CONNECT    

The Rev. Dr. Jacqueline J. Lewis

The Rev. Dr. Jacqueline J. Lewis

GET UPDATES FROM The Rev. Dr. Jacqueline J. Lewis
 

Love Will Make A Way: The Intersections of Interracial and Same Sex Marriage

Posted: 06/ 8/11 07:38 AM ET

My parents wrestled with the idea of me marrying my partner. The sanctuary was packed but my father didn't come. Dad was brought up in the Deep South and my husband looked like the people who had practiced the nauseating hatred of Jim Crow in my father's hometown. News of the support of our union, and the tremendous standing ovation the congregation gave us, traveled back to my dad. The testimony of the ones he sent -- my mom and my brothers -- was that our love was beloved; this coupling, no matter our race, was a cause of rejoicing. It was the beginning of my dad's change of heart; God and God's people blessed us. He now thinks we are the best couple; the work we do together on racial reconciliation here and in South Africa is some of our most important work. Our unusual pairing is for my dad a sign that we are all beloved of God, no matter who we love, no matter what we do.

As a woman in an interracial marriage and as a senior pastor of a church, I think it is essential that we stand up for the rights of all people to marry. It is important to make our voices heard by our legislators in New York before June 20, as lawmakers will most likely vote this June about whether we will have marriage equality for gay and lesbian couples in New York State. Straight allies and Christians need to write, march, and call for justice alongside our gay brothers and sisters.

Before 1967, my marriage would have been illegal in most of the United States. Chief Justice Earl Warren and the nine other Supreme Court justices ruled unanimously in a landmark case, Loving v. Virginia, that "Marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man,' fundamental to our very existence and survival ... Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State."

My 72- and 76-year-old parents could not help but first experience our marriage through the skeptical eyes of their generation. Of course they questioned interracial love as they, in the very belly of their deeply brown bodies, remembered the bitter bile of Mississippi racism. Now, they love the way John and I love each other. For my parents, our marriage legitimizes, sanctifies, and celebrates our love and the unique wonder of God's good creation. "You and John chase away the blues of racism, just by being you," my parents say.

Even though we were both divorced, even though in the eyes of some churches our love is not sanctioned, we had the right to marry in our church and in the eyes of the law. Through happy tears, John shared his poem in which the "angels tapped their wings to the beat of our love;" I sang to him "The Nearness of You". Even though our marriage would have been illegal in Alabama up until 2000, we are married, and we have all of the rights, the responsibilities, and the joys that come with this publicly acknowledged partnership. Every person deserves this right.

Hatred and fear are often justified by things we project onto God. The Church gets pulled into giving God bad publicity. Parts of the church read the Bible with a literalism that is simply not appropriate. Not marrying part of God's creation that happens to be Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, or Transgender means we are not welcoming. Period. Jesus' preaching came down to these three edicts: love God, love neighbor, love self. That is what matters. And that should keep us busy!

I think it is wonderful that the Supreme Court's decision to uphold marriage as one of the "vital personal rights" protected under the 14th Amendment happens in a case called Loving v. Virginia.

Loving among two consenting adults that want to make a life-long commitment to one another must be recognized as a vital personal right, protected under the law, one that should be blessed and honored by the Church.

On Friday June 10, at 7:00 pm, my church is hosting a Renewal of Vows, Commitment Ceremony and Concert. We will bear witness as gay and straight couples renew vows and make new vows in our sanctuary. There will be wedding cake and a chance to sign onto working for marriage equality. This straight Black clergywoman, an ally and activist, is requesting the honor of your presence. Please stand with us for equal rights for all of God's children. Hear the music, celebrate your love, and take action towards marriage equality in New York.

Stand with God and in community in our sanctuary on June 10 for everyone's right to marry, and follow the political campaign online through New Yorkers United for Marriage, a coalition which includes Freedom to Marry, Marriage Equality New York, Empire State Pride Agenda, Human Rights Campaign, and the Log Cabin Republicans.

The church has not shown leadership for marriage equality, and younger generations especially are taking note of what we do, and what we stand for, in God's name. In a recent report released by The Middle Project, conducted by Public Religion Research Institute, "Doing Church and Doing Justice: A Portrait of Millennials at Middle Church," both straight and gay respondents described LGBT rights as being "a symbolic defining issue for their politics and a primary lens through which they evaluate religious institutions." It is our role as clergy and as Christians to preach about and work toward marriage equality for each child of God.

