The New York Times


June 1, 2011, 9:30 pm

When Tennessee Turned South

Disunion

Disunion follows the Civil War as it unfolded.

Two weeks after South Carolina declared its secession from the United States, Governor Isham G. Harris called Tennessee’s legislature into special session. Harris, a native son of Tennessee, was a popular-two term governor who had campaigned vigorously for John C. Breckinridge, the candidate of the Southern faction of the Democratic Party, during the presidential election of 1860.

Harris wasted no time in presenting his reasons for calling the General Assembly into session: “The attempt of the Northern people,” to confine slavery “within the limits of the present Southern States,” to appropriate the whole of the western territory to themselves, and to put slavery on the path of “ultimate extinction” was regarded by the “people of the Southern states as a gross and palpable violation of the spirit and obvious meaning of the compact of Union.”

Tennessee Gov. Isham HarrisLibrary of CongressTennessee Gov. Isham Harris

Harris knew the choice was clear: “Abandon it [slavery], we cannot, interwoven as it is with our wealth, prosperity and domestic happiness.” Tennessee had to leave the Union. But it would be another five months before a majority of his fellow Tennesseans would agree. What took so long?

Tennessee was a complicated state. Like its neighbor Virginia, it was profoundly divided over the issue of secession, with its mountainous eastern section deeply opposed to the idea. They weren’t alone: A special election on Feb. 9 revealed the political gulf between Governor Harris and the people of the state: On the same day that Mississippi left the Union, the voters of Tennessee voted 80 percent against secession.

In fact, Harris himself was hardly a fire-eater. While he saw a clear threat to slavery from the incoming Republican administration, he also believed there were ways short of secession, like a constitutional amendment, to remedy the problem. In his address to the General Assembly, Harris proposed a five-part amendment that would, in his mind, “deprive the fanatical majorities of the North of the power to invade our rights or impair the security or value of our property.” Four of Harris’s articles protected slavery in various ways throughout the nation, while the fifth provided that the preceding four would “never be changed, except by the consent of all the slave States.”

Two weeks after Harris’s submitted his proposal, the General Assembly responded with its own amendment protecting slavery, which it quickly submitted to Washington. Secession’s siren call, however, had become too strong for any compromise based on amending the United States Constitution. By the time of Lincoln’s inauguration in March, nothing short of a repudiation of the 1860 Republican platform would satisfy the state’s fire-eaters.

The two sides, Unionist and secessionist, stood at a stalemate until the bombardment of Ft. Sumter in early April. While some favored immediate secession, others held that secession was unconstitutional. A larger number futilely hoped for some sort of settlement based on a constitutional compromise regarding the “question of negro slavery.” Even after the outbreak of war, Tennessee, like Missouri and Kentucky to its north, hoped that it could remain neutral.

Related
Disunion Highlights

Fort Sumter

Explore multimedia from the series and navigate through past posts, as well as photos and articles from the Times archive.

That changed with Lincoln’s April 15 call for the states to send 75,000 troops to fight the Confederacy. If the federal government was going to “coerce” the seceded states into returning, Tennessee had no choice but to join its Southern neighbors. “Tennessee will not furnish a single man for purposes of coercion but 50,000 if necessary for the defense of our rights and those of our Southern brothers,” wrote Harris in response to Lincoln’s request. The legislature (with 32 percent of the House and 16 percent of the Senate dissenting) voted on May 6 to join her “Southern brothers.”

Unlike every other state to join the Confederacy with the exception of Texas and Virginia, however, the legislators insisted that the public ratify their decision. While the state government prepared for secession and war following the vote for secession, Tennessee was technically not yet a member of the separatist government. But on June 8, by a two-to-one majority, Tennessee’s electorate confirmed the General Assembly’s verdict. The Volunteer State thus became the last to secede.

Still, Tennessee remained divided throughout the war. About a quarter of all the men who went off to fight did so for the North. Unionism remained especially strong in the mountains, but also in pockets throughout the state. Bedford County, south of Nashville in Middle Tennessee, supplied an equal number of troops to the North and the South. Its county seat, Shelbyville, became such a pro-Northern hotbed that it became known as “Little Boston.” One of the ironies of the war was that Nathan Bedford Forrest, the much revered Confederate general, took his middle name from his Unionist birthplace. More significantly, following Tennessee’s departure from the Union, Andrew Johnson retained his seat in the United States Senate, becoming the only representative from a seceded state to remain in Congress.

Ironies in Tennessee continued. Because it was largely occupied by Union troops in early 1863, it was unaffected by the Emancipation Proclamation. As the war was drawing to a close, Tennessee voters approved a constitutional amendment that abolished slavery in the state, and in 1866, with Andrew Johnson then occupying the White House, the state approved the 14th Amendment over Johnson’s objections. With ratification a congressional requirement, Tennessee thus became the first former Confederate state to be readmitted to the Union.

Follow Disunion at twitter.com/NYTcivilwar or join us on Facebook.


Dwight Pitcaithley

Dwight Pitcaithley, a former chief historian of the National Park Service, teaches at New Mexico State University. He is writing a book on the secession crisis.


One-hundred-and-fifty years ago, Americans went to war with themselves. Disunion revisits and reconsiders America’s most perilous period — using contemporary accounts, diaries, images and historical assessments to follow the Civil War as it unfolded.

