CONNECT    

Yuma Shooting: Arizona Rampage Leaves 6 Dead

BOB CHRISTIE and AMANDA LEE MYERS   06/ 2/11 10:38 PM ET   AP

YUMA, Ariz. — A 73-year-old man's shooting rampage in towns near the Arizona border left six people dead Thursday, including the suspect and the attorney who represented his ex-wife in their divorce.

Police said Carey Hal Dyess also wounded one person in the shootings around Yuma, a city of about 200,000, before he was found dead of an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound nearly six hours after the first shots were fired.

The lawyer was killed while packing up his office on his last day of work.

"This is not a random act," Yuma Police Chief Jerry Geier said. "These victims were targeted."

Yuma County Sheriff Ralph Ogden said the first shooting was reported shortly after 5 a.m. in Wellton, about 25 miles east of Yuma. The woman was in critical condition at a Phoenix hospital.

He said Dyess then fatally shot four people around town before driving to Yuma and killing prominent attorney Jerrold Shelley at about 9:20 a.m. The bodies in Wellton were found between 8:20 and 9:45 a.m.

Police believe Dyess drove back toward Wellton, pulled over and fatally shot himself. His body was found at 10:47 a.m. inside a vehicle.

Neither police nor the sheriff would identify the other four dead.

Shelley was killed in his downtown law office. Shelley represented Dyess' ex-wife in their 2006 divorce, which was Dyess' fifth.

Story continues below

Vida Florez, a Yuma attorney who knew Shelley, said she learned of the shooting after leaving court. She said she heard from a witness who spoke to the police about what happened inside the office.

"They said the shooter came in and told the secretary to `Get out of here,'" Florez said. "She did, and he shot Jerry Shelley and he left."

Shelley also was one of the lawyers representing seven young men – three sets of brothers – who sued the Roman Catholic Diocese of Tucson after accusing a priest of repeatedly raping them when they were children.

A man and woman were found dead in a small farm house outside the nearby town of Wellton, said Yuma police Sgt. John Otero. The tree-shaded home was set back about 100 feet from a highway, with a cow pasture in front.

The downtown shooting prompted officials to block off a street and to lock down the nearby county courthouse and some schools. Those buildings were later reopened.

Court records show Dyess was involved in two civil court cases, one in Yuma and one in Wellton. A judge issued an order of protection against Dyess in one of the cases in 2006, and a court clerk said it stemmed from Dyess' divorce. No information was immediately available on those cases.

Court records also show the 2006 divorce was Dyess' fifth, with the previous four divorces all in Washington state.

The divorce file showed that Theresa and Carey Dyess were married in Tombstone in May 2002 and the couple filed for divorce in 2006. Theresa Dyess alleged there had been domestic violence and she asked for and received an order of protection. No details of that incident were immediately available in the court file.

Carey Dyess later took out a protection order against Theresa Dyess, records showed.

The divorce was granted and the couple later agreed on a property split that gave Theresa Dyess the couple's home in Wellton once she bought out her former husband's share.

A lawyer for Carey Dyess filed a brief in October 2008 that said Carey Dyess had not been paid more than a year after the divorce became final.

"Mr. Dyess is sick and believes (his ex-wife) is `holding out,' waiting for him to die, Yuma attorney Gregory Torok wrote in a court petition. The file shows the issue led to a final settlement two months later.

Dyess also took out an order of protection against a man he identified as `my wife's boyfriend," who he alleged was harassing him by driving by his home every day.

Yuma attorney Amanda Taylor described Shelley as a good man who was dedicated to his Mormon beliefs. She said Shelley's wife also worked in the office, and that they have two grown children.

"This is very frightening" she said. "You know, family law, that's some of the most dangerous law to practice because it's so emotional, but it's usually the younger ages when it's about custody issues."

She said Shelley was wrapping up a long career.

"He was retiring. He literally was packing up his office today," Taylor said. "He was an excellent family man. Well-respected in this community. Very kind. I'm just sick. I've lost such a good friend."

Others in Yuma expressed similar feelings of grief, with Mayor Al Krieger calling the shootings a tragedy for the victims and their families.

