Closing Post Offices


Last week the Wallstreet Journal ran a story on the US Postal Service which is proposing closing offices and making and other cuts due to continued unprofitability. The story says there are roughly 36,000 post offices in this country and as many as half are under review for possible closings or cuts. Current law only allows the USPS to close offices that are damaged, or whose leases are up without specific approval.

The USPS has been operating at a loss for years. While FedEx and UPS have experienced tremendous growth and have increased the number and quality of services, the post office has continued to stagnate. Last year the idea of cutting mail service to 5 days per week was floated. It received enough political fire that the idea was quickly shelved.

Anyone who has been to the post office recently and who has been forced to stand in line for some sort of product or service has most likely experience the maddeningly slow and inefficient customer service. As someone who has lived all over the U.S. (in big cities and small towns) I can tell you my experiences are not isolated incidents. While the staff behind the counter may be friendly enough, they simply are not in a hurry to to anything. After all why should they? They are union members being paid a government salary with some of the best healthcare and retirement benefits in public service. They get paid whether the line stretches out the door or whether there are no customers at all.

Whenever the idea of closing unprofitable offices is debated, small towns and rural areas like to cry foul. They argue that the post office is a pillar of their social community. These post offices function as a social gathering place as well as providing a needed connection to the outside world. While that may be true in some cases, the social gatherings of people should not be a concern of the federal government or of taxpayers.

Unlike businesses in the private sector who have experienced a decrease in customer traffic or business, rather than improve service, increase product offerings, or cut prices, the USPS has chosen to continuously raise the cost of postage, and not offer new services. While the argument may be that rates need to be raised to keep up with inflation and increased costs, the increases simply force more customers into online bill paying, email, and the competition (FedEx and UPS).

The post office has served an important function throughout history, and continues to provide some valuable products and services. The problem is, like most government or quasi-government agencies, it has continued to grow, and has refused to change its technology and methods to keep up with the times. In my opinion there are three choices we can make when it comes to dealing with the post office’s continued unprofitability:

1. Continue on the current path and let tax payers continue bailing out the USPS with additional funding.
2. Drastically cut locations, cut employees, cut prices, improve customer service, improve product offerings, eliminate the union, and bring pay and benefits in line with the rest of the government sector so it can better compete.
3. Allow privatization of the USPS and asassociated services. I am sure that there are companies out there willing to bid for the opportunity to operate the service for 5-10 years at a time, and who could do so profitably.

Really, option 2 and 3 are the only plausible ways to continue operating and save taxpayer money at the same time. Option 3 is probably the most effective and profitable of the three, but also the most likely to be fought by the left in this country.

DF
www.notadriveby.com


Category: , , , ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

49 Comments Leave a comment

Cut locations, cut employees =improve customer service?

bobmontgomery Sunday, January 30th at 2:47PM EST (link)

No, we live in a small town and we need our post office and we need our mail delivery. I would gladly pay fifty cents to send you a birthday card, and I remember when first class was three cents. They are trying to take our township trustees away from us. They are trying to take everything local away from us. They eventually want us to abandon our rural communities and live in cities so they can control us. We don’t have grocery stores or drug stores anymore. The people who live in cities get subsidized bus service. They make us out in the boonies pay 4dollars for gas. We are good people and take care of our selves and don’t commit crimes. If the Unions are a problem, get rid of them, like Ronald Reagan did with the flight controllers. Fedex and UPS are okay, but for just mail, I always liked the Postal Carriers. I think it’s a noble profession, at least out here in America. I don’t like to get credit card applications and stuff with my name and birthdate on it telling me I am old but can still buy life insurance if I act now, but I like getting fliers and catalogs and magazines. Remember how when we were kids and we didn’t go to school until we were six but got a lot of love and attention up until that time so that when we went to school in our little local schools we had little trouble learnng how to read and get along in society?

Off topic? Yes and no.

If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.
George Washington

You may need. . . .

DF Sunday, January 30th at 3:24PM EST (link)

You may need your post office for social and personal reasons, and I am not advocating closing all of them. When you say that YOU would gladly pay 50 cents for a card that is fine, and it would be fine if your 50 cents and the 50 cents of all the other willing customers was paying the bills for the USPS. Instead we the taxpayers are paying the bills. That sort of comment is similar to the left saying ” it’s ok to raise taxes I don’t mind paying a little more”. Just because some are willing all should not be required.

