Top Comments
All Comments (16)
-
it is fine as wisdom gleamed from empirical practice, and i agree with you about the thin and unrealistic neoclassical model. the philosophy here though, not the economics mind you, isn't a breakthrough. as he said, it is obvious but neglected, but only by economists.
-
sorry buddy you are a good guy, but the philosophy isn't very professional.
-
2:45 hands
-
George stands up and screams Balls rips his underwear off like in Zoolander and yells "I can count to potatoes!" ( Who is sore now georgie porgie? All the rest of you kiss asses are sure to not comprehend!
-
OBEY.
-
i think its funny that he has student from the London school of economics eventhough he is the one who broke their bank
-
Thank You for posting this. This will be looked at 300 years later by posterity in awe....it is as if Voltaire himself is lecturing and was recorded on camera....
-
This is entirely wonderful, reflexivity and fallibilism presented in a way that challenges and furthers philosophy and social science -> bravo ... well done
- Loading comment...
@fiwbnpb out of 8 trades this week only 1 went red and it was my mistake. the large profit margins are due to clever bets on penny stocks, ive been getting killer trade advice from a college math wiz once a week. you can get his pick here >> bit.ly/Icoqzt?=ofljqc
giuseppetrevisan 3 weeks ago 17
'Philosophy isn't very professional'? Read a book or some journal articles. Basing economic theory on totally unrealistic assumptions is not only unprofessional it's damaging to the real world economy. What he is say isn't original but it's definitely true. Look up intersubjectivity and performativity. Perception moves the markets fact: Option Pricing Theory is an obvious an verifiable example.
AngryJock1982 in reply to levislevitas (Show the comment) 3 weeks ago