CONNECT    

Bradley Manning Supporters Rally At Kansas Prison

Posted: 06/ 4/11 05:54 PM ET

Bradley Manning Wikileaks Quantico

WASHINGTON -- Hundreds of supporters of Bradley Manning converged at Leavenworth, Kan., Saturday to rally for the Army private accused of leaking classified documents to the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks.

Gathered outside the prison where Manning is currently being held, protesters denounced Manning's treatment and called on the White House to drop all charges against him.

"PFC Bradley Manning is a fellow soldier," Brian Wolfe, a Kansas-based Army Veteran who served in Operation Iraqi Freedom, said in an email statement. "If a fellow soldier is punished for taking his oath to defend the constitution seriously, what does that mean for our military and for our democracy?"

The event marked the first public rally in support of Manning since he was transferred to Fort Leavenworth in April after being imprisoned for nine months on the Quantico Marine Corps Base in Virginia.

While detained at Quantico, Manning was forced to sleep naked in a military jail after a commander of the brig ordered his clothes be taken away for a full seven hours. He was also forced to stand naked outside his cell in front of the rest of the clothed inmates until he passed inspection and was given his clothes back.

"The information Bradley Manning is accused of releasing should have been in the public domain. Whoever revealed it is an American hero." said Jeff Paterson, a Steering Committee member of the Bradley Manning Support Network who also spoke at the rally, in a statement. "Our leaders in Washington need to return to American principles of transparent and accountable government. That starts with protecting -- not prosecuting -- whistle-blowers and dropping all charges against Bradley Manning."

Manning stands accused of revealing tens of thousands of classified U.S. military and State Department documents that some believe helped to catalyze democratic revolts across the Middle East this spring. His trial is slated to begin this summer.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Hundreds of supporters of Bradley Manning converged at Leavenworth, Kan., Saturday to rally for the Army private accused of leaking classified documents to the anti-secrecy group WikiLea...
WASHINGTON -- Hundreds of supporters of Bradley Manning converged at Leavenworth, Kan., Saturday to rally for the Army private accused of leaking classified documents to the anti-secrecy group WikiLea...
 
Loading...
 
  • Comments
  • 4,739
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (50 total)
6 hours ago (8:25 PM)
On this board there is an often repeated argument against PFC Manning: %u201Che broke his oath%u201D­. It has the advantage of being short, probably true, and easy to embellish (with verifiably false claims about treason, etc).

But this argument makes an assumption­, namely, that if a soldier breaks his oath or the law, or disobeys an order, or skips the chain of command, it is ALWAYS WRONG.

I disagree.

Sometimes a truly moral or ethical action might require disobeying an order or breaking a law. In fact, this is exactly what people expect from good soldiers (like we expect from good people in general).

Dutifully obeying the chain of command and following every order does not make ones actions automatica­lly moral. The %u201Cjust following orders%u20­1D defense was utterly discredite­d in the Nuremberg trials. In fact, people were sent to the gallows for it.

The issue here is not whether Manning %u201Cbrok­e his oath%u201D or %u201Cdidn­%u2019t respect the chain of command%u2­01D. The issue was whether or not he was right in doing so.

I think he was.
5 hours ago (8:57 PM)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
3 hours ago (11:27 PM)
Leaking this informatio­n clearly was the right thing to do.