If the post office was profitable or breaking even at 40 cents or $10 per letter I would not care whether we kept them open or even built more. But until the USPS is profitable without one dime of taxpayer money we need cuts.

DF
http://Www.notadriveby.com

We the taxpayers are not paying the bills

bcb1 Sunday, January 30th at 6:19PM EST (link)

While the USPS is indeed a federal government agency - it is an idependent agency, and it is fully self-sufficient, it doesn’t receive any taxpayer funds. (at least it hasn’t since the early 80’s).

The exception to that may be a federal subsidy for disabled people and overseas voters postal costs - but I’m not even 100% sure of that.

Basically the USPS is the model of what every conservative should want! An agency that exists fully self-funded, that offers good jobs, good pay, and good retirement benefits for it’s workers - without being a drain on taxpayers.

Imagine if all government agencies were fully self-funded and didn’t use taxpayer dollars. Yes, there would still be a huge defecit because of military, social security, and medicare - but it would be a smaller defecit.

no taxpayer money?

DF Sunday, January 30th at 7:36PM EST (link)

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2010/11/post-office-loss-jobs/1

How can it lose 8.5 Billion dollars in a year and not get any money from congress? How are retirement and healthcare costs paid? How are operating costs paid without any taxpayer funds?

ince its reorganization into an independent organization, the USPS has become self-sufficient and has not directly received taxpayer-dollars since the early 1980s with the minor exception of subsidies for costs associated with the disabled and overseas voters. However, it is currently borrowing money from the U.S. Treasury to pay its deficits.[3] The decline of mail volume, due to the increased usage of email, has forced the postal service to look to other sources of revenue while cutting costs to maintain this financial balance.[4]
Employing 596,000 workers and over 218,000 vehicles, it is the second-largest civilian employer in the United States (after Wal-Mart) and the operator of the largest civilian vehicle fleet in the world.[2] The USPS is obligated to serve all Americans, regardless of geography, at uniform price and quality. It has exclusive access to letter boxes marked “U.S. Mail.” It competes against private package delivery services that are not supposed to deliver to letter boxes but may leave packages by front doors if no one is available to receive them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Postal_Service

Borrowing money from the treasury for operating costs thats how.

 
 

When the heck did "social reasons"

Scope Sunday, January 30th at 9:37PM EST (link)

become a reason for post offices? Sure, in the very old days, it may be that people socialized with their neighbors when picking up their mail. I have no choice but to pick my mail up at the post office, but, that is the last place I have any interest in socializing. That dog don’t hunt, as they say. Most people don’t even have the patience to be the next in line at the grocery store these days.

 
 
 

I am willing to pay more for defense, too.

bobmontgomery Sunday, January 30th at 4:20PM EST (link)

Some things are worth paying more for. Get rid of the DOE, and the other DOE, and the EPA, and HUD, and HHS, and the CPA and the FTC and about half of the USDA, and then talk about the Post Office. Last I heard, the Post Office wasn’t trying to tell me what to eat, what to think, where to live, what to do, how to spend my leisure time. Some government services and functions are desirable even for us conservatives. If bailing out the Post Office was a left-wing cause celebre, they would have done it. Instead they bailed out GM and Goldman Sachs. And they are still trying to bail out the National Endowment for the Humanities and the National Endowment for the Arts. What’s the budget for the CDC? And they not only can’t stop an epidemic, they can’t even identify one. After years of scapegoating the drug industry, the lefties bailed them out to the tune of $8o billion so they could get their guy in the White House. There are a LOT bigger and better TARGETS than the Post Office.

If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.
George Washington

You forgot the NIH and NSF. nt

Menlo Sunday, January 30th at 10:35PM EST (link)

“[...] constitutional jurisprudence has devolved [...] into a mix of policy preferences, political prudence and legal precedents that long ago departed from the actual words and original meaning of the Constitution.” -Stuart Taylor Jr.

 

It isn't what we want and are willing to pay for that matters.

RoguePolitics Monday, January 31st at 3:44PM EST (link)

Government has to be about legitimate roles that only government can serve.

FedEx and UPS have demonstrated that government is not needed here.

But even yet, rather than end it outright, simply allow full and fair competition which is prohibited by law.