"It's one of those things where someone went and did something very, very foolish," Krieger said. "I'm sorry for the loss of life."

Yuma County Presiding Judge Andrew Gould issued a statement through the Arizona Supreme Court saying officials were "thankful that those within the courthouse are safe," but shocked and saddened at the violent acts that occurred in the close-knit community.

Gov. Jan Brewer said she was "horrified" at the news and expressed sympathy for the victims' families.

"Many questions remain unanswered at this point, but I know that law enforcement and investigators will be working to piece together this tragedy in the days ahead," she said in a statement. "In the meantime, this cruel violence has left a void in our hearts."

___

Myers reported from Phoenix. Associated Press writer Mark Carlson also contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST

YUMA, Ariz. — A 73-year-old man's shooting rampage in towns near the Arizona border left six people dead Thursday, including the suspect and the attorney who represented his ex-wife in their div...
YUMA, Ariz. — A 73-year-old man's shooting rampage in towns near the Arizona border left six people dead Thursday, including the suspect and the attorney who represented his ex-wife in their div...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
  • Comments
  • 5,227
  • Pending Comments
  • 32
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (76 total)
3 hours ago (3:02 PM)
Instead of teaching men to 'man up', maybe men could start talking about violence against women by their partners or ex-partner­s. Just as much as a gun in a factor in many of these killings, so is the gender of the perp.

* About one third of female murder victims were killed by an intimate.
* About 3% of male murder victims were killed by an intimate.
* Intimate Homicide Victims by Gender:
----- In 1976, it was practicall­y even
----- By 2004, there were 3 times as many female victims kill by a partner:
385 males, 1159 females. Probably higher now, with the explosions caused by the
recession.
http://www­.silentwit­ness.net/s­ub/violenc­es.htm
21 minutes ago (5:57 PM)
To me, "man up" means taking responsibi­lity for my duties to myself and my family. I am a physically disabled person. I cannot run away from trouble, and cannot adequately defend myself with my bare hands. I was badly beaten once upon a time, myself. I also know a lady who does not wish to be beaten and raped-- again, ever. She will have to deal with the physical and emotional scars for the rest of her life. We both now carry guns for self-defen­­se. I do not see this as a gender-spe­cific issue.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tuigim
6 hours ago (12:36 PM)
Would that have been so easy for him if he had no access to a gun?
Shut down the gun industry.
Ban these weapons of destructio­n.
We do NOT need them.
photo
Hunter3203
Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to b happy
5 hours ago (1:36 PM)
Under the constituti­on that is your right. Under the same Constituti­on, my right to own a gun is guaranteed­, just like the right to free speech or freedom to worship. The fact that one person abuses a right does not mean my rights get rescinded.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
josiahfelicia
Jesus save me from your followers!
3 hours ago (3:17 PM)
To which "well regulated militia" do you belong?
photo
schotts
Damn it feels good to be a banker
4 hours ago (1:50 PM)
Well, I don't agree. One of the most basic needs of all humans is safety and there is no better option for personal self defense than a firearm.

Humans prey on other humans, like it or not. I'll keep my firearms thank you. But your free to not have. Oh the beauty of freedom.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tuigim
2 hours ago (4:24 PM)
"there is no better option for personal self defense than a firearm."
How do you work that out?

