CONNECT    

Muammar Gaddafi's Troops Hit By British, French Airstrikes In Libya

Libya Airstrikes

HADEEL AL-SHALCHI   06/ 4/11 07:22 PM ET   AP

BENGHAZI, Libya — British and French attack helicopters struck for the first time inside Libya, giving the NATO campaign more muscle against Moammar Gadhafi's forces. Hours later, Tripoli was hit by another round of airstrikes and at least eight explosions sounded in the capital.

The use of helicopters significantly ramped up NATO's operations and was a major boost to Libyan rebels, just a day after the fighters forced government troops from three western towns and broke the siege of a fourth. It was yet another erosion of Gadhafi's power since the eruption in mid-February of the uprising to end his 42-year rule.

NATO said the helicopters struck troops trying to hide in populated areas, military vehicles and equipment. Lt. Gen. Charles Bouchard, commander of the Libya operation, said the engagement "demonstrates the unique capabilities brought to bear by attack helicopters."

Until now, NATO has relied on attack jets, generally flying above 15,000 feet (4,500 meters) – nearly three miles (five kilometers) high. The jets primarily strike government targets but there have been cases where they missed and hit rebels instead.

The helicopters give the alliance a key advantage in close-up combat, flying at much lower altitudes.

The British Apaches hit two targets near the eastern oil town of Brega, according British Maj. Gen. Nick Pope, and separate Royal Air Force aircraft destroyed another military installation near Brega and two ammunition bunkers at the large Waddan depot in central Libya.

Brega is of strategic importance to Libya's oil industry and lies on the coastal road along the Mediterranean that leads to the capital, Tripoli. In the early days of the uprising against Gadhafi, it went back and forth between rebel and loyalist hands, but later the front line settled to the east of the town, leaving Brega under Gadhafi's control.

The French Gazelle and Tiger helicopters struck 15 military vehicles and five military command buildings, said Col. Thierry Burkhard. All the helicopters returned safely, the French and British said.

British Defense Secretary Liam Fox said the "use of the attack helicopters is a logical extension" in NATO's campaign and indicated more would be used in the future.

Story continues below

"We will continue with the methods we have to degrade his (Gadhafi's) command and control, to degrade his supplies," Fox said from Singapore, where he was attending an Asian security conference.

The head of the rebels' Transitional National Council, Mustafa Abdul-Jalil, welcomed the helicopter attacks and emphasized that they launched from ships outside Libya.

"We welcome any measures to expedite the departure of Moammar Gadhafi, but at the same time we maintain the sovereignty of the Libyan state," Abdul-Jalil told reporters Saturday.

The conflict in Libya appears at a stalemate after nearly four months. NATO airstrikes have kept the outgunned rebels from being overrun, but the rebels have been unable to mount an effective offensive against Gadhafi's better equipped forces.

Gadhafi's regime has been slowly crumbling from within. A significant number of officers and several Cabinet ministers have defected, and most have expressed support for the opposition, but Gadhafi's hold on power shows little sign of loosening.

Gadhafi has been seen in public rarely and heard even less frequently since a NATO airstrike on his compound killed one of his sons on April 30. Questions are arising about the physical and mental state of the 69-year-old dictator, who has ruled Libya since 1969.

The NATO strikes on Saturday targeted an educational institute in eastern Tripoli where military officials and civilians studied engineering, computers and communications, according to an official who requested anonymity in line with government policy.

Libyan rebels on Friday won control of four towns in the western Nafusa mountain range, where government forces have besieged and periodically shelled rebel-held areas.

The small rebel force in the western mountains is unlikely to threaten Gadhafi's hold on Tripoli, 45 miles (70 kilometers) northwest, but the victories could bring relief to local residents by opening up roads between their communities. The western mountain population is tiny compared with the large rebel-held territories in east Libya.

Fighting continued Saturday in another part of the mountain range, near the border with Tunisia. A resident of the town of Nalut, Mohammed Jernaz, said via Skype that Gadhafi's forces fired grad rockets, injuring 10 people.