Force the USPS to stand on it’s own without govenrment bailouts or protectionist policies.

If free trade is good between nations why not between street addresses?

“So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don’t even know that fire is hot.” George Orwell

“Ancient Rome declined because it had a Senate, now what’s going to happen to us with both a House and a Senate?” Will Rogers

When the American spirit was in its youth, the language of America was different: Liberty, sir, was the primary object. Patrick Henry

http://DreamsFromMyForefathers.com
http://theprecinctproject.wordpress.com

 
 

When is the last time FedEx or UPS delivered a piece of mail for 47 cents?

Scope Sunday, January 30th at 5:10PM EST (link)

What an idiotic post, and idiotic idea. None of your three options has an validity, as you propose them. Get rid of the postal service unions, just as Reagan did with the Air Traffic Controllers. Fire their arse and get real workers to do the job gladly. Your second option is laughable. I live in a rural location. I will gladly pay .47 or even more to not have to drive to a location miles away, and with a skeleton crew to man it. How willing do you think the current regime would be to privatize anything when they are on a rush forward to have government control of everything.

As Ron Reagan said, there are legitimate roles for government. I believe that providing mail delivery is one of them.

HUGE AMENS Scope re my second favorite govt dept: The USPS!

Mike gamecock DeVine Sunday, January 30th at 5:27PM EST (link)

a) The Post Office is a constitutionally mandated duty.

b) 47 cents

c) I have been reading many great books about the founding and thru the Jacksonian era and in it, Washington and many of the founders considered the Post Office vital to bind the nation together around common concerns and values and for security and economic reasons;

Having a post office is one of the things that kind of defines what it is to be a countryman and

the same arguments were used for national interstate public roads going back to Jackson.

Very few of the Founders and Framers in both parties remained consistently against national roads, ports and canals.

And they were right.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

Which is your first most favorite? The IRS?

Jim Tomasik Sunday, January 30th at 7:10PM EST (link)

A.) Does the Constitution mandate delivery six days a week?

B.) How about $1.47 per piece. The USPS needs to start covering it’s own bills.

C.) We don’t need the post for binding. We have the internet now.

Other than the Constitutional mandate for postal roads, the Post office has little to do with roads, ports or canals other than they help to wear them out a little bit.

Jim Tomasick- NOT EVERYONE HAS THE INTERNET

Scope Sunday, January 30th at 9:06PM EST (link)

or any online capability to pay their bills etc. Do you not understand that many won’t use the internet to pay their bills, or to receive their bills online? So, you are willing to tell those that do not live by your internet standards to go pound sand? You must be very young and unaware that for some, life does not revolve around the internet, and, that there really are many many people that don’t even have a computer, nor want one. What do you do about all those people, tell them tough luck?

Well Scope, I'm old enough to know how to spell my name and your screen name correctly.

Jim Tomasik Monday, January 31st at 9:19AM EST (link)

I think that if I want a computer, I alone should pay for it. I think that if you want a bloated federal bureaucracy to waste money, then you and those who think like you should pay for it.

When the USPS starts running a tight ship (which it could) and stop needing bailouts, people like myself will be less likely to wish for it’s total demise.

Jim T- You still don't get

Scope Monday, January 31st at 9:49AM EST (link)

my post. I never said anything about the government paying for anyone’s computer. What I said is that there are many people, particularly the elderly, that do not have, nor “want” a computer. They rely on the USPS to send cards, letters, bill payments etc. There are also many others that do not pay their bills online, or do their banking online, because of the fear of identity theft. If I send a letter or a package to a military member serving overseas, I do it at reduced postage through the USPS. Last I checked, FedEx and UPS don’t deliver any mail or packages to our military members in War Zones.

You are being ridiculous to say that I or anyone wants bloated federal bureaucracies to waste money. It is one of the functions of our government to insure mail delivery whether you like or agree with it or not. Get rid of the postal worker unions, and mail processing and delivery will improve drastically, and, the associated costs will also decrease dramatically.

With defense spending, not one drop of our military members blood should be spilled in order to save a few taxpayer dollars, and, our citizens that rely on the postal system should not be sacrificed in order to save a few taxpayer dollars. I agree with Ron Reagan, there are legitimate government functions.

Good move! Just drag the conversation over to defense.

