Home » Reports and StudiesRSS
The TRIPS Agreement and Egypt's Responsibility to Protect the Right to HealthThe TRIPS Agreement and Egypt's Responsibility to Protect the Right to HealthThe ReportPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendBookmark/Search this post withRight to Health
1. Introduction- On 1 January 2005, the agreement on the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereinafter TRIPS) came into force in Egypt, which is now bound by international law to implement its duties under this agreement in order to ensure full protection of intellectual property rights, including copyright, trademarks and patent rights.
A large proportion of modern drugs enjoy patent protection in developed countries, allowing multinational companies a monopoly over the production and sale of these drugs. However, generic drugs (manufactured in developing countries with or without the permission of the patent owner) have been utilised across the third world to reduce prices of essential drugs.
Traditionally, many developing countries do not provide patent protection, or provide only limited protection, for pharmaceutical products and Egypt has been one of the countries that has granted limited protection to pharmaceutical products. However, as the agreement on the trade related aspects of intellectual property (TRIPS) comes into force in many large developing countries in 2005, including in Egypt, these countries will have to extend full protection to pharmaceutical products.
Many of the medicines in the developing world are generic medicines manufactured by a process of reverse engineering in countries such as India or Brazil1. For countries that have relied on this supply of essential drugs the implementation of the TRIPS agreement will have a retrogressive effect on the delivery of essential drugs.
Even for countries that have generally relied on voluntary licences, such as South Africa or Egypt, the international enforcement of TRIPS limits the options available to the state in the face of a health crisis. Furthermore, for the previously mentioned countries, the reduction in supply of generic medicines from countries with a large generic drugs industry like India and Brazil may have the effect of increasing global prices for medicines which will, in turn, have a negative effect on countries where the local industries rely on voluntary licences.
This policy paper examines the normative rules of TRIPS as part of international law and the TRIPS compliant legislation on pharmaceutical products introduced by the Egyptian government. The paper analyses the expected effect of TRIPS on the ability of the Egyptian government to fulfil its legal obligations to protect its citizens’ right to health. It concludes with recommendations to the Egyptian government and other actors on policies that should be adopted to avoid the adverse effect of the agreement on people’s access to essential medicines.
The policy paper also aims at raising public awareness on the different aspects of the TRIPS and its effects on the right to health in light of the apparent lack of information provided by the government on the issue, and its failure to involve civil society and the public in planning for the phase following the TRIPS entrance into force.
1- Drahos P, “Access to medicines: after Doha” Trade hot topics Commonwealth Issue No. 20.
The Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights encourages freedom of information.Regular View