'I lost my moral compass': how a young US soldier triggered an abuse scandal in Afghanistan

Jeremy Morlock is central to a controversy that has been compared to Abu Ghraib. Guy Adams tells his story, from Sarah Palin's home town to Afghanistan - and jail

Alleged to be one of the men in the photographs, Jeremy Morlock is accused of throwing a grenade at an Afghan civilian in a pre-meditated plan

AFP/US Army

Alleged to be one of the men in the photographs, Jeremy Morlock is accused of throwing a grenade at an Afghan civilian in a pre-meditated plan

Smiling as he leaned over the young man's body, and using one hand to present his bloodied face to the camera, Corporal Jeremy Morlock celebrated the murder of an innocent Afghan civilian as if he had just bagged a magisterial moose from the wilds of his native Alaska.

Photos of the 23-year-old soldier treating a human being as if he were some sort of hunting trophy shocked the world when they were published last week by the German news magazine Der Spiegel. Even the US Army, an organisation not usually given to grovelling apology, described the images as "repugnant".

On Wednesday, at Joint Base Lewis-McChord near Seattle in Washington State, Morlock was sentenced to 24 years in a military prison, after pleading guilty to being part of a "kill squad" of junior soldiers who randomly murdered three unarmed locals, for sport, during a 12-month tour of Kandahar province, which ended last spring.

The relatively light sentence followed a plea bargain that will soon see Morlock give evidence against four comrades who are also accused of taking part in the murders. In exchange for evidence about how the group "waxed" victims (an expression used in his interviews with prosecutors) he should be eligible for parole some time around his 30th birthday.

Yet behind the stiff formality of the courtroom drama, Afghanistan's version of the Abu Ghraib scandal seems likely to leave important questions unanswered. Did senior officers know about the "kill squad's" activities? Did they care about the mental health of the young men under their command? And are a few wayward junior soldiers now being made scapegoats for an abuse problem which runs far deeper?

Jeremy Morlock's story certainly gives pause for thought. Born in Wasilla, Alaska, he grew up the third of eight children in a working-class Athabaskan native family. As a teenager, he played ice hockey with his friend Track Palin, in a team managed by Palin's mother, the state's now-famous former Governor, Sarah Palin. After leaving the local Houston High School in 2006, he joined the army, assigned to the 5th Stryker Brigade of the 2nd Infantry Division. During initial training, he suffered homesickness and occasional depression, exacerbated by the sudden death of his father, Richard, who drowned in 2007.

In the summer of 2009, Morlock began a year-long tour of southern Afghanistan. He was swiftly involved in four different "contacts" with enemy forces. After three of them, he was found to have concussion. "I have been here barely for two months, and I don't think that I will ever be able to talk about some of the things that have happened," he told his mother, Audrey, in a letter suggesting that he was traumatised and having trouble sleeping.

Morlock soon began smoking locally cultivated marijuana several times a week. He was also being prescribed ten different medications (including painkillers, anti-depressants, and sleeping pills) by military doctors. An army medical evaluation later found that he had post-concussive syndrome, dependence on cannabis, had abused opiates and sedatives, and was suffering from personality disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. But he was not removed from the front line.

Morlock told prosecutors that he and his colleagues began randomly killing unarmed Afghans shortly after Christmas 2009, allegedly at the behest of their sergeant, Calvin Gibbs, who was said to be in the habit of keeping the fingers of victims as souvenirs and to have claimed to have carried out similar murders during a tour of Iraq. "If Gibbs knew that I was sitting in front of this camera right now there's no doubt in my mind that he'd fucking take me out," he told investigators, in an interview uploaded to YouTube.

The three murders before the court marital occurred in January, February and May last year. Details of what occurred are still being fleshed-out, but Morlock says the bodies of the victims were re-arranged to leave the impression that they had been armed. Lawyers for Gibbs and the other defendants strongly dispute his claims.

There can be little doubt that the 5th Stryker Brigade was in turmoil. Its commander, Colonel Harry Tunnell, was abruptly removed from his position last summer, and has been accused at this week's court martial of presiding over a "dysfunctional" brigade. His command structure, "created an environment that led to these crimes", a defence psychologist hasalleged. Several troops took concerns about drug abuse and bullying to senior officers, but were ignored (and in one case assaulted) for their pains. The family of one soldier, who had revealed in a message on Facebook that he thought innocent civilians were being killed deliberately by colleagues, contacted staff at the brigade's HQ near Seattle, but their allegations were not properly investigated.

Morlock, who has been held in solitary confinement since his arrest last summer (he is yet to meet his first child, born shortly afterwards) has never sought to blame his behaviour on drug abuse, stress, mental health problems or poor pastoral care in the army. In court this week, he admitted: "I lost my moral compass."

His mother has spent $50,000 helping to fight his case. She was not at home when The Independent called yesterday, but told her local paper, The Mat Su Valley Frontiersman, that her son's prosecution represented an effort to paper over a widespread problem.

"I believe he was taking orders from somebody else," she said. "I believe there are higher up people involved, and these guys are the scapegoats for the whole thing... It's not only his unit [involved in criminal activity], there's all kinds of stuff going on over there... No one will ever understand what happens in a war zone unless you're there."

