CONNECT    

Robert Gates: Only Modest Troop Reductions In Afghanistan

Robert Gates Afghanistan

ROBERT BURNS   06/ 4/11 09:15 PM ET   AP

KABUL, Afghanistan — U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates appealed for patience with an unpopular war and said Saturday that only modest U.S. troop reductions would make sense this summer in a still unstable Afghanistan.

On his 12th and final visit to Afghanistan as Pentagon chief, Gates held out the possibility of a turning point in the war by year's end. But Gates, who's retiring June 30, said much depends on whether the death of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden creates a new opening for peace negotiations with leaders of the Taliban insurgency.

This and other aspects of the war, now in its 10th year, were on the agenda for Gates' meetings Saturday with Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. and NATO commander here, and with U.S. Ambassador Karl Eikenberry. A decision on U.S. troop reductions is expected in the next couple of weeks.

Gates stressed the effectiveness of U.S.-led NATO military operations against the Taliban over the past year, after President Barack Obama ordered an extra 30,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan. Gains have been notable in the south, the heartland of the Taliban movement.

"I believe that if we can hold on to the territory that has been recaptured from the Taliban ... and perhaps expand that security, that we will be in position toward the end of this year to perhaps have a successful opening to reconciliation" with the Taliban – "or at least be in a position where we can say we've turned the corner here in Afghanistan," Gates said.

"Making any changes prior to that time would be premature," he added.

Together with remarks he made about Afghanistan earlier Saturday at a security conference in Singapore, Gates' statements suggest that he worries that large U.S. troop cuts this year would run the risk of undermining battlefield gains and jeopardize a NATO-endorsed plan to remove all foreign combat troops from Afghanistan by 2015. The White House is pushing for bigger reductions than are favored by the military.

Gates also is concerned that a U.S. troop withdrawal could lead other members of the coalition, known as the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) to quit or sharply reduce their participation.

"There will be no rush to the exits," he said.

Story continues below

In Singapore, Gates said the United States and its allies fighting in Afghanistan will have to keep up military pressure on the Taliban in order to eventually reach a peace deal.

"The Taliban are probably a part of the political fabric of Afghanistan at this point," he said, so they could have a political role in the future. But to get to the point of a possible negotiated settlement, he said, the Taliban first will have to see a more severe reversal of their battlefield fortunes.

Gates said in Singapore that "perhaps this winter" some form of political negotiation could begin, but only if ISAF keeps up heavy military pressure to force the insurgents to the table.

"The prospects for a political settlement do not become real until the Taliban and our other adversaries begin to conclude that they cannot win militarily," Gates said.

In Kabul, Gates spoke at a news conference with President Hamid Karzai, who repeatedly stressed his anger at civilian deaths caused by airstrikes. The president also criticized night raids and detentions of innocent people.

"We cannot take this anymore," Karzai said, making no mention of civilian deaths attributed to Taliban fighters.

Gates offered conciliatory words about unintended civilian deaths and injuries.

"I am keenly aware that some of these (ISAF) military operations have at times impacted the Afghan people in unwelcome ways, from minor but grating inconveniences to, in some rare but tragic cases, civilians accidently killed or injured – losses we mourn and profoundly regret," he said.

"But we also know that the vast majority of civilian casualties are caused by the Taliban, who intentionally target innocent men, women and children with their terror attacks. And few Afghan citizens want a return to the cruel and despotic regime that so devastated this country during the 1990s."

Karzai said he, too, hopes the Taliban will undertake a "rethinking" of its relationship with al-Qaida in the aftermath of the May 2 U.S. raid that killed bin Laden at his compound in Pakistan.

When the Taliban ruled Afghanistan in the late 1990s, the group's leader, Mullah Mohammed Omar, gave bin Laden haven. When American forces invaded in October 2001 in retaliation for the Sept. 11 attacks, the Taliban were driven from power and bin Laden escaped into Pakistan.

Gates also said the Afghans must take more responsibility for their own security if a planned withdrawal of American and other foreign combat troops by the end of 2014 is to succeed.

He said the international military commitment to Afghanistan is strong and durable but "not infinite, in either time or resources."

During his Afghanistan visit, Gates planned to travel around the country to meet with soldiers and Marines.

Some in Congress argue that the war's cost, which now tops $100 billion a year, is excessive and unsustainable. Gates has disputed that reasoning.

"Success of the mission should override everything else because the most costly thing of all would be to fail," he said before flying to Afghanistan.

