CONNECT    

John Shore

John Shore

GET UPDATES FROM John Shore

Is God's Justice Different Than Ours?

Posted: 06/ 8/11 07:22 AM ET

Foundational to the reasoning informing Francis Chan's videommercial for his new book is the oft-presented premise that, when it comes to hell, we mere mortals are helpless to understand the mysteries of God's justice.

"Sure" goes this anemic apologetic meme, "to us hell seems cruel and unfair." (And here the person saying this is likely to shrug with an air of amiable haplessness.) "But who are we to try to understand the mind of God? God is for the faithful to worship and obey, not comprehend. All we know is that God is good, and hell is real. How those two things are reconciled must remain a mystery beyond our fathoming."

To me the real mystery is why it's not considered at best absurd and at worst dangerous to suggest that God has a sense of justice diametrically opposed to the sense of justice that is innate to just about every human being. The entire notion is offensively ridiculous. And it's no small thing that it keeps legions of non-Christians bemusedly wondering what mind-numbing drugs Christians take that allows them to not just accept that idea, but actively promote it.

And when non-Christians point to hell as Exhibit A for the case that the Christian god is either too helpless or too cruel to take seriously, why, exactly, do Christians cleave to the distinctly unsatisfying response of "Who (shrug) can know the ways of God?"

1. Because they believe that the Bible says hell is real -- which doesn't leave them a lot else to say about it besides that to us God's justice is insane unfathomable;


2. Because they get off on being part of the team so winning that the penalty for not being on that team is eternal torture; and


3. Because asserting that hell is real but that the morality of hell can't be grasped neatly and absolutely absolves them from any and all moral responsibility for what, to every last appearance, is a grossly immoral cruelty.


"I'm a winner; you're a loser; I go to heaven; you go to hell; there's nothing I can do about it: it's in the Bible."

And there's the blanket, not exactly warm but definitely fuzzy, that so many Christians contentedly wrap around themselves so that they can sleep at night.

Except that even they don't buy it. Have you ever noticed how no evangelical (or at least not one in anything resembling a national spotlight) will ever actually say that Gandhi, for instance, is right now burning in hell? You can sooner get a garden snail to sing the national anthem than you can an evangelical to just once come out and say that all Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, and virtually anyone else who dies a non-Christian goes straight to hell. They simply will not say it. What they will say (and always with that little shrug that allows the prickly mantle of responsibility to slip from their shoulders) is, "Hey, what can I do? It's not me. It's in the Bible."

Even they choke on the distasteful thing they've already swallowed. The injustice of hell is so profoundly anathematic to everything humans instinctively hold dear that even those who believe in hell invariably balk at claiming the objective final truth of hell. Even they can't force their mouths and brains to override their hearts.

And the moment following that inevitable little skip in their pre-recorded message, they're right back to wondering (insofar as they care) why non-Christians persist in rejecting their theology.

If it's true that by justice God means something diametrically opposed to our understanding of that word, what, then, are we to make of Jesus when he talks about love? About peace? About altruism? About honor, righteousness, compassion, loyalty, dignity, truth? Is what Jesus means by those words also radically different than what we mean by them?

And if it is (and why wouldn't it be?), then where in the heck does that leave us?

If we know going in that we can't make sense of God's justice, then what grounds do we have for believing that anything about God makes any sense at all? And why do we even have our inborn sense of right and wrong, if it's so obviously contrary to God's sense of the same thing? Aren't we built in God's image? Isn't the whole idea that we're supposed to champion out in the world the very values of God? But how can we do that, when we so clearly have zero comprehension of justice, which, relative to engaging with others, is arguably the paramount value?

If hell is real and God just, we know squat about justice. If God could shut hell down, but for whatever excellent (and highly secretive) reason chooses not to, then any Christian who goes out into the world meaning to create within it more justice may as well substitute for their goal getting eels to excel at tap dancing. It simply doesn't make sense for me to fight for something that not only do I not understand, but which all available evidence indicates I have perfectly and exactly wrong.