"All right, I'll go to hell then!"--Hu­ck Finn
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timma
unicorn charlie
10 hours ago (4:46 PM)
Bradley Manning's truly a hero!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pinkeyelemonade
16 hours ago (10:01 AM)
Bradley Manning is a hero.
11 hours ago (2:59 PM)
A hero to whom and for what? Your statement assumes he did, in fact, do what he is accused of doing. Starting from your assumption­, to suggest that an individual may and should apply his or her personal opinions about whether classified informatio­n should be indiscrimi­nantly disclosed, potentiall­y to our country's enemies, is both reckless and naive. The full impact of these illegal disclosure­s has yet to be fully understood­, and people's lives and America's legitimate interests may be jeopardize­d. Doesn't sound very heroic to me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
3 hours ago (11:28 PM)
Saying that a soldier should NEVER leak classified informatio­n, no matter how vile the crimes being covered up, is twice as reckless and naive.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sophie M
ANTI WAR.
11 hours ago (3:05 PM)
and treated like a criminal..
18 hours ago (8:18 AM)
TO THE MODERATOR OF THIS : As a vet that served my country. This man has insulted me and every other vet out there implying that we are mindless automatons with the statement he made. I've been trying to respond. Unless it's okay to let this guy insult me and every other vet, without rebuttal. What kind of neutral position is that for a moderator. This clown is going to call me childish and he never wore the uniform. So either you post one of my three responses to him or you remove his immediatel­y. I'm not even joking here. I will call HP for this one sided deal here and file an official complaint on behalf of all veterans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pinkeyelemonade
16 hours ago (9:57 AM)
FANNED AND FAVED.

Thank you for serving my country.
LittleGirl
Flaming Lib since '06
16 hours ago (10:10 AM)
Just because you're a vet doesn't give you the right to shut down every other voice that disagrees with you and how dare you use that status to try to! America is great because we can agree to disagree, not have your side control the message or experience­.
16 hours ago (10:39 AM)
No kidding, but I have the right for constructi­ve argument without insults, just like you do. This guy, who never served, implied soldiers are mindless automatons­, and we are not. We are people with hearts and a conscience just like everybody else. All I said is the kid is subject to the UCMJ, and not civilian. I didn't even say he was guilty. So I'm not shutting anybody down, but I'm not going to be insulted either. Thank you.
14 hours ago (12:41 PM)
Since when is voicing one's opinion an act to "...shut down every other voice that disagrees.­.."? That may be your "progressi­ve" view, but it's inconsiste­nt with the "free speech" you purport to support. eledude was exercising his right to voice disagreeme­nt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pinkeyelemonade
16 hours ago (10:11 AM)
However, I've just read your comments, and I think we disagree, but this post is right on the money, and I stand by my previous reply.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
11 hours ago (3:52 PM)
Automaton is as automaton does.
8 hours ago (6:45 PM)
Have you ever served?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Dawson
Hello, Is there anyone out there?
18 hours ago (8:14 AM)
"The wordings of the current oath of enlistment and oath for commission­ed officers are as follows:

"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constituti­on of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulation­s and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962)."

You will notice that no where in the oath does it say anything about "As how you interperat­e it". If you break the oath is constitute­s treason.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdiasmd
"Avon calling" - Team6
10 hours ago (4:18 PM)
throw in the Classified Informatio­n Nondisclos­ure Agreement (Standard Form 312) that all military w/ access to classified informatio­n sign.
18 hours ago (7:57 AM)
The military has rules that we live by. If we don't follow those rules people die that is the bottomline­. What private manning did has cost lives on the battlefiel­d. Furthermor­e, he is a private in the US Army. He does that have the forthsight or the knowledge to understand that decisions are made high about his pay grade. You can call him a hero but if it is your son, daughter, mother or father that is killed because of his action tell; I don't think those family members will think of him as a hero.
16 hours ago (10:18 AM)
"What private manning did has cost lives on the battlefiel­­d."

That's not what NATO or the DoD has said. How did you reach this conclusion then?
21 hours ago (4:59 AM)
I don't know the details but it seems to me that if this person leaked out classified documents he broke federal law and as such makes him guilty of espionage. In wartime (and I am pretty sure that includes now) the penalty is death. Even if this informatio­n should have been released to the public it wasn't his call. When you are in the military you are obligated to keep secrets, even those you disagree with, even thos I might disagree with. I know some people are painting this soldiar is a hero but if just one person dies as a result of his leaks he deserves the death penalty.
photo
Bryan Boru
Free-market socialism
23 hours ago (3:16 AM)
Bradley Manning is a traitor.
photo
Giglawyer
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
17 hours ago (9:25 AM)
Yep. Try him as such, and if found guilty, shoot him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pinkeyelemonade
16 hours ago (10:04 AM)
If there is any statement driving me to fear for the future of this nation, it would be this one.
16 hours ago (10:19 AM)
PFC Manning has not been charged with treason.
He will not be found guilty of treason.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
10 hours ago (3:56 PM)
The big traitors are prosecutin­g the little one.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Power To Unelect
Corruption Is Destroying The Nation
01:30 AM on 6/06/2011
War crimes trumps the military oath... period.


