American politics

Democracy in America

Commodities crisis

Protecting our vital interests

Mar 8th 2011, 15:49 by M.S.

I DON'T usually go along with arguments that American presidents are at fault when foreign conflicts disrupt the flow of some commodity or other to our unslakeably greedy economy, but I have to confess that with the events of the past couple of days it's become clear to me that Barack Obama's failure to take action in this current crisis is simply shameful and displays both unforgiveable timidity and a callous disregard for the vital daily needs of ordinary Americans. It's one thing to recognise that America can't force democracy on other countries and can't determine their future for them. But we also can't just sit back and watch while a clearly disturbed dictator defies the wishes of his own people, embroils his country in civil war, and then uses as his final weapon his control over his nation's supplies of the fuel that drives the economies of America and the rest of the developed world. There is such a thing as "vital American interests". Mr Obama needs to act, not next week, not after further deliberations with NATO allies, but now.

With that in mind, I propose that Mr Obama:

• order the United States strategic coffee reserve to immediately release into the market quantities of bean sufficient to calm nervous consumers worried about supply disruptions

• call on Congress to repeal all environmental legislation impeding development of America's domestic coffee production

• demand that Laurent Gbagbo of the Ivory Coast give up control of that country's coffee production or face possible American naval action to secure stockpiles

And don't even get me started on cocoa. We should just make it clear that all options are on the table.

(Photo credit: Rex Features)

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Please login or sign up for a free account.
1-20 of 31
Mar 8th 2011 4:13 GMT

No, what we need is the FDA to regulate coffee consumption. Starbucks isn't going to serve less coffee on its own. Big Coffee is making obscene profits. We need special taxes for them. We also need to subsidize alternative beverages like herbal teas. It'll create millions of green tea jobs. We should also invest in more efficient modes of waking up like getting high off speed and rails of cocaine. Sure, it's insanely expensive but if it can get us off our addiction to coffee, nothing is too costly or stupid.

Jesse Lansner wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 4:56 GMT

Your call to "calm nervous consumers" by giving them more coffee seems counter-productive. Still, cocoa is the real issue here. The Ivory Coast produces only 3% of the world's coffee, but roughly 35% of the world's cocoa. We can weather a minor uptick in coffee prices (assuming other countries don't step up their own production to fill the gap), but a chocolate shortage would be devastating to America's Gross National Happiness.

hedgefundguy wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 5:02 GMT

demand that Laurent Gbagbo of the Ivory Coast give up control of that country's coffee production or face possible American naval action to secure stockpiles

I'll assume that this is not an early April Fool's joke.

The U.S. supports the export ban as a way to deny Gbagbo hard currency.

M.S., What warship are you on?
You seem to want to put other Americans in harms way very quickly and for a silly reason.

Regards

Faedrus wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 5:10 GMT

Oh sure, you say that NOW.

Open your eyes America!

Us conservatives have been insisting for a number of years now, and to no avail:

"Plant baby plant!"

And, release the country's coffee reserves NOW.

No more depending on them foreigners for foreign coffee!

They just use their earnings to buy up US radio space, and replace it with salsa music anyway. This will not stand.

Geoff G wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 5:15 GMT

The optimum policy would help America's struggling dairy industry while loosening Big Coffee's viselike grip on American consumers. All we need to do is mandate that every cup of coffee contain at least two times as much as milk as coffee - Obama could introduce the bill while sipping on a big latte. "Umm-umm, tasty, and healthy too."

Except, of course, for the fact that Obama has coffee in his blood, and almost certainly hates milk. While other Americans grew up with contented cows grazing on green hillsides, Obama grew up in Indonesia - on the island of Java, no less - where fresh milk was unavailable, but the coffee literally grew on trees. Or in Kenya, where coffee exports, not dairy exports, are a major part of the economy - you can get Kenyan coffee at Costco, but try buying Kenyan milk anywhere in the US. Or in Hawaii, producer of some of the most expensive coffee beans on earth, but with per capita milk consumption far below that of the states in real America.

Doug Pascover wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 5:34 GMT

Excellent post and, RR, excellent riposte.

No blood for coffee. Wait, that's wrong. No distant blood for coffee.

Kevin Viel wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 5:45 GMT

I am lost. Democracy certainly cannot be forced upon a people, but enforcing decency can and should. Few of us would tolerate domestic violence in our neighborhood, why do we tolerate or worse support governments that egregiously violate the human rights of its citizens? Attacks by the Libyan military on unarmed demonstrators and citizens should have been squelched on hour one.

That Obama is lost did not surprise me. Cool and collected might get one through a debate when one is not a leader and has little experience, but it will not pass muster in foreign policy. It does surprise me that Clinton was party to the inaction; I would like to expect more from her.

The final point to make is that impact of the price of oil on the lives of US citizens is not the main issue, though more failure in the administrations to achieve energy independence cuts hard. The lives of the Libyans and other peaceful residents in North Africa are and were greatly affected by our policies and we have the power to act and should. Unfortunately, acting now may require a military response-a sad state since adhering to our principles and having a coherent policy that put principle above oil and power could have avoided the urgency. When, oh when, will we learn?