A video posted by Nalut activists on YouTube showed injured men covered with blood being transported in the back of pickup trucks. The video's authenticity could not be confirmed.

Abdul-Jalil, the head of the rebel council, and other leaders met with British Foreign Secretary William Hague in the rebels' de facto capital, Benghazi.

Hague is one of the highest-ranking foreign officials to visit rebel-held territory in eastern Libya.

He traveled with another British Cabinet minister, International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell, on a visit Hague said was to show support for those fighting Gadhafi's rule.

Hague called the National Transitional Council "the legitimate representation of the Libyan people," but fell short of calling it a government as other NATO countries like France and Italy have.

He said that British efforts to support rebel fighters were in full swing, and included providing radios, uniforms and bulletproof vests.

"I believe now the momentum has shifted increasingly against the Gadhafi regime," said Hague.

___

Associated Press writers Diaa Hadid in Tripoli, Alex Kennedy in Singapore, David Stringer in London, Jamey Keaten in Paris and Don Melvin in Brussels contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BENGHAZI, Libya — British and French attack helicopters struck for the first time inside Libya, giving the NATO campaign more muscle against Moammar Gadhafi's forces. Hours later, Tripoli was hi...
BENGHAZI, Libya — British and French attack helicopters struck for the first time inside Libya, giving the NATO campaign more muscle against Moammar Gadhafi's forces. Hours later, Tripoli was hi...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 554
  • Pending Comments
  • 3
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (10 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoboyukiMasaki
Happy-Happy, Joy-Joy
5 minutes ago (8:34 AM)
It'a crying shame when NOBODY likes you...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoboyukiMasaki
Happy-Happy, Joy-Joy
21 minutes ago (8:18 AM)
Poor Gaddafi. Nobody seems to like this guy.

Pretty soon, he'll have to tie a Sirloin Steak around his neck - just to get the dog to play with him.
6 hours ago (2:28 AM)
If Russia is indicating a Land War in Libya [troops on the ground] for NATO is imminent, a Chinese diplomat's recent visit with the provisiona­l Rebel National Transition­al Council in Benghazi is clearest evidence yet of the following: If NATO isn't physically forcing Muammar Gaddafi' ouster... they're certainly handing his head-piece and designer sunglasses­.

Given both Russia and China initially abstained from voting for approval of a NATO-enfor­ced NO-Fly Zone over Libyan airspace only four months earlier, and now their offering Muammar Gaddafi the most subtle clues to date... regarding his 40-year dictatoria­l reign, that indeed finally "The End Is Nigh."

In other words, he can leave now of his own free will. However, once the ground forces descend from within Libyan airspace he's "toast"... or fish bait.

"...China meets Libya rebels in latest blow to Gaddafi"

By Peter Graff Reuters

TRIPOLI | Fri Jun 3, 2011 9:47pm BST

"...(Reute­rs) - China made its first confirmed contact with Libyan rebels in the latest diplomatic setback for Muammar Gaddafi, and France said on Friday it was working with those close to the veteran ruler to persuade him to leave power...."

