CONNECT    

Steve Martin Victim of German Art Forgery Ring (PHOTO) [UPDATE]

Steve Martin

First Posted: 06/ 1/11 03:12 PM ET Updated: 06/ 2/11 08:58 PM ET

Steve Martin has had a varied career as an actor, writer, comedian, SNL host, musician, and art lover, but he's probably not too happy to add 'victim' to that list.

The perpetrator was allegedly a German art forgery ring that's been in operation since the 1990s. A painting that was in Martin's possession from July 2004 to February 2006 was recently discovered to be a fake, and may have been the German ring's handiwork. Martin bought the painting for €700,000 at the Cazeau-Béraudière Gallery in Paris and sold it at a Christie's auction to a Swiss businesswoman for €500,000.

Read more below.

The painting in question was "Lanscape With Horses" (1915), above, by Heinrich Campendonk. Martin sold the painting long before it was determined to be a fake, and has not been accused of any wrongdoing.

Investigators said that the painting was most likely created by Wolfgang Beltracchi, the accused leader of a forgery ring that included his wife, sister-in-law and another accused forger Otto Schulte-Kellinghaus. Beltracchi's forgery ring is suspected of producing paintings attributed to Campendonk, Fernand Léger, Max Ernst and others.

The Daily Beast reports:

After forging each painting, the clan would fabricate its provenance—its history of ownership. In the case of Martin's painting, the forgers said it had come from the collection of Werner Jägers, a German businessman who happens to be the grandfather of Beltracchi's wife. The provenance allegedly states that Jägers acquired paintings from art dealer Alfred Flechtheim and hid them from the Nazis during World War II. The forgers allegedly sold many of their paintings to French galleries, including to Cazeau-Béraudière, where Martin bought his work.

Martin commented on the duplicity via his twitter with his signature humor, saying "I was also once duped by a German vegetarian salad that was loaded with ham."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST ARTS

Steve Martin has had a varied career as an actor, writer, comedian, SNL host, musician, and art lover, but he's probably not too happy to add 'victim' to that list. The perpetrator was allegedly a...
Steve Martin has had a varied career as an actor, writer, comedian, SNL host, musician, and art lover, but he's probably not too happy to add 'victim' to that list. The perpetrator was allegedly a...
 
Loading...
Filed by Sydney Edelist  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 166
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
caroline gray
07:01 PM on 6/02/2011
reminds me of part of his book I just finished, "An Object of Beauty"
18 hours ago (10:14 AM)
I was about to say the SAME thing!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sassiestkat
http://bitteristhenewblack.wordpress.com/
02:48 AM on 6/02/2011
I am saddened to see people commenting per his intelligen­ce to not discern a fake or his taste and sensibilit­ies to pay so much for a painting, This was his money he earned, he can spend it how he wishes. Regardless of what we think of his judgment, he doesn't deserve to be cheated. I'm glad most of you aren't on a jury per the right or wrong of this. The wrong is that he paid for a forgery, it has nothing to do with who he is or how much he paid.

I shudder to think of the juries most people face if the responses here are indicative of the jurors the average person would receive.