  • zandeman
    Most of the comments that have already been made are thoughtful and substantive. I can only add that during 20 years of clearing up the aftermath of atrocities in Northern Ireland I often asked myself how one human being could do such savage things to another. I rehearsed scenarios and dismissed some: killing someone in broad daylight in an urban area takes planning and sure execution if you're to get away with it, so drink and drugs have to be ruled out. So perhaps the killers were able to convince themselves that they were watching a video nasty or a computer game. I don't rule that out entirely; indeed, I'm certain that we're raising a generation that is less shocked by violence than mine. But, after much discussion with other NI folk with an equally close interest, I find one conclusion inescapable: before you can kill a stranger just for who or what they are, you have to dehumanise them. In Northern Ireland, we used to see loyalist graffiti like: Don't be vague Shoot a taig and Yabba-dabba-doo Any taig will do When human beings are reduced to "taigs" or "fenians", they cease to be human. That's why it isn't the fabled political correctness that makes me shudder every time I see or hear the terms "towel head" or "sand ****er". One of the other posters argued that leadership is a major determinant of the behaviour of junior soldiers. That was certainly something I observed in Northern Ireland. There were regiments that behaved properly. When you saw them on a checkpoint, you knew you could approach safely. There were others that struck fear into you by their mere presence. I say that as someone who has never given the security forces a day's trouble, and yet I have been targeted in ways that made me fear for my life. I knew that to the Paras I was just a paddy. Yet these very different regiments recruited from the same sections of society. So it can only have been their leadership that made the difference. So I hope that this inquiry doesn't just toss a few expendable junior ranks into prison cells. I hope it reaches into the command levels and roots out the inept or malign senior officers who promoted or accepted the poisonous culture that gave rise to these atrocities. I hope, but I don't have much confidence. That has not been the way of such inquiries in the past.
  • sunsetfriend
    I think the problem is the constant drumbeat in America, that America is the greatest nation on earth and that the rest of the world should be grateful for it. Many Americans are taught that Islam and its followers are 'evil'. Is it any wonder that they go crazy when out in the battle field?
  • zandeman
    I have no argument with most of that. I've had reason to be very grateful to the British army and I'm not one of those civilians who thinks that war is inevitably wrong. Sometimes you have to fight to defend yourself or others. Where I part company with you is in your apparent satisfaction with the process of military justice. Where were the commanders when these recent abuses were taking place? Where are they now? The closest we got to finding out was with British Colonel Jorge Mendonca, who faced court martial two years ago on charges of involvement in the systematic abuse of Iraqi prisoners. Among other things, his men beat Baha Mousa, an innocent hotel receptionist, to death. The case collapsed and he resigned, allegedly in disgust that he faced further internal disciplinary charges. However, he was the commanding officer of a regiment that committed many abuses against a population they had allegedly been sent in to protect. They could not have gone that bad without bad leadership. Of the seven soldiers charged with Mousa's murder, only one was convicted and he got a one year prison sentence and a dishonourable discharge.
  • wandler
    I don't know about the "moral compass", but he certainly lacked common sense - posing for a photograph, indeed - unless, of course, he was the only person on the planet who hadn't heard of Abu Ghraib?
  • Okiza
    With hatred and bigotry instilled in the bloodstream of these soldiers from the American culture as well as at training camps, it should not be a surprise to anyone that this kind of incident would continue to happen. It happened during the Vietnam war (the infamous My Lai massacre). I happened during the Iraq war. And it will happen again and again. When you give a moral-deprived, ego-driven, hate-ragging, undereducated immature and poorly trained soldier a deadly weapon, what would you expect? A Mother-Teresa-like gesture of kindness? The beauty here is those American church-goer hypocrites always seem to bestow the US military as some kind of "God's army" spreading good around the world. This kind of shallow culture found in abundance in places where people like George W. Bush hang out is too dangerous for peace, freedom, and humanity itself. And therefore, they must be deleted - somehow and soon.
  • British twits commenting on things entirely outside their experience are not to be paid much attention. If any of you lot have served in Helmand, I'll lend you an ear. However, I think that unlikely, given the cluelessness being served up here. No one should forget that it was an Englishman who offered us the most trenchant wisdom on the subject of soldiers: "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." (Eric Blair, aka George Orwell) For the trolls ready to pounce, this timeless truth in no way excuses the aberrant actions (and they ARE aberrant by every statistic) of a few 'rough men' -- but, as has escaped notice of the armchair moralists, it is other soldiers who intervened, other soldiers who prosecuted, and other soldiers who will punish. And Der Spiegel, so you know, published court-sealed photos that were leaked by another defendant's lawyer in a calculated move to damage Morlock right before his court-martial. Der Spiegel's move was designed to sell more copies, no motive more noble than that, I assure you, as someone who works with the media for a living. These cases were already proceeding steadily through U.S. military courts, long before a German tabloid -- or any European -- paid much notice. Moral credit is due no one but the U.S. Army who are policing their own. You may take your haughty moral superiority elsewhere; I suggest to the nearest mirror. How easy and satisfying it is to elucidate the flaws of others, but how plainly it illuminates one's own fault: smug, easy condescension and a lack of humble self-awareness that moral failings are human, not national. I expect to change no minds here, but hypocrisy deserves to be challenged wherever it is found, and it is in plain abundance here. Flame away, ye trolls.
  • ineluctable2u
    Rubbish. This is the young soldier commenting on his own malfeasance. It is not anyone higher up the food change making a' damage limitation exercise'. It seems nothing is to base for you to use in your attempts to fit your conspiratorial narrative. Why don't you assess the truth of what we know so far, and stop trying to embroider things to suit your prejudice? In the fullness of time let's hope that the truth will out. It has a habit of doing just that and no one will look upon the American army the same after Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo and the clandestine rendition stories that have been positively flowing out. Why would you try to finesse this into something it is not? It is not 'cheap American spin'. Quite the reverse. This is exactly what you do all the time against the freedom fighters in Benghazi. Now that we are able to see the footage of the peaceful march that started the revolution taken by numerous people, and the police and army shooting at the unarmed protesters you can never tell the lies you have about the people in Benghazi again. Not to those of us who have seen the truth with our own eyes and read the reports of eye witnesses. I have never read someone on these threads who so consistently lies as you do. All petty point scoring while the truth is neglected when it doesn't serve your angry and dishonest purpose. Shameful.