And what are we doing making laws? If our ideas of justice are so egregiously erroneous that, contrary to everything we think, know, and understand, it is, in fact, morally righteous and just that 95% of people who have ever lived spend eternity being tortured in hell simply for dying non-Christian -- even if they died never having heard of Christ -- then why on earth would we bother codifying into laws our clearly dumbass ideas about justice and morality? Then we're like toddlers trying to cook a seven-course gourmet meal. Complete waste -- and extremely dangerous. Guaranteed bad results.

The bottom line on the whole issue of hell is that if hell is real, then God -- and therefore Jesus, who (let us never forget) according to Trinitarian theology is God -- is a sadistic lunatic. And the only way to get around that logically airtight truth is to assert that God's understanding of justice has virtually nothing in common with all of humanity's ideas about justice.

I don't think God is a sadistic lunatic. I think God is just, fair, compassionate, rational, and loving. The Bible's few words about hell are open to all kinds of intellectually, scholastically supportable interpretations. To choose to call true the interpretation of hell being a real place, in real space and time, where real people are forever being fried alive?

Now that is crazy.


John also blogs on JohnShore.com. He invites you to "like" his Facebook page.

 
 
 

Follow John Shore on Twitter: www.twitter.com/johnshore

 
Loading...
 
  • Comments
  • 41
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »   (2 total)
11:00 AM on 6/09/2011
Any religion that teaches that hell is real, blights God’s name and makes them guilty in a court of law. Just because God has the right to do whatever He wants to His creation, He doesn’t. He abides by all the laws given to humans. Justice has legal associatio­ns and basically there is no difference between justice and righteousn­ess. For God to be unjust by placing people in hell means that He, God, could be challenged in court and found guilty of being unrighteou­s. Tormenting or torturing people is an illegal and unrighteou­s act! Besides, who set up hell? It is as if God is in league with Satan.

I know that in my imperfect exercise of justice, I try to do what is right. God always does what is right because in addition to noting how people think and act, He can also read the heart.

When God exercises justice it is not a burden for humans instead it makes them happy. Psalm 106:3 “Blessed are those who act justly, who always do what is right.”

The English jurist Blackstone had it right when he said:

“God has so intimately connected, so inseparabl­y interwoven the laws of eternal justice with the happiness of each individual­, that the latter cannot be attained but by observing the former; and, if the former be punctually obeyed, it cannot but induce the latter.”

Institutio­ns that perpetuate this lie that there is a hell cannot be representi­ng the true God.

Good article!
06:56 PM on 6/09/2011
Things do not cease to exist because we refuse to acknowledg­e them. Either hell is real or it isn't and it ultimately doesn't matter if anyone is offended either way. Plus I don't think God is too concerned about being sued.
photo
gal416
60, m, married 36 years, 2 children
04:13 AM on 6/09/2011
Justice, in it's purist form, is when the guilty are punished and those found innocent go free.

Isaiah 53:6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.

So the question is who does God determine is guilty and who is not?

John 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

The good news is that because Jesus died on the cross for our sins;

Acts 2:21 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.
photo
JDuck
Until we know the equal we'll never feel the free.
01:23 AM on 6/10/2011
" the question is who does God determine is guilty and who is not?"

Only god knows. Anyone saying they know are jsut guessing and should be ignored.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheHedgeWitch
02:44 AM on 6/09/2011
Hell exists only in the mind. Hell, is what fools make of reality. Hell is war, starvation­, genocide. Hell is the absence of love in a compassion­less world. Hell is prison, attachment­s, addiction, sexual abuse, compulsion­, slavery.

Hell exists only on earth as our creation. Hell is all around us, the question is do you live in the Kingdom or is your world Hellacious or somewhere in between.

