CONNECT    

Paid Sick Leave: Cities, States Putting Mandates On Employers


First Posted: 06/ 6/11 06:26 PM ET Updated: 06/ 6/11 06:26 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Millions of American workers face an ugly choice when they fall ill: Either tough it out and head into work, or stay home and not get paid for the day. But in cities and states around the country, that's starting to change.

Perhaps as early as this week, Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy (D) is expected to sign a bill into law that would make his state the first in the country to require large employers to provide their workers with paid sick days. State legislators approved the bill Saturday after 11 hours of debate in the House and a narrow one-vote victory in the Senate back in May.

Later this week, the Philadelphia City Council will probably vote on a similar sick-day measure and the Seattle City Council will likely introduce one. On the state level, a group of Georgia legislators has brought forth a bill that would let workers use their sick time to care for family members who've fallen ill.

For people who are sick of working while sick, the passage of the bill in Connecticut marked a major victory.

"I think it's a big deal for our state and part of a trend in this country," said Jon Green, director of the Connecticut Working Families Party. "It's partly a matter of public health, and partly a matter of common sense and common decency. We all agree that employees should not have to choose between their health and their income."

Although many people don't realize it, employers aren't required to give their workers paid sick days unless local law mandates it. Local chambers of commerce and restaurant trade groups have strongly opposed such laws, including the one in Connecticut, which they claimed would burden small businesses and kill jobs.

The law in Connecticut will give service-industry employees who earn an hourly wage one paid sick hour for every 40 that they work. Even though it exempts businesses with less than 50 employees, House leader Larry Cafero (R-Norwalk) warned before the vote that passing the bill would be “the absolutely worst thing we could do" in a sluggish economy.

Story continues below

But worker advocacy groups say the impact on businesses' bottom lines will be either negligible or non-existent, while the boon to workers' quality of life and morale is considerable. The Drum Major Institute for Public Policy studied the impact of a paid sick-leave law in San Francisco and found "no evidence" that local businesses were hurt by it.

Advocates also say there are public health concerns to consider. According to Green, the workers who don't have paid sick days tend to be concentrated in "industries where you would least want people to come in sick": nursing homes, day care centers, and restaurants, among other areas. Many of the same workers also receive modest wages, making them more likely to work through their illness.

In Connecticut, paid sick days became an unlikely campaign issue last year for Malloy, now in his first term. Malloy had loudly supported such a measure on the campaign trail, while one of his Democratic competitors, Ned Lamont, had aligned himself with small-business concerns.

A spokesperson for Malloy, Colleen Flanagan, said the governor remained committed to the issue once he took office. "It's just one of those things he really does believe is good public policy," she said. "It makes little sense to have front-line workers coming in sick."

Among those who had testified in favor of the bill was Cheryl Folston, a former livery service driver from Newington, Conn., who ignored pains in her chest because she didn't have paid sick days to use for a doctor visit. It turned out she had a tumor in her chest.

"Working a job without paid sick days nearly cost me my life," Folston testified. "Sick or not, I went into work. Even if I had a cold or a flu or a stomach bug, I would be driving sick patients to the hospital and special needs kids to school. I couldn’t afford to stay home." Folston didn’t find out about the tumor until after she was laid off. She had surgery in December and is still recovering.

Currently, only three cities -- San Francisco, Washington, D.C., and Milwaukee -- have sick-day laws on the books, according to Ellen Bravo, executive director of Family Values at Work, a consortium of state groups that has made paid sick days its primary issue. In Milwaukee, the law remains contentious more than two years after it was passed, with business interests pressing lawmakers to roll it back. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker recently signed a bill into law that will prevent local municipalities from enacting such laws, pre-empting the Milwaukee ordinance.

Despite the heavy pushback from business groups, Bravo said she expects other municipalities to follow Connecticut's lead.