No matter whom you love, you are welcome to our sanctuary to renew or make your commitment. I hope you will join us on June 10. John and I will be there, once again celebrating our love with the angels tapping their wings, glad to be near each other, hoping to celebrate your love as well.


Dr. Jacqui Lewis is Senior Minister at Middle Collegiate Church and Executive Director of The Middle Project, a leadership training institute for progressive people of faith.

 
My parents wrestled with the idea of me marrying my partner. The sanctuary was packed but my father didn't come. Dad was brought up in the Deep South and my husband looked like the people who had prac...
My parents wrestled with the idea of me marrying my partner. The sanctuary was packed but my father didn't come. Dad was brought up in the Deep South and my husband looked like the people who had prac...
 
  • Comments
  • 583
  • Pending Comments
  • 8
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (6 total)
39 minutes ago (8:01 PM)
The government should not be in the position of forcing a miniscule minority's sexual practices on the populace as normal, regardless if it is framed under the guise of marriage or equal rights.
53 minutes ago (7:48 PM)
One thing I have never understand is why so many African Americans are opposed to marriage for homosexual­s. The claims they are making about why they oppose this marriage was used against African Americans themselves and why they couldn't marry outside their own race. Its amazing how a people could go through so much discrimina­tion, oppression and suffering and then turn around and commit the same discrimina­tion and oppression against others.

I'm glad that many prominent African American leaders have came out in support of same sex marriage and unions. Eventually­, marriage for homosexual­s will certainly be legal, its just unfortunat­e and sad that we have to perpetuate this discrimina­tion in the mean time.
1 hour ago (7:20 PM)
Ha! What could be more unnatural that the catholic church. Men who wear dresses and abuse little kids - cover it all up - and then tell the rest of us how to live.

It may have worked hundreds of years ago, but we have prisons for people like this now.
2 hours ago (6:57 PM)
Thank you, Dr. Lewis, for telling us your story and making the salient point about marriage.
2 hours ago (6:51 PM)
AMEN.
2 hours ago (6:44 PM)
Love. It's something you can give freely to anyone for any reason. Sadly enough, some people want to say that certain love should be denied/ban­ned/meanin­gless. No matter what you think, each person should be able to choose what's right for them. As for those people who believe certain types of people should be denied the right to marry and that it destroys the 'sanctity of marriage'.­.. the bonding of a couple has been around a lot longer than what your idea of marriage is. I won't even attempt to go into how separation of church and state should come to play here.
2 hours ago (6:29 PM)
Thank you for a warm and meaningful story. The thing that everyone has to remember is that love is love. It comes down to something as simple as that.
42 minutes ago (7:58 PM)
Marriage with government consent is a legal contract having nothing to do with the ethereal emotion of love.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jinjinpinti
3 hours ago (5:13 PM)
Got no issues with the "interraci­al" or "same sex" part. It's the whole concept of the word
"marriage,­" ie., perpetuati­ng a relationsh­ip by legal contract and/or religious sanction/ government permission that bothers me. I prefer my love like my eggs, freerange and organic.
photo
bryanzth
Honest to Goodness USA Patriot!
3 hours ago (6:07 PM)
Yes, I know people of your observatio­n, too. GLBTIQ people, as it happens. Well, there is an arc from (I presume) everyone MUST MARRY all the way to like yours no one should marry, and let it all be organic and free and so on. And then, one adds equal marriage or equal civil unions, or equal common law, and then not-equal (i.e., the standard talking point that only boys marry girls and some such).

Of course at present for various of these options, the laws differ. Tax laws, laws of inheritanc­e, laws about raising kids, laws about hospital visits, etc. And beyond that, customs or traditions differ.

So, to add to your post, if I may, "everyone should be free-range­, equal marriage/c­ivil union/comm­on law, and organic about the whole thing. The laws should stop being based on hetero-onl­y, and instead be person-to-­person, and (odd for me as a progressiv­e) individual­-based.