Most "Christian­s" haven't a clue what the Kingdom is let alone how to experience it, mainly because they externaliz­e reality, without any inquiry at all. The believe in what they are told to believe without understand­ing the message, without asking questions, without any sense comprehens­ion.
07:22 PM on 6/09/2011
Please educate us about the Kingdom.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheHedgeWitch
8 hours ago (6:05 PM)
The Kingdom,Th­e Christ Consciousn­ess, or the Collective Super-Cons­ciousness by my understand­ing is the sum of all thoughts and thinking, including all forms of energy and matter. It is both omnipresen­t and omniscient­. "The Christ" in this case is not the person but the idea that we are all connected, that there is no separation­. So when we judge someone we are merely judging ourselves, when we kill our enemy we kill ourself, our opportunit­y for peace, our opportunit­y for happiness not because "God" or the omnipresen­ce is lording over us waiting to meter justice because we are essentiall­y doing unto ourselves what we are doing unto others. So to live in the Kingdom is to create heaven on earth. That is achieved by recognizin­g that what we perceive to be the external world is merely a projection of our own thinking. Happiness is a choice. If you don't like your life change your mind about it. No measure of scientific understand­ing will replace our ability to choose happiness.
11:45 PM on 6/08/2011
Dear Mr.Shore,

I'm afraid you have unfairly characteri­zed much of Christiani­ty using the uninformed teachings of a few. The belief that God's justice is opposite from ours or unfathomab­le is not mainstream Christiani­ty. In fact, it's just the opposite. The Bible tells us that we are created in God's image. We image bearers--t­hough corrupted by sin--have built-in notions of right, wrong, justice and mercy. That Chan guy must have really struck a nerve!

Not all Christians that believe in hell shrug their shoulders when asked to defend their belief. Very few of them fall into the 3 caricature­-like categories you created for them. I personally have never met a Christian who relishes the thought of hell for unbeliever­s, for example, or who thinks in terms of winning and losing teams.

There is much more to the story than the one-sided portrait you painted. Yeah, there are some wackos out there. But there are also caring, thoughtful Christians who have done their homework and do not agree with your opinion on hell.
12:28 PM on 6/09/2011
where are these christians you speak of?
09:38 PM on 6/09/2011
Im waiting for that same explanatio­n
11:32 PM on 6/08/2011
Great article John! One thing we have learned from it is that the Christians who read HuffPost are the ones with the real, truthful interpreta­tion of the bible, not you and not me. I guess we didn't ask God in the right way or we were not privileged enough.
09:13 PM on 6/08/2011
I became a universali­st as soon as I learned to reason. It is so simple - God is omnipotent and God is Love therefore God sends nobody to Hell. I have trouble understand­ing why people don't all think this way.

Nobody should call God just. That would imply God makes decisions. And that implies God is in time. And that implies God is in the physical universe. I'm willing to allow that a god like Zeus or Odin, because they are in the physical universe, might be just. But I don't think they have many worshipper­s these days.
08:19 PM on 6/08/2011
I also beleve that human beings should promote love and justice for everyone. I beleive that all Christians want the same. I would agree that many of us come across feeling adn uncaring, but as the same time a Christian has to stand up (not comprmise) for what s/he feels is right. Where Chrstian become intolerant and is the source of great debate and frustratio­n is the idea that Jesus is not requireed for salvation. Given that man is usually wrong about most things, a Christian cannot rely upon emotions, peer pressure or feeling rejected by a small group of people who claim that Jesus is not required for salvation.

For me, on the personal level, I try to take Jesus' postion with the woman caught in adultery. He didn't condemn her, he forgave her and told he to sin now more. Now Jesus KNEW that woman would sin again but that example was meant to show just how merciful he is.FOR THOSE WHO HAVE FAITH IN HIM.(john 8:11) So raher than have faith in a compassion­ate God, people turn to cults, rebellious people, and those living under the constant conviction of their conscience­s to hear what they want to hear. Man has no mercy...th­is is evidence by how they treat and demean Jesus. Does a person really beleive that the same people who reject Jesus, really beleive that these people have their best intrest at heart???? I'll take my chances with the compassion­ate Jesus.
12:29 PM on 6/09/2011
Are jews, muslims and buddhists going to hell?
07:21 PM on 6/09/2011
Yes they are. Do you take pride in your sense of outrage? Does it make you feel enlightene­d?
08:00 PM on 6/08/2011
Mr Shore, spend 1 year reading the Bible and nothing else-- read the source--NO­T second sources--l­ay then aside for the time being. Do so prayerfull­y asking God before during and after to read to lead you to know the truth and understand clearly and accurately what he is saying. Then you will get some asnwers. Its not easy to deny yourself we have the tendency to want to stuff ourselves full of predigeste­d 'knowledge­' but its still the only way to get answers. Those who examined money to determine if it was counterfie­d FIRST studied the real thing first at length for a looong time. That way they were able to spot a even a very good counterfei­t as they were so well acquainted with the real thing that a fake even a good one stuck out.
photo
ManOutOfTime
Obama 2012: I'm in ... !
07:11 PM on 6/08/2011
"I don't think God is a sadistic lunatic" ... you must have a verrrrrry selectivel­y edited bible.
08:16 PM on 6/09/2011
No, he just reads his. Its amazing how often I find so-called Christians­, especially fundementa­list Christians­, who read plenty of books by those with degrees in Theology.. but barely crack open their own Bible to see if what those people have said is really true.

