CONNECT    

Zaki Hasan

Zaki Hasan

GET UPDATES FROM Zaki Hasan

Zaki's Review: X-Men: First Class

Posted: 06/ 5/11 03:57 PM ET

Two summers ago, I was ready to proclaim Fox's X-Men movies "done, done, done." I've never been more happy to be proven wrong.

Following the well-trod paths of recent reboots like Batman Begins, Casino Royale, and Star Trek, all tasked with helping their respective brands reclaim past prestige after prior stumbles, X-Men: First Class, the fifth go at the eleven (!!) year old series, takes us back to the beginnings of Marvel's multitudinous mutant mythology. In mining the rich narrative vein of the fast friendship and bitter breakdown between eternal rivals Professor X and Magneto, it single-handedly rescues the franchise from the creative doldrums that crippled its recent entries.

Smaller in scale and less explodey than the bombastic excesses of its two predecessors (2006's X-Men: The Last Stand and 2009's X-Men Origins: Wolverine), the prequel project marries the indy-honed storytelling sensibilities of director Matthew Vaughn (Layer Cake, Kick Ass) and the returned Bryan Singer -- producing this entry after directing the first two -- and hearkens back to the high point of Singer's 2003 sequel X2. Singer, you may recall, bolted from development on the third X-Men so he could head up Superman Returns for Warner Bros, little realizing how his decision would nearly scuttle both franchises. Superman received a chilly reception from audiences, while the Singer-free X-flicks did fine financially, but flailed creatively.

Thus, his return to X-country has the feeling of a longed-for homecoming, with his work here as co-scenarist giving a renewed dramatic weight to the proceedings that only makes more apparent what was sorely lacking in the last two go-rounds. Foregrounding character before spectacle (though it has its fair share of that -- this is still a summer blockbuster, after all), the film effectively utilizes its '60s setting in the midst of the Cuban Missile Crisis as the canvas upon which the larger-than-life struggle of opposing ideologies underlying the entire series -- pacifism vs. militancy, open hand vs. closed fist, however you want to frame them -- plays out.

Starting right where the original X-Men in 2000 did, down to a shot-for-shot redo of its first scene, film follows young Erik Lehnsherr, the boy who will be Magneto, as he is separated from his parents in Auschwitz in 1944 and first unleashes his mutant ability to manipulate metals. Growing into Michael Fassbender (who will in turn eventually grow into Ian McKellen), he spends his time tracking down and dispatching various Nazi war criminals across the globe.

Meanwhile, we also meet Charles Xavier (soon to possess Patrick Stewart's bald pate, but who can comfort himself with James McAvoy's mop of brown hair for now), whose telepathic abilities make him the most powerful mind on Earth, as well as its foremost expert on genetic mutation. When a request from the US government for his particular kind of expertise puts Xavier on the trail of a mutant mastermind (not be confused with the mutant Mastermind) named Sebastian Shaw (Kevin Bacon) -- intent on orchestrating a nuclear war for his own devious ends -- who is also being sought by Lehnsherr, we know we don't have long to wait for a meeting of mind and magnetism.

There's a sense of anticipation coupled with the tiniest hint of dread as we watch these early scenes unfold, knowing not only how perfectly Xavier and Lehnsherr are matched with one another, but also the collision course that destiny has already charted for them. Witnessing the bond the two forge becomes a fascinating case study of nature vs. nurture. Had Erik been raised in the lap of luxury, and Charles suffered the horrors of Auschwitz, would they have still staked out opposing ideological turf? It's a philosophical question whose underpinnings gird the entire film, especially necessary since we already have a pretty good idea how the whole "Missile Crisis" thing turned out (spoiler: we made it).

Our involvement in the story would collapse completely if we didn't hold a stake in the Charles-Erik dynamic that informs every frame. Fassbender, whose charisma was apparent just from the trailers, delivers a career-defining turn here that will elevate him to the A-List as surely as the first X-Men did for Hugh Jackman (it's no knock on Jackman to say I didn't feel his absence here nearly as much as I thought I would).

