How a naval confrontation in the South China Sea created a global investment bubble -- and cost me half my life savings.

BY JASON MIKLIAN | JANUARY 21, 2011

"What's the definition of a mine? A hole in the ground with a liar on top."

The most famous aphorism about the mining business is usually credited -- possibly apocryphally -- to Mark Twain, who before assuming the mantle of America's great literary wit was just another mining speculator gone bust. But generations of fleeced investors since Twain's day would nod angrily in agreement -- losing a fortune on too-good-to-be-true mining deals is a tradition as old as mining itself.

So it goes with rare-earth elements, a group of materials used in the manufacture of various high-tech applications and the object of the latest subterranean fad. Since a border dispute between China and Japan pushed rare earths into the headlines last fall, prices for some of the elements have shot up to an incredible 1,000 percent of what they were just three years ago -- and as in Twain's day, there is no shortage of smooth-talking suits who will tell investors this is only the beginning. I should know: For a few months, I was one of the suckers.

Before we get to that, a brief geology lesson: "Rare earths" is the catchall phrase for 17 elements mostly near the bottom end of the periodic table that are essential for cutting-edge optical and magnetic applications in hybrid cars, wind turbines, iPads, mobile phones, and smart missiles, among other things. What rare earths aren't, however, is rare -- in years past, they were mined everywhere from Florida to Indonesia -- or terribly valuable. In 2009, global sales of all raw rare earths combined came to less than $2 billion -- half the market for palladium alone, and 1 percent of the market for gold. These aren't exactly precious gems: Most rare earths are priced by the ton, not the ounce.

China started cornering the rare-earths market in the 1990s not because it was the only one with the stuff in the ground, but because everyone else gave up. Mining rare earths requires some of the most invasive and ecologically destructive open-pit extraction practices in the world, and China's lack of environmental regulations and its cheap labor meant that it could easily undercut even the biggest suppliers. The one active mine in the United States, operated by the company Molycorp in Mountain Pass, California, halted production in 1998 after a radioactive-waste spill and was shuttered four years later.

For fly-by-night speculators, rare earths couldn't be packaged more attractively. No amount of polite explanations like the above will strike the word "rare" from their name, and the stuff has a knack for attaching itself to headline-worthy buzzwords: "China," "green technology," "iPhone." The rare earths' names -- dysprosium, neodymium, yttrium -- may be a mouthful, but everyone knows how to spell "opportunity." Many companies currently dealing in rare earths have seen their stock valuations jump more than 500 percent on speculation alone, even as global demand for what they're selling has remained more or less flat.

I first heard about rare earths last February, while researching the link between mining -- including rare earth mining -- and guerrilla conflict in rural India. Almost as an afterthought, I noticed China's monopoly and the potential for a big price jump should China decide for any reason to twist the screws. Acting on the hunch, I dumped my meager life savings -- about $9,000 -- into the rare-earths sector, and waited for the payoff.

Investing in speculative mining companies is a bit like buying lottery tickets -- for every firm that pays off, there are dozens whose promises of vast riches disappear into the fog of stock dilution, mismanagement, environmental catastrophe, and fraud, as well as the ever-looming possibility that companies digging for pay dirt will find only the regular kind. The business is full of cautionary tales like that of Bre-X Minerals, a small Canadian gold-mining company that opened up shop in an Alberta basement in 1994. Bre-X started putting out spectacular press releases about phantom gold findings on its Philippines property; the stock soared, and soon the company was worth almost $5 billion before a single ounce of metal was mined. By 1997, however, its claims couldn't be substantiated, and one of the company's geologists died under mysterious (and ambiguous) circumstances. Individual investors and pension funds eventually lost everything, and the cases are still clogging Canadian courts.

Then there are the geopolitics: Events perpetually threaten to upend whole mining subsectors, with countries flooding markets or nationalizing firms more or less on a whim. For rare earths, with their Chinese near monopoly and high-tech military applications, the odds of the whole market being turned on its head were particularly good -- and that was exactly what happened on Sept. 7, when a Chinese fishing boat collided with two Japanese naval vessels along a disputed border in the South China Sea.

AFP/Getty Images

 

Jason Miklian is a researcher at the Peace Research Institute Oslo.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

CARTERLEW

8:57 AM ET

January 22, 2011

Rare Earths

Something doesn't make sense to me. If you put $9,000.00 into Molycorp's IPO at about $14.00 and you still hold it -- it closed at $42.99, you didn't lose money!

  REPLY
 

TECHGUY222

6:20 PM ET

January 22, 2011

I think the author implies he

I think the author implies he began shorting too early, using his earlier profits.

