CONNECT    

Ringo Starr Almost Killed By Nazi Bombing: Author

Ringo Starr

First Posted: 06/ 7/11 11:52 AM ET Updated: 06/ 7/11 12:27 PM ET

A few feet further, and Pete Best may have been the permanent drummer of The Beatles.

According the new book "Liverpool Blitzed: Seventy Years On" by British historian Neil Holmes (via the Click Liverpool), Starr -- born Richard Starkey -- lived on Madryn Street in Liverpool, which was hit by stray bombs from the German Luftwaffe during their air raids on the English port city in October 1940.

Starkey, born on July 7th of that year, was just three months old at the time, and it's unknown if his family was home at the time. But, as the Echo notes, his mother hated the public bomb shelters, and Holmes says that they were very uncomfortable and far away from where the future Beatle's family lived.

"We do not know what the Starkeys did on the night of 19th October but their home would have have suffered some damage when the homes opposite were destroyed," Holmes said. "Either way the baby who was to find fame as Ringo Starr was very lucky not to have lost his life that night."

Instead, he went on to Rock n' Roll Hall of Fame status -- and is still going, playing the Russian leg of his All Starr Band tour this week.

For more, click over to Click Liverpool.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST ENTERTAINMENT

A few feet further, and Pete Best may have been the permanent drummer of The Beatles. According the new book "Liverpool Blitzed: Seventy Years On" by British historian Neil Holmes (via the Click Li...
A few feet further, and Pete Best may have been the permanent drummer of The Beatles. According the new book "Liverpool Blitzed: Seventy Years On" by British historian Neil Holmes (via the Click Li...
 
Loading...
Filed by Jordan Zakarin  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 138
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »   (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Randolph Greer
I am a Poet .
4 hours ago (11:02 PM)
If anyone needs any proof of Ringo's importance in becoming the final piece of the puzzle, remember that John, Paul, and George were together from 1959 to 1962 with Best and others in their group. Ringo joined in 1962 and the Beatles immediatel­y hit the charts with LOVE ME DO.
Timelines don't lie !!!!!!!
2 hours ago (12:56 AM)
Of course JPG were still very young 1959-62. Paul didn't turn 20 till mid 1962 and George still a teen until 63. Young guys, no financial backing and from 'distant' Liverpool. Not the known hotbed of English show biz. Recognitio­n there would be like someone in the US breaking it big in Omaha
They worked hard as teens with the Hamburg days a particular­ly important period in their developmen­t. Ringo had set in with the boys on occasion and was obviously the right guy at the right time. He fit...othe­rs really didn't.
It was coming to fruition when they finally had the right recording opportunit­y with George Martin. Not exactly Ringo's presence that caused the break through in the studio.
But certainly fate.
We're still so glad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drumbeato
5 hours ago (9:22 PM)
Back off Bombaloo!
8 hours ago (6:23 PM)
You know, it don't come easy!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ConfuciusSay-
Oi'll droive that tankah!
9 hours ago (5:54 PM)
WOW!
Just think, I wasn't in that house either... and neither were you!

We were all *almost* killed by the same Nazis!
11 hours ago (4:04 PM)
I always liked Ringo - he's the most unassuming Beatle.
REDSTATEREFUGEE
Texan by birth ; Californian by choice
16 hours ago (10:48 AM)
Unfortunat­ely, Ringo's drumming might have left much to be desired during his Beatle days. Apparently­, Paul McCartney thought his talent was insufficie­nt. He would secretly re-enter the recording studio when everyone had left, remove his colleague'­s track, and do the drum riffs by himself. As for his singing talent, IMHO, Ringo was a lightweigh­t.....
Gasparilla
my father was a gambling man down in New Orleans
11 hours ago (3:12 PM)
So no one ever knew that Paul was actually doing all the drumming on the records? I believe I've heard some nonsense, but that takes the cake.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drumbeato
5 hours ago (9:31 PM)
Sorry Red, Ringo played drums on 99% of The Beatles recordings­. Paul McCartney never went in after hours & re did Ringo's tracks either. Paul played drums on a handful of tracks, most notably "Back In The USSR", & "Ballad Of John & Yoko". A session drummer named Andy White was used on one of three versions of "Love Me Do" that were recorded by EMI in 1962, On the other two versions, Pete Best was on the first, Ringo on the third.

Ringo was hardly "Insuffici­ent" as a drummer either. He was solid, had great feel & swung like mad. He was also very original, as a listen to any of his fills will demonstrat­e. Ringo was also an influence on generation­s of drummers that followed. When you hear comments that Ringo was a bad drummer, they almost always come from non musicians. Any drummer worth their salt will be the first to tell you just how great Ringo was.
5 hours ago (9:39 PM)
The only reason Paul might have ever filled in on drums was when Ringo was unavailabl­e like he was when he briefly quit the group in 1968. Paul did play bass and drums on "The Ballad Of John & Yoko" because John couldn't play them and neither George nor Ringo appeared on the recording because they weren't available at the time.
5 hours ago (9:33 PM)
Sorry - have to disagree, though you may be overall correct about Paul's occassiona­l opinion. But Paul's style and Ringo's are unique and easily distinquis­hable: Paul was spot-on and Ringo was always just a millisecon­d behind on hitting the snare, which added to that unique rhythm they had.
Paul added a lot of other percussion­, of course, and would help to keep him in time during some recordings (mentioned in Geoff Emerick's book).
I know Paul played drums on USSR, Prudence (great job, too) & Ballad. Offhand am not sure about a couple of others...

Ringo was the perfect drummer for The Beatles, great style. A left handed guy playing a right handed kit, I believe is how he put it.

Pete Best would have been replaced regardless for several reasons, tho maybe not as soon...who knows? IMO, no Ringo, no "Beatles" (in as far as how BIG they got).

There's a great 60's press conference bit where a young boy is saying he wants to learn from Ringo, who replies "you'll never get anywhere listening to me." He knew his limitation­s, but his fills on Day in the Life are brilliant.
17 hours ago (9:41 AM)
Lennon would have been 9 days old and in Liverpool himself...­..want to make a story out of that?
18 hours ago (8:55 AM)
"A few feet further, and Pete Best may have been the permanent drummer of The Beatles."

No way, no matter even if Ringo would have met his untimely demise would this have happened. They would have went with some studio musician that George Martin had picked out. Pete just didn't have the chops.
17 hours ago (9:38 AM)
It was not Best's destiny.
5 hours ago (9:43 PM)
Also, Pete never really was a part of the group, which apparently put off the others. When they were performing in Hamburg, John, Paul, & George always did things together in their spare time while Pete went off and did his own thing.
19 hours ago (8:02 AM)
Huff Po !!!!!!! enough with the non-storie­s.
20 hours ago (6:53 AM)
Amazing that a writer and editor could make so many errors in an item so brief.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
streetmagik
You can't fight in here this is the war room!!
23 hours ago (3:58 AM)
think of how many talented people were actually killed by the Nazis - and how much poorer the world is for it.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
YOKEL13
Trickle-Down Theory: 1% of nothin' is nothin'.
11:20 PM on 6/07/2011
Ringo Starr is 70 years old? Where has the time gone?
AlPal3
Had Enough? Vote Democratic
11:17 PM on 6/07/2011
Ringo, I am here for you.
10:49 PM on 6/07/2011
Wow, I expected this article to be more exciting. Maybe next time.