Asia

Banyan

Asian optimism, European gloom

A chill wind from the West

Jan 13th 2011, 4:28 by Banyan

ANYONE doubting the theme of an editorial in The Economist’s Christmas issue that “hope is on the move” from the West might have thought again after this week’s “regional outlook” forum held in Singapore by the Institute of South-East Asian Studies.

Asia’s economic prospects for the year were deemed healthy by private economists and the IMF alike. A forecast slowdown to 7% annual growth for Asia (excluding Japan) hardly sounds the stuff of nightmares. Inflation is becoming a worry but governments still have policy weapons in reserve to keep it under control.

Politically and in terms of regional security, there is less cause for universal optimism. Thailand faces a troubling year, not to mention the more obvious hotspots of the Korean peninsula, Afghanistan and Pakistan. But even these seem almost minor disruptions compared with the big story: the rapid rise of China, India and the two-fifths of the world population who live there.

For a real dose of sobering gloom, the invited keynote speaker was an imported European, Jacques Attali, a Frenchman with a distinguished career as academic, development-bank boss, presidential adviser, author, consultant and all-round “public intellectual”.

Mr Attali began by quibbling with the theme he had been given; “Repositioning Asia after the crisis”. It was the word “after” he balked at. For him a private-debt crisis in the West had been “solved” by turning it into a public-debt crisis and then by resorting to the printing press. In the past, he said, this strategy has usually ends in “inflation, war or both”. This would be what the optimistic regional economists glossed over as “external shocks”.

His most chilling observation, however, was a comparison between Asian optimism now and European and American buoyancy in the early 1900s. Then, as now, technological advance was transforming the world, and globalisation bringing unheard-of prosperity. Communism was almost unknown and fascism and Nazism still to emerge.

Yet, within a few years, the world was to enter a “dark age” that did not end until 1989 (as Mr Attali sees it—a view probably not shared by most of the West’s baby-boomer generation, who had things pretty good).

Of course, Mr Attali was far from predicting any such disaster for Asia; just sounding a cautionary note against irrational exuberance and hubris. As we noted at Christmas: “As for the Westerners’ gloom, it has its uses.”

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Please login or sign up for a free account.
1-2 of 2
Hoobe wrote:
Jan 13th 2011 4:57 GMT

I recently read a book on economic history book that began in the 1870s which gave me a similar realization.

1870 to 1914 was the first 'true' era of globalization, trade was ever expanding and most nations produced products where they had a competitive advantage. Most parts of the world saw rapid economic growth even though there were some examples of protectionism and recessions within countries. Investors from Great Britain, the most industralized country in the world were powering this boom although their own country was in relative decline. Certainly no one back then could've imagined what was about to happen. Feel familiar?

Fabio C wrote:
Jan 14th 2011 3:10 GMT

Hoobe, I totally disagree with you. In present day a war would end either in genocide or in the human race annihilation. I don’t see hubris from the Asian part of the world but I do see hubris from the Anglo-Saxon elite as they are the ones constantly shoving Asian prowess down our throats using journals like the Economist as a vehicle. I don’t see Asia sabotaging the Euro and EU but I do see the Anglo-Saxon elite doing so in the pages of this very journal.

I keep reading in our press that the only way out the financial crises is to keep buying more and more Chinese trinkets on cheap credit and increase more and more immigration levels. Borrow, borrow, borrow, borrow, spend, spend, spend, spend, tax, tax, tax, tax.

Also, I keep listening to pundits telling us that the only solution would be to reform the whole western financial system in a way that Banks could not cause the same damage as they did just did 3 years ago at the tax payer’s expenses. Well... what is it that our governments are doing? Waiting for the Asians to come up with ideas or waiting for the end of the world?

The East is rising because we are been handed to them in a silver platter by our elite and they are doing that because they are making an apocalyptic amount of money with it. And they are not going to stop it for as long as there is one of us to be sold down the river.

But of course, we can always nuke Asia and say it was its own fault.

1-2 of 2

About Banyan

In this blog, our Asia correspondents and our Banyan columnist provide comment and analysis on Asia's political and cultural landscape

Advertisement

Advertisement

Latest blog posts - All times are GMT
That 70s problem
From Buttonwood's notebook - 2 hrs 5 mins ago
The mysteries of TripAdvisor
From Gulliver - March 7th, 10:51
Hong Kong too-y
From Asia view - March 7th, 10:20
Look at that
From Babbage - March 7th, 8:48
More from our blogs »
Products & events
Stay informed today and every day

Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters and alerts.


Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on Twitter


See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, topical videos and debates on Facebook.

Advertisement