In light of Monday’s decision by the British Parliament to remove the People’s Mujahedeen of Iran (MEK) from its list of banned terrorist organizations, Amir Taheri in the Wall Street Journal looks at the implications of the decision and its possible impact on reform in Iran.
- Amir Taheri suggests ways that the MEK can rehabilitate itself but falsely suggests that the MEK has credibility amongst Iranians. This is the same “Yellow Badges for Jews” Amir Taheri of course.
- Guitta promotes the “false choice” fallacy according which either we must bomb Iran, or Iran will get nuclear weapons — conveniently ignoring peaceful compromise solutions offered by Iran and endorsed by international experts such as multilateral enrichment on Iranian soil.
- Rice’ “multilateralism” constituted of issuing ultimatums to Iran, not any real “diplomacy”
June 26th, 2008 at 11:39 am
- Amir Taheri suggests ways that the MEK can rehabilitate itself but falsely suggests that the MEK has credibility amongst Iranians. This is the same “Yellow Badges for Jews” Amir Taheri of course.
- Guitta promotes the “false choice” fallacy according which either we must bomb Iran, or Iran will get nuclear weapons — conveniently ignoring peaceful compromise solutions offered by Iran and endorsed by international experts such as multilateral enrichment on Iranian soil.
- Rice’ “multilateralism” constituted of issuing ultimatums to Iran, not any real “diplomacy”