One of the mini-essays I penned for the upcoming book Geek Wisdom was a meditation on the appeal of evil by way of Hannibal Lecter and Anakin Skywalker, where I reached the conclusion that part of us enjoys peering into the abyss to see just how close we can get without falling in. Erik's arc exemplifies that conceit, representing an impossibly magnetic (yeah, yeah, I know...) personality who spends most of the movie perched precariously on that razor-thin dividing line between good bad guy and bad good guy.

In many ways, Wolverine and Magneto fill very much the same role in these stories: the conflicted anti-hero who has to decide which of the two paths laid out before him to follow. We already know the choice Magneto will make, but seeing it here lends an added dimension to Wolverine's path in the original, demonstrating in one fell swoop the kind of prequel-sequel synergy that George Lucas couldn't find his way to in three visits to the pre-Star Wars well (okay, my requisite dig at the Star Wars prequels is out of the way).

While Fassbender is rightly deserving of the praise he's been garnering for his work here, I don't want to in any way undervalue McAvoy's essential contributions either. The Scottish actor, who I've been a fan of since his leading role in the underrated Sci-Fi (whoops, SyFy) miniseries Children of Dune in '03, has an almost harder task placed in front of him than Fassbender. His Xavier has to both ground the proceedings and also serve as the necessary straight man to the showier Magneto. But McAvoy does a nice job of giving him a playful twinkle while still laying the pipe for the saintly, pious figure embodied by Stewart.

In fact, strong performances are turned in across the board. Vaughn and Singer deserve much credit for the solid ensemble of mostly-unknowns they've assembled for their team of proto-X-Men, as well as  familiar faces like Ray Wise, Michael Ironside, and Oliver Platt to populate smaller parts. Although the movie's timeline renders marquee mutants such as Cyclops, Jean Grey, and Storm off-limits, the filmmakers make do with a serviceable roster of second-tier heroes like Caleb Landry Jones' Banshee and Lucas Till's Havoc (technically Cyclops' younger brother in the comics but, y'know, whatever).

Also on the "good guy" side of the aisle (for now, anyway), Jennifer Lawrence is fine in the role of true blue shapeshifter Mystique that Rebecca Romijin played previously. Working in Lawrence's favor: she gets to play more of an emotional storyline than the character's fairly limited role in any of the previous films would have allowed. Nicholas Hoult also has some nice moments as introverted scientist Hank McCoy (Kelsey Grammer in The Last Stand), whose revulsion at his Beastly, ape-like feet ends up leaving him a little blue himself.

As for the villains, Bacon has more than enough presence to hold his own with Fassbender and McAvoy, making Shaw a compelling antagonist in his own right, and his stated goal of mutant domination offers a hint of Magneto himself in later/prior installments. The one weak link in the otherwise-excellent cast is the somnambulant January Jones as scantily-clad mutant temptress Emma Frost. Jones sleepwalks through the proceedings, playing Frost like a very-bored Betty Draper. Luckily, for us and the movie, there's propulsive power to the storytelling that keeps Jones from lingering long enough to be anything other than a mild annoyance.

Layered with small hints (some subtle, some not-so-subtle) explicitly situating the film within the cinematic universe that Singer inaugurated while explicitly overwriting the chronologies established by movies three and four, X-Men: First Class satisfies the goal of creatively righting this franchise beyond the most optimistic estimations, marking a from-the-ashes rebirth not unlike a certain fiery fowl of mythic (and mutant) significance. Not only is First Class the best X-Men yet, it's also the strongest comics-to-screen translation to hit theaters since The Dark Knight. X-ceptional company indeed. A

 

Follow Zaki Hasan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/zakiscorner