Jim Tomasik Monday, January 31st at 10:23AM EST (link)

Then throw in a “Ronald Reagan” comment or two…Next thing you know, I’ll be believing you when you say that the USPS actually delivers a letter for 47 cents.

You know, it could happen! I mean, why not? Santa delivers all those toys for free. Even in the war zones. ;)

No Jim T

Scope Monday, January 31st at 11:25AM EST (link)

There is no question that either one of us won’t convince the other. I made an appropriate comparison between your wanting to end a legitimate role for the federal government in calling for the demise of the USPS, just as you would agree to cutting the dense budget, which is another appropriate role of the federal government Ron Reagan supported a strong national defense, and increased that budget, just as he would support another legitimate role of the government in mail delivery. I can’t help it if your extreme views of government are non-starters. I can sit comfortably in the knowledge that your utopian goals will never be forced on me. Continue on with your dreaming though, that doesn’t hurt anyone, and it doesn’t cost anything.

My dreaming...

Jim Tomasik Monday, January 31st at 11:53AM EST (link)

I dream that the USPS South East Area office will close within the next few months. One more step in bringing into line the USPS spending.

My “utopia” is a government living within it’s means and it staying out of my business/wallet as much as possible.

This following quote “…just as you would agree to cutting the dense budget,” came from between your ears and not out of anything I have ever written or said anywhere at anytime.

 
 
 

USPS doesn't deliver to warzones

nilram Monday, January 31st at 10:52AM EST (link)

USPS doesn’t deliver to warzones. I’m not sure of the exact sequence, but USPS gives mail for military members to APO and APO does the actual delivery. And the army pays the delivery costs.

I don’t know why FedEx and UPS don’t deliver to APO. I wouldn’t be suprised to find out that they can’t legally do so.

But I do know that we send equipment back to the states via DHL.

The soldier above all others prays for peace, for it is the soldier who must suffer and bear the deepest wounds and scars of war.
–Douglas MacArthur

nilram- You are correct

Scope Monday, January 31st at 11:01AM EST (link)

The USPS gets the mail and packages to the destination where it is then picked up for delivery to the military in War zones. The USPS does charge little for those deliveries. I’ve sent many big boxes, that have some weight to them, and am always shocked at how little the postage is.

 
 
 
 
 

lol Jim...the Defense Department of course!

Mike gamecock DeVine Sunday, January 30th at 10:45PM EST (link)

The postal road power is a pretty broad license to build roads, ports, canals etc and I threw that in there partly because I am working on a column concerning how the GOP should stand on infrastructure spending in the context of the need to reduce overall spending but also create jobs and the tactics we use vs Obama’s budget.

Some sloppy comments from some conservatives, incl elected reps in DC, on the propriety and even constitutionality of same inspires my desire to try and clarify the issue in the context of more than just the desire to cut spending.

And the post office power is a significant part of the legal basis and legitimate reasons for federal infrastructure that go beyond posts, but also interstate highways, ports etc for interstate commerce, security and national unity.

more later

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

I'm with ya 99% n/t

Jim Tomasik Monday, January 31st at 9:20AM EST (link)

..

 
 
 
 

TO SCOPE

DF Sunday, January 30th at 8:17PM EST (link)

Although I have often been accused of being an idiot. . . .

I believe your ideas mirror mine exactly as written in #2.

“2. Drastically cut locations, cut employees, cut prices, improve customer service, improve product offerings, eliminate the union, and bring pay and benefits in line with the rest of the government sector so it can better compete.”

If you read my post. .. . you will see I was not calling for total elimination of the post office, and I understand it still provides some valuable services (again that was written in my original idiotic post.) :)

And you are still

Scope Sunday, January 30th at 8:56PM EST (link)

an idiot DF. You cleverly turned my post around to your idiocy. I said that it was not a good idea to eliminate post offices, and for the rural people to not have to drive miles to get their mail. Do you have a reading comprehension problem, or do you just simply spin?

 
 

FedEx and UPS can't legally charge 47 cents.

nilram Monday, January 31st at 1:13AM EST (link)

The private express statutes grant USPS a monopoly on letter delivery in the United States. (With a few exemptions)

See
http://pe.usps.com/text/qsg300/Q608.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Express_Statutes

Oh and heres something interesting:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Letter_Mail_Company

The American Letter Mail Company was apparently sending letters for LESS that USPS in the 1840s. That is until the USPS shut them down. It has to be great to be able to regulate your competitors.