At least some of our policies result from ignorance. Most people in the US would make different decisions if they were familiar with the effects, namely suppression of people. Towards this end, we need to increase the number of Fulbright fellows and similar exchange programs.

bampbs wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 5:51 GMT

Don't forget the oil we need to keep coffee and cocoa flowing abundantly to our shores. Our national state of caffeination is under threat by two mad African dictators at once.

This is unprecedented.

g cross wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 7:00 GMT

@ Kevin Viel: "Cool and collected might get one through a debate when one is not a leader and has little experience, but it will not pass muster in foreign policy."

Yes, because what we really need is a hot-head President who leaps at opportunities to start new wars!

David USA wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 7:06 GMT

Kevin Viel, your post sounds serious, yet looks incredibly ill-conceived. You say "Democracy certainly cannot be forced upon a people, but enforcing decency can and should." But what is the difference?
You say "Attacks by the Libyan military on unarmed demonstrators and citizens should have been squelched on hour one". Where is your argument for the same in Zimbabwe, Venezuela, Nepal, Khazakistan, and myriad other places? Or your argument against the US government during our own Civil War?

Mar 8th 2011 7:18 GMT

This really has to be a joke!

doublehelix wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 8:11 GMT

Sure, but don't let a little thing like truth or logic prevent the leftists from blaming a Republican President like Bush for expensive gas. According to the Michael Moore crowd, it's all one big scary conspiracy by the Halliburton gang and Saudi Arabia to suck the lifeblood out of the country. Why, George's buddy Dick Cheney probably looked at the calendar and noticed the presidential election is next year! He then reached across the big desk in his office and turned the red knob that send gas prices up just to make Obama look bad. They're so mean and evil!

PKP801 wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 8:43 GMT

A perfect tongue-in-cheek blog post! Just what i needed to get through another grueling Tuesday.

@Restrained Radical

Excelent response! I had to literally hold my desk to stop from r-ing on the f, l-ing mao.

PKP801 wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 8:48 GMT

P.S. And now my impression of Glenn Beck:

And have you noticed that the US is not exactly on perfect terms with MOST of the coffee growing countries? Columbia, Cuba, Sumatra, Jamaica, Kenya. And have you noticed that many of those countries have some strangely Socialist beliefs and actions built into their system?

*GASP*

The whole coffee-inducstrial-complex is a giant global conspiracy to flood the US with impure socialst ideals via an addictive stimulant, therefore corrupting our Democracy to make us suceptible to the ideas of a Socialist system!!! We need to do something to keep coffee jobs on American soil! The fate of the Free World depends on it!!!!

cellos wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 9:03 GMT

US should protect you vital interests at home and reduce its power over foreign nations. We all have enough evidence that this marshall atitude is wrong and does bad to everyone, including US citizens. Let us learn from History and stop doing the same mistakes.

speckledhen wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 9:06 GMT

Get with the times, M.S.!

Your dry wit and satire may have been self-evident in the old days, but today, a winkie-face is mandatory.

Please update your post before someone starts the invasion.

Jesse Lansner wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 9:06 GMT

Geoff G's post shows how our current political divide will prevent any meaningful action on America's looming hot beverage crisis. Obama cannot help coffee growers because the right will take that action as proof that he is Kenyan/Indonesian/etc. On the other hand, he can't promote a switch to the most viable alternative beverage - tea - because the left will see that as selling out to the tea party.

Cocoa fails because Glenn Beck will spend hours pointing out the similarity of the words "cocoa" and "cocaine." And a nationwide switch to hot cider will drive up the price of apples to the point that apple pie - the dessert that defines our nation's very identity - will be unaffordable to all but the wealthiest Americans.

I beg our leaders to put aside their partisan differences before it's too late, lest our children face a future in which they are forced to drink warm water (or hot toddies).

cellos wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 9:07 GMT

US should protect its vital interests at home and reduce its power over foreign nations. We all have enough evidence that this marshall atitude is wrong and does bad to everyone, including US citizens. Let us learn from History and stop doing the same mistakes.

Orcus wrote:
Mar 8th 2011 9:29 GMT

Yeah ... YEAH!!! :D

I'm not one for coffee, but I need cocoa for my Extra Strength Cocoa Puffs. I'm just COOCOO for Cocoa Puffs, hahahaha.

It's funny cuz it's relevant. :P

Garaboncias wrote:
Mar 9th 2011 12:49 GMT

M.S. must be on the payroll of Big Coffee. He made me blow a half of a cup of really good coffee -fresh from Pete's-through my nose. Now I have to get some more. What was it on M.S's part, if not a blatant attempt (a successful one at that) to make one waste precious commodities?

1-20 of 31

About Democracy in America

In this blog, our correspondents share their thoughts and opinions on America's kinetic brand of politics and the policy it produces.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Latest blog posts - All times are GMT
First impressions
From Babbage - March 12th, 20:29
Rick Scott 1, Bullet Trains 0
From Gulliver - March 12th, 20:15
Group mentality
From Babbage - March 12th, 20:02
Containing the nuclear crisis
From Asia view - March 12th, 15:49
Over-aged and under-powered
From Babbage - March 12th, 7:51
The nuclear threat
From Asia view - March 12th, 3:18
More from our blogs »
Products & events
Stay informed today and every day

Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters and alerts.


Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on Twitter


See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, topical videos and debates on Facebook.

Advertisement