Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close

ROE: After Obamacare: Principles for reform

System needs good medicine to remedy some bad ideas

MugshotIllustration: Health care
Social Networks
facebookFacebook
twitterTwitter

Next week, the House will vote to repeal and replace Obamacare with reforms that will keep control of health care decisions in the hands of patients and their doctors. As a physician, I've seen firsthand the problems insurance companies have created for patients. I've seen firsthand how government programs have made beneficiaries worse consumers of health care. I've seen how the cost of health care has exploded and made insurance unaffordable. I want to fix these problems. But Obamacare will not fix these problems - it is bad medicine for our nation.

Creating jobs and health care reform are at the forefront of my mind, and I am committed to helping this Congress implement true health care reform. By passing this legislation immediately, we will be sending the message that this Congress is not in favor of inserting Washington bureaucrats into a patient's relationship with his doctor; that we are not in favor of increasing the cost of health insurance; that we are not in favor of weakening Medicare to create a new entitlement; and that, at a time of record unemployment, we are not in favor of legislation that will eliminate jobs.

In medicine, there's no such thing as a Republican disease or a Democratic disease - there's just disease. Likewise, good ideas on health care reform shouldn't be defined by a party but by meeting a series of principles for reform. Through experience, listening to people from all sides of the political spectrum and from all walks of life, I have developed a few principles that I believe health care reform must encompass in the new legislation:

c Above all, do no harm.

A doctor's Hippocratic Oath should be applied to any reform considered. While many have focused on what's wrong with the current system, there's still a lot that is right. Eighty-five percent of Americans today have health insurance, and for the vast majority of them, the system works. They go in and see their doctor, who, in turn, diagnoses them and sends them home with a prescription or remedy that addresses the problem. When Washington tries to "fix" our health care system for one person, I want to make sure the result isn't a downgrade of care for three others.

c Doctors and patients should make medical decisions.

I prefer a system with private health insurers, who ultimately do a better job of putting decision-making authority in doctors' and patients' hands. The problem with publicly operated health insurance (the new way of saying "government-run health care") is that care must be rationed to meet the budget. Consider that here in America, the five-year survival rate for breast cancer is 98 percent, largely because of education, early diagnosis and sophisticated medical treatment. But in England, which has a national health system, mammograms are no longer covered because too many false positives resulted in more costly biopsies being performed. While it's less costly to wait for a lump to develop, no American in his right mind would think this is a reasonable approach to providing care. But these are the choices that have to be made in a public health plan funded with taxpayer dollars.

c Every American should have access to health insurance.

We should be able to agree that all Americans should have access to a basic benefits package that makes sure he or she is covered when going to the doctor's office or hospital. This isn't Rolls-Royce coverage that includes cosmetic surgery, hair transplants or fertility treatments, but basic benefits.

c Health care costs shouldn't bankrupt you.

Story Continues →

© Copyright 2011 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments

savetheusa says:

1 day, 7 hours ago

Mark as offensive

New User e8, We CANNOT INSURE 35 - 40 million more people for what we now spend. Haven't you taken the time to read all the information about Obamacare? The CBO office said it would cost more and our premiums are going to go UP. As a matter of fact, they took some things out of Obamacare because it would increase the costs, but they are going to do these things in separate bills. For instance, they are supposed to reduce the rate of pay doctors who see Medicare patients get paid. It is getting reduced and there is NO incentive for doctors to treat Medicare patients! We don't have enough doctors as it is and HHS's Sebelius and the president will be running and deciding our care, NOT OUR DOCTORS. They must follow what the rules and regulations will be or they will be fined. You and I don't always react to the same treatment for the same disease, but you will have to now. We are already BROKE as a nation and we cannot go forward with this law-the biggest tax increase we have seen in years. Costs will go UP and this does nothing to keep them down besides RATIONING (AKA death panels). This doctor is RIGHT about nationlizing by comparing the countries in Europe that are not getting superior care like me do NOW. Who will stop the illegals from going to the ER in hospitals? There are some people who will not HAVE to purchase Obamacare and will not pay a penalty to the IRS for not doing so. While the rest of us will have to. This bill will put our bankruptcy of this nation over the edge. Wait until the EPA make us pay more for our utilities!!!

New User e3173 says:

1 day, 22 hours ago

Mark as offensive

China is NOT the enemy. The U.S. is its own worst enemy, and doesn't need help from China in that regard. Who forced U.S. transnationals to manufacture everything in China? Did China force the U.S. to become insolvent? How exactly is China the bad guy, and the U.S. the good one? Everything China is being accused of, all nations are guilty of. What is apparent in the final analysis is that the venom the West spews toward China is mostly misdirected. We did it to ourselves.

New User e8a1a says:

1 day, 22 hours ago

Mark as offensive

I don't see where your plan includes insurance for the 35 to 40 million who are without insurance. Also, the HCR that was passed does everything you suggest from what I can tell, although your statement that "Every American should have access to health insurance" is not progress. That's what we have now and I'm sure you realize that the trajectory of healthcare insurance as well as competitiveness of our corporations is closely tied to reigning in these costs. Where is a comprehensive solution that takes us forward? Leaving millions uninsured is pure stupidity especially when it has been shown that we can insure everyone for what we now spend to insure 40 million fewer. We can do better than paying more than twice what the second most expensive country does, don't you think?

View all comment(s) on this article.

Not Registered Yet?

Comment on articles. Receive e-mail newsletters and alerts. Sign up today.

Most Read