The soldier above all others prays for peace, for it is the soldier who must suffer and bear the deepest wounds and scars of war.
–Douglas MacArthur

 
 

close em all I say

steve010 Sunday, January 30th at 5:44PM EST (link)

the marketplace will take up the slack. Congress only needs to allow competition with first class postage and take away the USPS monopoly.

And folks, please, how many 1st class envelopes do you send per year? Maybe if you are in direct mail or marketing for a grocery store, but if you aren’t paying your bills on line you probably missed the 21st century roll over. And if people want a meeting place in their rural home town, we’ll subside the meeting place. It is a lot less expensive than govt salaries and pensions.

I do a fair amount of billing by mail

Neil Stevens Sunday, January 30th at 6:21PM EST (link)

Plus I mail my IRS quarterlies that way.

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

 

The sooner the better. nt

Jim Tomasik Sunday, January 30th at 6:59PM EST (link)

 

The Founders considered the unifying effect of a national post office

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, January 31st at 9:27AM EST (link)

was paramount.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

GC- This is what you get when

Scope Monday, January 31st at 10:01AM EST (link)

you give the libertarians, whose ideas of smaller government cross into extremes, a microphone. They honor and want to abide by the Constitution, and the founders visions, only when it suits their purpose. Their call for defense spending cuts, in addition to the already deep defense cuts by the Obama admin. is one prime example. Then again, it just might be me, after all Ron Paul thinks we could defend the country with a few good submarines. I wonder if he would paint them yellow?

yep - nt

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, January 31st at 11:05AM EST (link)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

 
 
 

Many elderly folks in rural communities use the USPS...

rightwingmom52 Monday, January 31st at 2:16PM EST (link)

to mail bills, letters, cards, etc. My parents are in their 80’s, live in a rural area in TN and do not have nor do they want a computer. They couldn’t get cable until a few years ago. There are still a lot of remote areas like this throughout our country, and many of these folks are the backbone of the working class.

Personally, the cards and letters I get from my mother (and from other friends of her generation) are gifts that I treasure when they arrive because letter writing is becoming a lost art. To hold her words written in her own hand are more meaningful than the Facebook comments from one of my 200+ friends.

Finally, I agree that the Post Office is not what it once was. My dad was a rural carrier for 35+ years who drive over 100 miles a day on mostly dirt roads through heat, cold, rain, sleet, snow. He knew every single family on his route, and I don’t remember him ever not getting through. He had only one arm, but never took disability or any other dime from the government and draws a pretty small pension that he paid into.

 
 

I'm sympathetic to ending the USPS

Neil Stevens Sunday, January 30th at 5:56PM EST (link)

Just because something is allowed in the Constitution, it doesn’t mean that we must do that thing. The left likes to argue that if something is bad it must be unconstitutional, and we must not get caught up in the flipside to think that anything constitutional must be good.

There are great reasons for ending the USPS, but I think there’s one overriding reason we should keep it. That is, we need a reliable, government-protected way for government to communicate with the people. The Internet isn’t free to every home (and shouldn’t be), so we need a way for the courts, the IRS, and others to communicate with people, and for people to respond.

The USPS is the only way to do that that I can figure out, in a country larger than a city.

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

I agree Neil

powertothepeople Sunday, January 30th at 6:30PM EST (link)

that we are not to the point where the USPS can be shut down. What I would like to see is a privatization of the USPS or where the USPS contracts out a large portion of their business. Being billions in the red is bad enough, but I can not see where they can get into the black and stay in the black with the way they do business now. With most of us having and using Bill pay, debit cards, and credit cards to pay bills along with paperless billing, online greeting cards, faxes, etc the need for the USPS has diminished greatly. Take all that and the rest of the stuff we no longer use the USPS for, add in the fact that the USPS is a perfect example of a spend excessively bureaucracy, they are either going to keep going further in the hole and we will have to bail them out or they will have to increase cost to mail so much higher, they will no longer be anywhere near competitive.

They need to do what a lot of prisons have done, go private. Many of the private prisons actually make money and offer many times the rehab services for the prisoners that state prisons offer. It has been a win win for the states that have gone private.

