The New York Times


April 26, 2011, 8:49 pm

Taylor Digs In Deeper

Oh, my. Rather than answering my question — where are these big new Obama programs? — he points to CBO projections showing that spending on mandatory programs is expected to remain high in 2021.

He has to know — or has no business writing about budget issues if he doesn’t know — what that’s mainly about: it’s about the baby boomers hitting retirement age, plus the continuing rise in health care costs. Baby boom starts in 1946; 65 years after that is …? I mean, we’ve been hearing tons about the demographic deluge (exaggerated, but still a very real factor). And Taylor presents budget projections that are mainly driven by that demography as if they represented a massive Obama initiative?

Back to my original point: the actual rise in the spending/GDP ratio under Obama represents (1) weak GDP (2) safety net programs. It’s not a huge expansion of government. No amount of dodging can change that fact.


About Paul Krugman

Paul Krugman is an Op-Ed columnist for The New York Times.

Recent Columns

Let’s Take a Hike
By PAUL KRUGMAN

If the federal budget and national deficit situation is so serious, shouldn’t we be raising taxes, not cutting them?

Patients Are Not Consumers
By PAUL KRUGMAN

Politicians will have you believe that receiving health care is the same as a commercial transaction.

Let’s Not Be Civil
By PAUL KRUGMAN

The House budget proposal shows a huge gap between the two parties’ priorities, and the difference should be made clear to voters.

Who’s Serious Now?
By PAUL KRUGMAN

President Obama called the Republicans’ bluff on Wednesday and laid out a budget plan that really is serious.

Obama Is Missing
By PAUL KRUGMAN

Where’s the Democratic vision on the budget?

Archive

Recent Posts

April 27

When Is A Target Not A Target?

When it's an upper bound.

April 27

One More Point About 2021

Or maybe two.

April 27

Bernanke Wimps Out

Intimidated by the inflationistas.

April 27

Bernanke At Bat

ZOMG inflation, indeed.

April 27

UK, Not OK

Contractionary policies promote contraction.

From the Opinion Blogs

Schott's Vocab
Reader Rejoinders

An occasional assemblage of overheard or underappreciated words - generously proposed by co-vocabularists.

Opinionator
Royal Wedding? What Royal Wedding?

Are people really all that excited about Prince William and Kate Middleton's pending nuptials?