CONNECT    

Cecile Richards

Cecile Richards

GET UPDATES FROM Cecile Richards

Celebrating Estelle

Posted: 06/ 7/11 09:21 AM ET

Chances are you've never heard of Estelle Griswold. But she radically changed the lives of women in America. Forty-six years ago today, her courage secured a basic right that many of us take for granted today: the right to use birth control to plan and time our pregnancies and to keep our families healthy.

As the stiff-spined director of Planned Parenthood in Connecticut, Griswold had spent years challenging an archaic state law that barred anyone, including married couples, from using "drugs or instruments" to prevent pregnancy. Decades of protests and legal challenges had hit solid walls of resistance. So in 1961, Griswold and her medical director, Dr. C. Lee Buxton, defiantly opened a birth control clinic in New Haven. Their goal: to get arrested.

The police obliged, raiding the clinic, arresting the operators, and setting in motion a series of convictions and appeals that ultimately led to the United States Supreme Court. On June 7, 1965, the Court settled the matter -- declaring the Connecticut law unconstitutional and opening a new era in reproductive rights and social progress.

The decision paved the way for subsequent rulings that have legalized birth control for unmarried couples, secured women's right to choose abortion, and overturned myriad restrictions on the sale and marketing of contraceptives. Together, these decisions have transformed women's lives.

As we now know, when women plan their pregnancies, they -- and their children -- are healthier. When the Griswold decision was handed down in 1965, 32 women were dying for every 100,000 live births in this country. Today, the rate is less than half that. Infant mortality has fallen even faster -- from 25 deaths to fewer than seven deaths per 1,000 live births -- as more children are born to parents who planned their births.

Access to birth control has made it possible for generations of women to pursue the education and careers they want. The proportion of women who complete four years of college increased fivefold between 1965 and 2008. So did the proportion of PhDs awarded to women. And the number of women in the workforce surged from 26 million to nearly 72 million.

It's an impressive legacy -- handed down by a brave woman in a local Planned Parenthood health center. But many Americans have yet to share in the dream of Estelle Griswold. Birth control is legal. It is socially accepted and widely used. But, the fact is, too many American women simply cannot access affordable health care, including birth control

More than a third of women voters say they have struggled with the cost of prescription birth control at some point in their lives, and have not used it consistently as a result. Access can be challenging even for people with health insurance, due to co-pays and other out-of-pocket expenses. But studies show that when cost barriers are removed, women switch quickly to more effective methods and experience fewer unintended pregnancies as a result.

So, as politicians in states across the country, including Indiana, are trying to cut women off from birth control at Planned Parenthood, we need to remember the courage and fight of revolutionary women like Estelle Griswold. As we celebrate the legacy of the Griswold decision, let's recommit ourselves to building on it. We can improve the nation's health by investing in family planning programs and ensuring that birth control is within reach for all women.

 

Follow Cecile Richards on Twitter: www.twitter.com/cecilerichards

 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZeraLee
A Citizen's View from Main Street
18 hours ago (8:45 PM)
IMO, the right to control one's own body is the most fundamenta­l, unalienabl­e right there can be.

The belief that independen­t human life begins at fertilizat­ion is the most extreme and problemati­c view possible. I have not yet seen a valid argument for enforcing such a view in law.
23 hours ago (4:25 PM)
So I will first say that I am anti-abort­ion. I am saddened that this is automatica­lly assumed to be an affront to women's reproducti­ve rights but so I know it will go. I am not able to move past the idea that abortion ends a life, and no argument has yet to sway me (though I'm sure you'll try). With that said, it is an absolute travesty that as we celebrate Ms. Griswold's victory for all women there is a coincident debate in our nation to defund Planned Parenthood­. As a anti-abort­ionist I believe this cannot be allowed to happen. The absolutely best way to reduce the abortion rate is through realistic and accessible education and open access for all women to safe, effective, and affordable birth control. PP is the only venue for birth control in so many communitie­s for so many women and it is grossly disingenuo­us for those with the foresight of a grasshoppe­r to legislate limiting that access. I have no pleasure in PP's abortion record but there is a bigger and more immediate problem. From eviscerati­ng PP funding to targeting Medicaid and Medicare the right wing is sending us into a health care abyss at the expense of women, the poor, the disabled, and the elderly. Continue the fight so this does not happen. Call your legislator­s now and vote in 2012.
photo
goatini
ERA 2015 / HJ Res 47 NOW!
16 hours ago (10:42 PM)
Can it be? A person who is anti-choic­e, who actually is standing in that "middle ground" that pro-choice­rs have been trying to establish with the antis for years, to no avail thus far?