  • Great. How many more of these "kill squad" members will be coming back home to become jack booted cops?
  • rpdiplock
    Can I have a puff of whatever you've been smoking? Please!
  • JaitcH
    Personally I attribute a lot of the 'attitude' and perspective of U.S. specialised forces to the training they receive, particularly the Marines and their counterparts. If readers have viewed the military training these fighting men have to endure, television series can be seen on either Discovery and/or National Geographic following this type of training, and given the youthful immaturity of the predominantly men participants, it is little wonder these tragedies occur. This is their training, egged on by military trainers having no regard to the legality or consequences. I was neither shocked nor surprised at what the pictures depicted - the celebration of the murder of an innocent Afghan civilian, as this is what is expected of these specialised soldiers by the U.S. Government. He did what he was trained to do, albeit to enemies not innocents. Yes,he behaved as if he had just bagged a moose in the wilds of his home state Alaska, but what criteria had been taught this young man in his training?
  • jennewinn
    The problem with the principle "the cause is right" is that in this case the original "cause" claimed by GWB was that he only wanted to get hold of bin Laden. That was his declared cause, preparing the way for justifying the war he and his monsters had already planned for their profit. So two weeks after the WTC came down, the Taliban offered to hand bin Laden over. So reported in the Boston Globe, The Guardian, The Telegraph and probably many other newspapers which I didn't read at the time. GWB said no, we prefer to come and get him. Meaning getting hold of him was NOT the real aim behind the invasion of Afghanistan. Any more than finding WMD was the aim and cause in Iraq. Blair and Bush both knew that was a red herring. Investigate Cheney, Rummy, Haliburton, Blackwater, no-bid contracts if you seriously want to pin down those aims and causes. And for dessert check out how a plane could collapse a building it didn't even hit but which just happened to contain Giuliani's headquarters. And ask yourself why the famous US air force was totally grounded on exactly that day, for training to prevent a serious attack. Neat prevention! Also, selling any cause with the line "the end justifies the means" is risky at best and in the worst case opens a Pandora's box of dirty tricks for any unscrupulous person who thinks "he started it" is a valid excuse for inexcusable behaviour. It's not just Americans. Over all the world there are people who think they can solve their problems by bashing someone up, and all over the world there are people who realise that the system didn't work for them. Neither of those viewpoints are a national feature. The only people - as a race - who have no conception or even a word for "war" on this planet are the Inuit, the Eskimos. Their lives are hard enough without inventing problems nobody needs.
  • Okiza
    What moral compass? The US military has never had any moral and the concept of moral has never been a big part of the US culture in the first place. When you have a military-industrial complex that puts money above humanity, the meaning of moral has already been lost. The fundamental problem with the US is it has too many hypocrites who confuse morality with depravity. With trillions of American tax dollars pouring into the military-industrial complex, feeding the exclusive club of fat cats, while the rest of American children going to bed hungry and with broken spirit, the US is heading straight into a perfect storm. The death of an empire is on the horizon and it'll be from "self-inflicted wound".
  • zandeman
    What a ridiculous post. Firstly, it equates US armed forces with the Taliban and Al Qaeda in that happy and unworried way that only apologists seem to manage. Secondly, it brings in groups like Hamas and Hezbollah who, while they use terrorist tactics against civilians that can't be excused, are facing an enemy that is at least as savage and indiscriminate as they are, and I don't see you criticising them. Finally, Jack the Ripper? Really? Wise up wee man.
  • andre_t
    experience from vietman shows that these murderous attitudes return to the US with their soldiers coming home to roost, enjoy
  • rpdiplock
    Oh dear! Yosef, you appear to have so many facts intertwined with so much, muddle-headed nonsense. If you would permit me to try to cut-to-the-chase, The US military establishment and the corporate titans love 'wars,' because 'wars' are good for business. The US very, very rarely, goes into 'war' for humanitarian ideals. Also, suicides never "just happen," they are a direct result of intolerable depression for a myriad of different reasons. Suffice it to say ... The more one is exposed to horror, or similar depression inducing events, the more likely one is to inflict self-harm, to 'escape' the mental-torture. Subjecting people in the various armed forces to immoral 'wars' and conflict increases the potential for mental-stress, and the varied consequences.
  • maias
    So this 23 year-old soldier gets sentenced to 24 years for the appalling murders of civilians of an occupied country and can be expected to be eligible for parole in just 7 years. Meanwhile, Afghan prisoners have been held in Guantanamo Bay for over 8 years without any charges brought against them. When they will inevitably be sentenced I doubt time served will be taken into consideration. As for parole?
  • sadoldpoof
    The relatively light sentence followed a plea bargain that will soon see Morlock give evidence against four comrades who are also accused of taking part in the murders. Mi Lai all over again. 27 Vietnamese villagers lives weren't even worth a month imprisonment. But surely the issue is you take young men from their home enviorment, train them to kill and it's what they will do. Do we expect them to go back to barracks and discuss Terpsichore or the Sonnets of Michaelangelo? But this raises the question why is American soldiers who appear to be prone to these appalling crimes. (since the nazis and none of knows about the communists in russia or china) Vietnam; Iraq and now Afghanistan. And the double standards over drugs in the military? is it a case of Don't ask, don't tell? Obivously the US Army ignored what was going on and yet Americans are paranoid about drugs. This is the real George W Bush Legacy. Two nasty wars and the degradation of the people they were supposedly showing how they should live!
  • zandeman
    You're telling me you understand the cold-blooded murder of innocent civilians?
  • Speaking from personal experience of war crimes investigations I have to say that "losing your moral compass" is about the most accurate summary of what happens that I have seen. What is more of a challenge is why this happens. The aim of military training is to produce a group which uses violence to achieve its aims and then stops being violent. The problem is that in forming the group you create social bonds within the group which can result in violence against others as a form of revenge for colleagues being killed or injured. So the risk is always that a military unit will use more violence than necessary. A second issue is that the country concerned will always present the mission as being right, which by implication means those opposing the mission are wrong. This is especially true when the mission is sold as being for the benefit of the locals etc. Our own media can quite unintentionally reinforce this, assuming as they so often do that our values are right and somehow superior to other values. Our own national values are a factor here too. Another issue is frustration. When attacked most of us want to strike back, and this is very difficult if the opposing force hides amongst civilians. This can cause frustration and stress, and dealing with this is critical. The whole population can become a target for aggression, especially if the locals are ambivalent or vaguely hostile to the presence of the foreign military. Then there is leadership. Leadership depends on trust, and if your own team don't trust you then you can't lead them. That means that in some cases it may be necessary for leaders to turn a blind eye to some things, although strangely this is not always the case. With that said, leaders also define to a large degree the ethos within the unit and if there is a tacit understanding that certain things are OK then things will happen. All these things can and do combine, and can cause a negative spiral. Events in the ground can make things worse, by creating a desire for revenge and by reinforcing the impression that we are the good guys and everybody opposing us are bad guys. Clear leadership is key to breaking this. Finally, don't think that this problem is confined to the US. All military units from all countries are at risk of these problems, even those from the UK.