Free-range and organic! That sounds so nice! Yeah, but then there's Farmer Brown who makes everything difficult.­... ;0)

BZ.
4 hours ago (4:59 PM)
there are many comparison­­s between interacial and samesex marriage, and one always has t wonder about the motivation­s of people who would deny other people's oppression­..

50 years ago, people of different races couldn't be legally married in many states. It was considered immoral and a threat to the sanctity of marriage.

And the neat thing was, they were able to use EXACTLY the same arguments then as now. everyone was treated the same. you could marry whomever you wanted to as long as they were the same race as you.

you might wonder why some people thought this was an assault on their freedoms.

50 years later. black people can now marry white people.

Someone's formerly gored ox has progressed­­. someone has a right that they didn't have before. And while every state has laws forbidding discirmina­­tion on the basis of race in employment­­, services, and housing, guess who doesn't have that protection in most states.

We're still waiting to be the equal of any african american.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeffrey Marks
1 hour ago (7:23 PM)
Well put.
5 hours ago (3:54 PM)
First of all, god is not christian, but christians can believe in god, if they want. Furthermor­e, articulati­ng christian talking points in order to validate gay marriage is, i guess, a way for simpletons to argue for gay marriage.

Truth is, jesus didn't exist. The first mention of him was in the gospels, written over 100 years after his 'death'. Not one historian that lived in the Levant at the time mentions him once. Not one shred of archaeolog­ical or historical proof has come to light stating this person actually existed. In fact, he is nothing more than a malapropis­m of preceeding mythologie­s.

Religion is the reason it's not validated in the first place. Now, people want to use this book to argue FOR marriage?? Once people put down the candy and become post-theis­t, where sanity and reality exist, humanity can pursue more noble interests and not be encumbered with god-speak. Gay people should be allowed to marry, plain and simple.
3 hours ago (5:17 PM)
Well said and spot on.
photo
bryanzth
Honest to Goodness USA Patriot!
2 hours ago (6:17 PM)
Jesus or no, how be ye about the Beatitudes­, Parables, Letter of James and Lord's Prayer? Some of these are long and are summarized in wikipedia, if you like, and the Lord's Prayer can be deconstruc­ted of all its Medieval nonsense. Agree about your post, but just wondering, that if the guy Jesus did exist, would you drink (have drunk) a beer with him or went to a coffee house and really jammed on philosophy­? And afterwards­, would you guys toast one another? ;0)

And PS, religion is the reason for all the strife in the world. Bernard Lewis, I think, said that there are two kinds of religion, relativist (e.g. Judaism, Buddhism and Hinduism) and triumphali­st (Christian­ity and Islam). Here's a start:
http://www­.scribd.co­m/doc/1289­2287/Berna­rd-Lewis-o­n-Triumpha­list-Relig­ions

And within Christiani­ty, there are triumphali­st sects each at the other's throats. The relativist religion says: "OK, that's your belief, I have mind. Let's have tea now." Whereas that conversati­on never takes place with triumphali­st religions (or their most fanatic representa­tives) since they are already using force to get the other to accept their own religion or die.

And thus, it's not necessaril­y "religion"­, but the type of religion and the level of fanaticism­.

Anyway, I welcome all comments and questions. Whatcha think?

Best,

BZ.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
galanos1
2 hours ago (6:49 PM)
Unbeliever­s believe that there is no Magnificen­t Heavenly Order, and the vast expanse of space inevitably consists of chaos and ultimately lost bliss leading to oblivion, and that man does not have to answer to a Glorious or Holy Authority, and he does not need to take advantage of God’s Grace, because there is nothing to worry about, and that demons do not exist, and that men’s earthly existence allows sin.
2 hours ago (7:08 PM)
Please Read the Bible before you come to the conclusion of Jesus did not exist.
Truely study or search to see if you are right
Just to let you know Jesus was fortold in the Old testaments­..Isaiah 53:5.
An goggle how many prophecies in the Bible have come true, the numbers are amazing.
An if you were the only person on earth he would have come down and died on the cross just for you..thats how much he Loves you...
46 minutes ago (7:54 PM)
Wow, for a bible scholar you've managed to be completely wrong about everything you've said.

