European politics

Charlemagne's notebook

EU and Ireland's bail-out

A frosty response to Enda Kenny

Mar 5th 2011, 13:58 by The Economist | Helsinki

HE MAY have won an overwhelming endorsement from voters for his promise to renegotiate the terms of Ireland’s €85 billion bail-out. But on his first outing on the international stage as the Taoiseach-in-waiting, Enda Kenny is finding it much harder to convince his fellow European leaders of the justice of his cause. The Irish Independent summed it up well this morning: “Enda gets a few pats on back - but little else from EU allies”.

In Helsinki for a summit of leaders from the European People’s Party (EPP), the centre-right “family” of parties in the European parliament, Mr Kenny’s election bring the EPP’s crop of presidents and prime ministers up to 15 of the EU's 27 member-states.

But for all the congratulations, the EPP’s matriarch, Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, only conceded Mr Kenny “a couple of minutes” of her time for one-on-one talks, says one well-placed source. On the substance of his plea, the response was a cold as the ice that still covers Finland's lakes. Mrs Merkel said that any concession to Ireland would have to be matched by “further commitments” and “further conditionality”. The host, Jyrki Katainen, Finland’s finance minister and possible prime minister after April’s general election, put it bluntly: “There are no free lunches”.

Wilfried Martens, the EPP president and former Belgian prime minister, put a hopeful gloss, saying “nobody spoke against” Mr Kenny in the meeting behijnd closed doors. But had anyone supported him? Uhm, no.

In truth, there is growing sympathy within Europe for the demand by Ireland and Greece to pay lower interest. The rate they pay, about 6%, is much lower than the market would demand. Yet it represents a substantial premium (more than 3%) above the rate that the European Commission and the special-purpose fund, the European Financial Stability Facility, are paying to raise the loans.

This bail-out rate was deliberately designed to impose a degree of pain to deter other countries from seeking bail-outs except in the direst need. The worry, though, is that the burden is adding to the mountain of debt that Ireland and Greece are already carrying. The European Commission, for one, privately thinks that the rate should be reduced. One senior source argues that the danger of “moral hazard” should be addressed by the tough austerity measures imposed on countries, not by "punitive" interest rates.

The EPP statement at the end of the summit spoke vaguely of “periodic re-evaluation” of the rescue terms, and the possibility of “possible amendments”.  But these seemed to require “certain adjustments at national level”. So what could Mr Kenny offer? The obvious concession is a reduction in Ireland’s low corporate-tax rate, which most other EU states resent. But Mr Kenny says that is a non-starter: it would lead to lower investments and job losses in Ireland. The European Commission is working on a plan to harmonise the corporate-tax base, rather than the tax rate. But Mr Kenny sees this as the thin end of the wedge for future tax harmonisation.

Mr Kenny also seems to have given up his one weapon: imposing losses on senior Irish bank bond-holders, which would have a knock-on effect on other European banks, not least German ones. “There were strong comments that that wouldn’t be a runner,” he said, according to the Irish Times.

The trouble for Mr Kenny that his electoral mandate runs into the wall of the electoral problems of the core-within-the-core of the euro zone: the six AAA-rated countries, among them Germany and Finland. Mrs Merkel faces a series of regional elections, and Mr Katainen is hoping his centre-right Kokoomus party will lead the government after next April’s election (thus becoming the EPP’s 16th leader). Both face a strong backlash from electors for having to bail-out less disciplined European partners.

Indeed, the EPP summit was held in Helsinki in part to boost the profile and standing of the boyish Mr Katainen, still only 39 years old. As he walked in to the Kamp Hotel, Mr Kenny was the only one who played his assigned part. He pointed to Mr Katainen and told the cameras: “He’s a good man and I hope he gets elected.” Mr Katainen looked sheepish. “Thanks Enda,” he might have thought, “but if you want me to get elected you’d better stop asking for special favours.”

* The matter of interest rates is not closed yet, it seems. Since I put up this post, I see that Olli Rehn, the economic and monetary affairs commissioner (and a Finn) has now come out explicitly in favour of lower interest rates for Ireland.