Mr. Martin, I have long respected you and laughed at your work. I am sorry you were wronged. Regardless of your wealth, it is not right.
12:52 AM on 6/02/2011
He had it 10 months, and sold it at a loss of €200,000.
That comes out to about €350 a day.
So in the 19 months that he had it in his possession­, did it give him €350 worth of pleasure per day? Could a fake make him as happy as a real painting?
If he bought it as an investment­, then he just plain miscalcula­ted and had a €200,000 loss. If he bought it because he liked it (I think personally about 5 minutes looking at that thing was more than enough for me), then he should feel neutral if he though it was worth $350 a day, ripped off if he thought it gave him €1 worth of pleasure each day, and he should feel elated if it gave him €1000 worth of pleasure each day.
I'd rather look at a horse on a neolithic french cave painting. That would satisfy me. This ocre/pink/­burnt Sienna mess doesn't inspire me.
Maybe it just took him 19 months to realize it disgusted him and he wanted to cut his losses.
Rich people can spend their money any way they like. But I think he could have obtained a lot more positive hedons of pleasure if he had invested his lost €200,000 in call girls or ice cream.
12:43 AM on 6/02/2011
Van Meegeren, the talented WWII art forger - who sat in a Nazi jail and invented two new “Vermeers” while under public scrutiny. Or be charged with being a collaborat­or by selling the genuine article ... to Reichmarsh­all Hermann Goering.
12:34 AM on 6/02/2011
he thinks he is this suave intellectu­al, playing the banjo, of all things. poor thing.
12:12 AM on 6/02/2011
A duplicitou­s Campendonk­, well I never
09:25 AM on 6/02/2011
Dang I spit out my coffee reading this...lol
11:20 PM on 6/01/2011
If only Martin's ears were two inches higher in that photo.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tulsey
I was Bill Hicks.
11:18 PM on 6/01/2011
Mr Martin has been pullin' one over ever since he put that arrow through his head. What's a little Fauvist Fraud amongst high end collector?
photo
Tigerama
Proud Non-Holder of a Wisconsin State ID
11:11 PM on 6/01/2011
Let me first say that I consider myself an artist, albeit not one who can make a living at it - but this is ridiculous­. Who should I feel sorry for? He paid that much money for a painting - if you want to see it, look at it in a book or go to a museum. And really, the OUTRAGE of a forgery - look, it's the picture you think it is, it's just not made by who you thought it was. The entire thing is beyond bizarre.
11:10 PM on 6/01/2011
He should start to consider outside artist
like the great and extraordin­aire artiste
C.L.DeMede­iros, he's very alive and affordable
I'm just saying...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PBR Street Gang
this is Almighty, over..
11:20 PM on 6/01/2011
Charles Schultz did some of his best work for peanuts...­.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tulsey
I was Bill Hicks.
12:07 AM on 6/02/2011
Ouch!
11:02 PM on 6/01/2011
Art, like anything else is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. Would you pay $1000 to see Lady GaGa? Not me, but someone will. I wouldn't pay $10 to see most movies either. Is that bottle of wine really worth $250 and is 25 times better than a $10 bottle? Not likely, but there are plenty of takers for it. Is it worth almost $90M to run for governor of California­? It was to Meg Whitman, who lost. How about $175K for a restored '57 Chevy?

Just because you see no or little value in something doesn't mean it isn't worth the asking price to someone else and the fact you don't understand what drives the art market doesn't mean it's a scam. I wouldn't pay pennies on the dollar for anything by Jeff Koontz, but he's made a fortune off of what many people wouldn't want if it was given to them.

Steve Martin, by the way is not a novice art collector. Getting taken by forgers is a hazard of collecting­. Some very famous museums have been victims of frauds involving paintings and antiquitie­s, among other things. Last year, someone was peddling what they claimed was a lost collection of Ansel Adams photos, but were most likely taken by someone else in his style.
photo
Tigerama
Proud Non-Holder of a Wisconsin State ID
11:13 PM on 6/01/2011
All I could see were snotty wavy lines of pretension coming off your post.
12:03 AM on 6/02/2011
A free market is where a buyer and seller agree on what something is worth. No one else matters.
photo
Victoria-nola
There is no way to peace; peace is the way.--Muste
12:48 AM on 6/02/2011
huh?
photo
Harbinger08
You have the right to remain silent
04:50 PM on 6/02/2011
LOL @ tigerama for snottily and pretentiou­sly criticizin­g his betters. Better than a pratfall!
5 minutes ago (4:18 AM)
It is a pity that all a lot of people think of when art is mentioned is pretension­. The snottiness­, however, seems to come from you.
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
11:01 PM on 6/01/2011
That's what happens when you price art acording to the signature in a corner instead of the art's intrinsic qualities. I had a coworker go on an extended rant about Jackson Pollock just a couple days ago. Me, I can appreciate Pollock's vision, but it certainly ain't worth $140 million (the selling price for "No.5, 1948")
photo
Tigerama
Proud Non-Holder of a Wisconsin State ID
11:13 PM on 6/01/2011
My husband made a near perfect Pollack recreation that I proudly hang in our living room. Note I said "recreatio­n" - it's spattered paint on canvas. I don't care if an actual drunk person did it or not.
09:27 AM on 6/02/2011
Pollack's paintings were spattered paint on canvas. Your husband may be more talented than you know!!
10:28 PM on 6/01/2011
I think the real story here is the epic Moose antlers backdrop on his file photo
10:22 PM on 6/01/2011
After seeing the legit work of this artist, the forgery is far to slick and skilled. I think Martin trusted his dealers and the bogus provenance instead of his own eye.
09:48 PM on 6/01/2011
he should just go away.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheHandyman
Death...the last new experience you will ever have
11:57 PM on 6/01/2011
Why don't you show him the way?
photo
GraphicMatt
Somebody make me a sandwich!
10:15 AM on 6/02/2011
Why?