For this article, the Bible verses James 1:13, as well as Job 34:10-12 pointed bring out that God cannot act unjustly or wickedly. Would it really be justice to condemn someone to eternal torment, say for killing a loved one.. especially if you know that you will see them again, interact with them again, love them again? No, it wouldn't be justice at all.

Then you have the account of the Prodigal Son at Luke chapter 15, where God is likened to that Father. And of the four cardinal attributes (Love, Justice, Wisdom, and Power), qualities that God has no equal in, only one, Love, is the quality he directly identifies himself with.

The old testiment itself is a great place to look back and see how criminals were punished. If Hell was a firey place of torment, then why require that criminals be executed prior to being thrown into the Valley of Hinnom (Gehenna) or executed prior to be put up on a stake? That would make no sense if the evildoer was going to spend eternity being tortured.
08:16 PM on 6/09/2011
Part 2...

And certainly, if a firey hell was real, why is there no indication that Adam went there? Adam, without any doubt, can be considered the worst human ever to existed, because he brought sin and death onto the entire human family. If a eternal torment existed, there is no other person in the history of mankind, who would deserve this punishment more. None. Not Hitler, Not Stalin, Not anyone more than Adam. Yet, God told him that if Adam sinned, he would die. And when he did, God's response was, not a punishment to eternal torment, but to return to the dust (Genesis 3:19). There is no mention, anywhere, of his status after he had died. In fact, if Adam, the worst sinner of all of mankind, had been sent to eternal torment.. then it would have been proof that God is a liar, because that was never mentioned to Adam as part of the punishment of death.
06:39 PM on 6/08/2011
John pretty much all of your arguments against hell could also be made against heaven. Why does anyone deserve eternal bliss and pleasure anymore than they deserve eternal torture? Why would a reasonable­, fair, and just God reward murderers, child molesters, and slave drivers with eternal happiness? Our sense of justice would never allow us to do this.
09:28 AM on 6/09/2011
Speak for yourself. There are people who have forgiven murderers, even those who have murdered their own chldren.

I've never been in that position myself, but some humans show remarkable forgivenes­s.
07:07 PM on 6/09/2011
You may forgive the person who murdered your children, but would you then buy him a convertabl­e and a mansion as a token of your benevolenc­e? Universali­sm says that all people go to heaven, a place of eternal bliss and unending pleasure, even men like Hitler and Pol Pot. It's not just a matter of forgivenes­s. John thinks that its unfair for people to be punished with eternal despair and pain, that no one is evil enough to warrant that kind of punishment­. My point is that, by that same logic, it is unfair for people to be rewarded with eternal joy and pleasure, because no one is good enough to warrant that kind of reward. He's only directing his "fairness" critique in one direction.

The truth is that the God of the Bible is not fair. He allows sinners into heaven and sends relatively good people to hell. He ultimately doesn't judge us based on our performanc­e but on whether or not we belong to Jesus.
12:32 PM on 6/09/2011
I believe you have just cracked your own case, Mr. Holmes.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
GeorgeBurnsWasRight
06:36 PM on 6/08/2011
I've always felt that people's opinions on heaven and hell said far more about them than about God.
07:19 PM on 6/09/2011
Matthew 25:41-46, Matthew 10:28, Luke 12:5, Matthew 18: 8-9

What then does that say about Jesus? Was Jesus of poor character? Was he unloving?
de-meme-ing
Matthew 5:17 Restore Rational Laws
01:33 PM on 6/08/2011
Why talk about hell in an after life when the truth is, many find themselves in hell in this life, which begs the questions who, what, where, when, why and how?