"Now that does not preclude adjustments in the mission or in the strategy. But ultimately the objective has to be success in the mission that has been set forth by the president," he said.

___

Robert Burns can be reached at http://twitter.com/robertburnsAP

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

KABUL, Afghanistan — U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates appealed for patience with an unpopular war and said Saturday that only modest U.S. troop reductions would make sense this summer in a st...
KABUL, Afghanistan — U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates appealed for patience with an unpopular war and said Saturday that only modest U.S. troop reductions would make sense this summer in a st...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,651
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (71 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dutch163
The world is crazy
0 minute ago (7:50 PM)
I am afraid I am no longer patient..I wish we were out of Afganistan
our troops are tired, morale is low
suicides are up
it is sapping money out of our ecomony..
that we need here..
enough already!
photo
vippy
Carpe Diem!
56 minutes ago (6:54 PM)
3 billions per week but they want to cut and cut from the middle class and elderly, makes sense.
photo
JDM73
male, 38, writer/draughtsman/ex-musician
3 hours ago (5:01 PM)
Just say no to endless war in Afghanista­n (and everywhere else). Contact your lawmaker and say NO...and urge your friends and family to do the same.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sophie M
ANTI WAR.
3 hours ago (4:25 PM)
how about starting a draft.....­........an­d get this endless war over with.
like what happened to my dad.......­..
his birthday was his doomsday.
end Obama's war.
he is too afraid to end it. he is a coward.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sophie M
ANTI WAR.
4 hours ago (4:12 PM)
that photo makes me want to vomit.
6 soldiers killed this weekend. and 5 wounded.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brokerallen
4 hours ago (4:11 PM)
Gates I believe, is a good man. He is totally wrong on this. Even if there are some good reasons to stay we still need to leave. We cannot afford to bankrupt America over the middle east.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dutch163
The world is crazy
0 minute ago (7:51 PM)
I agree
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sophie M
ANTI WAR.
4 hours ago (4:04 PM)
so i wonder how we are spending our 330 million dollars in Afghanista­n today?
no wonder Karzai does not us to leave.
why are we there again?
why does Gates have to Kiss Karzai and re-assure him ?
shame on Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tpk
having sense of humor is priceless
4 hours ago (3:24 PM)
LET'S NOT!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeckyJustice
Portland, OR
6 hours ago (2:12 PM)
Naturally President Obama gets blamed if the troops aren't withdrawn.

" The White House is pushing for bigger reductions than are favored by the military."

Trouble is, even the President can't do everything he wishes to do. Other members of Government have to agree, and Republican­s are determined to keep every single dime they can find, going to the Pentagon. Whether the Pentagon wants it or not.

Besides, if they stop spending so much on Afganistan­, the money could go for our own economy and they don't want the economy to improve before the 2012 elections, because they are hoping Obama will be blamed, and a Republican will be elected so they can finish their job of destroying the economy completely­.
Gaylord P Farqua
Herb Gardner Amateur Chef, Historian and Political
6 hours ago (1:38 PM)
Suit up Bob, or shut up. The rear echelon ticket punchers have all visited the "front" from a safe distance and are home polishing their medals and preparing their resumes. Plenty of promotions have been handed out topside so it is time to withdraw and save some of our kids from being killed or wounded. We ran out of money soon after
photo
Aikaterina
A Greek-American living in California
6 hours ago (1:33 PM)
Afghanista­n can and will never be a stable democracy (or even theocracy)­, no matter how long we remain, how many more trillions we spend, or how many more American children are sacrificed­.

Since Alexander the Great, no outside government or military has been able to control, rule or mold Afghanista­n into anything it wants. The Brits, Soviets both tried and failed.

The country and its people are rugged, fierce, and have been hostile to outside influences for centuries. Within the country, control and power rests amongst the tribal leaders, war lords, religious leaders as most Afghanis have a disdain a central power-gove­rnment. To top it off, they deem Karzai (corrupt and weak US puppet) as illegitima­te and irrelevant­. Afghanista­n has centuries' old tribal, ethnic and sectarian rivalries that we can never overcome, settle or dissipate.

The only reason to perpetuate this war is for the benefit of private contractor­s and corporate interest, who believe they'll have access to and control over the natural resources there. Colonialis­m and imperialis­m aren't suited for the modern era. Even if we gain in the short-run, in the end, we'll lose far more.

