Politics

readers' Comments

Obama and Hu Cite Mutual Aims Amid Trade Deals

China's president is welcomed to the White House with an elaborate ceremony and guarded words.

Share your thoughts.

Back to Blog Post »

1.
victor
china.
January 19th, 2011
10:56 am
we Chinese really wanna work with United states. We have our own political system and cultural value. Mutual-respect and cooperation is the only way out.
2.
T888tai
Belmont, CA
January 19th, 2011
10:56 am
President Obama and President Hu both set the right tone at the official ceremony for closer cooperation of the two countries. Mutual respect and trust is absolutely essential and key to successful and substantive dialogue.
3.
Cobzy
SFO, CA
January 19th, 2011
10:56 am
We may not have "political prisoner", but we sure have many prisoners in Gitmo.
4.
raptorhunter2011
NYC
January 19th, 2011
10:56 am
I think the relationship between each other-China and the U.S. is set to be very very vital in the future,while China is seeking to step upstairs to share the "RIGHTS" with the latter-it's the hardcore.Although there's many issues even bias in lots of fields, cuzing thousands of problems,I still keep a positve stance.
5.
Tony
Frostburg
January 19th, 2011
10:56 am
Welcome boss hu!!!
6.
Xing
Delaware
January 19th, 2011
10:56 am
This is rather promising for both countries despite China and USA's fundamental differences. Many global, economical, human rights issues will be discussed. Yet in order to accomplish anything, both administrations needs to recognizes eath other's fundamental differences and not to impose each's policies upon another. China does violate certain human rights, but those issues can be solved with time, not with American rhetoric that can only harm the ever so precious Sino-American relationship. Both administrations need to focus heavily on economical issues since it's probably the most positive relation between the two countries. Lastly, a military dialogue needs to be established some time to ensure both countries military might solve their conflicts and differences diplomatically.
7.
New York City
January 19th, 2011
11:04 am
If America the Stupid really understood the common timeless interests of all governments, it never would have invaded Afghanistan or Iraq.
8.
NYC
January 19th, 2011
11:04 am
George W. Bush did not want to extend the honor of a formal state dinner to a leader who was not democratically elected.

George W. Bush was correct.
9.
marik7
wailiku, hi
January 19th, 2011
11:04 am
In other words, Obama says that the nation that waterboards insures its own success.
10.
Tampa, FL
January 19th, 2011
11:05 am
I hope China's leaders see this pageantry for what it's - a civil welcome of a head of state and not a sign of weakness. They must realize that they have to clean up their act when it comes to fair trade. And, do it soon. Patience is running thin.
11.
Eric
Chicago, IL
January 19th, 2011
11:06 am
Nations ignore the extraordinary power and importance of tightly scripted Kabuki theater productions such as this one at their peril. This one was very well done, with Obama's gentle hectoring appropriate for the character the US was supposed to play at this event.
12.
Jim
The Heartland
January 19th, 2011
11:06 am
Oh, the irony! Sure, China's record on human rights is lousy, but the U.S. is the world's preeminent world military power that is up to its eyes in renditions, torture, indefinite detention, state secrets, almost limitless executive power, aggressive tactics against the press and whistleblowers, etc. What gall it must take to lecture other countries about human rights with a straight face.
13.
morris wise
New York, NY
January 19th, 2011
11:06 am
It is wishful thinking to suppose that 350 million Americans will continue to have leverage over 1.3 billion super intelligent Chinese workers. But miracles can happen with prayer and faith in the benevolence of the Lord.
14.
mfd
Phoenix
January 19th, 2011
11:06 am
Obama the socialist and Hu the communist. Birds of a feather.
15.
Manic Drummer
Madison, WI
January 19th, 2011
11:06 am
Does Obama really think China cares about human rights? Is this guy's mind still back in his college days?
16.
appleman
Sebastopol, CA
January 19th, 2011
11:06 am
Could someone explain to me the difference between the current regime in China and Fascism ?
17.
Austin
January 19th, 2011
11:07 am
President Hu's speech:

"I have come to the United States to increase mutual trust, enhance friendship, deepen cooperation, and push forward the positive, cooperative, and comprehensive China-U.S. relationship for the 21st century.

Over the past 32 years, since the establishment of diplomatic ties, the China-U.S. relationship has grown into one with strategic significance and global influence. Since President Obama took office, with concerted efforts of the two sides, our cooperation in various fields has produced fruitful results and our relations have achieved new progress. This has brought real benefits to our two peoples, and contributed greatly to world peace and development.

As we enter the second decade of the 21st century, the people of both China and the United States want to see further progress in our relations and people around the globe want to see greater prosperity in the world. Under the new circumstances, and in the face of new challenges, China and the United States share broad common interests and important common responsibilities.