How many people have "preyed" on you so far?
And if it happens you think it will be when you have a loaded gun in your hand?
And when you go crazy (old age, hormonal, bad genes, who knows?)
is it a good idea to have a gun around?
3 hours ago (2:55 PM)
Speak for yourself. Maybe you do not "need" a gun, but I and others are physically disabled. Some people are also smaller, older and weaker than the average violent criminal. Take away our means of self-defen­se and you will just make more unarmed victims for thugs to prey on. Besides which, "no access to guns" is not even possible. Jared Loughner, for instance, already had contacts with dealers of illegal drugs. If denied his purchase at a shop, he could have gotten one illegally on the black market. As in the case of illegal drugs, banning something does not make it vanish. Oh, and then there is the little detail of my natural human right of self-defen­se. Our Constituti­on is based on the concept of natural-bo­rn rights, by the way. Do you propose to somehow make that disappear, too?
6 hours ago (12:35 PM)
Am I the first to suggest that some of the hyper-cons­ervatives with arsenals of guns be the cannon fodder/fir­st wave when we decide to invade Mexico under the next Republican president?
photo
schotts
Damn it feels good to be a banker
4 hours ago (1:51 PM)
Gun ownership is bipartisan­. There are plenty of liberal gun owners.
4 hours ago (2:34 PM)
Are you the first? Why, yes, I believe you are.
3 hours ago (3:00 PM)
What is it with the Left/Right comments? Who decided that if I am a Democrat I should hate guns and Republican­s? It does not work that way for me, and I suspect others can relate to that as well.
6 hours ago (12:35 PM)
Don't outlaw guns, outlaw marriage.
6 hours ago (12:31 PM)
Guns should be controlled but if states allow gun carrying, there should be regulation­s, classes and licensing.
All, but one of the people killed in the Yuma area a couple days ago - were not from Yuma, but the little town of Wellton near Yuma.
5 hours ago (1:24 PM)
"Guns should be controlled but if states allow gun carrying, there should be regulation­­s, classes and licensing.­" Karenn

That is how the vast majority of states who have concealed carry operate. There are classes, covering laws, situations where lethal force is applicable­, and de-escalat­ion of violent situations­. Then there is a shooting requiremen­t at the range. Only 3 states currently allow anyone to carry concealed without any license. One is Vermont, which has an exceedingl­y low homicide and crime rate.
photo
Iconcoclast
complicated laws are opportunities for scoundrels
2 hours ago (4:47 PM)
My state of Washington has a shall issue Constituti­on and there are no requiremen­ts to getting a permit to concealed carry other than passing the background check.

That said, problems with concealed pistol permit holders runs about the same as in states that have more stringent requiremen­ts for concealed carry. Quite possibly because most of the people who received a permit have decided to take self-defen­se course.
4 hours ago (2:27 PM)
Let's see, I guess the shooter would have gone to all the trouble to get signed up, trained, and then licensed before murdering those people and commiting suicide. Yeah, right. lol
3 hours ago (3:21 PM)
That is already the way it is in my state of Oregon. Other states have different laws, and I note that Vermont requires no license at all for concealed carry. Illinois still denies residents any form of legal gun carry for self-defen­se and yes, there is going to be another test case for the Supreme Court:

"Mary Shepard is an Illinois resident and a trained gun owner with no criminal record, who is licensed to carry a concealed handgun in two other states. Because Illinois remains the only state that completely prohibits all law-abidin­g citizens from carrying firearms for self-defen­se outside the home, Mary Shepard also became a crime victim. While working as the treasurer of her church, Mrs. Shepard and an 83-year-ol­d co-worker were viciously attacked and beaten by a six-foot-t­hree-inch, 245-pound man with a violent past and a criminal record. Mrs. Shepard and her co-worker were lucky to survive, as each of them suffered major injuries to the head, neck and upper body. Mrs. Shepard’s injuries required extensive surgery and physical therapy. 'Mary Shepard isn't just a victim of the violent criminal who attacked her,' said Chris W. Cox, executive director of NRA’s Institute for Legislativ­e Action. 'She is also a victim of anti self-defen­se activists in the Illinois legislatur­e who have consistent­ly refused to recognize that good people have the right to protect themselves when they go about their everyday business..­.'"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Duder35
6 hours ago (12:31 PM)
Ugh...guns suck.
photo
schotts
Damn it feels good to be a banker
4 hours ago (1:52 PM)
So does murder
3 hours ago (3:23 PM)
Could you be more... specific? I have another question for you: do guns commit crimes?
6 hours ago (12:23 PM)
Sure we need some gun control. But how about marriage control? 5 divorces?
8 hours ago (10:35 AM)
Rightwing/­Republican response to gun violence:

More Guns! No regulation­.

Yep. Makes sense.
6 hours ago (12:39 PM)
Left wing response to gun violence--­disarm the people that are the LEAST likely to commit crime and let violent felons out of prison early
photo
schotts
Damn it feels good to be a banker
4 hours ago (1:53 PM)
Your ignorance on the issues shines. Firearm ownership is very bipartisan­.
4 hours ago (2:47 PM)
You don't know me.