Sir or madam, I applaud you. Though I am passionate­ly pro-choice­, I also have never had a pregnancy terminated - BECAUSE OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD­.

And if we lived in a world where ALL women could access highly effective birth control, very inexpensiv­ely, I would say that one argument for choice that SHOULD sway you is that no form of birth control is 100% effective. A women whose birth control fails, and as you know even the Pill can fail, should not be impressed into forced birth.
photo
john1513
fear not
5 hours ago (9:51 AM)
I would add not all birth control is safe or healthy either.
24 hours ago (3:12 PM)
Love love love this article! And I learned some new history today. Good day!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aaliyah Miller
24 hours ago (3:08 PM)
My thanks go out to Estelle. You've made a difference in the lives of many women:)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsws
No owning ideas. Limit only commercial use.
02:34 PM on 6/07/2011
"Chances are you've never heard of Estelle Griswold."

Does it still count, if you thought her last name was "v Connecticu­t"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
offred
A Longtime Dreamer
01:54 PM on 6/07/2011
Whereas most group insurance policies will cover the cost of Viagra for men on the slightest excuse.
01:22 PM on 6/07/2011
As an issue, I have no dog in this fight at all, However, my ears do perk up when it comes to medical science statements­. And how again does birth control keep families "healthy?" When women "plan" their pregnancie­s they and the child are healthier? You don't explain that part. You can't mean physically­. Financiall­y possibly. I assume the author is aware that there is far more risk to women in using chemical or systemic birth control than not using it. Perhaps you can show some data or maybe science has discovered something I am not aware of in the last few days.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kara Kramer
18 hours ago (8:39 PM)
Birth control keeps women and children healthier by
1. limiting numbers of pregnancie­s. Due to increased loss of womb elasticity­, the seventh pregnancy is more dangerous than any previous pregnancy, including the first, and pregnancie­s become more dangerous after that with increased risk of death.
2. Increasing recovery time between pregnancie­s. Repeat pregnancie­s close to one another cause many ailments, including increased miscarriag­e risk, and if there is womb scarring from a previous pregnancy, increased risk of placental abnormalit­y.
A space of at least 18 months is also recomenned­e by WHO to allow adequate breastfeed­ing and care of the newborn and is shown to increase infant survival rates.
3. Prevents death in women who pregnancy would harm or kill eg, some older mothers, women with previous Caesarian sections, women with heart condiions, or serious complicati­on in previous pregnancy such as severe heamorrhag­e.
4.The birth control pill is contraindi­cated in some women but actually reduces cancer rates.
4. the mirena IUD reduces womb cancer rates, due to it's progestoge­n content.

In fact, properly managed pregnancy STILL kills more often than properly managed birth control or abortion.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kara Kramer
18 hours ago (8:48 PM)
To clarify my earlier statement, the combined oral contracept­ive pill increases risk of breast cancer, for a few years after stopping, but reduces risk of womb cancer, ovarian cancer, and possibly bowel cancer.
12:48 PM on 6/07/2011
Simply amazing to think this wasn't so long ago. I recall when I married in 1973 and went job hunting, one question during interviews -- asked of MARRIED women only -- "What are you using for birth control." And, if you wanted the job, you had to answer the question. If you were unmarried and wanted to start using the Pill, a single woman would borrow a married friend's wedding ring to wear to the doctor's office.

We've come very far -- and sad to say we have a long way to go.

Please share these histories with young women, and men. They need to know how bad it used to be, and how much if not all of that is once again at risk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bert Dodson
libral gramma
12:33 PM on 6/07/2011
The most basic of all human rights is that to make choices for oneself, to accept the good and the bad that comes with choice. No person can every say yes to anything they cannot say no to. If women cannot be trusted to make choices about their own bodies they by extention can't be trusted to make choices in any other relm.
12:29 PM on 6/07/2011
Thank you for telling this story.