  • It is easy enough to pin blame to one person for these kinds of despicable acts, but the reason there are "rules of engagement" and the currently bastardized Geneva Convention is because war inevitably brings them out. They are most probably nestled in our wiring ready to be employed whenever the situation warrants. It seems to me that the nature of military combat training is steeped deeply in producing these responses and then trying to manage and organize them. Like training pit bulls to attack, but only in certain situations and using certain methods with specific commands. This Morlock fellow's training was successful. He, or his brain, acting in the most primitive way his military training tapped into, was egged on by something to continue past where his training taught him to stop; training that his traumatic battlefield experiences negated. The fact that his training failed him in this situation says more about his training than him. Most young people subjected and imprinted with this kind of training, and having to experience battlefield conditions, come out scarred for life. Their brains, often still adolescent by any developmental standards, are ripe to be taught through basic battlefield training to believe in their own impermeability. When that is smashed, they must rely on more primitive and less predictable, less conscious, autonomic reactions. Besides, it is likely he saw other acts that at least approximated the one he has been scapegoated for. One cannot relieve him automatically of his guilt for this heinousness, in spite of the expectation that in war these things are expected to happen. Some might see a subtle line between hand-to-hand murder of civilians and dropping bombs from unmanned aircraft on them. I don?t. Be that as it may however, one might be better served in such situations to see how his non-battlefield employed military theoreticians, and pro-war administrators are the primary instigators that ruin young people's hopes for going into adulthood without a scarred psyche or a life long brain-based "gimp". It would be best if they were taken equally to task for not preparing these kids for battle, and not being prepared themselves for what happens when you expose developing brains to such horror.
  • rpdiplock
    Quite. Also, in most cases, doesn't the very essence of 'leadership' start at the very top, at the governmental level? How does one respect a coterie of leaders who audaciously maintain something as abominable as Guantanamo Bay?
  • The more I read about these cases, the more repugnant it becomes. Still this is only the opening act, the main character in this tale is Staff Sgt. Calvin Gibbs who is poised to become one of the greatest sadists ever to disgrace a military uniform. Gibbs, now 26, is a high school dropout, earning just 1 of 20 credits necessary to graduate, a devout Mormon from Billings, Montana and a behemoth of man at 6'4" and 220 lbs. What is it about rural culture in America that produces such psychopaths? Listen to what Army Specialist Adam Winfield says of his Staff Sgt Gibbs: "I take that man very seriously," Winfield told the investigator in the interrogation tape. "He likes to kill things. He is pretty much evil incarnate. I mean, I have never met a man who can go from one minute joking around, then mindless killings. I mean, he likes to kill things." It was an Internet chat that Adam Winfield had with his father Christopher Winfield, a former Marine, that raised the first flags. Though Mr. Winfield contacted the Army and even his Senator, Ben Nelson of Florida, on February 14, 2010, the US Army failed to act until May. In that timespan, Sgt Gibbs committed another two murders.
  • pfbulmer
    It is good that at last some of these cases are coming out probably we have more reason to thank Dei Spegal for bringing this to light than the US government but if the US is going to be able show that it too has not lost its moral compass, as must the US army it must be more more proactive . The fact is there is a definate culture and training problem in the US army that is very clear and has been for a long time by the number of civilian deaths, and the those incontrol of the US army must recognise this must take responsiblity and do something to get it back on track . The US has so much of this type baggage it needs to clean out its cuboards which are already bulging with these type of cases which has been ignored ,sooner or later everything will come out in the wash from ,sexual abuse torture , rendition programs off shore human rights prison it will not be a pretty sight some people look like a saint but there will much more respect for US , if they have the courage to clean up their act and start again . It is very important to US makes a genuine effort to do this so we can reduce the level of hypocrisy to acceptable levels, the current level to many people is unbearable and insufferable pulls the rug from under the US moral authority which if they had back , they could achieve much more than they could ever achieve with their armed forces .
  • I suspect you have turned into a MORALISER when you said , " but I am betting it won't be good".
  • They are only representatives? What, innocent representatives? As if it is the people who are to blame for telling Blair the 45-minute story....
  • rpdiplock
    Sadly, you have more chance of seeing pigs fly.
  • You're using ad hominem attacks against anyone who happens to disagree with you sir. That's poor reasoning.
  • The Vietnam War lasted 19 years. The war in Afghanistan has only last 9. It is hardly a "never ending war". Now, while that is a shame. The two are nothing alike. The rich dodged the draft as much as anyone else. In fact moreso, since they were the people who had the means to go to college, one of the most popular ways to escape the draft, it was mostly the poor to middle class individuals in Vietnam. I am not poor, nor am I from the working class. I am from a middle-class family from white suburbia. I say "enough" to all this bullcrap, about how the government is picking on the poor, or sacrificing the poor. They aren't, there are people from all walks of life in the military STILL TODAY. This, is absolutely nothing compared to some of the stuff that went down in Vietnam. You realize people from paranoia would randomly shoot civilians right? Like, a decent majority of the army? This is one of the few instances I've heard of our troops doing anything incredibly horrific. If you think we don't have time to connect with our families, you haven't seen the world today. Skype, The Internet, everything. My brother was deployed and had a videochat with my entire family, it's a different world. Suicides happen, people kill themselves. What about High School? Plenty of people kill themselves in High School. Does that mean we should outlaw schooling? You paint a picture that we are weak-willed, that we're a sad lot, staring down the barrel of a gun just waiting for someone to pull the trigger. My dad always said one simple thing, if you start something, you'd better finish it, and not only get the damn job done, get it done right. Even as a citizen of these states, I would like us to finish what we started, rather than leaving a Charlie Foxtrot over there, which Obama wants us to do. We can't just pick up and leave. Did you know there are still troops in Iraq? The country we were supposed to be out of, what a year ago? None of what we say on this message board matters, no one in the Pentagon will actually read this, nor will they take it to heart, yet I felt the need to speak up. Our Generation is strong, we have our bad apples, same as any other generation, or group of people for that matter, do not pretend to speak for anyone but yourself, you are you, I am me. You think dehumanizing an enemy is the reason people do these things? We dehumanize people every day, does that mean I'm going on a rampage through New York? No. People dehumanize "bums" every day, the internet is rife with examples. We as human beings tend to take sleights against us by one person of group to encompass them all. It's a few bad apples, it doesn't mean the whole bunch is spoiled.