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Please login or sign up for a free account.
1-12 of 12
johnspencer wrote:
Mar 5th 2011 2:49 GMT

Two years ago the outgoing Irish government (which just last week lost the general election in a wipe-out) decided to give a state guarantee to its beleaguered bank's bond-holders: meaning that their loans to the Irish banks would effectively carry no risk whatsoever. Most of these bondholders are European banks, mainly German and French. It's rather disingenuous of Jyrki Katainen, Finland’s finance minister to talk of there being "no free lunches” when it comes to the EU's dealings with Ireland, or of the European Commission citing "moral hazard" as an excuse for no going a little softer on Ireland.

I wish I could place a bet somewhere with a guarantee of winning even it the horse dropped dead mid-course. Though I wouldn't have the audacity to mention moral hazard or free lunch out loud; I'd just keep my head down, eat the free lunch and start rewriting the economics dictionary.

Mar 5th 2011 2:57 GMT

"So what could Mr Kenny offer? The obvious concession is a reduction in Ireland’s low corporate-tax rate, which most other EU states resent."

We'd happily offer to reduce our corporate tax rate! Should get us a good few more jobs.
How does 10% sound?

barrkel wrote:
Mar 5th 2011 3:55 GMT

The free lunch that Germany got in the early and mid 2000s in terms of low ECB rates which helped its economy, cost peripheral countries dear, by making money too cheap. It's not just the bond guarantee; Germany has been benefiting from the causes of this crisis for some time, but does indeed want its free lunch.

Blaaat wrote:
Mar 5th 2011 4:38 GMT

"Most of these bondholders are European banks, mainly German and French."

Try British and German. French bank exposure to Irish debt is pretty much smaller compared to that of German and British banks.

FFScotland wrote:
Mar 5th 2011 8:39 GMT

The other night there was a Fine Gael TD giving an interview just near to the Irish Parliament. She was going on about how dire the economic situation was in Ireland. Meanwhile behind her a stream of upmarket cars - recent Mercedes, BMWs and such like - went past. There was hardly an old crock amongst them.

Economic crises take strange forms.

matt_us wrote:
Mar 5th 2011 9:53 GMT

Of ocurse European leaders are not going to give in to a demand straight away, but the new Irish PM has staked his claim. The rate is only 6%, so that it can be reduced when difficulties come up. Or when countries change governments. There is no reason, not to reduce it, especially as the EFSF (the EU bail-out fund) can probably refinance itself at a much lower rate than the 2.89% it achieved at its first bond issue, which was 9 times oversubscribed.

A reduction of the interest rate from 6% is sensible, both to debtor and creditor. The argument about moral hazard is nonsense. Ireland has the IMF in the country, they will ensure that nobody will take advantage. And to reduce moral hazard in the future, a reining in of the financial sector would help.

And, of course, the banning of credit default swaps, betting on the bankruptcy of Euro periphery countries. That would avoid the biggest moral hazard of all, greedy hedgefunds and speculators trying to make obscene profits out of the misery of others!

Orionmcdonald wrote:
Mar 7th 2011 4:29 GMT

Their is a growing feeling in Ireland (from what I can gather in the press and anecdotally)that if the EU doesn't renegociate more sustainable terms that senior bondholders should have their haircut. After all a very pro-European country is being told that they and they alone are responsible for this crisis. Irish hubris and financial mismanagement has been rife these last 10 years but the narrative of Northern European politicians ignores the fear that had Ireland sent the banks to the wall Iceland style then German French and English banks would have serious trouble. The fact that these investor have an EU and IMF imposed repayment scheme and is injustice enough without them flaunting their superiority. Irish banks were foolhardy but European ones possibly more-so and should be punished for their poor investments.

Mar 7th 2011 9:50 GMT

As was recently revealed in an Irish newspaper, the whole European debate on the Irish corporate tax rate is a bit of a red herring. In keeping with the country's "one stop shop" approach to attracting foreign investment, the effective rate of corporation tax payable in Ireland (i.e., after offsetting any allowances, etc), at 11.9 %, is almost identical to the headline rate of 12.5 %. What you see is what you pay, as it were. The situation in other Member States is very different. While both Germany and the UK have stubbornly high effective rates (at over 20 % each), the effective rate in Belgium for example is just under 5 % compared to a headline rate of over 30 %. The most interesting example is France where a headline rate of 34 % becomes an effective rate of just 8 % (lower than Ireland's) once account is taken of multiple allowances, and no doubt the occasional bottle of expensive cognac for the tax inspector! My advice to Mr Kenny when the issue comes up in the European Council later this month is to grab the attention of the other heads of government by announcing that, after due consideration, Ireland is indeed prepared to accept an EU minimum effective rate of corporate tax, of 12.5 % ! !