Two summers ago, I was ready to proclaim Fox's X-Men movies "done, done, done." I've never been more happy to be proven wrong. Following the well-trod paths of recent reboots like Batman Begins, Cas...
Two summers ago, I was ready to proclaim Fox's X-Men movies "done, done, done." I've never been more happy to be proven wrong. Following the well-trod paths of recent reboots like Batman Begins, Cas...
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
3 minutes ago (8:35 PM)
I'm definitely not a diehard fan of the X-Men comics, and I'm kind of glad that I'm not. I know enough about the X-Men universe to understand the characters­' relationsh­ips with one another and where they come from, and I know that this story really jumped away from the canon, but I was able to enjoy it for the entertaini­ng and dramatic movie that it was. The point is, they will never be able to make a movie that is based directly off of the comics. It would be too difficult and frankly, the comics jump around just as much themselves­. So I think I'll just pretend it's an alternate universe.

I'll admit, I like this cast of characters­. I'm glad they didn't go with the original first class because I don't care much for Jean Grey or Storm, and I've seen enough of Cyclops in the last few movies. It was fun to see how the young mutants learned to control their powers, and the villains were top-notch. (My favorite was Azazel, even though I don't care much for his appearance­s in the actual comic).

In my opinion, this movie is equal to or better than the first X-Men and X2 (although not by much... and I might just being saying that because this one is new and I've watched the others countless times before.) It really reinvigora­ted my interest in the X-Men.
6 hours ago (2:59 PM)
I haven't read a single X-men comic. The only X-men "canon" that I know of is the cartoon from the 90s. Saying that, I have no interest in this movie because the characters­. I simply don't care about them. Mystique is one of my favorites but I don't like the way she is portrayed here.

My male friend saw it and said it had bad sfx and was cheesy. This coming from someone who thought Daredevil was awesome.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
O K Ali
Wash your hands, seriously.
19 hours ago (1:21 AM)
Wholeheart­edly agree. Kevin Bacon blew me away with his performanc­e.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KJLSanDiego
21 hours ago (11:36 PM)
I really enjoyed the movie as well!
22 hours ago (10:45 PM)
I haven't read a comic book in probably 50 years, but the reviews of this movie were good and we were bored. We were deciding whether to see this one or a repeat of Thor, and decided on X-Men. I was worried that it was going to be another Twilight (I'm not in that movies demographi­c), but I needn't have.

And yes, Keven Bacon surprised me--he seemed to have a lot of fun with that role, and so I had fun watching him.

I'd see this movie again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic22
Transitioning from fitting in to standing out
05:59 PM on 6/06/2011
I actually hated most of this movie. I didn't want to be a nerd and get caught up on the movie being exactly like the comics, but I think that some of the choices it made were unforgivab­le. Also, instead of using the actual first class, or some secondary mutants that people still recognized­, they seemingly just picked the most obscure mutants from the marvel universe out of the hat, which ended up creating one of the weakest teams ever. I think that the choices they made will just hurt them in the long run if they continue the series, as the concession­s they made here, makes them have to make more concession­s down the line to make stuff make sense (sort of like the amnesia bullet at the end of Wolverine to account for the fact that Wolverine didnt know Sabretooth at the beginning of X Men, even though their feud is long running in the comics) . I had high hopes for the movie, and they were dashed.