Join Disunion on Facebook »

Inside Opinionator

June 2, 2011
A Way to Pay for College, With Dividends

Why using “human capital contracts” to finance higher education isn’t as scary as it sounds.

May 30, 2011
Instead of Student Loans, Investing in Futures

Is it possible to finance higher education the way we finance start-up companies?

More From Fixes »

June 2, 2011
Fall of the Wild

Can there really be no possible alternative to California’s plan to close one-fourth of its state parks?

May 26, 2011
Twister’s Tale

A season of violent weather and, one would hope, a return to common sense.

More From Timothy Egan »

June 2, 2011
Captain Hannum Attends the Philippi Races

What an Indiana soldier saw at the first battle of the Civil War.

June 1, 2011
When Tennessee Turned South

Why did it take so long for the Volunteer State to secede?

More From Disunion »

June 1, 2011
A Voice From the Past

Anthony M. Kennedy’s opinion in the California prison case recalls the days when the court took charge of failing social institutions.

May 18, 2011
Justice in Dreamland

A decision this week makes it worth wondering what planet the Supreme Court justices have been living on when it comes to encounters between the police and the rest of us.

More From Linda Greenhouse »

May 31, 2011
Hooked on Meat

The human urge to eat meat may be primal, but we can’t afford to wait for it to evolve in the other direction.

May 17, 2011
Imagining Detroit

Can a city come back with the help of markets, gardens and farms?

More From Mark Bittman »

May 29, 2011
Are There Natural Human Rights?

The way we think about the turmoil in the Middle East and elsewhere is shaped by how we understand human rights.

May 22, 2011
The Flight of Curiosity

Why historians of philosophy must resist the contemporary demand for relevance.

More From The Stone »

May 29, 2011
The Trouble With E-Mail

Time to ditch the Web in favor of ‘LDL.’

May 22, 2011
Making a Hashtag of It

Twitter 2011 is a wiki-wit machine specializing in one-liners in the spirit of Dave Chappelle, Chris Rock and Wanda Sykes.

More From Virginia Heffernan »

May 27, 2011
French Press

Why can’t the French and the Americans just get along?

May 20, 2011
No Disrespect

Was President Obama’s statement on the need for a Palestinian state a provocation or a bold challenge?

More From The Thread »

May 25, 2011
Prague 1970: Music in Spring

The education of a young composer in a time of revolution.

May 18, 2011
Until the Next Revolution

Can composers embrace politics in their work without music taking a back seat to message?

More From The Score »

May 25, 2011
Does It All Come Down to Medicare?

In the 2012 presidential election, the Democrats will try to address the fiscal problems without touching the elderly or the middle class, while the Republicans will focus on tax revenue. No matter how you slice the issue, it’s voodoo policy.

May 18, 2011
Sex and the Politician

Is it really true that voters will overlook almost anything if they think the sinning political figures will carry out the policies they support?

More From The Conversation »

May 23, 2011
What’s Up With the Jews?

Recent events have proven that historical attitudes about Jews, especially negative ones, continue to flourish.

May 16, 2011
Sex, the Koch Brothers and Academic Freedom

When academic freedom is an issue, and when it isn’t.

More From Stanley Fish »

May 20, 2011
The First Shall Be Last — Or, Anyway, Second

Postponing a talk-show debut was only one of the indignities foisted upon the author by network censors.

May 6, 2011
The Week That Was

The assault on Bin Laden’s compound, and the reaction to it.

More From Dick Cavett »

May 11, 2011
Don’t Let Go of the Anger

If Wall Street is not going to be held more accountable, we need to know why.

April 27, 2011
Why Is Enough Never Enough?

The Raj Rajaratnam trial and other recent cases raise questions about money, motivation and risk.

More From William D. Cohan »

May 6, 2011
Suburbia: What a Concept

A design project descends on Levittown.

March 27, 2011
The Future of Manufacturing Is Local

In San Francisco and New York, manufacturing industries are showing signs of life, thanks to a new approach.

More From Allison Arieff »

May 6, 2011
Suburbia: What a Concept

A design project descends on Levittown.

March 27, 2011
The Future of Manufacturing Is Local

In San Francisco and New York, manufacturing industries are showing signs of life, thanks to a new approach.

More From Allison Arieff »

Opinionator Highlights

Thumbnail
A Way to Pay for College, With Dividends

Why using “human capital contracts” to finance higher education isn’t as scary as it sounds.

Instead of Student Loans, Investing in Futures

Is it possible to finance higher education the way we finance start-up companies?

Thumbnail
Are There Natural Human Rights?

The way we think about the turmoil in the Middle East and elsewhere is shaped by how we understand human rights.

Thumbnail
The Path From Charity to Profit

Social businesses require a delicate balance of the humanitarian and the financial to succeed.

Thumbnail
Until the Next Revolution

Can composers embrace politics in their work without music taking a back seat to message?

Previous Series

Thumbnail
Line by Line

A series on the basics of drawing, presented by the artist and author James McMullan, beginning with line, perspective, proportion and structure.

Thumbnail
The Elements of Math

A series on math, from the basic to the baffling, by Steven Strogatz. Beginning with why numbers are helpful and finishing with the mysteries of infinity.

Thumbnail
Living Rooms

The past, present and future of domestic life, with contributions from artists, journalists, design experts and historians.

Thumbnail
Specimens

This series by Richard Conniff looks at how species discovery has transformed our lives.