2 girls undermine entire US border strategy in under 18 seconds

8 video's MeldingspictogramGeabonneerd
547810
Meldingspictogram
Deze functie is momenteel niet beschikbaar. Probeer het later opnieuw.
roypgermano | 16 december 2010 | stemmen voor leuk, 70 stemmen voor niet leuk

http://www.TheOtherSideOfIm... Since the mid-1990s, the US has built fencin...

roypgermano | 16 december 2010 | stemmen voor leuk, 70 stemmen voor niet leuk

http://www.TheOtherSideOfImmigration.com Since the mid-1990s, the US has built fencing at various points along the southern border in an attempt to deter would-be immigrants from Mexico. Building the fence isn't cheap. On average, each mile of border fence costs US taxpayers about $4 million to build and will cost another $6.5 billion over the next 20 years to repair and maintain.

Are we getting our money's worth? Is the border fence an effective deterrent? To find out, I asked two young women—both only about 5'5"—to see if they could climb the wall. Check it out...

If we're really serious about reducing rates of undocumented immigration, we could make more effective use of our tax dollars. Those of you who have seen my documentary, The Other Side of Immigration, might remember this statement from the end of the film: "Why spend money on a border fence when we could invest in highways, factories, and greenhouses. How many greenhouses could we build for the cost of that wall? If we invest in Mexico, people won't want to leave."

What do you think? Would spending a dollar to reduce poverty in Mexico be a more effective way to reduce undocumented immigration than spending a dollar to build more fencing along the border?

(c) 2010 Roy Germano Films
http://www.RoyGermano.com
For interviews with the director, contact: press@roygermano.com

Zoals te zien bij: theblaze.com
Link naar deze reactie:
Delen met:

Hoogst beoordeelde reacties

  • our arrogant nationalism will doom our country

  • @iansull Nonsense. The areas where the Left pushes for "freedom" while the Right doesn't are Orwellian. The Left is for the nanny state: Telling you what you can and can't eat, what healthcare you should have. The Left is for regulation, not just of corporations (which are composed entirely of *gasp* PEOPLE), but of political speech. The progressivism of today is tied directly to the progressivism of the past, fact Hillary Clinton is proud of. And what are THEY famous for? Prohibition!

alles weergeven

Alle reacties (623)

Meldingspictogram
Je kunt je nu registreren of aanmelden om een reactie te plaatsen.
  • @Mathurin1911 I didn't say it was only America. Any country that tries to scapegoat immigrants for its own problems will fall. We are a nation of immigrants. peace

  • @andrewc513 Good point! I was being a little too optimistic maybe.

  • @canofsand ya prohibition and food safety standards and child labor laws and women's suffrage, yeah horrible progressive shit like that.

  • I'll crash a Land Rover into it and go to freedom lol.

  • God damn it. 4 million for primitive iron pipes!

    For that money, it should be huge concrete wall.

  • You can't take a vehicle over that fence.

  • Sometimes I wish I was as ignorant as all you mo fos out there. That way I wouldn't have to look at my nation and shake my head in disbelief at what stupid uneducated and disgusting pigs we have become. How our children grow into whores and little "playas" with the soul intention to impress everyone around them by causing pain to those in front of them.

    This world sickens me.

Alle reacties weergeven »
              Volgende
Laden...

Suggesties

Meer suggesties laden...
Wachtrij (0) Terug naar actieve lijst
    1. Je wachtrij is leeg. Gebruik de volgende knop om video's aan je wachtrij toe te voegen:
      of meld je aan om een andere lijst te laden.
    Laden...Laden...Opslaan...