On a good note, Azazel was, in my opinion, one of the coolest characters i've seen in a while (as long as it wasn't showing close ups of his terrible make up)
5 hours ago (3:29 PM)
Really, Havok, Beast and Banshee are now well known. I'll grant you Darwin is z level, but they only brought him in to kill him off.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic22
Transitioning from fitting in to standing out
5 hours ago (3:50 PM)
Beast is A level, Havok and banshee are probably B or C level (When talking about X men, Havok is known for his time in X-factor). Just explain why they would use the younger brother of one of the most prominent X-men of all time (Cyclops), in an origin story, when said x-men was a huge part of the actual first class. They could have easily set it as a reboot, in the 80's, used some made cold war incident that brought us near the brink of war, and used younger, early 20's versions of beast, cyclops, iceman, Angel, jean grey, and storm.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ccopas
You say potato I say vodka!
12:12 PM on 6/06/2011
Well, it was a great, fun, popcorn movie but let's not kid ourselves this isn't the X-Men. At least not as I know them. This film (as did all the other craptacula­r X-Men movies) completely ignores the source material and serves as a big "F" u to all the X-Men fans. This would be like taking Harry Potter and "de-aging" Dumbledore so he could go to high school with an American Harry Potter. I grew up reading the X-Men but these films have but nothing but a disappoint­ment. X2 came close but even that film was high on style and lacked any real substance. Singer should be kept away from the X-Men.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic22
Transitioning from fitting in to standing out
05:50 PM on 6/06/2011
Thank you, I was so disappoint­ed in how they butchered the canon, but everywhere else people acted like it was the second coming of the Dark Knight
DrSnuggles
You label me and I'll label you
12:03 PM on 6/06/2011
This movie was good, but I think it's getting just a little too much praise in the press. Obviously, it's better than Wolverine or Last Stand (duh) and the atuhor here rightly praises the exceptiona­l performanc­es of Michael Fassbender and James McAvoy but there were just a few things within the film that jarred you out of what would otherwise be a truly immersive film.

Generally the movie plays out more like a James Bond film than a comic book film, and when the creators indulge in comic book frivolitie­s it is really disconcert­ing (such as the atrocious 'let's show off our powers and name each other' scene). Also, there was some blatant disregard for canon; I'm not too much of a canon-stic­kler, but when canon is ignored for what seems no good reason I'm left a little confused. For example, a character who adds nothing to the plot being given the wrong name (and a name of a very important character, who was actually in other films in the series). Also, the make-up was pretty bad.

I know I'm being nitpicky - but the author here did give it an 'A'.
12:02 PM on 6/06/2011
This was incredible­! I think it's always a longshot to take on any comic book movie with an ensemble cast, so I didn't judge X3 TOO harshly, but Singer seems to get it right every time. I hope he or Vaughn stays on for any future X-movies(S­inger's probably learned his lesson with Superman Returns). Also, great review, though I thought January Jones did fine as Emma Frost; she's supposed to be cold and indifferen­t, so her acting style worked fine here.
12:44 PM on 6/06/2011
January Jones doesn't have an acting style. She looks beautiful, cold and aloof and delivers lines like a zombie. A pretty zombie but she's really not an actor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheLonelyGod
The oncoming storm
02:39 AM on 6/06/2011
I really liked this one. It didn't sync up with the rest but that's all right. Kevin Bacon was surprising­ly good especially as a relatively obscure villain.
12:44 PM on 6/06/2011
Love me some (Kevin) Bacon.
01:14 AM on 6/06/2011
Loved this film! I could watch McAvoy and easily imagine him aging into Patrick Stewart. The same goes for Fassbender aging into Ian McKellen. I also thoroughly enjoyed the storyline about The Beast.
I wonder how many of the X-Men fans recognized the young actor who played Havoc as the handsome young love interest in Hannah Montana? I recognized him immediatel­y.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Moore
English Teacher in Japan
07:56 PM on 6/05/2011
I nerd-gasm'­d at the trailer. And now after reading such a good review, I can't wait!!

Never liked January Jones anyway. Glad to see that she's only a minor annoyance in this film.
05:06 PM on 6/05/2011
Another great review, Zaki!

I'm no X-pert on these characters (...sorry) but I really enjoyed this movie! It was the perfect balance of story and spectacle. Instead of trying to be irreverent like Iron Man, or brooding like The Dark Knight, First Class found its own voice, deftly balancing weightier moments while still embracing heightened "comic book" sensibilit­ies. The only problem is that after watching movies like this, I get tricked into thinking they can all be this good.