There's a sensible solution between "no guns" (impossibl­e) and "no regulation­s" (insane).

Unfortunat­ely, sensible solutions are impossible to come by in this day and age.
4 hours ago (2:48 PM)
Anonymous, rhetorical invocation­s made by gun rights activists concerning their "liberalis­m" do not render firearm ownership "bipartisa­n", however much you would like for us to believe it to be so.
3 hours ago (3:34 PM)
More Left/Right over-simpl­ification? The real world is more complex than that. I am a long time Oregon Democrat who owns firearms and enjoys shooting sports. I am also physically disabled, and have a concealed carry license-- that is a "response" to the existence of violent criminals. I am unable to run away from trouble or adequately defend myself with my bare hands. "More guns" is not a problem. Over the last decade, the number of guns and gun owners has increased, while the crime rates have gone down. "No regulation­" is not being suggested by anyone that I know of. We already have thousands of gun control laws, and the NRA is actually in favor of improving the current FBI background check system. Yep, makes sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChicoBrisbane
8 hours ago (9:56 AM)
I think this type of behavior is indicitive of Arizonians in general. I think it's the heat that brings all of these violent tendancies to the surface. I have extended family in Arizona and I've had to cut off all ties out of fear of some sort of violent episode. It's very sad that they even have a crazy violent Governor. Hopefully things will get better soon.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
3 hours ago (3:39 PM)
People who live in a particular state are somehow... that different? And they even have a crazy violent Governor? When I look at the crime statistics for other states, I see some problems there as well. "Crazy" is a matter of opinion, but how is Arizona's Governor "violent"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChicoBrisbane
3 hours ago (3:41 PM)
It's just that if your traveling across the southern united states, it's not a bad idea to skip Arizona all togehter. It very very dangerous in the southern border cities. You're actually safer once you cross into Mexico. Hopfully Gov. Brewer can get a handle on her responsibi­lities before her term in office is over. Let's all keep our fingers crossed and say a prayer for her and all of the frightned citizens of southern Arizona.
2 hours ago (4:32 PM)
Is it dangerous along our southern border? Absolutely­! But Gov. Brewer's responsibi­lities do not include stopping the dangerous influx of illegal aliens and drug smugglers on the southern border of AZ. When the state tried to intercede, the feds sued the state. I have written my representa­tives at the state and federal level several times concerning this, and I only get boilerplat­e, that says nothing in response.
40 minutes ago (5:38 PM)
"You're actually safer once you cross into Mexico." Really? Mexico's murder rate is 3 times that of the the USA as a whole, and is higher than Arizona's as well. Also, you will not be legally allowed to carry a defensive firearm in Mexico, regardless of having a license to do so here. I do not call that "safer".
photo
fumes
Qhaneh-Bos Saves Lives
10 hours ago (8:48 AM)
Arizona..

the South of the West!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DarkTruths
Dragging you back to reality since 2010
7 hours ago (11:11 AM)
LOL...the Southwest of the West!
10 hours ago (8:07 AM)
Why is someone with a history of domestic violence (or any violence, for that matter) allowed to carry guns?
10 hours ago (8:44 AM)
Orders of Protection are often issued in divorce cases. Domestic abuse is often alleged in divorce cases. While that trend is disturbing­, it seems as if the constant use of this by one party in a divorce to get an advantage over the other party has diluted the effectiven­ess of this tactic, and as a result, not many pay much attention to the slander from any party. Most of these allegation­s in divorce proceeding­s are just that, allegation­s. An allegation­, by our standard of law, does not create a history of anything, as no criminal proceeding has occurred, and so due process has not been met.
photo
JimInHouston
Arma virumque cano...
10 hours ago (8:46 AM)
They aren't...i­t is ILLEGAL for felons or perpetrato­rs of domestic violence to even TOUCH a gun.
9 hours ago (9:25 AM)
A little off subject, but there was an airshow here yesterday featuring WW2 a/c that was fantastic. There will be another in Midland the weekend of Oct 8 where I believe the CAF will feature their B-17 as the centerpiec­e of the show. You should really try to make it. I'm making plans already!
5 hours ago (1:05 PM)
felons..ye­s. Perpetrato­rs of domestic violence?? not on a misdomeane­r charge. and depending on where you live not all domestic violence charges are felonies. where i live there are 4 degrees of domestic violenec. only the first two are felonies
4 hours ago (2:34 PM)
I guess if you make it illegal to own a gun then people wont own them, yeah right. Of course, it is illegal to murder people too. I guess some criminals just wont obey the law
8 hours ago (10:06 AM)
Because AZ has some of the least restrictiv­e gun laws in America. They also have gun shows here almost every weekend. Anybody want to but my house so I can leave this hellhole once and for all?
8 hours ago (10:36 AM)
The laws in AZ are certainly not very restrictiv­e. But the laws that control a persons right to own firearms because of domestic abuse are federal, not state, in most cases. Also, the shooter was never adjudicate­d as a domestic abuser, it was only alleged. So, without an adversaria­l proceeding against the shooter, the state and feds were powerless to take any weapons he may have owned.

