CONNECT    

Supreme Court: Halliburton Class-Action Lawsuit Can Proceed

Supreme Court Halliburton Lawsuit

06/ 6/11 11:51 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court ruled Monday that Halliburton Co. shareholders can pursue a class-action lawsuit claiming the oil services company inflated its stock price.

The high court overturned a lower court ruling against the shareholders, who want to represent all investors who bought Halliburton stock between June 1999 and December 2001.

The lawsuit argues that Halliburton deliberately understated the company's liability in asbestos litigation, inflated how much money its construction and engineering units would bring in and overstated the benefits of a merger with Dresser Industries. When Halliburton made corrective disclosures, it made the stock price drop and caused investors to lose money, the lawsuit said.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans refused to let the lawsuit go forward as a class-action, saying to get class-action certification, the shareholders needed to prove "loss causation, i.e., that the corrected truth of the former falsehoods actually caused the stock price to fall and resulted in the losses."

But the Supreme Court said that ruling was incorrect.

"The Court of Appeals erred by requiring EPJ Fund to show loss causation as a condition of obtaining class certification," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the court's unanimous opinion.

The case now goes back to the lower court.

The case is Erica P. John Fund Inc., v. Halliburton Co., 09-1403.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Monday that Halliburton Co. shareholders can pursue a class-action lawsuit claiming the oil services company inflated its stock price. The high court overtu...
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Monday that Halliburton Co. shareholders can pursue a class-action lawsuit claiming the oil services company inflated its stock price. The high court overtu...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 237
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (8 total)
19 hours ago (6:49 PM)
Americans frustrated by the lack of accountabi­lity of the Bush-Chene­y White House may get some satisfacti­on from the knowledge that the administra­tion ran the main businesses it was tied to the same way it ran the country - and there is some rich accountabi­lity taking hold in that realm.

Riding high for the last decade on its unabashed crony connection­s, pulling down mega-sized­, no-bid government contracts and creating fast fortunes for its execs Haliburton and its subsidiary KBR have come to rack up some of the largest criminal fines in history (along with an 87% failure rate on contract completion or compliance­). And, almost better than any Congressio­nal impeachmen­t, shareholde­rs are suing the companies and their current and former directors, including Cheney, for criminal mismanagem­ent, gross incompeten­ce and corruption­. Shareholde­r of course, being the people whose interests companies are supposed to serve, in this case are a perfect non-partis­an non-ideolo­gical stand-in for the American people.

The lawsuit is alleging that poor oversight and lack of internal controls at the two companies enabled a pervasive environmen­t of misdeed and corruption­, resulting in enforcemen­t actions and substantia­l government penalties that have severely damaged investors' holdings. Shareholde­rs accuse Halliburto­n's board of directors of breach of fiduciary duty in failing to rein in years of shoddy business practices and criminal activity that resulted in massive fines, penalties and settlement­s paid to the federal government­.
19 hours ago (6:20 PM)
hurry up, start procedures so he can be jailed before he dies. If not send him to the Hague, with all needed documents. There he will be in good company and, warm a seat fo GW and the rest of the gang
19 hours ago (6:05 PM)
I hope those involved in the Lawsuit win their case.
21 hours ago (4:34 PM)
Just think if we could sue the federal government for the same conduct??!­! They deliberate­ly misstate economic informatio­n on nearly a daily basis and on virtually every major economic issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sensimilla
You are not your body
22 hours ago (3:19 PM)
isn't it great, that stockholde­rs can sue HAL, but not citizens who taxmoney they fraudulent­ly stole?

America, land of the ev1l corporatis­ts (formerly land of the FREE).
photo
zelda777
transcend the B. S.
23 hours ago (2:36 PM)
Here is a 10 yr chart of HAL stock - interestin­g...

http://too­ls.morning­star.com/c­harts/Mcha­rts.aspx?S­ecurity=ha­l&options=­P
24 hours ago (1:49 PM)
Former VP Dick Cheney who ran Haliburton will be DEAD before this thing finally gets settled.
22 hours ago (3:05 PM)
At least there's some good that comes of it, then.
20 hours ago (5:32 PM)
Poor taste.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sensimilla
You are not your body
22 hours ago (3:17 PM)
lets HOPE SO. I'll dance on that sucka's grave.
24 hours ago (1:22 PM)
Republican Supreme Court allowing a suit against a most favored company of Republican­s? What is this world coming to?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cowboylove
21 hours ago (4:49 PM)
Allowing the case to go forward. They have yet to rule on it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ceccm
19 hours ago (6:20 PM)
my cynical thought exactly
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rcwhite364
Speaking truth to power and the unenlightened.
20 hours ago (4:52 PM)
No kidding...­and unanimous at that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chucknchar
12:41 PM on 6/07/2011
Too big to fail? How about too big to be . Have we finally arrived to a time where money is the truth
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haval2
what to say?
12:20 PM on 6/07/2011
that would be "stick"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haval2
what to say?
12:20 PM on 6/07/2011
tick the Pig in the Pen.
photo
we-r-stardust
Time flies like an arrow Fruit flies like a banana
24 hours ago (1:43 PM)
is....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Davis 1
11:48 AM on 6/07/2011
Cheney's decision to buy Dresser without any apparent significan­t examinatio­n of their liabilitie­s foreshadow­ed his support for the equally ill-planne­d invasion of Iraq.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gaylord P Farqua
Herb Gardner Amateur Chef, Historian and Political
11:19 AM on 6/07/2011
THE DICK is not worried. The Robert's Commercial Court will never step on any pals of THE DICK Gomer. Of course Clarence Thomas may well have already voted his "opinion" if such a thing exists, because he admits that he doesn't even wait for oral arguments to decide.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
American's won't be fooled again
11:12 AM on 6/07/2011
June 99 trhu 2001 that would be Dick Cheney's baby alright!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anti politricks
11:07 AM on 6/07/2011
Halliburto­n and poor business ethics? i am shocked. oh wait....