House Iran petroleum sanctions bill passes (UPDATED) - Laura Rozen: House Iran petroleum sanctions bill passes (UPDATED)

December 15, 2009

House Iran petroleum sanctions bill passes (UPDATED)

Debate in the House on Howard Berman's Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act has just gotten underway.

The legislation would sanction foreign companies that sell refined petroleum to Iran, or help Iran with its own domestic refining capacity, by depriving those companies of access to the US market.

(Bill passed at 5:10pm with 412 for, 12 against, 4 present.)

After Rep. Denis Kucinich requested additional time for members to speak in opposition to the legislation, the amount of time allowed to debate the bill was bumped up from 40 to 60 minutes.

The bill, with 343 co-sponsors, is widely expected to pass by a large margin.

A hotlined Senate version of the bill did not pass last week, and modifications are being worked on between various Senators and the administration.

Some sources indicated that reconciliation of the two bills is not expected to come before the end of the year.

At issue are two things: one whether the final bill will require the president to seek a waiver from Congress on national security grounds each time he doesn't sanction foreign companies accused of being in violation of the legislation. Alternatively, the administration would prefer that the president have that discretion without needing to seek a waiver in each case.

More broadly, many advocate trying to pursue international sanctions at the UN Security Council first -- or a coalition of the willing sanctions if those can't be obtained -- before moving to US unilateral sanctions that some fear could fracture the international coalition trying to pressure Iran on its nuclear program. In fact, Berman said he would prefer UN Security Council sanctions when he introduced his bill last month.

The Obama administration has set an end of the year deadline before seeking to get a new round of UN Security Council sanctions on Iran.

Meantime, the State Department said yesterday that a meeting of members of the P5+1 planned for next week would not take place this year. China could not apparently schedule the meeting. The political directors from the US, France, Germany, UK, China, and Russia may convene by phone. The meeting was to have been the one where the countries planned their next steps on preparing for possible Iran sanctions after the end of the year.

UPDATE: Debate finished. Will go up for roll call vote at about 450pm. Another staffer said it will be rolled for a voice vote after the next vote, then yeas and neas.

UPDATE II: Roll call vote under way. Currently 342-9. Expected to be done by about 5:10pm.

Passed: Final tally 411 yeas, 11 neas, 4 present. 

UPDATE III: Two late votes. Really final tally: 412 for, 12 against, 4 present.

 

Reader Comments (7)

Pages
  • 1
  1. Who would have thought that Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich would ever work together on something, let alone on the floor of the House.

    Posted By: Anonymous | December 15, 2009 at 03:41 PM
    Report Abuse
  2. Iran is already under three sets of penalties from the UN Security Council, as well as unilateral sanctions from numerous states. A fat lot of use sanctions have been! Israel needs to take action, sooner rather than later.

    Posted By: Lenny K. | December 15, 2009 at 05:16 PM
    Report Abuse
  3. Why are all these American-jews so against Iran when Israel has their own nuclear weapons? World's biggest hypocrits.

    Posted By: JasonFromTN | December 15, 2009 at 07:11 PM
    Report Abuse
  4. to jasonfromtn - as evidenced by the vote - every intelligent person is against iran acquiring nuclear weapons. religion has nothing to do with it. they are the world's most dangerous and out of control regime - responsible for the deaths hundreds if not thousands of american soldiers. get a clue!

    Posted By: aberan | December 15, 2009 at 07:53 PM
    Report Abuse
  5. to aberan ... iran is the world's most dangerous regime??! are you ****ing kidding me? since when has iran ever invaded a country? israel (lebanon twice, iraq) and the u.s. (korea, vietnam, iraq, afganistan) are guilty of invasion, terrorism and supporting terrorism (if israel is not the biggest terrorist country on the planet, i don't know who is). second, if a muslim country invaded canada or mexico (large u.s. trade partners whose citizens also practice a religion predominant in the u.s.), do you honestly think the u.s. would sit aside and not send in troops and military aid? then, why would you expect iran to sit on the sidelines when its neighbor and biggest trade partner is attacked for what turned out to be a ******** war? furthermore, as for the deaths of hundreds of american soldiers, you dumb little hypocrite ... more than 800,000 iranian men died during the 8 year war (that’s over 5% of the male population in iran at the time and more than all the u.s. soldiers that have died in every war the u.s. has ever fought since the revolutionary war in 1776!) they fought defending their country from invasion by saddam hussein. who do you think was the biggest supplier of military weapons to good old saddam? That’s right genius, the u.s.! and you have the ****ing nerve to say iran is the most dangerous and out of control regime?? just to make the math simple for a moron like you, 5% of the u.s. male population is 8.75 million men. do you honestly think what the u.s. has done to iran even comes close to what any country has done to the u.s.?! you are either a little punk kid who has no ****ing clue what he is talking about, a hypocrite, or both. i'll spare you the history lesson on britain's and america's role in overthrowing democracy in iran but do me a favor and shut your stupid mouth before you even think about making another dumb comment that only displays your true stupidity. regards

    Posted By: bijan | December 15, 2009 at 09:29 PM
    Report Abuse
  6. Well argued, Bijan. Israel attacking will not solve anything, but rather escalate WWIII. No decent human being wants that, so ease off the gung ho war attitude and think smart. Smart sanctions, coercive diplomacy; and back the new revolution that is taking place in Iran today - that way no Jew will suffer, nor will any Iranian suffer more human rights violations or military campaigns!!!

    Posted By: Mehrtash | December 15, 2009 at 11:10 PM
    Report Abuse
  7. Take out the SAND ******S NOW! I went to Iran for the first time after 21 years. 95% SAND ******S. They have too go. You gotta go to this country to believe me. ABSOLUTE ****HOLE. The leastt civilized dirty scumbag disrespectful undisciplined extremist people I have seen. As an Iranian I have lived in 5 different continents and speak there 5 languages so I don't talk outta my ass. THEY HAVE GOT TO GO. They contribute nothing to this world except consuming and fanaticism. Also there will be no ****ing WWIII. are you stupid? Who is gonna back these sand ******s anyway? IF and only IF china did that would because these SAND******S would bribe them with oil Thats all theyy got. OIL and squat toilets.

    Posted By: Ali | December 18, 2009 at 08:16 AM
    Report Abuse
Pages
  • 1
POLITICO44: The Obama Presidency - Minute by Minute

Contact Laura

Recent Stories: Laura Rozen