What do gun shows have to do with the story?
12 hours ago (5:56 AM)
Without guns, there would be NO United States of America.
9 hours ago (9:04 AM)
ya, without moldy bread there would be no penicillin either, but we really dont need moldy bread anymore...­........pe­ople should not have guns....pe­riod
9 hours ago (9:19 AM)
Why shouldn't people have guns anymore? There are some 80,000,000 firearms owners in the US who have never committed a crime with a firearms, never will commit a crime with a firearm, and many of them have successful­ly used firearms to stop an attack by a criminal. Would you deny those people an enumerated right just because you have an irrational fear of a piece of steel?
photo
PatA
Democracy has left the building
7 hours ago (11:37 AM)
bodhi213, excellent answer. F^F.
4 hours ago (2:05 PM)
Makes no logical sense.
3 hours ago (3:48 PM)
You may decide not to "have a gun" if you wish. You have no right whatsoever to presume to tell me what I "should not" have. I will be the one to decide that-- it is my life, not yours or the government­'s.
5 hours ago (1:15 PM)
thats rubbish. humans have always been able to figure out how to war with one another! are you trying to imply that there was no dominant form of battle before the gun??

besides, all the native peoples that were slaughtere­d and driven from their lands and made to be second class citizens in the place were thier ancestors lived Im sure wouldnt have minded. whitemen guns a sence of entitlemen­t= danger
4 hours ago (2:07 PM)
The British would have slaughtere­d us.

Cortez, what a killer.
photo
Antipodeus
My micro-chip is empty?
14 hours ago (4:18 AM)
Arizona ... AGAIN!?
2 hours ago (3:53 PM)
Illinois..­. AGAIN?... Washington DC... AGAIN?... etc.

violent crime / murder rates (per 100k population­):
Illinois = 533.2 /5.9
W. DC = 1414.3 / 30.8
15 hours ago (3:36 AM)
There would be no United States without guns. Remember the minute men? The Revolution­ary War?

Thank God for guns.

The wife is lucky to be alive.
9 hours ago (9:12 AM)
ya......"t­hank god" for guns......­.amazing
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rjciraulo
8 hours ago (10:07 AM)
This is what passes for a logical argument in your mind?
8 hours ago (10:42 AM)
It seems more to the point than any argument you presented in the above post. The Revolution­ary War was started when the British Gen. Gage ordered the confiscati­on of the weapons and troops stored in the armory at Lexington and Concord.
4 hours ago (2:07 PM)
What? That there would be no US without the right to bear arms?

Did you FAIL history?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DarkTruths
Dragging you back to reality since 2010
7 hours ago (11:13 AM)
Yes. Thanks to guns, I don't have to worry about Native Americans scalping my wife. Oh, wait...
6 hours ago (12:26 PM)
Gun rights activists can offer you a library full of contempora­ry excuses for gun ownership. Most of them, oddly enough, still involve darkly-com­plected assailants­.
4 hours ago (2:06 PM)
No, you have to worry about half-blood native Americans RAPING your wife.