In order to regain our government as it was intended to be, we must demand the the government recognize the power lies with the people and it is not them that rule this country, it is the people who rule the government.

I don't see why I care whether the USPS runs at a profit

Neil Stevens Sunday, January 30th at 7:11PM EST (link)

I don’t look at government the way I do private business. I don’t expect it to run at a profit, and I don’t worry if it doesn’t.

If it’s up to me we end this partial privatization we’ve already done: Bust the unions, bring it back in house under the Commerce department or something, and run it like any other government program.

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

To neil stevens

DF Sunday, January 30th at 7:30PM EST (link)

“. . .like any other government program”

By that you mean over budget, with outdated technology, overpaid people, legacy retirement costs, bloated benefits, inefficiently, more expensively than the private sector, and a reliance on grabbing more tax money any time they see fit?

I am sure that is not what Neil is saying nt

powertothepeople Sunday, January 30th at 7:33PM EST (link)

In order to regain our government as it was intended to be, we must demand the the government recognize the power lies with the people and it is not them that rule this country, it is the people who rule the government.

 

Yup, just like the military (nt)

Neil Stevens Sunday, January 30th at 8:14PM EST (link)

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

 
 

If we could break the Union

powertothepeople Sunday, January 30th at 7:31PM EST (link)

that would solve most of the problem. That happening may be a reality in the future, maybe even the near future, but not for now.

The problem with the USPS running in the red and so deeply in the red is that somewhere somehow we will pay for it via another bailout or something similar. Profit may not be the thing they need to strive for, and I could even agree with that since we pay the taxes to run them and the fees to use them, but I really do not want to see another bailout because we feel the USPS is something we can not afford to have go under.

I guess my point is this. The government does not run anything right. They spend like there is no tomorrow, they borrow against any surplus till they dry it all up. and then when the thing is bankrupt, they make us bail it out. The USPS is so badly run, unions do contribute to that extensively, and knowing government they way we all do, just do not see how they are going to fix the problem so that they at least break even, keep cost well below revenue, and get out of the red which would keep us from being forced to bail out yet one more thing. A lot of what the USPS does could be streamlined by a competitive private company which would help end the constant negative budget. Even if using contracts did not bring a profit, it would at least keep the union from being involved, assuming the company used was not union, and it would bring the massive budget deficit under control.

The only other way to do it is to make massive cuts in both employees and service. This would be the best way, but do not see it happening anytime soon.

In order to regain our government as it was intended to be, we must demand the the government recognize the power lies with the people and it is not them that rule this country, it is the people who rule the government.

We disagree on your last paragraph (nt)

Neil Stevens Sunday, January 30th at 8:11PM EST (link)

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

 
 

Neil, the government may not be a business

lineholder Sunday, January 30th at 8:32PM EST (link)

but it wouldn’t hurt this country one bit for the people we elect into office to consider applying some of the principles that allow businesses to succeed to various government functions.

There are plenty of mechanisms that could be put into place that would increase efficiency and productivity in the services that are provider, thereby allowing us to have an opportunity to reduce the costs associated with those services.

Most of our governmental agencies provide a service and we pay for that service through our tax dollars. In the real world of business, if I pay a provider for a service, then there is a contract, spoken or unspoken, that they will meet their obligations in providing that service. The legal repercussions if the business fails helps to keep them honest.

Why is it different with our government? Who keeps them honest? Who holds them accountable?

 
 
 

Funny that Neil

Scope Sunday, January 30th at 9:21PM EST (link)

so does that mean that the census should be done online? For those that don’t have access, should they not be counted? Or would it be better to hire a census taker to go out and gather all those forms?

80 to 90% of the census

steve010 Monday, January 31st at 9:45AM EST (link)

could be done online. People laughed in 1995, when I said that most people will eventually electronically file their tax returns. Now, more than 75% of returns are done electronically. I also said most people would buy their books and car insurance on line and that has also come true. And now, I’m not even sure that I could pay my power bill by mail even if I wanted to.

 
 
 

When you write a letter, or send a check, or a photograph....

bobmontgomery Sunday, January 30th at 7:44PM EST (link)

…and send it on it’s way, you know that it is a federal crime for anyone to tamper with it. That’s a good feeling. Now, we don’t do much of that anymore. Still, we ought to learn some things from wikileaks. Anyway, I just hope some of my patriot guardians out there aren’t junking all of their ham radios.