"Every time there's been an effort to pass some modest protections for workers, we've heard the same arguments," said Bravo. "But I think we're going to see a wave of this ... There are many people for whom basic fairness matters."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Millions of American workers face an ugly choice when they fall ill: Either tough it out and head into work, or stay home and not get paid for the day. But in cities and states around th...
WASHINGTON -- Millions of American workers face an ugly choice when they fall ill: Either tough it out and head into work, or stay home and not get paid for the day. But in cities and states around th...
 
Loading...
Report Corrections
 
  • Comments
  • 282
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (6 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Altario   15 hours ago (5:51 AM)
So, not only do businesses lose money (productiv­ity) when an employee misses a day, now they have to continue to pay the employee as well. Our company pays sick leave and I see it getting taken advatage of all the time. It becomes an entitlemen­t. ``Im owed so many days and since I wasn`t sick, I`ll lose them, so I`m gonna stay home tomorrow``­. This really hurts the smaller  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Altario
Among nerds, I'm cool.
15 hours ago (5:51 AM)
So, not only do businesses lose money (productiv­ity) when an employee misses a day, now they have to continue to pay the employee as well. Our company pays sick leave and I see it getting taken advatage of all the time. It becomes an entitlemen­t. ``Im owed so many days and since I wasn`t sick, I`ll lose them, so I`m gonna stay home tomorrow``­. This really hurts the smaller businesses­. But, hey, who cares about them. All they do is PROVIDE the jobs.
18 hours ago (2:31 AM)
Now let's pass law that will make all companies profitable that they can pay 4 weeks vacations, 30 days sick pay, maternity leave at least 6 month with 90% pay.
O one little detail: affordable health care for all.
05:21 PM on 6/07/2011
Congress gets paid sick days and free health care. This is the right thing to do. Hopefully this will be a trend for family values.
02:07 PM on 6/07/2011
Its a shame that we are a society that lives check to check so much so that we cant live without a day or two's pay. We also think it is owed to us even though we didnt work it.
01:31 PM on 6/07/2011
This piese of news is by far one of the most exiting in a long time
while not having any explosions­,dead and smoke as the main theme .
.
Workers are now Humans
.
Before, they were " Humanoidz " with no respect and rights
.
Cheers,
You're now members of the "uman" race
photo
R U Mad
Libbies make me laugh!
12:05 PM on 6/07/2011
Another attempt at nanny like regulation­s? With legislatio­n like this who needs unions? When you have a strong union presence and a nanny-like government­, businesses will leave. Way to go Gov. Malloy!

Are you trying to drive businesses out of the state?
12:37 PM on 6/07/2011
No, but slave labor wages in foreign countries makes them leave.
02:06 PM on 6/07/2011
progressiv­e policies = make business leave
11:46 AM on 6/07/2011
Public health is everyone's concern. If you have the flu and the rent is due your going to come to work and give it to me and I in turn give it to my family. We have all been in a work situation when someone came in to work sick and infected the whole group one by one.

1 hr for every 40hrs worked isn't a big deal. If your a restuarant worker you work part-time it will take forever to accrue a full-day of sick pay.
11:36 AM on 6/07/2011
If you start paying people for being sick, they will be sick. And then they will claim to be sick when they are not sick. And then they will make no pretense about it and just blow off work for the heck of it and demand it is their right.

Would employees so in favor of paid sick days be willing to be on call by the employer to come in and work without pay?
TurnSeiki
Staunch Conservative
10:01 AM on 6/07/2011
So, now paid sick time is a requiremen­t to offer a job? Well, just like the right-to-w­ork states not having union troubles, this will be another differenti­ator to potential entreprene­urs. And Connecticu­t is small, very small. A guy could drive 45 minutes and build a new office building.

This is a benefit, not a right of employment­.
11:35 AM on 6/07/2011
Indeed, it will separate even more clearly the states where employers are and are not permitted to work their employees to death. This would of course increase the mortality rate. I guess you support that.

The issue is that although it has been shown that a healthy workforce is a productive workforce, you would prefer to lower productivi­ty in order to achieve your primary goal of making workers suffer.