  • This young man is the same age as me. He is a terrible example of the US Military, and is being sensationalized as "the norm". His mental state is due to his own actions, and the actions of his sargeant. If a soldier sees his higher ups doing something, he will deem those actions as acceptable. These are horrible examples of our military. Keep in mind, 99% of them are normal people with normal lives, choosing to pick up a few extra duties as citizens of this nation, whether or not we agree with the actions of OUR nation. I hope he gets the help he deserves, and I will not tarnish this with a speech about bull@#$% political rhetoric. "War is sweet to those who have never experienced it." -Pindar "The only good part of a war is its ending." -Abraham Lincoln
  • paracetamol
    vipass. meditation? self hypnosis....blank mind... observing oneself?... oh, i forgot....the universe revolves around me! oh yea!
  • andre_t
    Where are the likes of WDC2301 who so happily make islamophobic comments on the Indie when you need them. Anything to say here
  • capa75
    Very interesting, though disturbing post, thank you sir.
  • petermorris
    Excuse me but I was not trying to excuse anyone! Understanding something is not the same as an excuse! In my book anyway.
  • Imranp2010
    Right on Zandeman!!
  • zandeman
    Indeed, but it was the perpetrator that you were trying to excuse.
  • zandeman
    I don't agree Peter. There's a big difference between killing an innocent person by accident in the heat of conflict and coolly and deliberately targeting non-combatants for murder.
  • Yes Alan, it was a scummy thing to do. War can make otherwise ordinary people do some pretty scummy things. The real scumbags are the politicians and bureaucrats who have failed to keep their countries out of war in the first place.
  • yo
    If the US is going to have the moral ground and say "we're liberating you" any comparison to what the enemy is doing as a justification is a moronic excuse.
  • petermorris
    Not to the victim there isn't!
  • herrmann1211w3rd
    Part of becoming a soldier is to view those who are your enemies as being less than human. Every country that fights a war has to convince its people and the young people who fight that the killing is justified because the enemy is evil. This was not particularly difficult to do when the enemy was the Japanese army of WWII of German SS troops. However, most soldiers were able to realize that enemy soldiers were just doing their duty as any soldiers does. During the Vietnam war, young Americans began to realize that the enemy soldiers, while desperately trying to kill the Americans, was just defending his homeland. Tens of thousands refused to be drafted and fled the country, or deserted the army and refused to kill someone that wasn't really any threat to them. Morale in the army plummetted and eventually the American people turned on the political leaders and demanded an end o the war that was killing their sons and forcing them to serve in an unjust war. The American military decided that it could never again risk having to fight an unpopular war with draftees, civilians dressed in uniforms. The US Army decided to be become an all volunteer force in 1973. The intial attempt was a disaster. Most experienced soldiers left the army due to their disgust with how the war had been waged and that they had been involved in such a awful waste of human life. The US Army of the 1970's could not have defeated an invasion from Costa Rica, and relied on the threat of nuclear power to keep enemies at bay. During the 1980's the Reagan Recession created millions of unemployed young people, people who did not remeber the Vietnam war and saw the army as an opportunity for a job. These new professional soldiers were very well trained and provided for by the army, and demonstrated their prowess and strength during the first Iraq War. These soldiers were now shown appreciation by the public and showered with praise. The second Iraq War started by George W. Bush quickly began to destroy the morale of the American Army. It reminded many of the Vietnam war and had been based on lies and deceptions and had cost the lives of many innocent civilians. Enlistments began to drop once again and the standards set for recruits was drastically lowered. Bush's economic policies quickly threw the country into recession, which once again brought new recruits into the army, but with a difference. The original draftee army contained people from every walk of life and income level. Rich and poor alike were drafted. Hippies and rednecks served in units together. This provided a very healthy balance that was now lacking in the modern soldiers. New recruits were often from lower incomes and people who were lest mentally fit to be soldiers were now recruited and kept in the service. Additionally, women and men of the National Guard and Reserves were increasingly called to active service. Because of their experience these citizen soldiers were often deployed multiple times, which created a great deal of stress on the soldiers and their families. After 911, politicians and rightwing radio hosts made careers from stirring up racial hatred against Arabs and muslims. The older draftee army contained a number of less fervent soldiers who helped moderate the racial hatred that was stirred up by the political and social leaders. Hippies had the effect of humanizing the army. The modern army of today is under tremendous unrelenting stress. Vietnam soldiers knew that if they survived their one year tour-of-duty, they would be sent back to the world and eventually return to civilian life. However, now the active duty soldiers along with the Guard and Reserve components were called upon to serve several times. It became impossible for soldiers to reconnect with their families and lives. Suicides became common place and even the best soldiers became numb to what they were seeing and doing. I think many of the soldiers in today's army are being ground down and many probalby feel that they too have lost their moral compass. I am not excusing what this young soldier did, but it has to be viewed in the wider context of what America's constant state of warfare is doing to its soldiers and citizens. It is destroying the lives of many men and women who only wanted to serve their country. I am afraid that there will be many more such incidents along with suicide and other deaths resulting from the constant battle fatigue felt by these people. I cannot begin to express my disappointment in President Obama for failing to keep his promise of ending this constant state of battle. I have taken the time to write this missive because of the number of people I have known who have suffered from this never ending war. I based all of what I said on my own observations and experiences. I wrked as a Behavioral Science Specialist during the Vietnam Era and again during Operation Desert Storm. I have also talked to many returning soldiers and watched their lives be destroyed. The Vietnam war ended because the American people finally said "enough" and demanded that the soldiers be brought home. I have no doubt that American soldiers will continue to die until the American people once more say "enough". The big difference is that the sons of the rich and powerful were being drafted, whereas today it is the sons, daughters, husbands, and wives of the working class that are being asked to sacrifice for their country. The rich don't even want to pay taxes, why should they invest their children?