We haven't learned from history, and therefore are doomed to repeat it, at greater cost and loss (monetary, lives, and credibilit­y). The US hasn't come to face reality that we won't be able to invade-att­ack soveriegn nations, expect foreign government­s to cede their soverignty­, self-rule, and control of their government­, lives and resources to our corporatio­ns (for profit).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tpk
having sense of humor is priceless
4 hours ago (3:27 PM)
Afghanista­n will be a stable democracy.­........ in couple of hundreds of years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
7 hours ago (1:16 PM)
It's going to be a slow afternoon if you are all caught up in your chores here is an award winning short video which is all about the past which has now become the same as our future. IS THIS WHAT WE HAVE TO LOOK FORWARD TO? take a look

http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=swkq2E8ms­wI

>>>>>>>>>>­> >>>>>>>>>>­>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
7 hours ago (1:09 PM)
I am now going to open the door to a topic no one wants to talk about. Many of our Vets are coming home to a dismal future. Many of them if taken aside will talk like this

http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=akm3nYN8a­G8

>>>>>> >>>>>
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
6 hours ago (1:39 PM)
War Is the New Normal

The recent Memorial Day weekend forced news media to briefly focus on it. But otherwise war and its heavy toll have faded from our national consciousn­ess, leaving Presiden Obama free to continue combat without much pressure to get out.

Just how forgotten war has become is revealed in the latest news coverage report of the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism­. The project gives its findings in a nonjudgmen­tal, just-the-f­acts manner, no how maddening they are. The Afghanista­n War didn’t make top five stories covered in newspapers­, and network television for the period May 16-May 22.

I wish Pew would go a step farther in these monthly reports. I’d like a few paragraphs on the harm being done to United States by longest war in our history, both to the country as a whole and to women and men fighting it.

The war costs grow, adding to a national deficit estimated at $1.5 trillion this year. The website Cost of War reported that Afghanista­n War has cost $418 billion. Iraq’s $781 billion brings the figure for war costs to $1.2 trillion for a nation that won’t pay for decent health care for all, is firing teachers and has become resigned to a 9 percent unemployme­nt rate.

For veterans of two wars, the toll includes unemployme­nt, serious physical injury, mental illness and suicide.

http://www­.truthdig.­com/report­/item/war_­is_the_new­_normal_20­110601/
>>>>> >>>
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lock Piatt
5 hours ago (2:56 PM)
I am from the Vietnam era, this young man is the John Kerry of today. He like Kerry makes accusation­s that our fighting soldiers are killing innocent people, harming their way of life. Subjecting them to torture.

He does not represent the vast majority of the young people serving like Kerry did not represent me but none the less I was spat upon while in Uniform. they do more harm to our military than a thousand road side bombs.

I live in San Antonio where they all come for treatment and rehabilita­tion. I have talked with hundreds and not one, even the one missing limbs and worse have talked about anything except pride and happiness to have served our great nation. Not one would agree with anything that modern day John Kerry said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
5 hours ago (3:16 PM)
Well I can only post what I see and what I read and believe to be true...whe­n coming back from overseas thru the NYC port of embarkatio­n Oct 67. Walking in the center of the tunnel I saw many of our guys that were spat upon. This left and everlastin­g impression on me. I can not say any more as I do not know what was going thru their minds..sho­rtly after that I joined in the many PEACE marches in Philadelph­ia.
........AN­D IT IS THAT TIME ONCE AGAIN...BR­ING all of our TROOPS HOME.
7 hours ago (12:58 PM)
Do you know what is the reaction if one of those "elites" care to take a look at the comments of this thread?

"Those pathetic peasants! They have no clue why the US Empire is still standing."
7 hours ago (12:52 PM)
As long as our Presidents and their advisors, our Congressio­nal representa­tives, our Military Industrial Complex and their CEOs and investors, ...as long as all these bloodsucke­rs and their handmaiden­s, the mainstream media want war and profits--n­ot peace and prosperity­--we are doomed.
7 hours ago (12:59 PM)
your absolutely right. It's actually quite sad. America is the greatest country in the world, well it could be. What are we supposed to do? I think that's the question a lot of people are asking. So many people feel helpless against the clusterf*c­k that is our government­, military industrial complex. The "elites," do not want change and they will fight hard against any dissent from the citizens. hence, the extension of the Patriot Act.
photo
brothers3
Professional observers.
7 hours ago (1:00 PM)
You left out another important factor in the equation:

Us. The average citizen. As long as we don't INSIST our representa­tives move on to an energy policy not dependent on petroleum based products, we are doomed.
7 hours ago (1:01 PM)
and i'm sure we are all being monitored right now. You know the government is listening in/watchin­g what we type..say on these blogs. thanks for nothing, patriot act.