CONNECT    

Robert Reich

Robert Reich

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Reich

Why Washington Isn't Doing Squat About Jobs and Wages

Posted: 06/ 5/11 08:28 PM ET

The silence is deafening. While the rest of the nation is heading back toward a double-dip, Washington continues to obsess about future budget deficits. Why?

Republicans don't want to do anything about jobs and wages. They're so intent on unseating Obama they'd like the economy to remain in the dumps through Election Day. They also see the lousy economy as an opportunity to sell Americans their big lie that government spending is the culprit -- and jobs will return if spending is cut and government shrinks.

Democrats, meanwhile, don't want to admit the recovery has stalled. They worry such talk will further undermine consumer confidence or spook the bond market. They don't want to head into the election year sounding downbeat. And they don't think they have the votes for anything that will have much effect before Election Day anyway.

But there's a third reason for Washington's inaction. It's not being talked about -- which is itself evidence of the problem.

The unemployed are politically invisible. They don't make major campaign donations. They don't lobby Congress. There's no National Association of Unemployed People.

Their ranks are filled with women who had been public employees, single mothers, minorities, young people trying to enter the labor force, and middle-aged men who have been out of work for longer than six months. You couldn't find a collection of people with less political clout.

Women who had been teachers, public health professionals and social workers have been hit hard. These jobs continue to be slashed by state and local governments. Public schools alone accounted for nearly 40% of the nation's total public sector job losses in the last year. From March 2010 to March 2011, women lost 214,000 public sector jobs, compared with a loss of 115,000 public jobs by men.

Unmarried mothers are having a particularly difficult time getting back jobs because their work was heavily concentrated in the retail, restaurant and hotel sectors. Many of these jobs disappeared when consumers reduced their discretionary spending, and they won't come back in force until consumers start spending more again.

According to a new report by the California Budget Project, the recession erased more than half the jobs single mothers in California had gained from 1992 to 2002. The result has been a drop in the share of unmarried mothers in jobs, from 69.2% in 2007 to 58.8% in 2010. Unmarried mothers who still have jobs are working fewer hours per week than before.

Blacks also continue to be hard hit. Their unemployment rate here in California reached 20% this past March, up 5% from a year ago. That's more than double their rate before the downturn. Some of this is because of the comparatively low education levels of many blacks, and their weak connections to the labor market. Some is due to employer discrimination. Blacks were among the last hired before the recession and therefore among the first to be let go in the downturn. That means they'll be among the last hired as the economy recovers.

Many young people who have never been in the job market are unable to land a first job. Employers with a pick of applicants see no reason to hire someone without a track record, particularly those without much education. Unemployment among high school dropouts is hovering around 30%. Even recent college graduates are having a much harder time than usual finding a job. Many are settling for jobs that don't ordinarily require college degrees, which pushes those with less education even further back in the line.

Older workers who have lost their jobs are at the greatest risk of continued unemployment. Employers assume they aren't as qualified or reliable as those who are younger and have been working more recently. According to research by the Urban Institute, once you're laid off, your chance of finding another job within a year is 36% if you're under the age of 34. But your odds drop the older you get. If you're jobless and in your 50s, your chance of landing another job within the year is only 24%. Over 62, you've got only an 18% chance.

What do these jobless have in common? They lack the political connections and organizations to get the ears of politicians, and demand policies to spur job growth.

Robert Reich is the author of Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future, now in bookstores. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org.

 
 
 

Follow Robert Reich on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RBReich

The silence is deafening. While the rest of the nation is heading back toward a double-dip, Washington continues to obsess about future budget deficits. Why? Republicans don't want to do anything abo...
The silence is deafening. While the rest of the nation is heading back toward a double-dip, Washington continues to obsess about future budget deficits. Why? Republicans don't want to do anything abo...
 
The Economic Hangover Part Two. My column on Huffington Post
The Economic Hangover-Part Two. A column I just wrote for Huffington Post
The Implosion of the Huffington Post-AOL Merger: That didn't take long.
MT : My Huffington Post article Canada-India Relations Deserve Sensible and Sensitive Diplomacy
The Honeymoon Is Over for AOL-Huffington Post - The Atlantic Wire Uh huh.
Former PW staff writer Steve Volk's new book Fringe-ology is out today. Read about it at Huffington Post
1 day ago from web
The Implosion of the Huffington Post-AOL Merger -
The Implosion of the Huffington Post-AOL Merger.
The Implosion of the Huffington Post-AOL Merger
 
  • Comments
  • 1,294
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (25 total)
3 hours ago (4:25 PM)
Robert, I'm 58 with three college degrees, and I've been unemployed since December 10, 2008 -- you do the math. No more UI benefits and have only worked temp approximat­ely 3 times, with no permanent job, much less a career, in sight.
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
14 hours ago (4:55 AM)
Good article, Robert. Thank you.
06:15 PM on 6/07/2011
By "Washingto­n" do you really mean our President?
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
14 hours ago (4:48 AM)
Since the president runs everything by himself?

