Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close

Removal order for crosses on memorials stays

State highway patrol loses bid to have court reconsider appeal

Social Networks
facebookFacebook
twitterTwitter

A federal appeals court said it will not reconsider its previous decision to order the removal of roadside memorial crosses for fallen Utah Highway Patrol officers.

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver said Monday it will let stand an August ruling by a panel of three of its judges that the crosses violate the Constitution's prohibition against government establishment of religion.

The Utah Highway Patrol and the Utah Highway Patrol Association had asked the full court to reconsider the case in light of the August ruling, a typical step as part of the appellate process.

It is unclear whether the patrol association or the Utah Attorney General's office, which represented the highway patrol, will appeal the 10th Circuit's ruling to the Supreme Court, as neither returned e-mail messages seeking comment.

Lee Perry, a lieutenant in the highway patrol who along with another trooper came up with the idea for the cross memorials, told The Washington Times he would like to see an appeal.

"Hopefully our Supreme Court will take a look at this case," Lt. Perry said, adding that he hopes it "turns out favorable there."

American Atheists, a Texas-based organization, had asked the court to order the removal of the crosses on the grounds they violated the Constitution. The three-judge panel agreed, concluding that "the cross memorials would convey to a reasonable observer that the state of Utah is endorsing Christianity.

"Moreover, the fact that all of the fallen (Utah Highway Patrol) troopers are memorialized with a Christian symbol conveys the message that there is some connection between the [Utah Highway Patrol] and Christianity," the judges wrote in a 38-page ruling. "This may lead the reasonable observer to fear that Christians are likely to receive preferential treatment from the [Utah Highway Patrol] -both in their hiring practices and, more generally, in the treatment that people may expect to receive on Utah's highways."

The three-judge panel said 14 crosses, which are 12 feet tall, were erected mainly on public land - on areas not meant as religious symbols, but as secular memorials.

The deceased officer's name and badge number are painted on the 6-foot crossbar in large black lettering. According to court records, the crosses bear the Utah Highway Patrol's symbol, the deceased trooper's picture and a plaque with biographical information.

Story Continues →

© Copyright 2010 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

About the Author
Ben Conery

Ben Conery

Ben Conery is a member of the investigative team covering the Supreme Court and legal affairs. Prior to coming to The Washington Times in 2008, Mr. Conery covered criminal justice and legal affairs for daily newspapers in Connecticut and Massachusetts. He was a 2006 recipient of the New England Newspaper Association's Publick Occurrences Award for a series of articles about ...

Comments

TonysTake says:

11 hours, 58 minutes ago

Mark as offensive

I could write volumes on this one. Suffice it to say that this judge is an idiot.
Americans have a right to freedom OF religion, not freedom FROM religion.
What a putz.

HowDyd says:

15 hours, 17 minutes ago

Mark as offensive

Assuming the police organization that provided and installed the markers did so not at public expense, the order to remove should be struck down, unless the court based its decision on a statute specifically prohibiting the private use of a public right-of-way. And in that case the police organization could approach owners of private lands adjacent.

rickahyatt says:

1 day ago

Mark as offensive

You really think cops do what they do for "Service to Community?" No, they do what they do for the thrill of the inherent dangers and risks and the powers of arrest and subjugation they get over others. Bondage, and all that.
Get real.
That's why they have to be kept in check, and to put them on a higher moral plateau as if a higher ruling elite will only get our Police-State headed Brown Shirt Society in even more trouble than it is now.
Haven't you noticed that in the recent decades Police Officers wear military-type rank insignia rather that the traditional Police ones? Now, they are "Generals," instead of "Captains?" Gold braid on their caps as if ranking Offizieren?
Pretty soon, it will be the Waffen SS and skulls' heads...
And their propaganda is always, always, "Citizen, do nothing to stop the crime, CALL US!" The word "Police" comes from the word "Clean up," as if after any citizen's business is done, as any Army Private would tell you. To "Police" a parade ground is to pick up all the cigarette butts, for example.
But today, to "Police" is to premeditate, for political reasons, one's presumed "Propensity for future unknown mind-crimes" lest they might could occur... Like Hitler did. His SS was very good at that, labeling suspected spies, political operatives, and the like as "Paranoid Schizophrenics." Our very own modern "Family Services" and "Public Health Nurse" types do exactly that same thing, now, to include intense surveillance upon such suspected "Indivdiduals" (To be an individual thinker rather than a "Group Member" -Socialism- Is a suspected crime in itself, PSYOPS-wise) as myself.
Driving me to the extremes that I write such things, Catch-22.

View all comment(s) on this article.

Not Registered Yet?

Comment on articles. Receive e-mail newsletters and alerts. Sign up today.

Happening Now
Most Read