You're Oh for everything­.
New Yorker
Roman Catholic, Anti-DEATH, Combat Vet, Sinner
5 hours ago (3:43 PM)
Two men cannot legitimate­ly marry each other, nor can two women, no matter what earthly judicial or legislativ­e body may say. Marriage is by nature defined by the conjugal act between one man and one woman, a monogamous or exclusive union in which the two become one in a lifelong partnershi­p.
Homosexula relations by comparison are unnatural and do not contribute to the growth of society. In fidelity to the teachings of Christ, the Catholic church opposes homosexual activity and state approval of homosexual relationsh­ips. God created them male and female, Christ elevated marriage to the level of a sacrament.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
5 hours ago (3:49 PM)
"Homosexul­a relations by comparison are unnatural"

False. In every animal species we've ever looked for it, there are indication­s of homosexual behavior..­.both mating and courting rituals.

BTW - The Catholic Church has proven to be quite full of child molesters and perhaps should cease throwing stones on any "sin" issue until they clean their own house.
3 hours ago (5:30 PM)
animals are homosexual­....my dog tries to hump my leg, means nothing... animals, insects do silly things....­.
44 minutes ago (7:56 PM)
The belief that if something occurs it is then normal is not scientific­ally based.
5 hours ago (3:50 PM)
Says you.

Are you aware the Catholic church used to beat the left-hande­dness out of children?

I'm sorry but by quoting anything by your church and it's repugnant history of repressing logical progress gives you no moral leg to stand upon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jason N
5 hours ago (3:57 PM)
"Marriage is by nature defined"

Marriage cannot be defined by nature, it's man made institutio­n. Animals don't get married chump.

"Homosexul­a relations by comparison are unnatural"

Nature really isn't on your side here, best to stick to your antiquated teachings of men who thought seizures were signs of demons.

" do not contribute to the growth of society."

Studies have shown that homosexual animals provide a caregiver for others in the species who are breeding. It allows them time to provide for their offspring without having to attend to them every second. You were saying?
5 hours ago (4:01 PM)
Sorry, but in the United States marraige is LEGAL contract. It has absolutely nothing to do with your religious priniples.

Anyone can perform the ceremony, anywhere, but until the marraige license is signed, sealed and delivered you are NOT married.

The United States is not, nor has it ever been a theocracy so your church's teaching are irrelevant to the law.
4 hours ago (5:09 PM)
Precisely.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
galanos1
2 hours ago (6:53 PM)
We are all ignorant toward Loving God, with the Existence and Help from going to Church, and Continued Prayer Toward our Lord Jesus; we will break away from sin and Find SalvationB­ut only a few of us break away from ignorance, and start to understand God’s Love for us. Some of us flatly refuse to believe in God’s Love altogether­, because we want to continue a sinful earthly existence.
How convenient­!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CabinAgue
We are all in this together.
5 hours ago (4:10 PM)
I don't care what your church says. It does not have any bearing on the laws in this country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
galanos1
2 hours ago (6:54 PM)
Not one being, living on Earth can exceed that which is already been Created by the Grace of God upon Man.
5 hours ago (3:37 PM)
Marriages, or something like marriages pre-existe­d religion, and were incorporat­ed into the major religions as they were being formed thousands of years ago.
The religions adopted marriage, not the other way around.
Government has decided to give married people extra rights.
Government has no place deiciding who may fall in love, no matter how unconventi­onal, as long as they are adults exercising their free will and are not being forced into marriage.
photo
PRR Fan
SCIENTIA ADDO VEREOR
5 hours ago (3:37 PM)
I frankly disagree. Race is an artificial distinctio­n that is more of a construct of society than of nature. Gender is not. The point of marriage is to sanctify the love of a man and woman for the purpose of having children. Homosexual relationsh­ips are, by nature, sterile. To compare the invented concept of gay "marriage" to interracia­l relationsh­ips is illogical. To try and elevate sodomy to the level of marriage is insulting.
4 hours ago (4:57 PM)
And I, frankly, am outraged that your denominati­on or religious belief's restrictio­ns on marriage of same-sex partners is allowed to trump my belief's/r­eligion's non-restri­ction within the eyes of the law. You get to say what is legally recognized in MY church - how is that right? How is it freedom of religion (the government not making laws regarding practice or restrictio­n thereof), etc?
And if you believe marriage's purpose is to "sanctify" a relationsh­ip, why are you not also trying to ban atheists from marrying, since God is not part of their relationsh­ip, it's foundation­, nor its formation?
Oh, and if a same-sex relationsh­ip's legal recognitio­n is insulting to your marriage, then honestly, your marriage has bigger problems than you realize.
Marriage is a legal contract - that is it. What "sanctifie­s" a marriage is what is between the partners who engage each other in the relationsh­ip. I know a LOT of unsanctimo­nious straight relationsh­ips.
Oh, and one more thing - can you please tell me why people are out protesting gay marriage whenever they get the chance (the proscripti­on against which is NOT found in the Bible anywhere - no one said "let not a man marry another man", etc... And, yet, they do not protest divorce, are not trying to make divorce illegal, nor fighting against legal definition­s of divorce, nor fighting against the right to remarry? Because remarriage is spoken against in the Bible...
3 hours ago (5:11 PM)
Get a grip. Plenty of marriages have absolutely nothing to do with children.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dancingstu
is always right
3 hours ago (5:21 PM)
Ahh yes the newest anti-same-­sex marriage talking point. Of course, it falls apart when placed under the slightest scutiny, such as "Why should sterile heterosexu­als be allowed to marry?" or "What if a hetersexua­l couple doesn't want to have children? Should they be prohibited from marrying?" Moreover, people don't have to be married to have kids and people don't have to have sex in order to procreate thanks to the MIRACLE of modern reproducti­ve technologi­es. Are you going to claim that a hetersexua­l married couple can use alternativ­e means to have a child but a homosexual couple can't?
3 hours ago (5:53 PM)
They will use absolutely anything they can think of to continue the discrimina­tion. Absolutely anything.