It's clearly all his fault ...

Jeez.
04:08 PM on 6/07/2011
Reich is one I would like to see Obama bring into his fold. Whether that be in a formal position or as an advisor. He is brilliant and, yes, he has published many ways to get the economy going and jobs created.
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
14 hours ago (4:49 AM)
You can tell him yourself:

http://whi­tehouse.go­v/contact
03:18 PM on 6/07/2011
come on man don't be so simplistak­e...unless you want the government to employ us all like a comunest country..t­he government cn do nothing...­it is just a pipe dream....b­ut the government can crete asn atmospher which all the Ivory Tower boys haventgot a clu of...to incourage progress..­.but we must fce the relity we cant long term grow our way out of anything..­...that is just phyphics 101... the old viking
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nyjjc
Dark Lord of the Facts
06:01 PM on 6/07/2011
I see by your horrendous spelling and lack of anything resembling a coherent sentence you are the target audience of the GOP...
8 hours ago (11:30 AM)
no I am neither gop or dem but I am for some common sense and some entegrity by all as for my spelling an lack of cohearness­...I feel the same toward those who can spell and speel with skiils beyound reproche who have such fuzzy thinking and lack of will to use their unreprocab­le skill to get anything done but sit at their computer and plead ther case and beg fr some one else to do their work to bring about change..li­ke I said you disagree there is space below in the reply to show mew the errors of my ways and the progrees y our ways have brought about...pl­ease fell free to reply as we do need progress inplavce of all this talk...the old viking
Citizen54
The man who would be king
12:23 PM on 6/07/2011
The other day my 83-year-ol­d mother, a lifelong Democrat, said, "Back during the last Depression­, FDR had a program that created a lot of jobs for people. Why doesn't Obama do something like that?"
05:33 PM on 6/07/2011
Because the Republican­s won't let him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nyjjc
Dark Lord of the Facts
06:02 PM on 6/07/2011
Bingo
7 hours ago (12:00 PM)
The Obama administra­tion has poured billions into the economy to stimulate job growth. The $787 Billion stimulus package was suppose to create jobs by stimulatin­g the economy. Also, according to a recent GAO report, there are 47 different employment and training programs across 9 federal agencies at a cost of $18 Billion annually that are suppose to stimulate job opportunit­es. We've spent a lot of money, but little has been shown in return.
3 hours ago (4:27 PM)
Because he wants to be a one-term president, like Herbert Hoover.
11:30 AM on 6/07/2011
It's a recession when your neighbor loses his job; it's a depression when you lose your own. - Harry S Truman
11:21 AM on 6/07/2011
Reich just loves to blame the GOP - hey - Obama had plenty of time to focus on jobs. the problem is he's been busy villifying business & saddling them with added costs via Obamacare & EPA regs. Pleeaase! you want to dictate your emotion based Utopia to the people who you then expect to take the risk and fork over any gain to the Feds so they can redistribu­te it. Enough already. Atlas is Shrugging! Who is John Galt?
Butquestioning
Searching for truth
12:31 PM on 6/07/2011
Eight years of Bush tax cuts...Tri­ckle Down economics for most of the last three Republican Administra­tions and we have had 5 recession, no job creation and have a debt that has grown to the point you now think it is a problem... Bush increased the debt by over $6.1 trillion during his term and now suddenly, the debt is a problem and must be dealth with while unemployme­nt is still out of control and the Republican­s in Congress want to make more spending cuts that will only increase the jobless.

Business seems to be doing great, with record or near record profits and an estimated $2 trillion in cash on their books and somehow you think that is due to Obama's "vilificat­ion" of business. Maybe they need more of that if that is a "problem". And, "ObamaCare­" is another problem with added costs but you seem to ignore that health care costs have more than doubled in the past 10 years...wi­thout "ObamaCare­".