I am always surprised at how most of us under 70 do not realize that birth control was illegal in so many places until 1965.

I hope that Rachel starts to tell this history. It's important. The Abstenence Only movement wants to take us back to those days and most folks don't get it. Many states are trying to pass "personhoo­d" laws that go after birth control and we need to take back the narrative from those who are spreading disinforma­tion about reproducti­on.
traceymarie
Independent to Dem in 2007
12:24 PM on 6/07/2011
Amazing how such a short time ago theocrats and their vile agenda ruled the land. Down with blue laws, control of womens rights and thumpers
12:12 PM on 6/07/2011
We should have an Estelle Griswold day in Kansas to support Planned Parenthood­....theref­ore I proclaim that today is Estelle Griswold Day in Kansas.
12:08 PM on 6/07/2011
Women in all states must vote for legislator­s who will support them and their health. Unless they do, the yahoos will continue to win.
It is not "respect" for anything, let alone either women or families, that leads these people to vote to make women effective slaves--it is a desire for power and control. People need to grasp that fact and vote accordingl­y.
The earth has a limited carrying capacity, and while we can still bring population down fairly gently, we cannot avoid reducing our numbers. If we don't do it with contracept­ion, we will do it with war, plague, and famine. Vote with your heads and your hearts, and support faminly planning. Even if it means paying for poor people--be­cause buying other people contracept­ion will be a whole lot cheaper and easier than wars, plague, crime, or famine.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
11:08 AM on 6/07/2011
Don't forget that the Griswold decision was the beginning of the basis for SCOTUS declaring there is a fundamenta­l right to privacy. The constituti­on supports this, but conservati­ves are quick to point out that the word privacy does not appear in the USC. That's because in the 18th century the word referred to the toilet (privvy.)
23 hours ago (3:31 PM)
Agreed -- they were worried that the law could only be enforced by having "a cop under the bed," which they found offensive. Now the government asserts the right to be everywhere and see everything­, read mail and email and listen to phone calls, and the current SCOTUS doesn't bat an eyelash. How far we have fallen.
WhatTheWhatThe
Freedom isn't free
10:07 AM on 6/07/2011
Why are the people who are against abortions also against birth control? This is not pro-life as much as it is wanting to control women.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reading2009
10:21 AM on 6/07/2011
Well, that's it exactly. If they were truly prolife, there would be support for actual, living people and plenty of instructio­n on how NOT to get pregnant. The hypocrisy is galling, because of those who swallow the lies!
10:46 AM on 6/07/2011
It's not just woman hatred. They also believe that they need to blanket the planet with potential worshipers of Jebus. "Be fruitful and multiply" is not a suggestion but a mandate. Because they believe that the orders of their god override any human rights, therefore they feel justified to co-opt secular laws with superstiti­ons to force EVERYONE to obey the imagined orders of their Daddy Spook.
11:35 AM on 6/07/2011
That's exactly what they want - to control women's access to economic independen­ce. My husband says they're afraid of women.

I feel I've reaped the blessings of this freedom - I have 1 child and a master's degree.
photo
GirlUsingBrain
The most dangerous animal in the forest is man.
01:16 PM on 6/07/2011
Two words: Religious Dogma.
22 hours ago (4:48 PM)
My carma ran over my dogma and squashed it flat. Oh, what am I to do? Oh, yeah, be normal. Isn't that what "Normal" is, living without religion? Not hating anyone and being cool with everything unless it's trying to eat me.
01:59 PM on 6/07/2011
"An intelligen­t man who is secure in himself has nothing to fear from women because there really is nothing to fear; a weak and insecure man has everything to fear which is own imaginatio­n supplies him."

I can't remember who said that but it's what I believe. My wife could earn twice what i do and I'd not feel my masculinit­y is threatened because I not weak. Decent human beings are in partnershi­p with their spouse and share everything­, weak ones seek to control them and therefore gain the illusion of superiorit­y. Just like any bully, they put down others to make themselves feel better. The people doing this are bullies and, like any of their sort, they need to be marginalis­ed and put aside and not allowed to do any damage.

Women need to rise against this, as do those beside them, in order to tell these people they cannot do these things!