Communication, Media, and Development Policy

Analysis, Ideas and Debates on Development Policy Issues from Communication and Media Perspectives

Is a free and plural media more important than elections in securing democratic development?

Posted by James Deane on Wed, 2008-10-08 06:52
 

The last decade of support to development can – simplistically - be boiled down to two sets of complementary strategies.

 

The first consists of mobilising financial resources to meet the Millennium Development Goals. This has focused on aid, debt forgiveness and trade justice.

 

The second has consisted of supporting democracy and governance.

 

The latter has had one core component – elections. Elections confer the status of making a country a democracy. They provide the essential check on government, the prime incentive for keeping governments honest and making them deliver for their people. Without elections, increasing resources does not really make development happen.

 

Consequently, the international community spends a huge amount of political and economic effort on supporting elections – exerting pressure to make them happen, and providing technical and monitoring support to make sure they are free, fair and efficient.

 

Except that they are simply not fulfilling this function very well.

 

Elections do not always create democratic governments – particularly in fragile and fractured societies, governments are often effectively elected dictatorships, governing on behalf of the ethnic or other groups who have provided the votes to elect them. Those who did not elect them are simply not looked after.

 

And elections do not seem to be working very well in keeping governments honest.

 

These arguments are not mine, but those of several commentators, and particularly Paul Collier, who makes this argument in the Bottom Billion. He is planning to expand on them in a forthcoming book, Wars, Guns and Votes: Democracies in Dangerous Places. He argues that mechanisms for providing checks and balances between elections are the key to providing the environment for economic growth in bottom billion countries. He considers media to be essential to this process. Similar arguments were made from a very different perspective in last year's Global Civil Society Yearbook.

 

Collier provided at a Salzburg Seminar on Strengthening Independent Media – organised with the Global Forum for Media Development - the most succinct case I have yet heard on why media is essential to economic development. He argues that information is an essential public good and that the media’s role in providing information and acting as a check on executive power qualifies it for public financial support (I will not quote him directly here because his arguments may be published separately and I don’t want to pre-empt them).

 

But if these arguments are right, and I obviously agree with them, then it suggests a massive rebalancing of development priorities.

 

I don’t want to suggest that elections are somehow unimportant. Nor that investing in checks and balances is not happening. Support to civil society and media, as well as parliaments. judiciaries and others is a long standing part of governance strategies and – if the recent Accra Agenda for Action on Development Effectiveness is to be implemented – a growing one.

 

But support to media occupies, I would guess, a tiny space in foreign policy and development discourse compared to elections. Whole departments in UNDP, other multilateral agencies, most bilateral agencies and others, all with major budgets, support the election process and the issues around them. Substantive and substantial research and policy networks inform strategy and learn lessons of what goes right and wrong in different election processes. Clear and coherent coordination functions exist at country level to make their conduct as effective as possible.

 

None of this can be said of media support.

 

Media and the development efforts that support them are not more important than elections in securing democratic development.

 

But, based on some of the best economic thinking of our time, media development is vastly more important than their current status within the development system currently suggests.



How useful did you find the knowledge and contacts on this page to your work?


0
No votes yet
Your rating: None

Post a Comment or Question   View All Comments   Become a Contributor



Five Recent Comments:


yes


yes



To my humble discernment and


To my humble discernment and perception, both the things( free media and holding of elections)are paramount so far as the question of the development and evolution of democarcy is concerned.Yet to make a clear no or yes regarding the choice between the two sides-media or the elections , my answer would be in favour of the primacy of the elections.



yes, media are more important

. . .

James Deane politely fudges an answer as to which is more important - media or elections - but is bang on when he says the media is a low priority in democratic capacity building.

What he does not say is why.

If we hold up modern notions of "political correctness" to a mirror, our reflection shows ample evidence instead of corporate correctness - rampant, mindless consumerism chewing through global resources at many times more than we have resources for.

Global corporates have steadily and secretly downgraded the importance of elections by gaining control and then sidelining media voices, leading to less and less participation in the democratic process.

So yes, media are way, way more important to democratic processes than elections.

Elections are merely the means by which a theoretically informed citizen can cast her or his vote for the candidate of their choice, enabling a renewal of mandate for governing democracy. If there is no media, there is no information for most people, meaning democracy is for most purposes defunct.

Such is the state of play that we have today, with wars started on a lie, spread as thinly disguised propaganda by media embedded with public power structures whose primary motive is to deliver the maximum profit to those who support them best - private business people.

Anyone doubting such a scenario need to take a harder look at the world around them. They need to ask whether the global economic crisis we are currently experiencing would have happened if most media were not hopelessly compromised by a media scape dominated by private ownership, and ever dwindling numbers of journalists. Speaking of which, where were the world's journalists before the collapse? Mostly parotting neoliberal tripe about the endless potential of the free market.

Fact is, with trillions of dollars mysteriously disappearing from the global economy, and billions more following by the day, free markets are now proven not to work, not even for free markets.

Look harder.

Who is bailing out the free market private sector?

The public sector.

