JelloB's comments

Mar 4th 2011 9:56 GMT

That's what you get for helping terrorists carve out their own country. The Taliban used to be friends too.

Another factor that should be considered is the image of the burger as a food item in a given country. In North America it's a staple. Everyone can afford it, good bang for the buck. In some developing countries it's considered a luxury item, a symbol of status, just like sporting a cell-phone for instance. So people will go out of their way to buy one, and will sacrifice more purchasing power than an American for one.

Feb 11th 2011 10:20 GMT

You're right CRenfro. I havent' seen any evidence of common people identifying with Israel. What I've seen is a systematic effort by some media to promote this idea. A vocal and prominent minority cheering for Israel may make it seem like there is broad support for Israel but it's mostly disinformation. That being said, we live in a society where advertisement holds power of persuation and if you keep repeating something often and loud enough, it becomes true. So if the Arabs want more sympathy they better start promoting their cause more actively.

Jan 28th 2011 1:51 GMT

So basically Israel finds Israel not guilty. Now that's a surprise.

Jan 11th 2011 5:37 GMT

The tone of the political debate is a factor, but the elephant in the room is the gun legislation in the US. Why on Earth do civilians need to own automatic rifles? I'm not even talking about hand guns here but military grade weaponry. A growing population of semi-literate gun owners that has fallen on hard times. This is a perfect recipe for disaster. As the recession worsens we'll be seing more of this.

A recent North-American study suggests that the sense of well-being increases more or less proportionally with personal income, but it plateaus at $75,000. This confirms the fact that as long as the basics are covered, money will become less important than one might think. There is a minority that indulge in expensive hobbies like flying planes, but the vast majority spends a great deal of time socializing, which costs nothing. Or almost nothing if a cell-phone is involved. There are 4 billion cell phone subscriptions out there, 2/3 of the total world population. This should be an indication of what really makes people happy.

Nov 27th 2010 3:31 GMT

I would think Romania's inability to integrate the Gypsies is more likely due to the same corruption and incompetence that prevented progress in basic areas like infrastructure and privatization. Integration of minorities is a mystery that much more advanced countries, like Germany, are still struggling with. But the Economist chose to highlight Mr. Nicolae Gheorghe's point of view because fascism sells. Who cares about red tape and general apathy in a poor country? That's a given. Let's talk about genocide, mass graves, fascists... now that's going to get people excited.
If Mr. Gheorghe genuinely thinks that the EU accession served the purpose of driving the Roma out of the country, then why is he so concerned about Romania's chances of joining the PASSPORT-FREE Shengen zone? Yet another disappointing piece about Gypsies.

"That means, in particular, making China see that a tinderbox it has long regarded as a strategic asset has become an appalling liability." Fair enough. And speaking of liabilities, I wonder when the US is planning to dump Israel. That would pacify the planet even more.

Nov 20th 2010 1:11 GMT

Mr Naegele,

I found the comparison between the royals and the Hollywood-type princesses hilarious. Those so called "princesses" are botox/silicone-filled puppets in the hands of the entertainment industry that are only meant to provide circus to the illiterate. They don't have any class, they don't have any education, most of them probably never finished high-school and they talk like five-year olds. Maybe the royals don't really have a role these days, but they have an education and (still) command respect for various reasons. BTW that Sarah Palin is a real piece of work and it looks like she's working hard on her tabloid credentials with that ridiculous reality show. That will surely pave the way to presidency for Momma Grizzly.

Nov 11th 2010 3:46 GMT

It would be an interesting experimet to watch. The Scandinavians have been setting the bar for standard of living and human development for years, so I wouldn't be surprised if did so in terms of political cooperation too. The system of values can be as strong a bond as common religion and language are in other parts of the world.

Oct 2nd 2010 1:05 GMT

Their "image" in some international circles is obviously not something that France worries too much about. They have enough clout to be that way. In 2001 some feverish Americans were pouring French wine down the storm drain because the French had the audacity to disagree with the world policeman. Did that damage France internationally? Water under the bridge. The Gypsy issue is very basic. You outstayed your welcome, you're not a guest anymore. There is the door. I don't care who you are, the Queen of England or a squatter. Nobody in this world will keep an abusive guest in their house because of what the neighbour might say. So when it comes to the real world international opinion, I think France is pretty safe. And the EU should remember who their most fervent supporter is.

Sep 23rd 2010 8:54 GMT

What kind of comparison is this? Somehow a handfull of Gypsies made it through the US' tough selective immigration process and we compare those to the millions left behind in Europe? Compare them to the Mexicans in the southern states. Places like Arizona where everyone with a brown face will have to carry their immigration papers with them at all times. It's easy to masquerade as the land of opportunity with Canada on the northern border and two rows of barbed wire on the southern one.

Sep 10th 2010 5:16 GMT

@ Paco

"Romania is acting as is these were foreigner that are just happening to be leaving their country (because of intolerable conditions there) and she (it) is doing ZERO to retain them."

Romania, like other Eastern European countries is unable to retain its hard working, educated people, let alone the Gypsies. Everybody suffers from the "intolerable conditions" overe there, not just the Gypsies. And just how intolerable they are depends a lot on the perception of the individual and what they're prepared to do about it. This won't sound nice, but many Gypsies don't mind the "mess" they live in. This is of their own making, this is how they live and it only looks miserable to the outside observer.

