictates our behavior as well as our likes and desires. The fact is that it's perfectly ok to seek out a lifestyle devoid of others if you are overwhelmed empathicly by others emotions or not. This is not as foreign to eastern philosophy as it is to western dogma where is in fact encouraged to seek refuge in solitude. In the west (Particularly the U.S.) we are taught that there's something wrong if we are not constantly chattering, making friends, climbing the social ladder. We never have to get to know ourselves and we contribute everything to outward experience. It's over rated !
photo
Mark Whittington   5 hours ago (7:57 PM)
ya...uh, no. Please don't let someone, 'Doctor' or not, make you feel ok about YOUR SICKNESS. The path you are advocating will see you a friendless hermit before it is done.
Please read 'Codependent No More', and make an informed decision. And ps. everyone needs some alone time now and then...but the nature of disconnectedness you seem to desire for your own 'peace of mind' has only your friends heaving a (temporary) sigh of relief ( you'll be back ).
Doubledoot   7 hours ago (5:05 PM)
I've noticed that much of our suffering as human beings comes in the form of wanting everyone to like us. I've also noted that relationship guru's capittalize on this tendency. We like to think that everyone loves us or at least wants to love us. The fact is ; they don't ! The trick is : There's no trick ! Just be yourself. If some like you ; cool : If they don't ; it's just less human emotional baggage you have to lug around. Human beings come complete with phoibles, issues, complexities and problems. It's easy to get weighted down with others crosses. I agree with the author if she is suggesting that there are boundary issues that need redress. People can only bother you if you let them. Some people will try to use you to dump all their problems on. Others could give a care whether you lived or died but seem to have attached themselves to your life anyway. The point is : It doesn't matter a whit what's happening out there in social land. What really matters is what's going on "IN There " where you live. If you tend to spend time fretting about your relationships I can't see how you are enjoying your life. If you believe you can't be happy without all the turmoil and disruption relationships bring ; you have issues no self help book will solve. Free yourself instead ! Cut all that crap loose and live !
Doubledoot   8 hours ago (4:33 PM)
Think of all the time, money and energy we waste just trying to make ourselves into "relationship" kinds of people or trying to figure out why we're not. I often long for a simpler time. A way simpler time : Caveman time for example. It was much simpler. You probably mounted every female in the tribe before sun up ; went out and killed a buffalo to celebrate your prowess and feasted the women and children (which is probably the only reason they hung around w/ you anyway). Now it's got to be about "relationships" (said w/ as much sarcasm as possible). What do you feel ? What do I feel ? Feelingzzzz ! Blah blah blah ! I opted out a long time ago. You have to be young to keep bashing your head against the wall and still believe in the myth despite all the evidence to the contray that men and women can somehow have "a relationship". Bitter ? Cinical ? Absolutely ! Men and women have a truce at best and in that brief interval you may or may not get some of your needs met. Aside from that you are on your own ! You may as well figure out how to enjoy it. It's really the best part (the 'on your own' part). We spend an inordinant amount of time in the failure of "relationships" fretting over the loss desiring the impossible :Incredibly self destructive. Driven by hormones and social imperative. There has to
Doubledoot   8 hours ago (4:15 PM)
Have you ever noticed that there are millions of books on how to have a relationship and only one or two about being alone ? I know because I found and read both of them. Since there are millions of how to books on relationships from many different perspectives often with different advice one could conclude that relationships are one of the most difficult endeavors on the planet. No doubt about it ! Relationship advice is also one of the most controversial issues we indulge in. They range from the oversimplistic to the so complex that Einstein couldn't manage it. It seems the more advice we get about how to have a good (if not perfect) relationship the more enigmatic it becomes. Divorce is at an all time high. I'm reminded of Paul Simon: "If you took all the girls I knew
When I was single And brought them all together for one night I know they'd never match My sweet imagination ." So, we constantly try to match a vision of perfection that doesn't exist w/ a less than perfect reality. Maybe someone should write a book about that "how to make do with what will never do". Booz and drugs have always been the great mediators until you sober up that is. Perfect soul mate= fantasy. You are lucky if you ever meet someone you can just get along with for more than a day or two.
Doubledoot   9 hours ago (3:47 PM)