How is that different from slavery, which archaeolog­y has shown resulted in slaves being worked until they were crippled?

My guess is that you work for a wage yourself, if and when you are employed at all. This is a clear illustrati­on of the fact that many people only experience joy by making others even more miserable than they are.
photo
R U Mad
Libbies make me laugh!
12:02 PM on 6/07/2011
Geesh

Work their employees to death? Do you play the drama queen much?
TurnSeiki
Staunch Conservative
02:06 PM on 6/07/2011
Are you joking me? Get rid of the 1915 imagery. There are LAWS in place now that prevent that crap. All liberals do when confronted with logical fact, they trot out the "do you want children to starve" bit. Give me a BREAK!

Working in harsh labor conditions­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WarrenPease
It's a long story; like my birth certificate.
09:32 AM on 6/07/2011
The law in Connecticu­t will give service-in­dustry employees who earn an hourly wage one paid sick hour for every 40 that they work. Even though it exempts businesses with less than 50 employees, House leader Larry Cafero (R-Norwalk­) warned before the vote that passing the bill would be %u201Cthe absolutely worst thing we could do" in a sluggish economy.

Workers should receive one sick hour for every 35 HOURS that they work, as many service-in­dustry employers do not pay for lunch breaks. Mr. Cafero needs to learn that sick employees are not productive and they spread colds and flu to other employees. One round of flu and decimate a department or an entire company. Sick employees in human services can spread colds and flu to patients and those whose immune systems are already compromise­d can become gravely ill due to a simple cold.
08:53 AM on 6/07/2011
the problem with this "state-by-­state and city-by-ci­ty' approach is that businesses will always move to the cities and states that have the least regulation­. Therefore, these laws, and others like them, have to be passed at the federal level or we have to allow states to regulate interstate commerce, instead of the federal government­.
10:37 AM on 6/07/2011
And after the federal government piles on new mandates for everyone, companies will simply move to another country. Is that preferable­?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CountryBeforeParty
We are against misconduct, not agaisnt wealth" ~~
10:54 AM on 6/07/2011
Such mandates are even greater in other countries. Are they really going to move everything to Bangladesh or Uganda? If companies keep moving their businesses from city to city, then out of the country, those moving costs are going to catch up with them eventually­.
10:46 AM on 6/07/2011
But then again, people are not going to want to travel long distances to eat out for lunch. If restaurant­s move to where the regulation­s are more lax, there could be whole states that go without restaurant­s. Considerin­g that there's still money to be made even in regulated states, other restaurant­s willing to put up with the new rules will take their place and reap the profits.
12:13 PM on 6/07/2011
It is just another short-sigh­ted fast-buck strategy to wring more money out of the labor force, based on the idea that all jobs can be filled by warm bodies and training is unnecessar­y and/or free. Well-train­ed and healthy workers are more productive­. But that goes against the narrative.
08:34 AM on 6/07/2011
I hope this idea comes to Georgia soon.
08:15 AM on 6/07/2011
July 1, 2011

Dear employer:

I'm sick and won't be coming in this week. Next week, I'm taking my vacation. In two weeks, I'm due to deliver my fourth child, so I probably won't be coming in that week, or the following five weeks either. Just send my check to my p.o. Box. See you September 1, unless I decide to quit at that point.
08:21 AM on 6/07/2011
Dear employee,

I dont care if your sick and I didnt get you knocked up so I expect to see you at work Monday morning.
11:37 AM on 6/07/2011
P.S. you had better bring your Dr.'s note which I expect you to pay full price for b/c this company doesn't provide health benefits.
12:04 PM on 6/07/2011
Dear employer:

I'm sick, but because I need my paycheck, I'll be coming to work anyway. My infection will come too, and if we're lucky, only a few coworkers and customers will also fall ill. That salad bar?? It's okay, because I washed the diarrhea off my hands twice with soap and water before touching the doorknob, the tables, and setting out the lettuce. You'll only really care I was sick 2 months from now, when some lady dies after eating at our restaurant and you get sued.
08:02 AM on 6/07/2011
"We all agree that employees should not have to choose between their health and their income."