Speaking of what was done to integrate the Roma, the Communists gave these people brand new appartments and they built bon fires in there. Many high quality period homes that used to belong to the rich before Communism were given to the Gypsies. They turned them into pigsties. Does Spain give away new appartments to the people it wants to integrate?

Oh, and one more thing... If I was a Spaniard I'd have the decency of not mentioning handouts from the EU.

Sep 9th 2010 5:25 GMT

"Do these metrics take into account that the life expectancy differs between France and the US? If the life expectancy is 3 year higher in France than in the US, that explains 50% of the 6-year difference..."

They do. With a longer life span, you should be working proportionally longer.

Whose tent is Tukey guarding? The Cold War ended twenty years ago. Russia and Germany are now working on a very promising economic partnership. Iran is NOT a threat to Europe, no matter how hard US and Israel are trying to convince us otherwise. Now let's look at a more relevant topic, like illegal immigration from instance. From that perspective, Turkey is doing anything but guarding the tent. Tens of thousands of illegals come to Europe from this country every year. All in all, the idea that Turkey is crucial for European security is obsolete at best.

Jun 19th 2010 2:47 GMT

Look who is scolding Europe for pushing Turkey towards fundamentalism. The "organic link" (what an unfortunate choice of words) between the West and the entire Middle East (not just Turkey) was severed by the very people shamelessly accusing Europe for it. During the sad days of the Bush administration, Condolezza Rice was comparing the suffering in Afghanistan and Iraq to the "pangs of birth" of young democracies. Different administration, same language, same spin doctors with the same cynical attitude. Same war criminals running the show with impunity and deflecting responsibility by peppering the rest of the world with accusations and hoping that in defending themselves, the others will forget who the real culprits are. To sum it up, I think war criminals can't afford the luxury to fuss about political deadlock in other countries.

May 29th 2010 12:25 GMT

I can't believe this stream of anti-German articles in the Economist. It's beyond me why practicing and preaching discipline is seen as nationalistic and anti-European. They're not expecting more from others than they expect from themselves. Why would you hand your wealth to strangers, no questions asked, while teaching your own children to be thrifty? Of course they feel superior (in this context). Wouldn't anybody? When you stick out your hand at a passer by there is no question who is superior. Truth is, Britain (like France) was always resentful of Germany being able to do so much with so little. It's important to remember in this context that the most fierce opponent of the German reunification was Margaret Thatcher. After losing its colonial empire and now its position on the financial markets, Britain is going down the tubes. And it's making a sad spectacle out of it.

May 17th 2010 5:46 GMT

I'm surprised to see the Economist echoing this nonsense about Germany not stimulating consumption at home. Has anybody seen any hard evidence of Germany not spending enough on itself (relative to its neighbors)? All those German tourists you run into everywhere you travel around the world, isn't that a form of consumption that benefits other countries? Like my father was saying the other day, telling Germans to buy more of their own stuff is as absurd as telling the fat baker to eat more bread. Somebody can only sell too much if somebody else is buying too much. Nobody forced the Greeks to buy more than they can afford. It is amazing how developed the art of deflecting responsibility is in some places around the world.

May 6th 2010 4:48 GMT

@DistortedPlanet

"Why have none of the culprits in scandals gone to court? Why has no one been charged of commiting these crimes? Why am I being punished?"

These culprits are of Greek nationality, therefore it was your job as a Greek to bring them to justice. You waited for too long, you haven't done your homework and now the foreigners have to clean up your house for you. That's why you are being punished.

Apr 30th 2010 5:13 GMT

If Greece was to default, the losses to the foreign banks would be great but measurable. It would end there and then. If Greece under its current form gets the money, you'd only be giving a lease on life to a huge parasitical system, so that it can keep sucking the host dry for another day. There is nothing wrong with defaulting. Russia defaulted 12 years ago under an alocoholic president and now they're back with a vengeance. Let the Greeks learn a useful lesson. Looking back, it was hugely irresponsible to throw all this money into a Balkan country with a centuries old tradition of corruption. But again, this is no excuse to keep doing so.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Latest blog posts - All times are GMT
Link exchange
From Free exchange - 2 hrs 6 mins ago
Of female sin and the lesbian moon
From Johnson - 3 hrs 14 mins ago
"The Matrix" cometh
From Multimedia - 3 hrs 8 mins ago
Caption competition 7: The results
From Newsbook - March 11th, 19:34
Terrifying tremors
From Daily chart - March 11th, 18:19
Outside the room
From Multimedia - March 11th, 18:06
More from our blogs »
Products & events

The Economist on social networks
Keep up-to-date and interact with fellow readers via your preferred social network:

Twitter
Follow us @theeconomist for article updates, events and offers. For more detailed subject channels search for ‘The Economist’

Facebook
Join over half a million other fans and share your comments

Tumblr
Visit for popular charts, cartoons and videos as well as some of the best quotes from the newspaper and blogs

Linkedin
Become a member to connect with fellow Economist readers, view job postings and receive article updates


The Economist. On your iPhone and iPad
You can read and listen to The Economist on your iPhone & iPad. The apps are free to download and subscribers receive full access


Ask the Economist
Which emerging technologies are worth watching in 2011? Ask Tom Standage, editor of this week's "Technology Quarterly" in a live Q&A event, Tuesday March 15th, 4pm GMT. Pose questions with #askeconomist on Twitter


Advertisement