We should adopt a long-term perspective, seek common ground while resolving differences, and work together to achieve sustained, sound, and steady development of our relations. I hope that through this visit, our two countries will advance the positive, cooperative, and comprehensive relationship, and open a new chapter in our cooperation as partners."
18.
Still waiting for a NBA title in SLC
SLC, Utah
January 19th, 2011
11:34 am
The Chinese don't have a political system they have absolute rulers, that control smaller fiefdoms that answer only to the absolute rulers. Calling it a political system is a akin to calling hot dogs and potato chips a gourmet meal.
19.
Silver Spring, MD
January 19th, 2011
11:49 am
I would simply say that I just wrote about this today as another NYTimes comment prior to President Obama's comments.

These are not times to point fingers, jump up and down like Magilla Gorilla, nor suggest that political prisoners aren't political prisoners.

Regardless of China's holding of the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize winner, Jose Padilla was held for years by the Bush administration and virtually driven to insanity by the separation from humanity. Now I'd like to be able to say that America's withholding the rights of an American citizen accused of terrorism is something different than a Nobel Peace Prize winner, I can't. China put away a man against his will for his political beliefs without due process, and America put away a man against his will for his political beliefs without due process.

I'm not certain where the divide is, but it is obvious that there are more circumstances which equate to each other than not.

Did China put a political activist away? Very possibly, but one can wonder if America did the same.

It appears to me that we are equal partners in this world of continued growth and decadence. We have a stake in or debt to China, and China has a stake in what we owe them. If we demand that a citizen of China is released from political oppression than they have the right to ask for the same from America, even if they haven't.

But the point is that we, as American citizens, also have the same right to demand the same rights for others. First Amendment. The Right to Redress our Government. Not by guns, not by shootings, but honest conversations which don't hold political overtones and subterfuge.

Now in America Jose Padilla was convicted in a trial of several other individuals with whom he had never associated, yet he was sentenced without his own wherewithal being present. He could not help in his own defense because he lost his mind in 4 years of solitary confinement. Makes you wonder about Stockholm syndrome, doesn't it?

Regardless of how Jose Padilla was tried, he was convicted without his own help to defend himself, and therefore it is not possible to say that Americans have their freedoms because one man does not, today, have his freedom due to the revocation of his rights.

If it is one person, it can be 3 people, or 1000 people. Who knows? It is all secret.

So how do we differ all that much from China?

Eh.

Roger W Norman
http://rwnorman.typepad.com...
http://blogs.salon.com/0004478
http://www.reverbnation.com/rogerwnorman
20.
Leticia P. Carlos
California
January 19th, 2011
11:49 am
President Hu must not assume [ and maybe he does ] that in President Obama, he has an advantage because of the money owed to his country by the US.

Hu is a fine student of diplomacy, if his publicist was telling the truth.

So - it would be a highly charged event, in my opinion.

One man, talking from a position of economic strength - the other coming from a position of imposed need for fairness in all matters political and economic.

I am on President Obama's side.
21.
Jon Harris
San Francisco, CA
January 19th, 2011
11:49 am
China = Fascism.
22.
New York City
January 19th, 2011
11:49 am
China's government is very concerned about maintaining full employment lest it suffer the fate of Tunisia's government.
23.
chris hauser
washington dc
January 19th, 2011
11:49 am
i predict it'll be a rather tranquil summit, and the course of events will continue on.

in the picture, the chinese flag looks to be set/flying a little higher, doesn't it?
24.
Ashok Kumar
West Bloomfield,Michigan
January 19th, 2011
11:49 am
The responsibility of the huge deficit and job losses lies squarely on the shoulders of the large corporations, e.g. Wal-Mart etc etc. for short term gains USA lost the long term economic standing and international power clout. To continue doing business with China, which we have no choice but to, level the playing field on ALL fronts. Afghanistan included.
25.
Xiao-zi
Shanghai, China
January 19th, 2011
11:49 am
This is a good start. Have read many other articles and comments published in the Times today which reflect the hightened tensions between the US and China nowadays, I feel happy these two leaders who both approach their positions with seriousness and reason, can make progress on issues where both have lattitude to negotiate, and hopefully, exchange candid views in areas where we are farther apart to gain better understanding.

We, Chinese and Americans, have more common interests and values than people on both sides are inclined to believe. No doubt there are also compeating interests and some problems that cannot be easily resolved, but that should never be an excuse to not try.

I hope Times readers will try to be open-minded and drop the easy retoric that seems to infect our world today and take the more difficult challange to look at facts, to engage on problem solving and question our own assumptions.