Another way to prevent employees from such a troubling predicamen­t is to require each employee to take off 14 days each year, unpaid. Use the days because you are sick, because you're going to Jamaica, or because you have a meeting with the local Working Families' and Children's Family Values chapter. But you must take these days off -- it's mandatory so you don't have to face the awful Hobson's choice between working and getting paid or not working and not getting paid.
08:58 AM on 6/07/2011
14 days, unpaid? try 20 to 40 and you're being realistic.­..i work at a low-skill, low-wage job and 20 paid days a year off is the MINIMUM for new-hires.­..experien­ced people get up to 40 days a year, PAID. let's not throw out the baby with the bath water.
07:55 AM on 6/07/2011
Vacation and paid sick leave are benefits given by the employer. In my experience­, large employers already provide some benefits. It is the smaller employers, those with 50 or fewer employees, who do not provide benefits, and these are being exempted from the law. I believe it is also common practice to employ people part-time so as not to provide benefits, or to use temporary employees for the same reason. I believe there are many smaller companies in existence where employees are working without benefits. I'm not sure the government should, however, dictate what benefits the employer should provide to its employees. Instead, the business environmen­t should enable businesses to provide adequate salaries and benefits to its employees while still earning a profit. They should not be hamstrung by government­al beaurocrac­y and taxation.
08:18 AM on 6/07/2011
Pretty pathetic that this topic even needs to be discussed. Another example of how American capitalism doesn't work for most people.
09:02 AM on 6/07/2011
maybe these small businesses should be replaced by government corporatio­ns, or larger businesses­, that can provide the same services AND decent benefits? Who said small businesses are the greatest thing since sliced bread? IMO businesses exist to provide people with a decent livelihood­, when they fail to do that they deserve to go out of business--­even if that means regulating them to death.
10:59 AM on 6/07/2011
The reason why these small businesses can't compete if they are forced to follow reasonable labor laws is that they and their competitor­s are breaking the law already. It's like business owners who hire illegal aliens, fail to provide them with minimum wage or any other labor requiremen­ts, and then claim no one would be "competiti­ve" if they hired legal workers, that's a load of bull. If the price of an item or service goes up a penny or two, we as a society can afford it.
09:36 AM on 6/07/2011
Social democracie­s work. Social democracy is a political ideology center-lef­t on the political spectrum. Social democratic movements seek to reform capitalism to align ethical ideals of social justice with capitalist production­.

A new report released by OECD, and a new Forbes poll, show happiness levels are highest in northern European countries. Denmark is 1st, Finland 2nd and the Netherland­s 3rd. The US failed to make the top 10.

Why are happiness levels higher in social democracie­s? Because social democracie­s support:
1. A mixed economy of both private enterprise and publicly owned/subs­idized programs of education, universal health care, child care and related social services for all citizens.
2. An extensive system of social security with stated goal of reducing poverty and insuring citizens against loss of income following illness, unemployme­nt or retirement­.
3. Government regulates private enterprise in the interests of workers and consumers by ensuring labor rights (i.e. access to trade unions), consumer protection­s, and fair market competitio­n.
4. Environmen­talism and environmen­tal protection laws; example, funding for alternativ­e energy resources and laws designed to combat global warming.
5. A value-adde­d/progress­ive taxation system to fund government expenditur­es.
6. A secular and a socially progressiv­e policy.
7. Immigratio­n and multicultu­ralism.
8. Fair trade over free trade.
9. A foreign policy supporting the promotion of democracy and the protection of human rights and where possible.
10. Advocacy of social justice, human rights, social rights, civil rights and civil liberties.

God forbid the US should pursue this agenda (sarcasm)!
11:03 AM on 6/07/2011
You are not understand­ing the foundation of our capitalist culture. It is based on two laws:

1. Only rich people deserve happiness.
2. The only joy anyone else is permitted is from making others feel even more miserable than they themselves are.