If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.
George Washington

Learn what?

Neil Stevens Sunday, January 30th at 8:12PM EST (link)

It was a federal crime to sell the diplomatic cables to wikileaks, too, you know. :)

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

Ha! Yeah I know. I was just..

bobmontgomery Sunday, January 30th at 8:32PM EST (link)

…reminiscing about a simpler place in time when gentlemen were gentlemen(sorry, was that a bigoted remark?) Do they have a smell feature on the new e-cards where you can, like, get a whiff of your lover’s essence as you open it?

If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.
George Washington

 
 
 

Responses:

DF Sunday, January 30th at 8:09PM EST (link)

Just to clarify a few things and to respond to those who think “this is an idiotic post and an idiotic idea”.

1. I am not calling for the post office to be eliminated. As I said some of the services they provide are still valuable.

2. I understand that UPS and FedEx is more expensive than the post office for many services and that UPS in unionized just as the post office is. The difference is that the UPS union is working for a profitable company so although the wages and benefits may still be inflated due to the union, the company is still making money unlike the post office.

3. The idea that the post office is a “small target” and there are many more bigger things to cut is true. But what is even more important is that cuts need to start somewhere. We need to be careful not to fall into the usual message the left uses of “well thats only a few, thousand, million, or billion, so lets leave it and go after something bigger.

4. I understand that rural areas need mail delivery. Especially out west where there is s LOT of rural areas. Like I said I am not suggesting it be shut down. But every tiny township in the country does not need a post office. The county I live in in Virginia of 400,000 people has 39 post offices. Some less than 3 miles apart.

5. I really dont care if the post office runs at a profit either like some of you.. But I do care that it at least breaks even. If it does not it borrows money from the treasury (8.5 billion so far) that will either need to be repaid at some point or forgiven by the fed (aka taxpayer bailout).

6. The fact is if the post office was a private company it would be bankrupt (or be bailed out by Obama). It would not have an open-ended line of credit from the treasury.

 

Post offices don't have to be closed down

steve010 Monday, January 31st at 9:53AM EST (link)

Congress just needs to lift the monopoly of 1st class postage and the ownership of mailboxes. I’m not sure why people want to defend government monopolies. Plans have been in place for decades at the package delivery companies to move into this market, if Congress lifts the monopoly. Competition is good, monopolies are bad. Nobody is saying that you can’t use the USPS to send mail, just give the other companies the right to compete.

 

USPS claims they have overpaid pension requirments by billions

Common_Cents Monday, January 31st at 2:49PM EST (link)

USPS is required to prefund benefits.

“As he officially took office, the new postmaster-general and CEO of the US Postal Service reiterated his commitment to work with lawmakers in Washington to claw back the $6.9 billion overpaid into the federal pensions system.”

“The groups, which included the APWU and NRLCA,said the USPS would have been profitable over the past four years – even with the recession and competition from the internet – had it not been forced to pay $5.5 billion a year too much into the civil service retirement system.

The letter called for the $50-75 billion surplus within the USPS pension fund to be used to cover future payments, and asked the President to order a recalculation of USPS payments into its pension funds.”

So it sounds like the USPS is a reality check canary in the coal mine. If government recognized total future liabilities like this we’d get a much different picture.

USPS getting bad rap with unfair comparisons to other agencies not recognizing their own liabilities?

Leaders don’t create movements. Movements create leaders. Get involved. Your future depends on it.

Govt “invests” YOUR tax money for POLITICAL return rather than economic return.

 

Allow competition and the USPS will take care of its self.

RoguePolitics Monday, January 31st at 3:47PM EST (link)

No bailouts and allow FedEx and UPS to deliver the mail.

Maybe $0.47 is way to much to pay. We will not know until competition has a chance to drive the price down or up.

Remember $0.25 per minute long distance from that other government mandated monopoly?

What did competition do for that?

“So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don’t even know that fire is hot.” George Orwell

“Ancient Rome declined because it had a Senate, now what’s going to happen to us with both a House and a Senate?” Will Rogers

When the American spirit was in its youth, the language of America was different: Liberty, sir, was the primary object. Patrick Henry

http://DreamsFromMyForefathers.com
http://theprecinctproject.wordpress.com

 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.