The Americas

Americas view

Asset seizure in Colombia

Seizing control of a wayward agency

Nov 11th 2010, 22:40 by S.B. | BOGOTÁ

ASK anyone involved in Colombia’s long battle against organised crime about the keys to the country’s success, and one of the first responses will inevitably be the state’s attack on the mobs’ finances. In 1996 the government passed a law that allowed it to confiscate any asset whose owner could not demonstrate that it was acquired legally. At first, officials made little use of the tactic. But once Álvaro Uribe became president in 2002, he had the law streamlined, and began using its inversion of the burden of proof to strip hundreds of suspected drug lords of their presumably ill-gotten gains, with no need for a criminal conviction that would have been difficult to secure. Mr Uribe has called asset seizure one of the anti-narcotics tools “most feared” by the mafias.

So far, Colombian officials have managed not to abuse their confiscatory power to persecute political opponents, the most obvious pitfall of the policy. However, a successful asset-seizure programme also depends on a much more mundane task: safeguarding the forfeited property until it can be sold off, auctioned or given away to victims of organised crime. In 1992 Colombia established an agency called the National Narcotics Directorate (DNE), whose official responsibility was determining drug-control policy. In practice, however, it has focused on managing the 76,000 items the government has snatched from the narcos, such as jewelry, art, cars and real estate (including agricultural, residential, and commercial property).

By administering such a lucrative portfolio, the DNE became an automatic target for corruption. Sadly, it appears that the government’s efforts to maintain the agency’s integrity have fallen short. For months several Colombian newspapers have been reporting that some seized assets, including luxury hotels, had ended up in the hands of other criminals. Just five weeks after Juan Manuel Santos became president this year, he began acting on the allegations. On September 16th he had the head of the agency, Omar Figueroa, removed after learning that a DNE officer overseeing property seized from a well-known drug dealer had links to that dealer’s gang. He took an even bolder step on November 2nd, ordering a raid on the DNE’s offices, and letting the contracts of 100 employees lapse. Mr Figueroa’s successor, Juan Carlos Restrepo, discovered hundreds of cases of suspicious activity at the agency, and called it a “playground for the mafia and corruption”.

By responding so decisively, the new president is leaving no doubt about his desire to clean up the agency. But the fact that it became so thoroughly corrupt despite Mr Uribe’s commitment to fighting organised crime shows that Colombia’s achievements in establishing the rule of law and honest government are fragile and incomplete. If the DNE’s reputation cannot be quickly reinstated, citizens may begin to doubt the usefulness of one of their most powerful weapons against the mobs.

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Please login or sign up for a free account.
1-4 of 4
mymind wrote:
Nov 12th 2010 3:14 GMT

People are greedy by nature. If they think that they can get away with enriching themselves at someones elses expense, they will do it. Mr Santos has done so many impressive things since being elected that I am not surprised at his vigorous action in this instance.

Hopefully there will be no letting up.

Fighting drug related crime is difficult in all countries. Maybe the world could take notice of this "reverse proof" procedure in Colombia and learn from it.

After all it is arguably the most powerful tool to fight drug related crime, what is the point.

ColombianMan wrote:
Nov 15th 2010 2:48 GMT

And if only the rich countries of the world, especially Switzerland, agreed to freeze or confiscate the assets of these criminals and terrorists from all around the world, instead of having their banks profiting from them; the fact that people in Switzerland and other similar countries benefit from the violence and deaths of other people living in countries like Colombia is simply disgusting.

dreyfuss wrote:
Nov 17th 2010 7:20 GMT

Alvaro Uribe couldn't fight against organized crime for one reason....He was part of it...Moreover, he was one of the fearer mobsters.

dreyfuss wrote:
Nov 17th 2010 7:31 GMT

Can someone tell me where it came from the money that the Uribe's brothers used for buying huge farms in Colombia as La Carolina, Guacharacas and El Uberrimo including thousands of cows and expensive bulls? Don't you know? I will tell you: Drug money that his father Alberto Uribe Sierra left when he was killed by the guerrila, due to a drug deal that finished wrong. So please, don't try to depict Uribe as moralist or honest man when he's totally the opposite.

1-4 of 4

About Americas view

In this blog, our correspondents provide reporting, analysis and opinion on politics, economics, society and culture in Latin America, the Caribbean and Canada.

Follow us on Twitter @EconAmericas

Advertisement

Advertisement

Latest blog posts - All times are GMT

Muck and brass
From Americas view - 40 mins ago
Donald Ellis and the Eskimos
From Prospero - 1 hrs 4 mins ago
Link exchange
From Free exchange - 2 hrs 28 mins ago
Rush Limbaugh, sinophone
From Johnson - January 21st, 19:04
Boiling over
From Eastern approaches - January 21st, 18:47
More from our blogs »
Products & events
Stay informed today and every day

Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters and alerts.


Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on Twitter


See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, topical videos and debates on Facebook.

Advertisement