  REPLY
 

DKHEATH777

8:28 PM ET

January 22, 2011

Hilarious article

$9000 life savings and he lost half of it buy selling out early taking profits? Does that makes any sense? Was he isane enough to short these stocks in this market? Did he write this article from his mom's basement? I love how he dogs on REE like its a ponzi scheme or something....these stocks are so undervalued its ridiculous. Did you guys know that the Rothchild family (richest dynasty in the world) owns a third of MCP (not public knowledge) and you couldn't even trade it until this last July? Must be a horrible trade. This arm chair quarterback obviously has no clue what he's talking about and am not sure how he has the credentials to even write this article...but if he's a "day trader" it makes sense that he only has $9K to his name (big player). He obviously doesnt understand the geopolitical issues at hand here not to mention the future demand for new technologies. Countries around the world will be in a flight to resouces as the dollar collapses but I'm sure this guy would tell you to invest long in tresuries...hahah. Sure, investing is risky so if you don't want to play...stay out of the game. I'm done wasting my time here...listen to Dines and inform yourself.
http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2010/9/11_James_Dines.html

  REPLY
 

MIKLIAN

10:30 PM ET

January 22, 2011

Clarifications

Thanks for the comments. Carter, MCP was one of many rare earth companies I bought in the spring and summer but sold too early. And you're right tech guy, I started shorting a couple of months ago. Oops. Further, I was primarily trading options both ways, multiplying the gains (and eventual losses).

DKheath, as noted I've been researching the rare earths space for about a year, which has included visits to rare earth sites, industry conferences and interviews of senior geologists as well as company reps. A major point of the article was to show how easy it is for bubbles to form (and small time investors to get burned) when sectors are armed with provocative 'geopolitical' headlines and panic buying. Time will tell on the health of individual rare earth companies, but aside from saying that eventually fundamentals do matter the article makes it quite obvious that I won't be giving investment advice anytime soon. I'll stick to my day job, and promise never to leave my mom's basement again as long as rabid longs and shorts don't hijack this comment chain.

  REPLY
 

PARUL1234

2:27 PM ET

January 23, 2011

 

PRESTITI ONLINE

11:27 PM ET

January 23, 2011

Tell me the Point

Thanks for the blog but there is not a point that state which topic this blog belong to. But by the way a good view.
Prestiti online

  REPLY
 

APJ

1:00 AM ET

January 24, 2011

something's not right

I don't think it was the REE bubble that allowed you to lose half your life savings, it was you rlack of research and investment discipline. REE are a necessary part of the global electronics supply chain. This article does little but complain about Bre-X and take a personal swipe at some characters. Not a very well throught out or researched article. But hopefully will help you get hits on facebook and maybe help with your next book deal. Good luck.

  REPLY
 

ALEXBC

4:07 PM ET

January 25, 2011

Not So Rare

I posted many times on here about how rare earths were not comparable to oil in any sense (despite what Deng Xiaoping said), how China possesses only a fraction of the actual supply, and how Japan is already pioneering rare-earth replacement technologies. It's too bad that investors with actual money on the line found all this out too late.

  REPLY
 

FIONALOWTHER

1:43 PM ET

January 28, 2011

rare earths elements investments

My analysis is that I think this proves that there's something wrong with investment agents, investors and get-rich-quick believers -- not that there's something bogus about the need for rare earths elements -- or bogus about China's current usage of them as leverage and/or blackmail. "Bubble" is the word: It seems that Jason got taken because he was trying to catch lightning in a bottle -- so he's blaming the lightning.
It's as if one were to say that there is something intrinsically wrong with gold, oil, or houses, rather than with the people who try to make an obscene amount of money and try to make it too fast and on the backs -- or bankrolls -- of other people. If Jason is a researcher at the Peace Institute, it's no wonder there are wars going on all over the world. He sure didn't research the REE situation very well.

  REPLY
 

NICKURU

1:18 PM ET

January 29, 2011

Rare Earths including Actinides

Another reason to follow the lanthanides, that is the rare earths,is that they are geologically and mineralogically associated with the radioactive elements. For example, Thorium-232 with the absorption of a neutron becomes Th-233 which then decays by beta particle emission into Uranium-233. The U-233 is capable of being used in a reactor to produce energy, without any chance of having its byproducts being used to create atom bombs.

I wish our governments would realize the potential energy in Thorium to provide a safe means of nuclear energy by using the Molten Salt Reactor technology. Which produces less than 1% of the radioactive waste of other reactors. Most notably on this last is the Light Water Technology which is used (and abused) around the world.

  REPLY