Seems that you have a very selective view on the problems and causes...a­nd ignore the reality for the sake of continuing the same failed policies that perpetuate­d the decline of America in the world.
photo
jdcrump
Feed your head...
12:49 PM on 6/07/2011
Silly Rand worshipper­s. They believe Obama wakes up and thinks 'Okay, what can I do to vilify business and increase their cost? No time for creating jobs. Just need to ignore that and vilify some businesses­.'
No wonder most people think you're crazy. You not only convenient­ly assign blame somewhere else for your problems, you also imagine crazy motivation­s for anyone whose job is too complex for you to understand­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Dawson
Hello, Is there anyone out there?
10:53 AM on 6/07/2011
Put some certainty in what going to happen with taxes over the next 6-8 years, dump obamacare and jobs will follow.
11:13 AM on 6/07/2011
Why that makes no sense at all.
11:38 AM on 6/07/2011
Absolutely no sense...bu­t for these folks it does not have to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trepasky
Sanity is neither free nor easy
03:11 PM on 6/07/2011
SUre it makes lots of CENTS for the insurance companies and the GOP/TP LOL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Dawson
Hello, Is there anyone out there?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arts4u
11:47 AM on 6/07/2011
Uh... yea. Just like the Bush tax cuts were supposed to create jobs..... keep trying - not going to work.
Butquestioning
Searching for truth
12:41 PM on 6/07/2011
Sure, that 's the problem...­But did you notice, we have had health care costs double in the past 10 years and it is expected to double again in less than 9 if something is not done to stop it. That is not due to "Obamacare­"

But, "Obamacare­" has already helped and it isn't even in effect yet. The requiremen­t that insurance companies can spend no more than 15% to 20% on administra­tive costs, paying out the rest in claims limits the bloated bonuses and executive compensati­on that has been common in the Insurance industry. One major insurance company that had been regularly taking up to 52% of premiums for administra­tive expenses, just requested a rate CUT because of the nrew regulation­s... That should make it more cost effective for consumers and businesses that provide health care plans for their workers...

Why is it that businesses are sitting on record amounts of cash, approximat­ely $2 trillion on their books but you are concerned about their earnings - also at record levels. Business is not spending because of lack of demand, not uncertaint­y or any other lame excuse the Republican­s offer. It is sheer greed and we are the victims.
04:45 PM on 6/07/2011
Jobs were gone long before "Obamacare­" genius.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
calhar
23 hours ago (8:05 PM)
Please explain how that would create jobs!!!Bus­iness creates jobs.
10:48 AM on 6/07/2011
Thanks for your good work, Robert.
10:33 AM on 6/07/2011
It's all so unfair!
10:31 AM on 6/07/2011
We need a 3rd party....f­ast.
11:46 AM on 6/07/2011
Yes!! Yes!! Up with the Green Party of America!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nyjjc
Dark Lord of the Facts
06:02 PM on 6/07/2011
x2
photo
jdcrump
Feed your head...
12:51 PM on 6/07/2011
The trouble is that everyone trying to start a third party only does it half fast.
10:31 AM on 6/07/2011
And that's, ladies and gentleman, why we need an accountabl­e 3rd party that doesn't sell out.
photo
jdcrump
Feed your head...
01:04 PM on 6/07/2011
Our nation would be so much better if the people who waste all their energy with little splinter group parties would devote their time to influencin­g one of the two ruling parties.
Now, that doesn't apply to those who only like to complain and blame; they would need to actually get involved and devote some time and energy, but what an improvemen­t they could bring.
Too much of a commitment for them, I guess. Real government takes real work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robert horwitz
10:23 AM on 6/07/2011
Robert what you say is true. Just one thing. How long can these people remain invisible as Tent Cities begin to spring up as weeds in these politician­s political gardens. Almost everyone has at least an inexpensiv­e digital camera or at least one that is built into their cell phones. Once the pictures are snapped and put on the Internet they have a way of appearing everywhere in the World at the speed of light. I have to say that this will not do a lot of good to not only improve the image of our country, our political leaders, or give any confidence to the financial markets. The image that I see coming are more tents than at a National Boy Scouts Jamboree spread out over the horizon line in camps all over the country. So politician­s think they have an expensive and troublesom­e problem now. "They Ain't Seen Nothin Yet".
photo
Jeany
My micro-bio is empty?
09:57 AM on 6/07/2011
They just want to hold our heand under water for just a little while longer, just to the next election, then we'll revive, right? They'll expect us to revive, right?
11:19 AM on 6/07/2011
I doubt that they care about the PEOPLE involved.