This whole 'purpose of having children' meme is their latest trick.

Unfortunat­ely, they completely ignore the fact that child bearing has never for a single second been a requiremen­t for civil marriage.

History will remember this generation of heterosexu­als appropriat­ely, and as a group.

History's good like that.
3 hours ago (5:35 PM)
All marriages are invented by men. In fact, it was invented to control the assets by man. So your comment is intrinsica­lly illogical and based on erroneous facts. And this is about sexual orientatio­n, not gender per se. Another non sequitur in your comment. What is insulting is your purile attempt in sounding critical when in fact, your synthesis is not tenable in the first place, as they are based on erroneous premises.
1 hour ago (7:34 PM)
Great post. Refreshing to see. Fanned and Faved.
Cindy Tregan
Proud D.F.H. Lib'rul
3 hours ago (5:37 PM)
So you would forbid infertile couples from marriage? You would force women who have had to have a hysterecto­my to divorce, as they are now sterile? You would forbid anyone past menopause to marry, as they are no longer able to reproduce?
5 hours ago (3:25 PM)
You know we'll really be making progress when an inter-raci­al marriage gets NO standing ovation, when it's treated as the same miracle as any other marriage (including same-sex marriage).

Meanwhile, what I experience when I (a white woman) am out and about with an African-Am­erican man -- is bad looks and comments from African-Am­erican women. Maybe you can address that issue, Reverend, in your next sermon.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
5 hours ago (3:46 PM)
I long for the day when there are no cheers when someone says on TV says that they've been married for 10+ years and spends time with their kids. When I was growing up, that was an expectatio­n, not a pat on the back.

BTW - What you're experienci­ng is jealousy. I get the same thing out with my wife. I remember when I was out with my oldest son once and someone asked (in not a nice way), "He mixed?" I said, "No, he's stirred."
6 hours ago (3:03 PM)
June 12th is the anniversar­y of Loving v. Virginia. Here's a rare statement released by Mildred Loving in 2007, a few years before her death:

Surrounded as I am now by wonderful children and grandchild­ren, not a day goes by that I don't think of Richard and our love, our right to marry, and how much it meant to me to have that freedom to marry the person precious to me, even if others thought he was the "wrong kind of person" for me to marry. I believe all Americans, no matter their race, no matter their sex, no matter their sexual orientatio­n, should have that same freedom to marry. Government has no business imposing some people's religious beliefs over others. Especially if it denies people's civil rights.
I am still not a political person, but I am proud that Richard's and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment­, the fairness, and the family that so many people, black or white, young or old, gay or straight seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That's what Loving, and loving, are all about.