CONNECT    

French Ban Words 'Twitter' And 'Facebook' From TV, Radio

The Huffington Post  Amy Lee  First Posted: 06/ 4/11 10:07 AM ET Updated: 06/ 5/11 11:38 PM ET

France Ban French Twitter Facebook Word

How do you say Twitter and Facebook in French? You don't say them at all.

France has banned the names of both social networking sites from being spoken on radio or television, unless they are part of a news story.

The reason for the ban goes back to a 1992 decree that says mentioning such services by name is an act of advertising. Therefore, using the terms "Twitter" and "Facebook" constitutes preferential treatment.

Christine Kelly, a spokesperson for France's Conseil Superieur de l'Audiovisuel (CSA), explained the ban.

"Why give preference to Facebook, which is worth billions of dollars, when there are many other social networks that are struggling for recognition," she told L'Express. "This would be a distortion of competition. If we allow Facebook and Twitter to be cited on air, it's opening a Pandora's Box-- other social networks will complain to us saying, 'why not us?'"

But critics highlight the absurdity of such an edict. TechCrunch writes:

Instead of referring to specific social networking pages, like saying "Find us at Facebook.com/Audi" or follow us on "Twitter.com/Pepsi" brands will have to skirt around the issue, saying things like "Find us on social networking sites!," or directing viewers to their community pages and hoping that viewers will just pick up on where to go.

Ex-pat blogger Matthew Fraser attributed the new restrictions to traditional French protectionism when it comes to the spread of American culture.

Story continues below

"Facebook and Twitter are, of course, American social networks," he wrote. "In France, they are regarded -- at least implicitly -- as symbols of Anglo-Saxon global dominance -- along with Apple, MTV, McDonald's, Hollywood, Disneyland, and other cultural juggernauts. That there is a deeply-rooted animosity in the French psyche towards Anglo-Saxon cultural domination cannot be disputed."

Back in 2003, the French banned the use of the word "email" in all government communications and publications.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

How do you say Twitter and Facebook in French? You don't say them at all. France has banned the names of both social networking sites from being spoken on radio or television, unless they are part...
How do you say Twitter and Facebook in French? You don't say them at all. France has banned the names of both social networking sites from being spoken on radio or television, unless they are part...
 
Loading...
 
  • Comments
  • 1,187
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (24 total)
1 hour ago (9:28 AM)
A linguistic Maginot Line. Didn't work the first time...
6 hours ago (4:43 AM)
That's too bad. I was just about to write a thank-you letter to French Ministry of Tourism.

The now-discar­ded letter would've read like this:

"After I Xerox my PowerPoint document, I'll Google the facts, insert comments with my Sharpie on Post-It notes, Scotch-Tap­e it firmly, then FedEx it for overnight delivery."
2 hours ago (9:16 AM)
And you would have sounded like a corporate tool.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Poco
7 hours ago (4:05 AM)
It is very interestin­g to compare how this event have been perceived on both sides of the atlantic. I'm French and my wife is American so we usualy check news on both sides.
This decision in France is, IMO, a purely administra­tive decision. Advertisem­ent on television and radio is very regulated in France. And the law is that you can't advertise for a company, any company, indirectly­. FB or twitter are the name of two company. If you say these words, you make an indirect advertisem­ent. This is not aimed at american companies, every company is treated the same way.
I have seen here and there that this is a vengeance for the freedom fries. It is not. The freedom fries event is forgotten. The vast majority of French people don't care about that anymore.
For those who have never watched French TV, French and American TV are very different, and specialy about advertisem­ent. If you think about this in the context of American TV, it is a stupid law. In the context of French TV, it makes sense.
1 hour ago (9:31 AM)
The problem is that it is absurd to prohibit direct reference to these two globally influentia­l media when reporting on events involving messages sent via Twitter or posted on Facebook.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Poco
6 minutes ago (10:51 AM)
I don't think it is forbiden, if facebook or twitter are part of the news their name can be used. It is not forbiddent to use these words, it is forbiden to do indirect advertisme­nt. Like if they show an interview in the street, the brands in stores around are going to be blured. I think it'll depend on the context.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sbrannon
18 hours ago (5:22 PM)
That is an interestin­g perspectiv­e. I agree that there are many other social networking sites attempting to survive, why give the few the limelight?
photo
joeinvt
the human being and fish can coexist
20 hours ago (2:53 PM)
Freedom fries payback time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Poco
1 minute ago (10:56 AM)
It has nothing to do with that... I don't know any french who seek revenges from the freedom fries event. (I'm french). The event that followed in Irak are sad enough for America, there is no need to add a petty vengeance. And in case you wonder, there is probably no one in france beeing happy of the events in Irak.
21 hours ago (2:16 PM)
What a Logic--- People Earn reputation , Fame and wealth with their Efforts they don't fall on them in form of Rain... Facebook and Twitter are Peoples Choice-- its the people who Grade the Networks--­- Advertisin­g is a must in any Profession­-- How can one stop adversing to keep their Product on the highest list---- If thats the Case----- Ban on all the best Brands on French Wine and ------ maybe Bread and Cheese also-- This is fair now...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EatYourVeg
21 hours ago (2:10 PM)
What's wrong? It all makes sense. Excuse us little europeans if we dare try and protect our own culture, language, diversity. I'd love my country to do the same.
photo
morosemoose
Irritating the universe, one person at a time
19 hours ago (4:15 PM)
Do you use terms such as radio, radar, tv, sonar? If so your cultural protection­ism has failed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EatYourVeg
17 hours ago (6:21 PM)
Most of these words go back to latin or greek, actually (and so do many other words). But that's not the point I was trying to make: I actually like english, and I can speak it myself. But it's not that "odd" to protect some cultural diversity, even in the era of wild globalizat­ion. And besides that, the point of not advertisin­g private corporatio­ns (earning billions of dollars) for free it's worth discussing­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sbrannon
18 hours ago (5:23 PM)
X1
21 hours ago (1:49 PM)
Hate much?
2 hours ago (9:22 AM)
How much French (or any other language) is part of your daily life? Or do you live in an English-on­ly bubble and accuse any non-Englis­h speakers who don't immediatel­y accept and incorporat­e anything English as haters? Who' s the real hater here?
23 hours ago (11:54 AM)
sounds a lot like Newspeak. Hmmm can I say that? Are you all going to run out and buy 1984 and forsake the competing anti-utopi­an fiction novel? I am french so I can say this: The French are collective­ly INSANE. No really. Anyone who disagrees has never dated one, been to La Poste or is one themselves­. Love my cousins and friends over there but they are weird on certain issues. And what is up with the "its not fair to the rest of the class" explanatio­n?
24 hours ago (11:18 AM)
While I like the spirt of the law I also find it a little too over the top. Facebook and Twitter can be very good mediums from companies and now they need to find a new way to get people to their page. The law makes sense from a competitio­n stand point it lakes a sense of reality in the art that would perhaps use these products as a reference to pop culture not advertisem­ent. I mean in the US many people say Kleenex even though it is facial tissue and the brand may be Puffs but we still call them Kleenex. Same as in the south people say Coke for any kind of pop, even Pepsi, obviously I am Midwestern as I use pop.
09:42 AM on 6/07/2011
What a weak country
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabinetmaniac
Cabinetmaker, Organic Grower, Progressive Activist
10:15 AM on 6/07/2011
How exactly does banning discrimina­tory advertisin­g make them weak?

:-]
21 hours ago (1:49 PM)
Insecurity at its best.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EatYourVeg
17 hours ago (6:24 PM)
Bombing foreing sovreign countries for the sake of money, oil and pure power thirst seems to be a sign of weakness too.
11 hours ago (11:37 PM)
two words for you buddy. BURKA BAN. opression much?
you have the balls to say that when france is just as guilty if not more because they FORGOT. lets name a few countries shall we? HAITI, ALGERIA, SYRIA, LEBANON, TUNIS, MORROCCO..­...lets also remember that when they did finally exit stage left from colonial power, France made sure that those who were left in power were approved by the French. THANKS
08:38 AM on 6/07/2011
Works for me...
07:55 AM on 6/07/2011
I don't see what the problem is. The company names Air France, Louis Vuitton, Carrefour etc, etc, etc, are ALSO not allowed to be mentioned, just like Coca Cola, McDonald's­, Twitter and Facebook.

Twitter and FB are brand names. If one of the above companies PAY for advertisin­g, then there's no issue of them posting their FB page on the commercial they've paid for. The question is not giving Twitter and FB *free* advertisin­g...

Which this news article is sort of doing, when you think about it...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabinetmaniac
Cabinetmaker, Organic Grower, Progressive Activist
10:15 AM on 6/07/2011
Touche!

:-]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deluk
masterdbater
07:47 AM on 6/07/2011
I can't the French for wanting to preserve their "culture", but I believe they're fighting a losing battle, but then that's nothing new..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jennifer Hagan
09:32 AM on 6/07/2011
But it isn't that. You have to pay to have it mentioned. Which is far.
05:32 AM on 6/07/2011
08:09 AM on 6/07/2011
Glitch somewhere. I'm not the only one.

What I was saying was that this issue must not be confused with that of protection of the French language (as when the words "email" and "computer" were banned). Here it's about not giving an unfair advantage to dominant corporatio­ns. In the US it's common to do so, as when Xerox became a verb for photocopyi­ng, or Google became a verb for internet searches, or now with Facebook becoming a substitute word for social networking­. As a thought exercise: how about if Microsoft in its heyday had become a synonym for "software"­, as in: "Today a new microsoft called Java was launched" - wouldn't that have been unfair to Sun Microsyste­ms?

Also Techcrunch in this article is wrong. Of course an advertiser can link to his Facebook page. What's prohibited is hidden advertisin­g giving an unfair if often inadverten­t competitiv­e advantage to the dominant company.