TCDPhilSec wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 5:51 GMT

FFScotland: I'm sure that an interview in Parliament Square in Westminster would feature a backdrop of nice cars, too. It doesn't mean the UK economy is healthy. Parliaments tend not to be located in poverty blackspots.

Mar 9th 2011 1:21 GMT

Refreshing post and refreshing comments. It is about time to expose the German abuse of this situation. I always favour the qui prodest test. And it is clear that the great winner of months of incendiary press statements against the spendthrifts of euroland is Merlkeland, now blissed with the condition of bond buyer haven and taking advantage of a devaluated euro. The loosers, the "pheripheral" european citizen and the european project.
I personally think "l'Alemagne doit payer" is a perfect slogan now, after devastating months of German greediness and selfish calculations.

A J Maher wrote:
Mar 9th 2011 4:05 GMT

Germany’s – is now the open hegemon of the eurozone.

At every stage Germany has refused to deal with her own banking crisis and accordingly the eurozones grand bargain protects German bondholders (banks) at the expense of Irish (and other) taxpayers . Germany prefers to offer a limited and expensive extension of her own credit rating as the alternative to pumping huge volumes of real tax payer’s money to bail out her own chronically afflicted banking sector.

German political will 1 rest 0.

Severe pro cyclical fiscal tightening is proposed in the grand bargain for the afflicted members with no suggestion of solidarity transfers to help them mitigate the social pain. So the instruction to countries who already suffer unemployment levels of 20% is to get poor quickly because only poverty can make you strong – Oh but be sure to make your interest payments on time.

German political will 2 rest 0.

Germany has lived off the growth of the club med (in this case including France) because she cannot (or refuses) to generate her growth from within her own borders. German trade surpluses earned from Spain amounted to 3% of Spanish GDP year after year. It is these surpluses that have funded German growth and specifically provided the funding of German loans back to Spain that, in turn, fuelled Spain’s disastrous property bubble. We’d like to loan you back the money that you foolishly spent on our product so that you can foolishly spend even more. Vendor financing. Until Germany can generate growth from within her own borders she should not be sharing a currency with anybody. Intra eurozone trade cannot be stable and eurozone economies cannot converge with so large and so compulsive an exporter in the club. But Intra eurozone trade imbalances and therefore capital imbalances are not addressed or even referred to in the grand bargain – or (more surprisingly) in this Martin Wolf article.

German political will 3 rest 0.

Germany’s fetish for uber hard money and disinflation sets an ECB agenda that in no way accommodates the needs of most members of the eurozone. Germany needs a real interest rate of @ + 4% whilst the club med need one of around - 4.5% to mitigate the huge scale of economic contraction inflicted upon them. Interest rates are now set rise.

German political will 4 rest 0.

It is this pro cyclical combination of fiscal and monetary squeeze which puts this currency area in a counterproductive league all of its own. Contrary to the mythology “Strength through pain” was not the medicine that Germany prescribed for herself when she broke the debt and deficit rules of original growth and stability pact in 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2009, 2010 and she is certainly going to be in breach again in 2011.

But that was all about East Germany and real solidarity not Europe and rhetorical solidarity.

There is nothing "grand" about this proposal and it certainly isn't a bargain of any kind.

Mary M wrote:
Mar 10th 2011 4:12 GMT

Since Angela Merkel lost the election in Hamburg, we have hardly heard a peep out of her about doing everything possible to "save the euro." No doubt she realizes that she has to save herself first. I hope Enda Kenny can stand up to the Europeans and leave them in no doubt that Ireland's tax regime is its own business. We all know that the corporate tax rate of various European countries is not as it seems. However, if Ireland concedes on this - it is last person leaving turn out the lights! After all, that is all we have left.

1-12 of 12

About Charlemagne's notebook

In this blog, our Charlemagne columnist considers the ideas and events that shape Europe, while dealing with the quirks of life in the Euro-bubble. Follow Charlemagne on Twitter at @EconCharlemagne

Advertisement

Advertisement

Products & events
Stay informed today and every day

Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters and alerts.


Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on Twitter


See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, topical videos and debates on Facebook.

Advertisement