  • petermorris
    War is the suspension of normal moral laws. It is not legal to kill someone in peacetime but it is sanctioned in times of war. It must be difficult to operate in those circumstances if you have a rifle in your hands and come across situations that you have not experienced before. Novels like Catch 22 try to capture the insanity of war. It is not an excuse for bad deeds but it does go some way to making it understandable.
  • stfu fag.
  • why is when someone kills a white man, it is murder, but when an afghan dies, its "sport". Why is it when a white man is killed, he was murdered by a psychopath, but when an Iraqi is murdered, his killer "lost his moral compass". The fact that no one wants to admit is some people seem to be "worth" more than others. Imagine living in a place where foreign soldiers come and kill your brother, rape your mother and beat your sister until she kills herself. To the easterners, American soldiers are the terrorists and they are committing genocide under our noses...for sport. For a trophy, for respect among other soldiers. When i say these facts, other americans too dumb as fuck to accept that maybe their country isn't perfect would defend this monster. How can you sleep at night knowing that the next time you would see your mother, it would be at the feet of a soldier, bleeding out while he smiles and poses for a picture for his buddies.
  • No they will not be strapped down to a guerney, but they will probably given jail time. Stop being dramatic. It's tragic enough as it is.
  • herrmann1211w3rd
    Excellent posting.
  • Unlike the Taliban, Al-Quida, Hamas, or Hezboallah; the US military will try him and he will serve time in prison. Some of his co defendants may well be strapped down on a medical gurney and have a large needle inserted into their arm and be put to death. Are any of the aforementioned MUSLIM terrorist organizations putting any of their "troops" on trial for crimes against civilians? I think not. BTW, how cleaver to sneak Sarah Palin into the story. I wonder if London has any murderers? London, "home town" of Jack the Ripper.
  • And789
    You sound as if you are looking forward to that day.
  • google-8cad97315429054b1ead2408020d0c7a
    Only one word scum
  • Damaged people doing damaged things it seems. No winners in war. There must be another way.
  • You are welcome to disagree :) That's how opinions are changed, through dialogue and the exchange of idea's. You believe human's are born with morals then get corrupted? You are going to have to convince me of that with some kind of evidence other than your say so. I'll explain why I think it is the other way around. If 'we' raised a human child in say, a deep pit, with virtually no contact other than to keep 'it' alive. Fed it raw food, cleaned it's mess. No education, no religion. Maybe poked it with a stick once in a while. What do you think is going to come out of that pit in 20 years? I'm guessing it will react in one of two ways. Fight or Flight - neither of which relate to morality. That is instinct. Morality was introduced by men as a form of control. All religion, which is where morality was born, is about control. It is not genetic. We have it hammered home to us from birth that killing is wrong, stealing is wrong ....... why? Why is any of that wrong? Even writing about this feels unnatural, because it goes against everything I have ever been taught Why do morality laws apply more to the poor than the rich or powerful? Because man made them.
  • zandeman
    That's a pretty evil post.
  • Richard_London
    "criminal, corrupt, incompetent and treasonous politicians" - you seem to have a great deal of insight into the mind of the solider yet very little knowledge of the challenges facing a head of government. Naming Blair and Cheney in the same sentence, to me, reveals your ignorance.
  • ryan110001
    Looks like you enlisted your gay lover below in your war against moi.
  • ryan110001
    Well said.
  • "killing is not natural to human beings" I don't think we live in the same world.
  • Great post.
  • ryan110001
    forced? I no get, how. Do they force you into army nowadayS?
  • ryan110001
    I did not understand a single thing you said. Vipuss,.. what?
  • ryan110001
    Not as much as you grandad. You beat me hands down, I concede to you oh Brainless one.
  • I asked Torin Nelson, one of the good Americans at Abu Graib who worked for CACI, why some people behaved terribly and others didn't. " It is crucial that leadership play an active role in creating the "Atmosphere of Command" in a situation such as that one, and ones like we had at Abu Ghraib. If leadership shows a sense of disinterest in the welfare and humane treatment of prisoners, the soldiers and civilians will feel either free to act on their own or perhaps even compelled by a sense of duty to carry out the unexpressed interests of the Command. When commanders walk around the battlefield and talk about "dirty ragheads" and how they are all "terrorists," or when Donald Rumsfeld gets on TV and says that Gitmo has the "worst of the worst" it is almost an implied order to take the gloves off. This is the direct role of leadership in guiding subordinates without actually giving direct orders to violate Geneva or other conventions." Yet our government has rewarded CACI with the current Scottish census.
  • ryan110001
    Blah blah, After posting so many comments you still don't make sense. Have u ever thought about joining the army, I see an excellent candidate in you.
  • fairpete
    If you had a brain, you might be dangerous
  • ryan110001
    Eh! Still popping those pills, grandad
  • kobeboy
    We do it because we are forced into it by our psychopathic self-styled leaders.
  • kobeboy
    Para1: I disagree. Humans are innately 'moral', it is the conditioning of society/the world that twists us out of true. Para2: Desire and aversion are the two main, interlinked problems. Grabbing for something we can't get, and pushing away something else we don't want but are stuck with. Para3: There is another view of evolution, that by overcoming our conditioning, our desire and aversion reactions, we can achieve a state of peace. The solution is to observe ourselves: neither to suppress, nor to act out our impulses. Vipassana meditation is a practical technique for doing so. Para4: Yeah, you're probably right.
  • fairpete
    If those were the qualifications, you would make a good soldier!
  • fairpete
    The why does it say in the bible, "THOU SHALT NOT KILL", both in the old testament and particularly in the new testament. Are you a Satanist or devil worshipper by any chance?
  • rpdiplock
    Morlock, what an unfortunate name to have, for someone behaving badly. Although, young private J. Morlock, might be able to take some comfort from the fact that it is his government administration who are the real ... 'Orcs,' from 'middle-earth.' If I were this young man's parents, rather than hanging my head in shame, and embarrassment, I would be actively pursuing the appropriate Governmental Administrative Body, for consciously turning my son, into a deranged person. I would wager that this young man would not have displayed the apparent psycho-somatic tendencies, prior to the extreme, one dimensional propagandizing, of the military regimen.