And therein lies the answer to preventing new wars, new meltdowns. It is time to reverse course on media marginalisation and instead approach global problems with a global solution - information and media centrality. A good place to start would be in the public sector, with massive reinvestment in public broadcasters.

Like the markets, or any other sector for that matter, this risks moving power from one ill-governed sector to another, as criticised by the post above about media credibility. As the second post suggests, a resurgent public sector media could tie itself more closely to the communities it represents, gaining mandate from their input rather than undue influence from the public purse of the day.

How to do that?

By broadening public broadcaster roles to include ethics-based training for communities, creating a web2 hand-up (not hand-out) mentality by using the experiences of those who interact more widely, to more depth, more regularly than any other sector alone.

Yes, that would be the media.

After all, how often do you get to vote?

. . .



Media Credibility


James Deane’s point on the importance of media includes his observation that “elections do not seem to be working very well in keeping governments honest.” However, the mechanisms that keep media honest are far less straightforward and require a far more attuned population. It has been recognised that economics, politics, and other forms of power can strain media transparency and credibility. Management, editorial staff, and a readership that demands those things of its media can be difficult to assemble anywhere, perhaps especially in the “bottom billion countries”.



Importance of connecting communities to media


Somehow we need to tie support of a free and independent media to the communities that this media represents. Perhaps first that media needs to recognise and acknowledge that it represents a community/communities and figure out what that means within the ethical, ideally objective world of the media. Communities, individuals need to feel both engaged and represented by the media in order to feel a sense of either ownership of them ("they are reporting my experience") or leadership by them ("they have the information I need - they will help me sort through the facts").



Post a Comment or Question   View All Comments   Become a Contributor


Post Your Comment or Question:
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

The CI with

Comments on Blogs



Add our RSS feed

Recent Posts


Add our RSS feed

What price policy? 
Fragile States Research: impressive, compelling, influential - but still frustrating 
WE Submit! 
Feeling Good (Development)! 
Point to Point in Brasil! 
Who? Me? 
The Social Communications President (maybe)  
Continuing Commitments 
UN Peacekeeping Radio's Unexamined Past and Uncertain Future 
Haiti: Much Strength and Support 
Digital Technologies: Development Added Value? 
Social Climate Change 
Nobel Intentions 
Northern Lights 
Government Rules! 
Show me the Media Money - but what should we do with it? 
Little Green People 
Whose Policy is it Anyway? 
Can we put a value on the good that media do? A social cost approach to media development 
Percussive Effects 
A gutsy new DFID White Paper puts the politics back into development 
The commonalities lens sees AIDS better 
Battle Star Development: Prescriptions vs. Platforms 
Trading Rights 
Another Development 
Scaling Steep Slopes - The Public Policies Helping to Transform Medellin 
Accountability, media and the development system: a complicated romance 
People, Ideas and Things 
Donors, Governance and Media Aid: Some Thoughts from Sierra Leone  
ChangeNet: The Lessons from Obama's campaign for International Development Democracy and Governance Policy and Action 
Cable News 
Democratic Adjustment? 
Should international development NGOs play a major role in media for development? 
A Robust Research Agenda on Media and Democracy in Fragile States: Getting a More Serious Conversation Going 
Governance and the Media: the engagement gap 
A "democratic recession" presents challenges - and opportunities 
The TransAtlantic Taskforce on Development: great report, but where is the development and democracy debate headed? 
Development Street - no Wall? 
Media and democracy in fragile states: the promises and problems of policy relevant research  
Deportation of Rex Gardner is a Weak Attempt to Intimidate Fiji Media 
The media debate in the UK is unique - but the challenge of subsidising independent public interest media has urgent implications for democracy everywhere 
The Athenian Way!...or should that be "Why?" 
Winds of Change - Media Development Trends and Questions 
The Fairness Doctrine: is this the first big media debate under Obama and what does it mean for media development? 
Disaster-affected communities are and should be the architects of their own recovery, not merely passive recipients of international goodwill 
OBAMA, DEVELOPMENT, AID, and GRANDMOTHERS! 
Is a free and plural media more important than elections in securing democratic development? 
Media Development or Media for Development?: wrong question - but what’s the right one?  
A Rose by Any Other Name is Still a...the basis for one coherent Communication and Media Development field of work  
Accra: The big tent approach to development ends in agreement – and information is one of the big winners 
Where the European Union meets the African Union on media development 
Community Radio Initiators Ready to Run the Stations Soon in Bangladesh 
Re-vamping UNICEF’s Africa Communication for Development Strategy 
Accra Aid Effectiveness conference: can there be real “country ownership” without public debate? 
Big Investors - The Vacant Low Level Seat at the Accra High Level Development Effectiveness Summit 
Kenya Political Violence - Were Media Responsible? 
Tides of Hope? 
Miming Development: The Shortest Distance and International Development 
Over the Edge! 
Power of Movement 
Science Envy?: A Communication Perspective on the Core Principles that Guide International Development Interventions 
Talk with the People! 
AIDS Lines 
I Blame Smallpox 
I Had [I Think] A Dream 
Little Big Communication 

Your Recent Posts