It's sad to see so many calling themselves "Democrats­" seemed to have learned NOTHING from WWII.

Not only has Obama bought Republican thinking hook line and sinker... buy many of his brainwashe­d supporters seem to have done the same.
21 hours ago (5:02 AM)
Yes you are correct. However he did not bring this to the attention of any law enforcemen­t, prosecutor­s office or court. He leaked it to the public. I would have some simpathy for him had he brought it to the proper authoritie­s but he did not.
20 hours ago (6:38 AM)
He leaked to the proper authoritie­s and they told him to keep his mouth shut.
He is an hero and he is paying for that
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
10 hours ago (3:57 PM)
Was relying on law enforcemen­t, prosecutio­n and the courts really an option for Manning?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Enroh Mot
Anti-War Vet
11:38 PM on 6/05/2011
Defending the Constituti­on is now an Unpatrioti­c Act.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
10 hours ago (4:00 PM)
The Manning-ha­ters are starting to remind me of the anti-Dreyf­usards. (Not because they're attacking an innocent man--thoug­h I don't know the whole story--but because they're combining patriotism with anti-intel­lectualism to oppose justice. They too are the national establishm­ent's useful idiots.)
6 hours ago (7:57 PM)
Fav'ed for the Dreyfusard reference!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Enroh Mot
Anti-War Vet
11:17 PM on 6/05/2011
The cruise missile liberals, neocons, and homophobes have something they can agree upon.
02:12 AM on 6/06/2011
nice 1
11:07 PM on 6/05/2011
In some ways the Wikileaks publicatio­ns on Tunisian corruption were similar to Thomas Paine's "Common Sense". It didn't cause the American Revolution­. It didn't start it. It didn't win the battles. But it did help the American revolution­aries focus on and articulate what their grievances were.
10:55 PM on 6/05/2011
He's right were he belongs, getting everything thats coming to him!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
11:34 PM on 6/05/2011
FOX brand pablum: 90% of illiterate­s can't tell the difference between it and real news.
24 hours ago (2:45 AM)
Yes he is! Fanned!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pinkeyelemonade
16 hours ago (10:07 AM)
My word. They've tricked you into believing in Death Panels, that's easy to understand­, but it's remarkable that your logic tells you it's A-OK to murder Iraqi civilians.
10:32 PM on 6/05/2011
I was there this weekend. Not nearly enough people given the immense gravity of what is at stake in this case.

This is an attack on whistle-bl­owing, journalism­, the right of the public to be informed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
10:55 PM on 6/05/2011
I see it got virtually no coverage from the MSM. Typical.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sophie M
ANTI WAR.
15 hours ago (11:34 AM)
i bet Dylan Ratigan will talk about it today..
Dyaln cares.
24 hours ago (2:38 AM)
This is treason, not whistle-bl­owing journalism­. He took an oath to protect the US and defend the constitutu­ion. What he did hurt the US, it by no means helped this country.
20 hours ago (6:40 AM)
It hurt US war criminals and the US criminal government­. Agreed
09:42 PM on 6/05/2011
I wonder if this story would have 4,500 comments if Manning were...str­aight...
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
10:23 PM on 6/05/2011
Havining read a lot of them yours is the first that I've seen that brought up that point.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Luck
proud godless commie
10:55 PM on 6/05/2011
Are you both claiming that's true, or are you questionin­g "LetsGetSe­riousNow"? That's the first time I've heard even a hint of that. It would help explain some of his treatment. NOT excuse it, just explain it. 8-(
18 hours ago (8:26 AM)
I didn't even know he was gay, not that it matters in the case of national security.