  • I would argue that war is normal. It seems like no one has really stopped fighting since time began. We really are a stupid species.
  • 1GFusionToMars
    ryan11000: While your comment is right on, and totally valid, to characterize men as "animals" is, in my view, inaccurate. To call a man an animal is an insult to animals, not to men. To call a man a dog is an insult to dogs, and does not accurately describe the man! To call a man a pig is likewise an insult to those poor creatures (who may display more intelligence!). To call a man a weasel or a cockroach is again an insult to those creatures. Animals are what they are by nature designed to be, thus cannot be held morally responsible; mankind cannot get off so easily, precisely because we are consciously and willfully creative or destructive: therefore we cannot run to or hide behind any excuses, but humbly and genuinely repent and ask forgiveness, if that is possible in any particular case.
  • Killing is often rational but should never be sport. This murderer happens to be a soldier, the army would be a big employer in his town and would target recruitment at people like him. If the chain of command is to mean anything then Colonel Harry Tunnell should be in the dock with Morlock, alongside anyone who encouraged, permitted or condoned it. Palin? But the poor kids at the end of your street who were signed up and hauled off, then dumped back, they have been damaged by what has happened to them, and sometimes because what they have done, and it's not their fault. The relatives of dead soldiers are the backbone of the peace movement so you should show some respect even if you don't have the sense to know why.
  • Where did morals come from? We aren't born with them? Did one caveman club another caveman to death over a bit of food and three others said "Hang on! We didn't like that, and being as there are three of us, and only one of you - our opinion is now law and we will pass moral judgement and 'justice' over you. What if those three had an agenda? What if they just didn't like him and were looking for an excuse to split his food amoung themselves. I was raised a Christian, but once I grew up I realised that mankind's problem's, ailments ..... everything you can think of, is down to one thing - desire. For most of us, it drives everything else. The exception of course are the millions of starving, homeless & dying. Often for the sake of a drink of clean water. Of course, man's desire has also brought about great good, but the cost has usually been very high. {I'm thinking Space exploration, medical research} What you are witnessing is Evolution in it's most basic form - Survival of the fittest. You are always going to get people who want what someone else has got and if they are strong enough to make it happen - they will. This guy was simply susceptible to the collateral damage from someone else's desire. One of millions of victims - past, present and, I fear, for evermore. We find excuses and we will never learn. I don't know how it will all end for mankind, but I'm betting it won't be good.
  • gram64
    I watched Arlo perform this song at a Folk club in a Rochester (Kent, U.K.) pub back in '65 or '66.
  • ryan110001
    Actually true war is normal and so is such behaviour.
  • ryan110001
    What's the difference in 1. Killing someone you don't know, who you don't have any problem with, who may have a family in combat. 2. Killing someone by dropping a bomb cause that was the target given to you. 3. Killing someone like the above in sport. 4. Torturing the enemy to death
  • gram64
    You've never had any British army training, or you wouldn't write such nonsense. And 'saving mates' has been a part of many squaddies' experiences.
  • ryan110001
    Actually I agree with the points you make. What I mean to say is that killing is not natural to human beings and war is all about killing. Nothing complex, you have two good guys, both good to their kind, bad to each other, and they kill because politicians, money makers above, civillians have vested interest. Now as Blair etc, dude get a grip, they are only representatives, they have been given power to them by us who need governments to make decisions on our behalf. I may be against wars, but I am not an idealist. Wars have existed since the dawn of mankind and will continue to exist. Whether its killing people in combat, or killing like the above or dropping a missile by mistake on a marriage function or shooting people from helicopters, war is all about killing and to survive through that or to be even a part of that, you need be cuckoo.
  • ryan110001
    Glad you can make a difference, I can't killing anyone is really the same if you think about it. Saving mates etc, you should stop watching those soppy hollywood army\war movies. I cant reply to you below, I dont want to be part of the British army training. Saving mates, blah blah, first rule in life, save yourself. You have to be such a moron to join the Army to die for Politicians and ungrateful civillians like me for example. Hey you know the best way to save your mates, when your turn up for enlisting, convince everyone not to enlist and go get pissed. That would be much better than going to Afghanistan and than trying to save him.
  • Humans can't shut off their emotions they can just put them on pause. Killing the enemy is more about saving your mates than anything else, and killing civilians for sport is a whole other circle of hell.
  • "War is not normal!" Seems very normal to me. It has been a constant throughout the world for many centuries. Clearly mankind enjoys a good war, otherwise we would not indulge in it so frequently. remember - there is no force that makes us have wars, we do it because we enjoy it and choose to.
  • Botvinnik
    So are you saying that because war is not normal, then it is acceptable for soldiers to go around killing unarmed civilians for sport?
  • I didn't see anything about the real evil that made these young folk believe it was okay to kill people who are different: Christianity. As history shows, this is the great motivator in homogenizing the human culture while have a totalitarian patriarchal theocratic ruling class. Keep up the good work guys, some day Christians in the USA will be treated the same as they are treated in Muslim countries: killed.
  • roger_darce
    "And I went up there, I said, "Shrink, I want to kill. I mean, I wanna, I wanna kill. Kill. I wanna, I wanna see, I wanna see blood and gore and guts and veins in my teeth. Eat dead burnt bodies. I mean kill, Kill, KILL, KILL." And I started jumpin up and down yelling, "KILL, KILL," and he started jumpin up and down with me and we was both jumping up and down yelling, "KILL, KILL." And the sargent came over, pinned a medal on me, sent me down the hall, said, "You're our boy." " Arlo Guthrie - 'Alice's Restaurant' ...plus �a change, plus c'est la m�me chose
  • ryan110001
    Nah sorry mate, to be the best soldier, you gotta switch of your emotions and be ready to kill anyone simple and the secondly the only certainty about war is death, either you die or the enemy dies or both die. Simple. Nothing complex about it.
  • 1GFusionToMars