The Front-Runners

  • Ambassador to China at the White House After Hinting at 2012 Run
  • Labor Speech Previews Clash With Business in 2012
  • White House Looks to Avoid Gaffes During Chinese Visit

Ambassador to China at the White House After Hinting at 2012 Run

Of all the White House visitors in from China on Wednesday, Jon Huntsman, the ambassador, may be having a particularly awkward day.

Labor Speech Previews Clash With Business in 2012

Richard Trumka, the president of the AFL-CIO, says Washington politicians are living in an “Alice in Wonderland political climate.”

More From Elections »

Ambassador to China at the White House After Hinting at 2012 Run

Of all the White House visitors in from China on Wednesday, Jon Huntsman, the ambassador, may be having a particularly awkward day.

Obama and Hu Cite Mutual Aims Amid Trade Deals

China’s president is welcomed to the White House with an elaborate ceremony and guarded words.

More From The White House »

Congresswoman Cites Hero of Arizona Shooting in Opposing Health Care Repeal

Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida said that the woman who helped stop the Arizona gunman from reloading had come to urge Gabrielle Giffords to fight health care repeal.

Labor Speech Previews Clash With Business in 2012

Richard Trumka, the president of the AFL-CIO, says Washington politicians are living in an “Alice in Wonderland political climate.”

More From Congress »

Chief Justice Roberts Swears In Boehner’s Staff

John G. Roberts Jr. presided over a ceremony on Tuesday morning to swear in the staff of Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, the soon-to-be House speaker.

Sunday Breakfast Menu, Dec. 19

Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discusses a myriad of foreign and domestic issues and Justice Elena Kagan breaks her silence.

More From Supreme Court »

Chief Justice Roberts Swears In Boehner’s Staff

John G. Roberts Jr. presided over a ceremony on Tuesday morning to swear in the staff of Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, the soon-to-be House speaker.

Sunday Breakfast Menu, Dec. 19

Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discusses a myriad of foreign and domestic issues and Justice Elena Kagan breaks her silence.

More From Supreme Court »

Midterm Elections Results

2010 Midterm Elections
Results From Across the Nation
Election Night Coverage on NYTimes.com

Republicans rode a tide of voter discontent to take control of the House of Representatives and expand their voice in the Senate.

FiveThirtyEight

Nate Silver’s Political Calculus
Nate Silver’s Political Calculus

FiveThirtyEight’s aims to help New York Times readers cut through the clutter of our data-rich world.

More Politics News

Diplomatic Dangers Lurk in the State Dinner
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG

As host of the formal affair for President Hu Jintao of China, President Obama confronts tricky protocol issues.

Lieberman Announces He Will Not Seek Re-election
By DAVID M. HALBFINGER and ELIZABETH A. HARRIS

Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut said his independent-minded approach to politics does not “fit comfortably into conventional political boxes.”

News Analysis: Basic Questions, Elusive Answers on Health Law
By DAVID M. HERSZENHORN and ROBERT PEAR

The complex health care fight that has resumed in Congress will probably rage for the next two years.

Obama Asks for Review of Rules Stifling Jobs
By JACKIE CALMES

The order by the president was a signal to businesses that he wants to work more closely on job creation, though its immediate effect is likely to be mostly political.

Writers Are Asked Not to Talk About Author of ‘O’
By JULIE BOSMAN

Simon & Schuster requested that journalists and other writers not comment if asked whether they were responsible for the novel “O,” about a fictional 2012 presidential campaign.

Archive

Recent Posts

January 19

Gillespie and Ayers to Lead R.N.C. Transition

As the leadership of the Republican National Committee shifts, two party veterans -- Ed Gillespie and Nick Ayers -- will manage the transition team.

January 19

Ambassador to China at the White House After Hinting at 2012 Run

Of all the White House visitors in from China on Wednesday, Jon Huntsman, the ambassador, may be having a particularly awkward day.

January 19

Congresswoman Cites Hero of Arizona Shooting in Opposing Health Care Repeal

Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida said that the woman who helped stop the Arizona gunman from reloading had come to urge Gabrielle Giffords to fight health care repeal.

January 19

Obama and Hu Cite Mutual Aims Amid Trade Deals

China's president is welcomed to the White House with an elaborate ceremony and guarded words.

January 19

Labor Speech Previews Clash With Business in 2012

Richard Trumka, the president of the AFL-CIO, says Washington politicians are living in an "Alice in Wonderland political climate."

Blogroll

A-List of Supreme Court and the Law
Campaign Cash
General

About The Caucus

The latest on President Obama, Congress and other political news from Washington and around the nation from the staff of The New York Times.