Webb Link: http://uk.­reuters.co­m/article/­2011/06/03­/uk-libya-­idUKTRE74E­1I42011060­3
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Holly Smoke
Perspective is not condescending.
10 hours ago (11:03 PM)
The German should very proud of their moral standing on this Libya affair.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
melchar
10 hours ago (10:50 PM)
I just hope those westerners who support educationa­l institutio­ns in Libya being targeted by western military forces are fully aware of the moral implicatio­ns. Does it not mean that educationa­l institutio­ns in the US and Europe are also fair game for so called terrorists­?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
melchar
10 hours ago (10:48 PM)
Are there still people out there who deny that NATO and the US are engaged in the racist and insane destructio­n of a sovereign African state, ofcourse with help from the western press?
6 hours ago (2:20 AM)
Yes me, NATO is engaged in no such thing. The real question is why are you supporting Gadhafi who ordered the murder of U.S. civilians, Europeans and U.S. soldiers? This does not consider the thousands of Libyans that he has murdered, jailed and tortured for the crime of wanting to freely vote, or speak their minds. Now why you support such a person. Gadhafi can stop this tomorrow if he wanted to. It's all up to him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
melchar
10 hours ago (10:46 PM)
"The NATO strikes on Saturday targeted an educationa­l institute in eastern Tripoli where military officials and civilians studied engineerin­g, computers and communicat­ions, according to an official who requested anonymity in line with government policy." This would have been funny if it did not entail the destructio­n of a country and its people. Nato destroying educationa­l institutio­ns in the name of a humanitari­an mission. Absolutely Orwellian!
8 hours ago (12:50 AM)
And 90% of the posters here are buying it hook, line and sinker.
6 hours ago (2:44 AM)
The lack of understand­ing is stunning. The so-called educationa­l institute was being used as a command and control center. That's the reason that location was struck. It's also the reason that other installati­ons have been struck in and around Tripoli. I guess you don't seem to know that NATO is monitoring telecommun­ications emanating from Libya. Each time Gadhafi attempts to shift his command and control center he'll soon find a strike incoming. There's nothing Orwellian about it. It's a strategy and tactic that's as old as warfare.
lqw
Justmyopinion
10 hours ago (10:43 PM)
Is this what a no fly zone looks like ?
6 hours ago (2:48 AM)
Perhaps you would like to go back and read the UN resolution­, it authorized much more than a no fly zone
realitycitizen
Proud American, Proud Gentile
11 hours ago (10:01 PM)
Qaddafi and his commanders are unable to communicat­e directly with each other, yet Libya is still holding. It is difficult to destroy real organizati­on.

The rebels at this point are an afterthoug­ht. It's NATO's reputation on the line, and they are losing.
11 hours ago (9:33 PM)
I'm no fan of Gaddafi, but he has every right to defend the people of Libya from these racist aggressors­.
11 hours ago (9:27 PM)
it's unfortunat­ely that Qaddafi doesn't have nuclear weapons to defend his country against this aggression­...hopeful­ly, Iran and N. Korea learned a lesson. The only way to make NATO to behave is a credible threat of retaliatio­n.
11 hours ago (9:15 PM)
The canard that the French lead mission is harming civilians is getting old. So is this stagnant adventure in Libya.
12 hours ago (8:54 PM)
British and French do not have enough ground forces that could defeat Qaddafi. So guess where the majority of boots on the ground will eventually come from?
11 hours ago (9:43 PM)
The British and French are in this for the oil , what a bunch of thugs , them along with Khadafy.
The British and French still have that colonial blood running through their veins.
10 hours ago (10:39 PM)
Canada?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stefan Bast
Just a punk from Hamburg, Germany.
14 hours ago (6:53 PM)
Not one comment seems to remember, that it was Gaddaffi, who threatened to massacre Benghazi, and who laid siege to Misurata. Strange, it all did not happen so long ago. Gaddaffi tried to use weapons, he had bought from Europe, to suppress opposition by terror, and he was not coy about announcing his plans on Libya TV.

Bad move, as this would have made the guys, that sold him the weapons, look really bad. He should have read the Repo Clause on his war gear: "Lethal equipment, not for use in riot control"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaFemmeSASE
15 hours ago (5:44 PM)
Can someone remind me of the mandate for this interventi­on? I would look it up but it seems as though trying to use that as an argument against this interventi­on in Libya would be futile as people would rather be indoctrina­ted by lies. This situation reminds me of Lets go into Iraq to find WMDs.
14 hours ago (6:20 PM)
You would need to argue that Qaddafi was not currently and actively kil ling dissidents to finish the metaphor, and that would be in error.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stefan Bast
Just a punk from Hamburg, Germany.
14 hours ago (6:36 PM)
UN security council resolution 1973 (2011) on Libya
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1776 or 1984
It's an Empire, not a Republic.
14 hours ago (6:42 PM)
Who drafted the resolution­? (the same people attacking Libya right?)

Basically, the other major powers abstained from voting on the resolution because they didn't have a large enough stake in Libya to tick off the US.
photo
rbenjamin
read their lips
14 hours ago (7:03 PM)
Read about it on Wikipedia!