    ryan110001: This is not only inaccurate; it is untrue. There may be those who are predisposed to sadistic cruelty, and who may be sociopathic in the sense that they have no true conscience - or what some identify as a "moral compass". However, I know men, my father included ? he saw combat action in Iraq (Basra, Kirkuk, etc.), Libya (Tobruk, El Alamein) and Sicily, 1941-44 ? who conducted the awful duties imposed on them by the terrible exigencies of war, and were able to maintain their mental balance throughout the rest of their lives. My father refused to speak of any of the fighting in which he was involved, with one exception: when I was 7 years old, I pestered him to tell me of any action. All my school-chums were totally into violent war comic-strips (U.S. action in the pacific islands; British/German combat in Europe, Africa or in Asia), and I too was infected with that puerile curiosity. At first he refused, but when I persisted in pestering him, he relented, and with wise foresight, related to me the story of the taking of a strategic bridge in Sicily, which had, with deadly tenacity, been held by a German unit. The details so shocked and horrified me, the blood drained from my upper body to the point of my almost fainting. Silent ears streamed down my cheeks. Needless to say, I henceforth never raised any further questions. In my view, the last just war to be prosecuted, from the side of the Western Allies and Soviet Union, was WWII. Perhaps the reason for all the murderous behavior, suicides of vets, emotional and mental breakdown, is that, at some level of consciousness, the troops are ware that all these wars are criminal, immoral, and unjustified. The final responsibility must lie with the criminal, corrupt, incompetent and treasonous politicians, and their and top military chiefs-of-staff advisors. But, ultimately, with those politicians. Men like Blair, Cheney, "Wubbya" Bush, and Obama should face a new Nuremberg-style tribunal. All other wars since have been fought for fear-mongered ideological lies and sophistries, mostly fomented by the British global imperial oligarchy (using the U.S. as patsy, for her immense power), and for the slavering Priapic lust for wealth and power of the "people" involved, and we all know who they are.
  • The first primary qualification is poverty. Soldiers don't like murderers anymore than you do, and they especially don't like murderers who wear the same uniform as they do. The British soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan are war victims alongside the civilians. For blame you have to look at the politicians, and their populace that tolerates them.
  • ryan110001
    Ha ha well said. True, actually man is the most dangerous animal, it can be seen by the fact we have wiped out most of the animal species that took zillion years to evolve in a very short time frame. It can be seen by the acts we perpetuate on others. The best thing about us Humans is that we have something wonderful called Religion that allows us to feel better when we do something real bad and which also allows us to do bad things.
  • ryan110001
    What we need to do is dispel the notion that human emotions can exist alongside the primary objective of soldiers in war, that is to kill the enemy. Simple, the notion of courage and bravery etc is a misplaced. If you study war over the centuries, it is the time when men become animals and are celebrated for it, in ages before, torture, pillage, rape was acceptable. It is not acceptable now cause we live in different times, but soldiers are soldiers. This soldier is a victim, the real culprit is the ones in charge, the president and even the people who support them and these wars. Nothing good will come out of war.
  • ryan110001
    The first qualification in becoming a solder is to become a psychopath.
  • 1GFusionToMars
    "Morlock" is an unfortunate surname, but maybe appropriate. See H. G. Wells' The Time Machine ... And, one should not be too surprised that this is a wider problem, and that it goes up the chain of command. Further, we all know where the buck stops.
  • ryan110001
    Well you have answered my question than. Everything about war is abnormal including the soldiers who are in it.
  • Bent_Tony
    You misunderstood Rumsfeld ! The lying crackhead was talking about himself when he said "the worst of the worst" !
  • Bent_Tony
    Lost your moral compass?? How can you lose something you never had !
  • fairpete
    War is not normal!
  • ryan110001
    So you think soldiers in war are normal?
  • fairpete
    This guy is a psychopath and drug addict and should have been discharged from service. But when you get a brigade which is dysfunctional, you have no chance. The US government must seriously review their role in Afghanistan and their objectives.
  • What about Kissinger (Cambodia bombing)? Is he still alive?
  • Freedom fighters or terrorists? Are the Palestinians freedom fighters or terrorists? As for the peaceful march footage, that is just US propaganda. Our local paper had an article by a local who returned from Libya an showed a photo of the armed rebels. Chapter 1 of John Pilger's book Hidden Agenda is entitled "The Terrorists". The Terrorists are the USA and the UK. The evidence is so obvious in the 50 or so countries in which the US has interferd or invaded since WW2.
  • How many times has the cause changed in the last 10 years?
  • Bose100
    I have develped the opinion that the Americans are always too ready to go out and "kick ass". They do not seem to care whose ass they kick, or where.
  • unfortunate, yes, but not so much tolkien as wells. the morlocks feed on eloi while maintaining infernal machines whose function has long since disappeared from memory. prescient h.g.
  • rpdiplock
    I would beg-to-differ as to whether the 'cause is right' to be waging 'war' in Afghanistan. If i may be permitted to oversimplify the case ... if we are allegedly 'pissed-off' at a former Saudi Arabian, CIA operative for 'whatever,' let us go and wage 'war' on Saudi Arabia, not on some flea-bitten backwoods people.
  • rpdiplock
    Doesn't this set one to wondering whether the US is really a civilised country at all? The irony is mind-numbing. A digression, if I may, as evil as this young man appears to be ... who is the more evil, in the case of the slaughter of innocents? Mr Morlock, for his deranged activities, or an administration complicit in the deaths of entire populations of small 'peasant' villages, when the bomb-loads of B52's are delivered?
  • US Army and Peace... looks like two opposite words
  • maias
    But doubtless they all clasp their right hands to their hearts with tears in their eyes at their patriotism when gazing at their flag, and go to church and can cite the ten commandments word for word. You would have thought he is old enough to know right from wrong after 23 years. But there again, any non-christian, American or non-American, appears to be like cockroach to these people.
  • peterhawkins1
    I have heard from an UK Military Person recently visiting the USA Military facities that this phenomena of being gung ho over killings is an observable part of USA Military Culture. My father always said from War Time experience that the USA Military were very good at friendly fire. I think it was part of the USA Viet Nam experience also.
  • gulcher
    How much of a moral compass do you need , when you sign up for a job to go kill people ?
  • gram64
    One does suspect that the entire U.S. Army tends to 'lose its moral compass' when it goes to war. Anyone who has had any experience of the U.S. Army knows that they shoot first and ask questions afterwards, and any British soldier involved in operations with them from WWI onwards was more scared of being in proximity to them than of being in proximity to the Germans, the Japs, or whatever enemy they faced. This is not to negate the fact that we couldn't have won WWI or WWII without the might of the American military machine, nor am I saying that it is wrong for Britain and the U.S. to be in Afghanistan. The cause is right, the end might well turn out right, but so much of U.S. Army operations can be wrong because of inherent American attitudes that permeate that institution from top to bottom.
  • olympic
    this is what is known as a 'damage limitation exercise' that the US govt is so good at. It's not OK. I wonder if Gaddafi said he 'lost his moral compass' he would be let off the hook! Cheap american PR spin. It doesn't wash. He should be sitting in the hague standing trial for war crimes. Oh, the US won't sign up to the ICC yet wants to send everyone else there to stand trial.
  • toastkid
    Nuremberg principle "To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole." Put the supreme criminals on trial - Bush, Blair, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Brown.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date

Sponsored Links