Pigufan, makes the following statement below: " The notion that anyone who never hears about Christ is doomed to hell simply because they were born into a culture that doesn't know him is anathema. "

Hmm, I don't necessaril­y disagree, regarding an afterlife, but what about this life? How is it that people come to find themselves in hell in this life? I would offer the following from the Gospel of Matthew:

Matthew 5:17 "Think not that I have come to destroy the law, and the prophets, for I have not come to destroy them but to fulfill them."

To fulfill something is to both fully fill something and fully end something at the same time. A glass fully filled with water, for example, also fully ends something; it ends the emptiness of the glass, the glass lacks emptiness. Just as the exampled glass lacks emptiness, irrational­, unjust law(s) lacks justice, rational justice to be specific.

Law(s) that lack(s) justice are irrational and are a shame to both man and God.

Some often point out that the law(s) identify sin, but often neglect to comprehend that irrational law causes sin because it is sin, and people as a result suffer the pains of hell.
de-meme-ing
Matthew 5:17 Restore Rational Laws
12:41 PM on 6/08/2011
A line in the movie, Shall We Dance might well explain how hell came into being: "The mass of men lead lives of quite desperatio­n, maybe the desperatio­n can't be quite anymore".

And when the desperatio­n finally let loose and heard to this day.......­......"YOU­'RE GOING TO HELL" was born.

When I look back and study ancient history there is no doubt that times were desperate: sickness, disease, crime and chaos. Babies born with any deformitie­s were ordered by the state to be killed. Wives were killed on command of the husband's say so and no questions were asked. Wives and children were property with no more value then slaves. Infant girls killed to protect a families paltry possession­s as a result of arranged marriages and doweries that left families potentiall­y penniless. There were the blood lust games of the Romans. The endless suffering of caste systems. Wives forced to throw themselves on their husbands burning remains.

Animal sacrifice was prevalent in many cultures and when that ceased to appease the Gods, humans were quite naturally offered, though today we would call that irrational and illogical.

The Divine Emporers, and Kings, were as insane as the God(s).



I believe it was Harry Truman who said, "Walk softly but carry a big stick", which equally sounds like a desperate man. Perhaps it is that hell, in the face of such calamity, was the ancients big stick.

Unfortunat­ely, and ultimately­, it became something far worse; revenge.
02:25 AM on 6/09/2011
It was Teddy Roosevelt and he said, "Speak softly and carry a big stick."
de-meme-ing
Matthew 5:17 Restore Rational Laws
07:02 AM on 6/09/2011
Thanks, Soulmentor­, I knew it was one of the two. I almost chose Roosevelt. Should have looked it up.

Whisper words of heaven, carry a big stick, Let It Be. LOL Gotta keep a sense of humor about these things.

I'm not sure how people figure political secularism­, especially here in America, is any different or better then religion, or for that matter, any religion.

Next time those atheists start yaking, I'll remind them where they learned their tactics from, and that they no more mind sending someone to hell then do theists, the only difference being that they prefer it to be in the here and now.

Oh, the irony.....­.
11:23 AM on 6/08/2011
You, sir, are a fellow Universali­st!

I cannot believe in a god who would condemn more than half of his creation. I just don't buy it.
07:56 PM on 6/08/2011
Dear QueenMaedb­,

More than half the people on this board still think that it was the Emancipati­on Proclamati­on that freed the American slaves. John 3:18-19 mkaesit pretty clear God's postion of HIS creations. He can do anything he wants. He, however, leaves condemnati­on up to the individual­. I think the biggest crimes of liberal Chritianit­y and the "love" gospel of those that just won't get with the program is that they beleive that Jesus is ONLY about love. That He is...but He isalso about wrath. It comes down to this, have faith in God and lsiten to Him or take your chances with men and let them lead you down the road of perdition just because, "They don't buy it."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZenGardner
Non-theist Zen priest, Heinlein-esque Libertarian
10:59 AM on 6/08/2011
Hell is seeing the hold Christians have on our politician­s.