13 captures
27 Feb 2011 - 20 Oct 2014
About this capture
Issue #19, Winter 2011
Editor’s Note
Michael Tomasky introduces Issue #19.
Michael Tomasky
hese are bleak days for progressives, but it’s always worth remembering that in adversity there is opportunity. And the opportunity that the current political situation affords us–demands of us–is to collect ourselves and think hard about first principles. Just how did conservatism win all these arguments in our civic discourse? Yes, with billions of dollars, and yes, with outright lies sometimes. But those factors shouldn’t blind us to the fact that conservatives have had a strategy, and it has worked for them politically, and liberals have usually not answered it adequately with a strategy or ideas of their own.
It was with thoughts like these in mind that we decided to launch a series that we are straightforwardly calling “First Principles.” In these packages of articles that will run over the next several issues, we will look at important areas of civic life in the United States and ask: What did conservatives do and say that led to their success in redefining the way the American people think about this subject? Where exactly did progressives make errors? And what new narratives, arguments, and metaphors might be useful to us today in reframing the debate? We cannot promise that we will produce definitive answers that will transform American politics quickly. But we do know that we need, especially right now, fresh perspectives on what to do, and that is what we will provide.
The first subject we take on in this issue is the role of government: the matter at the heart, really, of the election just behind us. The historian Rick Perlstein delivers an intellectual history of right-wing attacks on government going back to the 1920s. Alan Wolfe, the writer and social scientist, describes why modern conservatives not only cannot but will not govern. And Eric Liu and Nick Hanauer, authors of The True Patriot, offer a highly provocative look forward into new ways progressives should think and talk about government.
We continue our “America 2021” series in this issue with a discussion of jobs and the economy, featuring five leading thinkers across the progressive spectrum–Robert Atkinson, Heather Boushey, Harry J. Holzer, Thea M. Lee, and Sherle R. Schwenninger–and moderated by our editorial board chairman, E.J. Dionne Jr. The value-added tax (VAT) is something of a hot topic right now. Though many progressives are leery of the idea, Andrea Louise Campbell of MIT makes a strong progressive case for a carefully structured VAT. And Michael Bérubé of Penn State considers the legacy of one of the great intellectual pranks in history–the Sokal Hoax, 15 years on. He demonstrates how the postmodern left helped plow the ground for the climate-change deniers and young-Earth creationists of the right.
David Kendall of Third Way responds to Jacob S. Hacker’s cover piece on health-care reform from the previous issue. The book reviews bring us Alan Brinkley on Barack Obama and political philosophy; Mary Jo Bane on Robert Putnam and religion; Yehudah Mirsky on the history and paradoxes of human rights; Jennifer Klein on two books taking stock of the 1970s; and Nina Hachigian on U.S. foreign policy in a less unipolar global future. And I lay out a few thoughts about the condition of Arabs in America.
It may be a difficult time. But difficult times are good for journals of thought, as we think this issue demonstrates.
–Michael Tomasky
ISSUE #19, WINTER 2011

Post a Comment
Comments (you may use HTML tags for style)
Note: Several minutes will pass while the system is processing and posting your comment. Do not resubmit during this time or your comment will post multiple times.
Printer Friendly PDF
Email Article
Single Page
Michael Tomasky is the Editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas and American Editor-at-Large of the Guardian (UK).
Advertise on Democracy
The News Frontier: CJR.org's online news outlet database
Bold and Nimble: A 21st-Century Case for Ambitious Government
Democracy: A Journal of Ideas: Join us for a discussion of Eric Liu and Nick Hanauer’s “The ‘More What, Less How’ Government” on March 9 at NDN. Liu and Hanauer will be joined by Michael Lind of the New America Foundation, Megan McArdle of The Atlantic, and E.J. Dionne of The Washington Post. Click here to RSVP.
Shadi Hamid on “The Cairo Conundrum”
Democracy: A Journal of Ideas: In our Winter 2010 issue, Shadi Hamid wrote of the dilemma confronting the U.S. in Egypt. His closing lines: “Egyptians, along with Arabs and Muslims throughout the region, have demonstrated their desire for substantive political change. It is time we did the same.”
Read Gene Sperling’s Essay on “Rising-Tide Economics” from Our Fall 2007 Issue
Democracy: A Journal of Ideas: President Obama today announced the appointment of Gene Sperling as the new director of the National Economic Council. Readers who are wondering what to expect from Sperling can find their answer in the pages of this journal.
First Principles: The Role of Government
Michael Tomasky: Progressives aren’t going to give up on government because of one election. A strong role for the federal government as incubator, nurturer, and watchdog is central to the progressive vision of society.
Enemies of State
Rick Perlstein: Historically, nothing has terrified conservatives so much as efficient, effective, activist government.
Why Conservatives Won’t Govern
Alan Wolfe: Rather than using government badly out of a conviction that it always fails, they now refuse to allow government to do its work at all.
The “More What, Less How” Government
Eric Liu and Nick Hanauer: What is government for? Over the last two years, this has been the dominant question of American politics. Yet so few leaders have offered coherent answers.

Subscribe  |  Site Map  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact  |  Copyright 2010. Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Inc. All Rights Reserved