This article while well intentioned seems to perpetuate the myth that it's really not ok to be alone or to want to be alone. labeling, catagorizing and pigeonholing can often create more problems than they were designed to fix. Having said that: It seems possible to consider 3 types of people. Those who enjoy and thrive on social interaction and need as many relationships as possible. Those who prefer solitude and avoid social interaction whenever possible and those inbetween who maybe somewhat confused about which they are or they are a hybrid of some kind. It is really these 'confused' in between people that this article seems to be addressing. The uncommitted or maybe they just want to enjoy the benefits of both worlds. The problem is trying to balance this can create huge problems. Some may be successful at this balancing act but that is just what it seems to be "an act". It would seem one would have to betray one side of there personality in order to live in both worlds. Seems dishonest to oneself and somewhat phony to me. It would also seem uncomfortable. I think it more productive to guide individuals towards the realization of which one they are :Outgoing socialite or Contemplative hermit. If you try to be both or force it ; one probably feels very wrong. You'd think Empaths would be sensitive enough to realize this but it often takes a moment of enlightenment or ah ha to get there.
Old Aunt   9 hours ago (3:31 PM)
I so needed this article at this time in my life. Thank you Dr. Orloff, now I know why I need to do what I wanted to do “when I grow up.” Sad that it took me so many years to grow up.
Doubledoot   9 hours ago (3:26 PM)
In the past socialization was a matter of survival. Today not so much. Remnants of enculturation have a tendency to hang on even when they are no longer usefull. Having large families for example. You no longer have to have 14 children to work the farm. The obvious negative consequences of overpopulation are immenant and having a huge family is an economic disaster. So to the enculturation of 'relationships'. While still important the benefits of not having them can also be counted. It's odd that all the dating services (on the net for example) do a booming business. They capitalize on the fear of being alone and lonely. The very people who don't really want to have "a relationship" (empathic or no) are the very ones who seek these services out. Whether emapathic or just not having the type of character and /or personality that thrives in relationships we are still goaded into the belief that we "need" them. We are somehow not complete without them. Not acceptable. What felonisous hores crap ! If you are in a relationship w/ someone who is particularly needy (of say emotional attention), and you start setting down the rules about needing space etc. let me know how that works out ! I'd bet they won't understand and if they do they won't believe you. I've also noted that w/ my empathic tendency ; I can turn it off (meditate and discover how to do this) but then you ricsk missing emotional cues.
bonniebell   9 hours ago (3:09 PM)
Thank you SO much for writing this article. It is LONG overdue in society, most people don't even know that this "condition" exists! There are so many people who have this situation in themselves, or in their partners or even just friends, people who are empathic, and don't understand it. It can be VERY overwhelming, especially before you know what it is! It is a great, fantastic gift, and when trained and managed, can serve as a powerful tool in a lasting, successful relationship of any kind! Not to mention, it causes you to really be able to feel the good in people, as well as the negative, and help those in need more easily! I love it, but it really has been a long road that won't be ending any time soon! I am always learning!
Thanks again so much!
Doubledoot   9 hours ago (3:07 PM)
I think this subject deserves more attention and much more study. The stigma attached to the desire or need to be alone is overwhelming. We are enculturated to be social beings. They even call it "socialization". If you prefer not to be socail you are called "anti-social". If you don't fit the mold you are often ostricized so that you are then alone whether you want to be or not. There are a myrad of other phenomenna and variables that could be factors in why people prefer solitude other than the "empathic" explanation offered here. This is a very odd analysis. It's like "how to have a relationship when you actually prefer not to" (or would rather avoid or escape it). It almost seems like it is a restatement of the contradiction ; again saying "it's really not ok to want to be alone". Once you start establishing rules and boundaries in a relationship you run into a whole set of other problems. My preference has been to embrace lonliness and learn to be ok alone instead of forcing a relationship I find overwhelming and exhausting. While empathic ability is a factor it may have more to do w/ the nature of relationships themselves that a list of do's and don'ts won't remedy.Give yourself permission to be alone ; explore it. It's not that scarry ! Get over the ultimatum that you have to have a relationship to be ok. You don't !
photo
Colette Kenney   9 hours ago (3:04 PM)
I love this post because it encourages the fact that it is so important to know yourself well before you get involved with someone else.

All too often we get romantically involved with someone purely because we are attracted/infatuated with them. Then before we know it it is 6 months or 2 years later (after the rose coloured glasses are off) and we realize there is some relationship deal breaker that we didn't see before because we either 1) chose not to look 2) chose to ignore or 3) didn't know we had.

Knowing yourself WELL is the best thing you can do to enter into a long term mutually satisfying intimate relationship :)
photo

HUFFPOST BLOGGER

Judith Orloff MD   9 hours ago (3:37 PM)
Yes, it is really important to know yourself before you get into a relationship. Then your beloved has someone to relate to!

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

Con Heartist   8 hours ago (4:28 PM)
It's the old saying I'll refer to ... You have to love yourself first and then invite love to the banquet.

Twitter Edition