THE HILL
 

Reid, McConnell reach compromise on speeding up legislative process

By Pete Kasperowicz - 01/27/11 12:27 PM ET

Senate leaders on Thursday announced a compromise aimed at speeding up the process of considering legislation and nominations, one that will be reflected in a colloquy between Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).

First, Reid said, the understanding would put an end to secret holds on legislation, and he thanked Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) for their work on this issue.

"Senators will no longer be able to hide, and the light of day will shine harder on the Senate as a body," Reid said.

Reid said an agreement has also been reached to free up presidential nominees. He said Sens. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), both members of the leadership and the Rules Committee, reached an agreement that should let the Senate "get rid" of about a third of these nominations, which require the Senate's approval — thus making the nomination process easier going forward.

Reid also said these senators would work with Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) on legislation to implement this agreement.

Third, he said senators agreed to forgo the forced reading of amendments in order to slow down the legislative process.

"It's wrong, and it's got to stop," Reid said.

Finally, Reid indicated that the two parties reached a compromise on cloture votes for motions to proceed, and the ability of the minority to post amendments.

Reid said that he and McConnell reached an agreement under which the Republicans agreed not to force the reading of amendments, and Democrats agreed not to "fill the amendment tree," which would give Republicans the ability to seek amendments.


McConnell took to the Senate floor after Reid spoke and said some votes would take place later Thursday evening to reflect the agreement. He indicated that these votes, which are expected around 7 or 8 p.m., could result in the approval of some, but not all, resolutions on Senate rules.


"We'll have the votes later, which will give the Senate a chance to go on record about some changes that have been agreed to, and some that are being proposed that are not agreed to," McConnell said.

Reid said the agreement means there will be no vote to alter Senate rules by a simple majority vote. "As part of this compromise, we agreed that I won't force a majority vote to fundamentally change the Senate — that is, the so-called constitutional option — and he won't either," Reid said.

— Josiah Ryan contributed to this story.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/140709-senate-reaches-five-point-political-compromise-on-debate-rules

Comments (6)

We see the Democrats again holding their tent and whining like little girls in the face of Republican lies, bluster, and stupidity. And then we have to put up with comments like "Reid said the agreement means there will be no vote to change Senate rules by changing the Constitution."; a blatant lie. The Senate can't "change the Constitution" and the Senate continues to operate as a Republican institution simply because the Democrats roll over and allow it. Any "deal" with McConnell is worthless.BY Michael Coburn on 01/27/2011 at 12:58
and deal with the obamacraps like reid,schumer . murray, durbin,boxer feinstein are WORTHLESS.BY jbobojake on 01/27/2011 at 13:10
Of course Reid would think it's wrong to read amendments, or any bill for that matter.BY JL on 01/27/2011 at 13:40
The conservatives win the election and the democrats change the rules? What could go wrong with this idea?

More marxist judical and O adminastrative confirmations by the senate unabated! The courts are the only part of our government he has not gotten control of yet!
BY mike on 01/27/2011 at 13:57
Unless they put the onus on the minority to maintain 41 live bodies in the chamber during any attempted filibuster, this is chicken feed and window dressing. Just watch the Republicans continue to not govern, and prevent everyone else from doing the people's will as well.BY sad on 01/27/2011 at 14:14
The conservatives win the election and the democrats change the rules? What could go wrong with this idea?

Just as Obama and team raise the size and cost of government and then "promise" to freeze spending - as if that is somehow going to save tax monies.

Only the Republican's drive to reduce them to 2008 (or some similar smaller) levels of spending can save our Country - it that is possible, or even desireable.

We've become a nation, ½ of which prays, "Our father, who art in Washington, awesome is your power and benevolence …" An indication that a ruinous worldview has infected our nation - likely via the public school system.
BY Merit on 01/27/2011 at 17:26

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Floor Action Twitter - Click to follow
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.