Chatter

A conversation about the national conversation

« Previous Post | Chatter Home | Next Post »

The science of kissing explained

Science of Kissing - Author Sheril Kirshenbaum

Some consider it humanity’s most intimate exchange.  Yes, even more intimate than sex.

Most of us have done it, and will do it many more times in our lifetimes: It’s kissing.

Sheril Kirshenbaum, a research scientist at the University of Texas, decided to take the kiss and put it under a microscope, in a way. She wanted to take the universal act and examine it from various scientific angles. The result of her research is her new book, “The Science of Kissing: What Our Lips Are Telling” (Grand Central Publishing, 2011).

Kirshenbaum recently spoke with The Times about why a kiss really is more than just a kiss:

“Scientists are not exactly sure why we kiss.” Explain. You reference Darwin’s take in “The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals.”
Kissing as a behavior hasn’t been studied the way other behaviors have. How do you classify or quantify different types of kisses? I dug into the evolutionary biology and anthropology texts. Some of these deal with our earliest feeding experiences as toddlers, such as nursing. In terms of individual experiences, neural pathways are probably laid down early in our lives and then reinforced by similar experiences later in life. 

Darwin talked about kissing and kissing-like behaviors (licking, blowing) and he surmised that it’s probably a universal experience. Because it is so important for social bonding.
 
Were we born knowing how to kiss, or is it learned behavior?
Kissing is a great example of a balance between the nature and nurture we always talk about. We see similar behaviors across the animal kingdom. So there is something innate.
 
It’s also something we pick up, not just from family and friends but it’s also exported by Hollywood. It is part of the community you’re in and what you’ve been exposed to.
 
Decades ago, anthropologists estimated that 90% of cultures across the world kiss. That was before the rise of the Internet and the frequency with which so many people travel around the world, so I suspect that percentage is even higher today.
 
Do men and women experience a kiss differently?
Men and women have different motivations when it comes to kissing.
 
Gordon Gallup did a study of more than 1,000 subjects. He found that men often describe a kiss as “a means to an end.”

Women place more significance on a kiss -– imagining a future together, thinking about whether it’s the right match. I don’t like gender stereotypes, so I called Gallup, and we talked about reproduction strategies. Women have to be very particular about who they choose, biologically speaking. Women are much more sensitive to scent and taste -– keen as to whether this is someone who is a well-suited match from a reproductive standpoint. Men can be less picky because they have far more opportunities to pass on their genes throughout their lives.
 
You went into the lab and enlisted NYU-based neuroscientists to examine the brain’s reaction to kissing. What did you find?
David Poeppel,  a neuroscientist at NYU,  has a brain scanning magnetoencephalography (MEG) machine. I thought it would be interesting to look at how the brain responds to kissing, especially with regard to gender, given that much of the primary literature highlighted differences between men and women. Our first obstacle was how to get kissing in the machine. You can’t fit a couple inside and ask them to make out. Two heads won’t fit.
 
Instead, we realized we could show subjects pictures of kissing and figure out if they had notable responses to different styles of the behavior. Since men are more likely to be aroused though visual imagery, I guessed that male subjects would show a stronger response to the kissing photos than the women.  I created three different categories of kisses: Erotic, Committed, and Friendship.  But I also acknowledge that a kiss that looks erotic to one person might be a friendship kiss to someone else. So I surveyed the readers of my DISCOVER blog to find images with the most universally agreed upon classification.
 
I ended up with nine photos of different kisses (they included opposite-sex kisses and same-sex kisses). We ran the experiment at NYU. The results were not at all what I expected.  To our surprise, the images of same-sex couples evoked the strongest response in all subjects.

This likely has to do with a phenomenon in neuroscience known as the “frequency effect.” When we encounter something often, our brain’s response is not as strong as when we encounter it infrequently. The volunteers in our kissing study likely observed opposite-sex pairs kissing more often than same-sex pairs.
 
Explain “red equals reward” in the evolution of humans and lips.
V.S. Ramachandran of UC San Diego suggests that we are probably wired to recognize red -– to draw our attention. Our primate ancestors needed to detect ripe fruit among the brush -– recognizing the color red resulted in a reward -- to get food, to live long enough to pass on your genes.
 
Over time red likely served as an important sexual signal, and became enhanced on the posteriors of females when they were ready to mate. After our ancestors evolved and stood upright, these sexual signals shifted. Zoologist Desmond Morris describes our lips as a “genital echo.” For this reason, they became intensely alluring to the opposite sex.

Morris actually tested male volunteers, showing them photos of women wearing various lipstick shades. The men consistently chose red as the most attractive.
 
What about the chemistry?
A good kiss is associated with a rise in a chemical called oxytocin (popularly known as the "love hormone") that leads to strong feelings of attachment as we form a special bond with someone else. Meanwhile, dopamine rises, resulting in feelings of craving and desire. It can also seem impossible to stop thinking about the other person because of a serotonin, which causes obsessive feelings and thoughts. A kiss acts like a natural drug, making it a very powerful experience.

-- Lori Kozlowski
twitter.com/lorikozlowski

Photo (left): "The Science of Kissing". Credit: Grand Central Publishing. Photo (right): Author Sheril Kirshenbaum. Credit: Grand Central Publishing.


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments (12)

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

A kissing expert? With those thin ungenerous lips? Hah!

@Bob - Hey, now. Not fair. That's not exactly a great picture of the lady; upon closer inspection, her lips appear to be quite well-suited to bilabial meanderings.

Or to put it another way, I'd kiss that.
Oh yeah. >:3

About my ex. I used to kiss her on the lips...but now it's all over.

Let me add to the meaningless dribble. Her lips are not thin. They are stretched by the insincere smile (notice the lack of action around the eyes). Else they photoshoped the heck out of her picture. She is, though, a tasteful morsel.

Inasmuch as red lips touch the chord that signifies engorged labia, the fact that same-sex kissing arouses more echoing within our multi-faceted minds, bouncing around the cerebral cortex, tells us the straight girls watching the guys kissing get to fantacize being one of the guys, and, yes, the straight guys fantacizing being one of the girls, which is why it is so exciting.

This is in part what the homophobic mean when they declare same-sex love a "choice", and not a [God-created and therefore God-approved] natural act. For the homosexual, sexuality is as innate as the color of their eyes. For the heterosexual, who are aroused by their opposites, being in love with their opposite includes desiring knowing his/her every emotion, especially the sexual excitement we all share. That love is felt in many ways, including identifying with the other gender we love. That is the "choice" the homophobic hate. It's no coincidence the Greek "heresy" and "heretic" means "choosing" and "chooser" which, stunted, they cannot abide. It is unorthodox, not uniform, sexually doffing the strait-jacket along with the other self-limiting mental inhibitions we reveal to ourselves we lose when we watch same-sex kissing.

It all depends on what you're kissing.

It all depends on what you're kissing.

Y'all are being way too picky and mean. She's really pretty. She's got gorgeous eyes. And the fact that she's interested in kissing and has actually done advanced academic studying of kissing and even wrote a book about kissing makes me think that she's probably a damn good kisser.

my no. 9909837324
you me call

Unfortunately for the author of this book and this article, kissing isn't universal. Eskimos, for one, don't kiss. They rub noses.

Look up the author's pix online. She is very kissable...!

I think she's hot, myself.




Advertisement


About the Reporters